preliminary results of pembina cardium core analysis c.r. clarkson and n. solano (phd candidate) t o...
TRANSCRIPT
Preliminary Results of Pembina Cardium Core Analysis
C.R. Clarkson and N. Solano (PhD Candidate)
T
O C
© TOC, 2011
Outline
2
• Objectives
• Well Locations
• Sampling and Measurements
• CT Scans
• N2 Adsorption Analysis
• Comparison to Bakken and 2WS
• SANS/USANS
• Future Work
T
O C
Objectives• Select low-permeability oil reservoir samples from the Cardium
Formation to perform preliminary laboratory experiments
• Use X-Ray CT Scans to evaluate changes in rock density and porosity and use to evaluate locations for permeability measurements (+ density of measurements)
• Use low-pressure adsorption and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS and USANS) to establish pore structure characteristics by facies
To date, only “muddier” intervals have been studied
• Establish controls on pore structure variation
• Establish relationship between pore structure and permeability
3
Sampling/Measurements• CORES SAMPLED / ANALYZED:
1. 08-17-049-06W5, CORE #1, BOXES 3 – 13
2. 08-04-049-06W5, CORE #4, BOXES 5 – 11
3. 04-24-049-07W5, CORE #1, BOX 11; CORE #2, BOXES 1 – 5; CORE #3, BOXES 1 – 4 (FUTURE)
• MEASUREMENTS (to date):
1. Coreplugs taken from 8-17 and sub-sampled for SANS/USANS (discs prepared) at NIST (1/2011) and ORNL (3/2011)
2. N2 adsorption analysis performed on 8-17 coreplugs for surface area/PSD (8/2011)
3. 8-17 and 8-4 full-diameter cores were “scout” (CT) scanned to identify locations for axial scans (7/2011)
4. Axial (CT) scans performed on 8-17 and 8-4 (8/2011)
5. Pulse-decay permeability measurements performed on 8-17 coreplugs
4
-630
-620
-620
-610
-610
-610
-600
-600-600
-600
-590
-590
-590
-590
-590
-580
-580
-580
-580
-580
-580
-570
-570
-570
-570
-570
-570
-570
-560
-560
-560
-56
0
-560
-56
0
-560-560
-560
-550
-550
-550
-550
-550-5
50
-550
-550
-550
-550
-540
-540
-540
-540
-540
-540
-540
-540
-530
-53
0
-530
-530
-530
-530
-530
-530
-520-5
20
-520
-520
-520
-520
-520
-520
-520
-640
-590
-600
-610 -610
-620
-620
-630
-540
-600-590
-540
-600
-580
-580
-550
-550
-460
-460-460
-470
-480
-480
-480
-480 -480
-500
-500
-500
-500
-500
-500
-500
-470
-470-470
-470
-470
-470
-450-51
0
-510
-510
-510
-510
-510
-510
-510
-510
-490
-49
0
-490
-490
-490
-490
-460
634000 636000 638000 640000 642000 644000 646000 648000 650000
634000 636000 638000 640000 642000 644000 646000 648000 650000
EAST (UTM 11), [m]
58
94
00
05
89
60
00
58
98
00
05
90
00
00
59
02
00
05
90
40
00
58
94
00
05
89
60
00
58
98
00
05
90
00
00
59
02
00
05
90
40
00
NO
RT
H (U
TM
11), [m]
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000m
1:78125
-690-680-670-660-650-640-630-620-610-600-590-580-570-560-550-540-530-520-510-500-490-480-470-460-450
Depth
TOP OF THE CARDIUM SS
08-17-49-6W5
4-24-49-7W5
8-4-49-6W5
LOCATIONS WITH CORES TO SAMPLE
Structure contour map: top of the Cardium SS 5
55 60 65 70 75
SP
1330
1335
1340
1345
1350
1355
1360
1365
1370
1375
1380
1385
1390
1395
1400
1405
0 20 40
RESIT (16" NORMAL)MD(m)
CZ
Cardium Aa
b
08-17-049-06W5Res
6
7
Kcard_ss
Completions 58.60 69.34SP
1
CN
12
34
5
78
91
01
11
21
3
BN 1350
1355
1360
1365
1370
1375
1380
1385
1390
1395
(1400)
1348
TVD1:275
SANS
CT
S
CTS
SL
AB
SLAB
SB
LS
SBLS
PR
OK
PROK
XR
F
XRF 1.00 50.00SN1.00 50.00SN1.00 50.00SN
0.01 100.00KMAX0.01 100.00K900.01 100.00KV
0.0000 0.2000PHIC
Kcard_ss
100/08-17-049-06W5/00 [TVD]
Kcard_ss
AVAILABLE RCA (Whole core diam.)
