preparing a program submission for the council for ...caepnet.org/~/media/archive files/fall 2017...
TRANSCRIPT
Jennifer Bullock: Director of Education and Professional
Standards & Practices, Council for Exceptional Children
Kathlene S. Shank: Professor & Chair
Co-coordinator Council for Exceptional Children &
Department of Special Education
Eastern Illinois University
Preparing a Program
Submission for the Council for
Exceptional Children
Agenda
Q&A
Option A: Program Report
Performance-Based Program Report Options
CEC Initial and Advanced Preparation Standards
Introduction and Review
© 2016 CEC. All rights reserved. 2
CAEP Program Review
Options (determined in State Partnership Agreements)
1. National Recognition of programs that have
met Specialty Professional Association
(SPA) standards, e.g. CEC
2. State program approval
3. CAEP Program Review with Feedback
© 2016 CEC. All rights reserved. 3
What is a program? • A planned sequence of academic courses and
experiences leading to a degree, a
recommendation for a state license, or some
other credential that entitles the holder to perform
professional education services in schools
• Each program should be submitted separately
with data disaggregated by licensure area
• Program submissions may be linked, if the
assessments are the same (e.g. baccalaureate
and post bac program leading to the same
licensure)© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 4
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
7th Edition
The Redbook
5
CEC Initial and Advanced
Preparation Standards
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
CEC Standards: Structure
• Align to
• Assessment,
• Scoring Guide and
• Data Tables
Major Elements/Components
• Broad standards for all special educators
• Informed by the appropriate specialty set(s
Preparation Standards
skill
28 major
elements
7 Standards
7
Use CEC Initial or Advanced
Standards?
Use CEC Initial Standards
If candidates are being
prepared for their initial
role as special educators
If candidates are being
prepared to teach
students with a disability
not included in initial
certificate e.g. visual
impairments
Use CEC Advanced
Standards
If candidates possess
initial credential in special
education
If program prepares for
advanced role, e.g.
educational diagnostician,
transition specialist ,
advanced specific
disability areas
8© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
CEC Initial Preparation Standards
Seven standards with elements describing
the specialized knowledge and skill
needed by special educators for initial safe
and effective special education
professional practice.
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 9
Learner Development and
Individual Learning Differences
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
1.0 Beginning special education professionals understand how
exceptionalities can interact with development and learning
and use this knowledge to provide meaningful and
challenging learning experiences for individuals with
exceptionalities.
Key Elements
1.1 Beginning special education professionals understand how language,
culture, and family background can influence the learning of individuals
with exceptionalities.
1.2 Beginning special education professionals use understanding of
development and individual differences to respond to the needs of
individuals with exceptionalities.
10
Learning Environments
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
2.0 Beginning special education professionals create safe, inclusive,
culturally responsive learning environments so that individuals
with exceptionalities become active and effective learners and
develop emotional well-being, positive social interactions, and
self-determination.
Key Elements
2.1 Beginning special education professionals through collaboration with general
educators and other colleagues create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive
learning environments to engage individuals with exceptionalities in meaningful
learning activities and social interactions.
2.2 Beginning special education professionals use motivational and instructional
interventions to teach individuals with exceptionalities how to adapt to different
environments.
2.3 Beginning special education professionals know how to intervene safely and
appropriately with individuals with exceptionalities in crisis.
11
Curricular Content
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
3.0 Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of
general and specialized curricula to individualize learning for
individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements
3.1 Beginning special education professionals understand the central concepts,
structures of the discipline, and tools of inquiry of the content areas they teach
, and can organize this knowledge, integrate cross-disciplinary skills, and
develop meaningful learning progressions for individuals with exceptionalities
3.2 Beginning special education professionals understand and use general and
specialized content knowledge for teaching across curricular content areas to
individualize learning for individuals with exceptionalities
3.3 Beginning special education professionals modify general and specialized
curricula to make them accessible to individuals with exceptionalities.[1] As used “general curricula,” means the academic content of the general curricula including math, reading, English/language ar ts, science, social studies, and the
arts.[2] As used, “specialized curricula” means the content of specialized interventions or sets of interventions including, but not l imited to academic, strategic,
communicative, social, emotional, and independence curricula. 12
Assessment
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
4.0 Beginning special education professionals use multiple methods of
assessment and data-sources in making educational decisions.
Key Elements
4.1 Beginning special education professionals select and use technically sound formal
and informal assessments that minimize bias.
4.2 Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of measurement
principles and practices to interpret assessment results and guide educational
decisions for individuals with exceptionalities.
4.3 Beginning special education professionals in collaboration with colleagues and
families use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions about
individuals with exceptionalities.
4.4 Beginning special education professionals engage individuals with exceptionalities
to work toward quality learning and performance and provide feedback to guide
them.
13
Instructional Planning and Strategies
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
5.0 Beginning special education professionals select, adapt, and use a
repertoire of evidence-based instructional strategies to advance
learning of individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements5.1 Beginning special education professionals consider an individual’s abilities, interests, learning
environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the selection, development, and adaptation of
learning experiences for individual with exceptionalities.
5.2 Beginning special education professionals use technologies to support instructional assessment,
planning, and delivery for individuals with exceptionalities.
5.3 Beginning special education professionals are familiar with augmentative and alternative
communication systems and a variety of assistive technologies to support the communication and
learning of individuals with exceptionalities.
5.4 Beginning special education professionals use strategies to enhance language development and
communication skills of individuals with exceptionalities
5. 5 Beginning special education professionals develop and implement a variety of education and
transition plans for individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and different
learning experiences in collaboration with individuals, families, and teams.
5.6 Beginning special education professionals teach to mastery and promote generalization of learning.
5.7 Beginning special education professionals teach cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills such as
critical thinking and problem solving to individuals with exceptionalities.
[1] Instructional strategies, as used throughout this document include intervention used in academic and specialized curricula.
14
Professional Learning and Ethical Practice
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
6.0 Beginning special education professionals use foundational
knowledge of the field and the their professional Ethical Principles and
Practice Standards to inform special education practice, to engage in
lifelong learning, and to advance the profession.
Key Elements
6.1 Beginning special education professionals use professional Ethical Principles and
Professional Practice Standards to guide their practice.
6.2 Beginning special education professionals understand how foundational knowledge
and current issues influence professional practice.
6.3 Beginning special education professionals understand that diversity is a part of
families, cultures, and schools, and that complex human issues can interact with the
delivery of special education services.
6.4 Beginning special education professionals understand the significance of lifelong
learning and participate in professional activities and learning communities.
6.5 Beginning special education professionals advance the profession by engaging in
activities such as advocacy and mentoring
6.6 Beginning special education professionals provide guidance and direction to
paraeducators, tutors, and volunteers.
15
Collaboration
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
7.0 Beginning special education professionals collaborate with
families, other educators, related service providers,
individuals with exceptionalities, and personnel from
community agencies in culturally responsive ways to
address the needs of individuals with exceptionalities across
a range of learning experiences.
Key Elements
7.1 Beginning special education professionals use the theory and elements
of effective collaboration.
7.2 Beginning special education professionals serve as a collaborative
resource to colleagues.
7.3 Beginning special education professionals use collaboration to promote
the well-being of individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of
settings and collaborators.
16
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
CEC Advanced Standards
For safe and effective practice at accomplished levels of special education and in advanced special education roles.
Deepening expertise
Classroom and Non-classroom
roles
Teacher leaders
Addresses need for specialists
Special education career ladders
1717
Assessment
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
1.0 Special education specialists use valid and
reliable assessment practices to minimize bias.
Key Elements
1.1 Special education specialists minimize bias in
assessment.
1.2 Special education specialists design and implement
assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of
practices and programs.
18
Curricular Content Knowledge
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
2.0 Special education specialists use their knowledge of general and
specialized curricula to improve programs, supports, and services at
classroom, school, community, and system levels.
Key Elements
2.1 Special education specialists align educational standards to provide access to
challenging curriculum to meet the needs individuals with exceptionalities.
2.2 Special educators continuously broaden and deepen professional knowledge,
and expand expertise with instructional technologies, curriculum standards,
effective teaching strategies, and assistive technologies to support access to
and learning of challenging content.
2.3 Special education specialists use understanding of diversity and individual
learning differences to inform the selection, development, and implementation
of comprehensive curricula for individuals with exceptionalities.
[1] As used, “general curricula”, means the academic content of the general curriculum including math, reading, English/language arts, science, social studies, and the
arts.[2] As used, “specialized curricula” means the content of specialized interventions or sets of interventions including, but not limited to academic,
strategic, communicative, social, emotional, and independence curricula.19
Programs, Services, and Outcomes
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 20
3.0 Special education specialists facilitate the continuous improvement of general
and special education programs, supports, and services at the classroom,
school, and system levels for individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements
3.1 Special education specialists design and implement evaluation activities to improve
programs, supports, and services for individuals with exceptionalities.