Kmax, PHI, GRAIN DENSITY
SANS/USANS (Horizontal disks 10 mm diameter x 1 mm thick)
3 disks from: 1374.3 m5 disks from: 1377.0 m
INTERVALS TO SAMPLE/ANALYZE
CTS: 1364.3 – 1377.8 mSLABBING: 1364.3 – 1377.8 mSAND BLASTING: 1364.3 – 1377.8 mPROBE K: 1364.3 – 1377.8 mXRF: 1364.3 – 1377.8 m
CT
S
7
CT ScansCT Scans: Scout Scans 08-17-049-06W5
Axial scan location
1364.3 m
8
Density, kg/m
3
0.5 0
Porosity
1825 2650
Mean porosity= 9.1% Mean porosity= 7.2% Mean porosity= 8.6%
Mean porosity= 7.0% Mean porosity= 7.8%
Mean porosity= 7.6% Mean porosity= 7.7% Mean porosity= 4.2%
Mean porosity= 6.5%
9
CT ScansCT Scans: Scout Scans 08-17-049-06W5
Axial scan location
1368.96 m 10
11
Mean porosity= 10.0% Mean porosity= 13.9%
Mean porosity= 15.2% Mean porosity= 21.7% Mean porosity= 18.6%
Mean porosity= 14.0% Mean porosity= 12.4% Mean porosity= 10.0%
Density, kg/m
3
0.5 0
Porosity
1825 2650
Mean porosity= 13.6%
11
CT ScansCT Scans: Scout Scans 08-17-049-06W5
Axial scan location
1374.59 m
Coreplugs
12
13
Mean porosity= 9.9% Mean porosity= 9.0%
Mean porosity= 9.9% Mean porosity= 9.5% Mean porosity= 10.4%
Mean porosity= 8.6% Mean porosity= 8.8%Mean porosity= 8.0%
Density, kg/m
3
0.5 0
Porosity
1825 2650
Mean porosity= 9.5%
13
N2 Adsorption/DesorptionIsotherms
• Shape: qualitative assessment of pore structure
• Adsorption/desorption hysteresis:
– Type IV isotherms, mesoporous solids (2 nm < d < 50 nm)
– Shape of hysteresis loop can be indicative of pore geometry
• Interpret isotherm data in terms of surface area (ex. BET Theory) and pore size distributions (ex. BJH Theory)
16
N2 Adsorption/DesorptionIsotherms
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Qu
anti
ty A
dso
rbed
(cm
3 /g
)
Relative Pressure (p/po)
CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
• Similar amounts of adsorption for all samples except D2
• Substantial mesopore volume
• Hysteresis loops may be indicative of slit-shaped pores
17
N2 Adsorption/Desorption
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Qu
anti
ty A
dso
rbed
(cm
3 /g
)
Relative Pressure (p/po)
CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
0
5
10
15
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Qu
anti
ty A
dso
rbed
(cm
3 /g
)
Relative Pressure (p/po)
BAKKEN
BAK4
BAK5
BAK6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Qu
anti
ty A
dso
rbed
(cm
3 /g
)
Relative Pressure (p/po)
2WS
2WS1
2WS12
2WS18
• More adsorption in Bakken, less in 2WS
• Differences in Hysteresis Loop Shape – pore structure differences?