3.2 Special education specialists use understanding of cultural, social, and economic
diversity and individual learner differences to inform the development and improvement
of programs, supports, and services for individuals with exceptionalities.
3.3 Special education specialists apply knowledge of theories, evidence-based practices,
and relevant laws to advocate for programs, supports, and services for individuals with
exceptionalities.
3.4 Special education specialists use instructional and assistive technologies to improve
programs, supports, and services for individuals with exceptionalities.
3.5 Special education specialists evaluate progress toward achieving the vision, mission,
and goals of programs, services, and supports for individuals with exceptionalities.
Research & Inquiry
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
4.0Special education specialists conduct, evaluate, and
use inquiry to guide professional practice.
Key Elements
4.1 Special education specialists evaluate research and inquiry to identify effective
practices.
4.2 Special education specialists use knowledge of the professional literature to
improve practices with individuals with exceptionalities and their families
4.3 Special education specialists foster an environment that is supportive of
continuous instructional improvement and engage in the design and
implementation of research and inquiry.
21
Leadership and Policy
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
5.0 Special education specialists provide leadership to formulate goals, set and
meet high professional expectations, advocate for effective policies and
evidence-based practices and create positive and productive work
environments.
Key Elements
5.1 Special education specialists model respect for and ethical practice for all
individuals and encourage challenging expectations for individuals with
exceptionalities.
5.2 Special education specialists support and use linguistically and culturally
responsive practices.
5.3 Special education specialists create and maintain collegial and productive work
environments that respect and safeguard the rights of individuals with
exceptionalities and their families.
5.4 Special education specialists advocate for policies and practices that improve
programs, services, and outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities.
5.5 Special education specialists advocate for the allocation of appropriate resources
for the preparation and professional development of all personnel who serve
individuals with exceptionalities.
22
Professional and Ethical Practice
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
6.0 Special education specialists use foundational knowledge of the field and
professional Ethical Principles and Practice Standards to inform special
education practice, engage in lifelong learning, advance the profession, and
perform leadership responsibilities to promote the success of professional
colleagues and individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements
6.1 A comprehensive understanding of the history of special education, legal policies,
ethical standards, and emerging issues informs special education specialist leadership.
6.2 Special education specialists model high professional expectations and ethical
practice, and create supportive environments that safeguard the legal rights and
improve outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities and their families.
6.3 Special education specialists model and promote respect for all individuals and
facilitate ethical professional practice.
6.4 Special education specialists actively participate in professional development and
learning communities to increase professional knowledge and expertise.
6.5 Special education specialists plan, present, and evaluate professional development
focusing on effective and ethical practice at all organizational levels.
6.6 Special education specialists actively facilitate and participate in the preparation and
induction of prospective special educators.
6.7 Special education specialists actively promote the advancement of the profession.
23
Collaboration
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
7.0 Special education specialists collaborate with stakeholders to
improve programs, services, and outcomes for individuals with
exceptionalities and their families.
Key Elements
7.1 Special education specialists use culturally responsive practices to
enhance collaboration.
7.2 Special education specialists use collaborative skills to improve programs,
services, and outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities
7.3 Special education specialists collaborate to promote understanding,
resolve conflicts, and build consensus for improving program, services,
and outcomes for individuals with exceptionalities.
24
What are the specialty sets?
What is their purpose?
How do we use them?
CEC Specialty Sets
Specialty Sets Purpose: Inform the Preparation Standards
Programs must demonstrate alignment to the major
elements of the CEC Preparation (Content)
Standard as informed by the appropriate
specialty set(s) in the program’s assessments,
rubrics, and data.
Without being informed by the appropriate specialty
knowledge and skills set, every special education
preparation program would look the same.
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 26
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
CEC Standards: Structure
• Specialty specific Knowledge and Skill
• Use for Curriculum Development & Professional Development
Specialty Sets
27
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Initial Level Validated Specialty Sets
1. Special Education Individualized General Curriculum
2. Special Education Individualized Independence Curriculum
3. Special Education Early Childhood/EI
4. Special Education Blind & Visual Impairments
5. Special Education Deaf & Hard of Hearing
6. Special Education Emotional & Behavior Disorders
7. Special Education Gifts & Talents
8. Special Education Developmental Disabilities & Autism
9. Special Education Learning Disabilities
10. Special Education Physical and Health Disabilities
11. Special Education Deafblindness
28
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Advanced-Level Validated Specialty Sets
1. Special Education Early Childhood Specialist
2. Special Education Learning Disabilities Specialist
3. Special Education Gifted & Talented Specialist
4. Special Education Developmental Disabilities &
Autism Specialist
5. Special Education Deaf/Hard of Hearing Specialist
6. Special Education Administrators
7. Special Education Technology Specialist
8. Special Education Transition Specialist
9. Special Education Diagnostic Specialist
10. Special Education Inclusion Specialist
11. Special Education Academic Intervention Specialist
12. Special Education Behavior Intervention Specialist
TEACHER LEADERS
29
Using Specialty Sets
Programs can assure that the assessments, rubrics, and data are
informed by the appropriate specialty area in a variety of ways, e.g.
content, populations, vocabulary, concepts, settings, and issues of
the specialty set are clearly addressed in the assessments, rubrics,
and data
There is no requirement or expectation for explicit or complete
correspondence between the items in a specialty set with
assessment items, and reviewers do not look for this level of
correspondence. Likewise, reviewers do not expect that programs
use the exact wording of the knowledge and skills within the rubrics.
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 30
Option A: Standard Program Report
Option B: Program Faculty Selected Assessments
Option D: Validity & Reliability Studies
Performance-Based Program Report
Options
Types of Reports
• Initial
• Revised
• Response to Conditions
Program Submission
Components Cover Sheet (online)
Section I Contextual Information (including clinical/field information)
Section II Assessment Chart – list the 6-8 assessments
Section III Standards Chart – which assessments provide evidence for each standard
Section IV Assessments (the assessment, scoring guide and findings)
Section V Use of Assessment Results to Improve Program
32© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Option A Program Reports
Program Reports must include at least 6 program assessments that collectively align to the major elements of the CEC Preparation Standards
All candidates must participate in all 6 assessments!!
Institution may submit 2 additional assessments
A maximum of 20 attachments
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 33
Six Required Program Assessments
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
1. State licensure exam
2. Content knowledge
3. Instruction planning
4. Student teaching/ clinical internship
5. Candidate impact on student learning
6. Program faculty choice
34
What is a Program Assessment?
Assessments that all candidates complete
What assignments are already in your courses? Do they align to the CEC Preparation Standards? Do they have a focus of one of the required program assessments?
Do they have a consistent scoring guide/rubric?
Can you collect data?
Start with those assessments!
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 35
Assessment 1: Content Knowledge
State Special Education Licensure Test, e.g. Special Education PRAXIS II, state specific special
education test
Must provide evidence that 80% of candidates
pass total test
Disaggregate subtests scores where possible
Cannot be the sole source for alignment to a
CEC Preparation Standard!
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 36
Assessment 2: Content Knowledge
Documents knowledge of special education content
Case study
IEP
Teacher work sample
Action research
“Grades” – see CAEP/CEC website for specific guidance
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 37
Assessment 3 Instruction Planning
Assessment that demonstrates program
candidates’ ability to plan individualized
instruction aligned to CEC Preparation
Standards as informed by specialty
set(s)
Example: Individualized unit or multiple
lesson plan assignment that describes
the individualized needs of a student(s)
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 38
Assessment 4: Student Teaching/Clinical Internship
Student Teaching/Clinical Internship
assessment must be aligned to the CEC
Preparation Standards.
It can also be aligned to state or unit criteria,
but a “general” student teaching form used by
all programs is not sufficiently specific usually
to document CEC knowledge and skills
This assessment does not have to address
all Preparation Standards and elements.
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 39
Assessment 5: Candidate Impact on Student Learning
This assessment should include a
pre-measure, plan for instruction,
post-measure, and reflection.
Unit/lesson plan,
behavior change project,
action research of student learning
Single Subject Project
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 40
Assessment 6
Assessment of Choice
Sixth assessment is a required program assessment designed by program faculty to address major elements of any CEC Preparation Standard not yet addressed, or that program faculty use to strengthen its program.
Examples: Assistive Technology project, Standardized assessment project, language analysis, case study, etc.
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 41
Assessments 7 and 8
Optional Assessments
Assessments 7 and 8 are optional providing
program faculty opportunity to submit program
assessments to strengthen the coverage of the
major elements of the CEC Preparation
Standards
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 42
Do the program assessments align to a preponderance of the major elements of the CEC Preparation Standards covered by the program assessments?
Are the program assessments, scoring rubric, and data each aligned to each other and to the major elements in the CEC Preparation Standards?
Are the alignments sufficiently direct and specific to provide clear and convincing evidence?