18
N2 Adsorption/Desorption
BJH Analysis (PSD)
• Capillary condensation of vapours in mesoporous materials
• Uses Kelvin equation to relate vapour pressure to pore size
• Can use desorption (convention) or adsorption branch
• (Figure)
– Step AB: removal of capillary condensate
– Step BC: removal of condensate from cores, multi-layer thinning of emptied (larger) pores
From SPE 147397
Desorption analysis using BJH Theory
19
N2 Adsorption/Desorption
BJH Analysis (PSD)
• Primarily unimodal pore size (peak ~ 200 – 350 A, desorption)
• Artifact at ~ 35 A on desorption curves
• Small pore size translates into low permeability (later)
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m3 /
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m3 /
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Adsorption -CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
20
N2 Adsorption/Desorption
• Cardium-Bakken, similar pore sizes, but difference in volume
• 2WS – less mesoporosity
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m3 /
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m3 /
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-BAKKEN
BAK4
BAK5
BAK6
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m3 /
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-2WS
2WS1
2WS12
2WS18
21
N2 Adsorption/Desorption
• Cardium-Bakken, similar pore sizes, but difference in volume
• 2WS – less mesoporosity
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
Po
re V
olu
me
(cm
3 /g
)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
10 100 1000
Po
re V
olu
me
(cm
3 /g
)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-BAKKEN
BAK4
BAK5
BAK6
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
Po
re V
olu
me
(cm
3 /g
)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-2WS
2WS1
2WS12
2WS18
22
N2 Adsorption/Desorption
BJH Analysis (PSD)
• Comparison to Montney tight gas reservoir
• Permeability implications
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m3 /
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-CARDIUM
A2+A3
B2+B3
C3
D2
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
10 100 1000
dV
/dlo
g(w
) (c
m³/
g)
Pore Width (Angstroms)
Desorption-POUCE COUPE
S4
S5
S24
From Clarkson et al. AAPG Bulletin, in press24
N2 Adsorption/DesorptionRelationship to
Permeability
• Can we relate pore structural parameters to permeability (dominant pore size, BET surface area?)
• Currently gathering permeability/porosity data for Cardium so plot like the one on the right (Montney TG) can be developed
From Clarkson et al. AAPG Bulletin, in press
27
SANS/USANS
• In a SANS experiment, a neutron beam is directed at a sample, and the neutrons are elastically scattered due to their interaction with nuclei of atoms in the sample
• The scattering vector is related to a characteristic length scale (pore size) in the sample
• SANS experiments, combined with USANS, also enable a wide distribution of pore sizes (~ 0.3 nm to ~ 10 μm) to be investigated
From Melnichenko et al. (2009)
28
SANS/USANS Analysis
29
SANS/USANS
• Similar scattering patterns for all except:
– B1 and B2 exhibit a “hump” at large Q, maybe related to composition
• Higher scattering intensity generally translates into higher porosity
• Slope of linear portion of curves (power-law scattering) is close to -3
• For surface fractal geometry (equivalent pore space is uncorrelated spherical pores), slope is -3 to -4
SANSUSANS
30
SANS/USANS
SANS/USANS
• Comparison to Montney tight gas reservoir
• Montney has greater slopes (-3.1 to -3.3)
31
SANS/USANS
SANS/USANS
1E-4
1E-3
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
1E+7
1E+8
1E+9
1E+10
1E-5 1E-4 1E-3 1E-2 1E-1 1E+0
Q (Å-1)
I(Q) (
cm-1
)
y = 27.69x-3.9648
1E-201E-19
1E-181E-17
1E-161E-15
1E-141E-13
1E-121E-11
1E-101E-9
1E-81E-71E-6
1E-51E-4
1E-31E-2
1E-11E+0
1E+11E+2
1E+31E+4
1E+51E+6
1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 10000.0 100000.0 1000000.0
r (Å)
f(R
) (Å
-1),
SSA(
r) (c
m-1
)
f(r)
SSA(r)(cm-1)
Power (f(r))
Fit of 1102A1 to PDSP model using PRINSAS
32
SANS/USANS
SANS/USANS
Sample Exponent Porosity(%) Specific Surface Area (cm2/cm3)a
1102A1 -3 5.17 3.50e5 1101A2 -3 7.18 3.13e5
a: The probe size for SSA is 6.31Å
34
Future Work• Gather profile permeability, XRF and additional pulse-
decay permeability data
• Relate pore structural information to permeability
• Examine compositional and structural controls on porosity and permeability
35