Are optional program assessments 7 and 8 needed?
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Deciding on assessments …
43
Things to keep in mind for scoring
guides/rubrics for each assessment
Are the descriptors focused on candidate performance?
Do they address what candidates know and can do?
Do the cell descriptors distinguish the different levels of performance in observable ways?
Are the cell descriptors likely to be interpreted in the same way by different evaluators? (inter-rater reliability)
44© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Section I – Contextual informationDescribing and explaining your
program contextState policies, including applicable
state licensure
Field experiences
Criteria for admission/retention/exit
AttachmentsProgram of studies
Candidate information
FacultyA chart of field experiences may also be
added © 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 45
CEC Field Experience Standard
Developmental, sequenced field
experiences
Full range of ages, types and levels of
abilities and collaborative opportunities for
licensure
Supervised and evaluated by qualified
professionals
Faculty needs to be involved in field
experiences46© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Section II: List of Assessments Chart
List 6-8 program assessments that are
aligned with the major elements of the
CEC Preparation Standards
Indicate name, type, and administration point
in the program
DO NOT change order or make substitutions
Give assessments brief specific descriptive
names – not course numbers
“OR’s” are not permitted – everyone does
same assessment
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 47
Section III: Relationship of Assessment to
Standards Chart
Identify which program assessments provide the evidence of alignment with the major elements of each CEC Preparation Standard.
One assessment may provide evidence for meeting multiple CEC Preparation Standards.
DO NOT cite every assessment as covering all CEC Preparation Standards
MAKE SURE YOU ALIGN THIS SECTION WITH ITEMS IN SECTION IV
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 48
Section IV: Assessments and FindingsThe heart of the program report
Assessments Must Have:
The narrative (2 pages maximum)INCLUDE:
brief description of the assessment and use in program
(paragraph),
how it is aligned with the CEC Preparation Standards cited in
Section III,
brief analysis of data finding - At least two administrations of
each assessment. For revised and response to conditions, at
least one additional administration.
summary of how data provides evidence of meeting CEC
Preparation Standards
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 49
Evidence Attachments
Assessment (assignment given to candidates)Directly aligned with major elements of the CEC Preparation Standard(s)
Requirements of candidates are evident
Instructions are clear, explicit
Scoring Guide (Rubric)Objectives are observable and measurable
Indicators of performance are consistent
Number of rating levels are kept to a minimum
Directly aligned with major elements of the CEC Preparation standards
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 50
Presenting/Reporting Data
Data tables should be self-explanatory–
reviewers must understand the display
Data for each cell, not just summary data
Give “N” – numbers &/or percents
Data should be presented by categories used in
the scoring guide as aligned to the major
elements of the CEC Preparation Standards
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 51
Section V: Use of Assessment
Results Narrative of how the program faculty use
the data from assessments to improve
candidate performance and program
effectiveness.
Organize discussion around
Content knowledge
Professional and pedagogical knowledge,
skills and dispositions
Impact on student learning
52© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Response to Conditions
Submissions Address all concerns cited as conditions in Part G
of Final Report
Complete the following sections of the report: Cover Sheet
Section I: Provide candidate information
Sections IV: Include only those assessments that have been revised and will have new data Provide additional data set for each standard not met or met
with conditions
Consider comments in “areas for consideration” in the review report as well as comments for each standard not met or met with conditions
Complete Sections V and VI
53© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Helpful Hints Focus assessment and rubrics on candidate
performance
Focus assessments on the appropriate CEC Preparation
Standards as informed by the specialty set (s) (e.g.
Visual Impairment, Emotional/Behavior Disorders,
Individualized Independence Curriculum)
Do NOT cite EVERY assessment as addressing
EVERY standard!!
Do NOT abbreviate or use acronyms unless they
have been explained
Be consistent in naming assessments
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 54
What happens next?
Review team assigned by CEC program review coordinator
Team (2-3 reviewers) completes review
A group of experienced CEC reviewers serve as auditors; each reviews 15-30 per cycle.
A CAEP tech editor reviews reports from multiple SPAs to ensure consistency
Program notified of decision
55© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Final Decisions The program is nationally recognized.
The program is nationally recognized with conditions.
Insufficient data
Insufficient alignment
Assessments not focused on candidate performance
The program is not recognized: Further development required/recognized with probation Little or no alignment of the assessments and or data to the CEC Preparation
Standards as informed by the specialty set.
CAEP staff will determine which of the above applied
© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved. 56
Resources
57© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
58© 2014 CEC. All rights reserved.
Question & Answer