preliminary les simulations with méso-nh to investigate water vapor variability during ihop_2002 f....

1
Preliminary LES simulations with Méso-NH to investigate water vapor variability during IHOP_2002 F. Couvreux ([email protected]), F. Guichard, V. Masson, J.-L. Redelsperger, J.-P. Lafore CNRM-GAME, Météo-France,42,av. G. Coriolis 31057 Toulouse France Méso-NH: Méso-NH: a non-hydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model of the french community (Lafore et al., 1998, Ann. Geoph.) Configuration: Large Eddies Simulation from an initial sounding \, \, from 20m to 250m IHOP data used and data we wish IHOP data used and data we wish to use : to use : Model input: -soundings (Mobile, ISS, NWS) - ISSF (surface fluxes) Evaluation: -AERI, MAPR, HARLIE, FMCW -satellite -radars (S-Pol: reflectivity and refractivity fields) -lidars (LEANDRE II, DIAL,Scaning Raman Lidar) -surface stations - soundings -King-Air in-situ data 14 June 2002, a Boundary Layer Evolution case 14 June 2002, a Boundary Layer Evolution case Clouds : scattered cirrus Past : precipitation the two days before => wet soils Winds : light winds (< 6m/s) from N and NE BL structure observed: convective plumes and growing thermals in the afternoon, h CBL 1500 m Definition of the LES: some 1D Definition of the LES: some 1D sensitivity tests sensitivity tests 3D-preliminary results of BL structures : 3D-preliminary results of BL structures : 3D-preliminary results: 3D-preliminary results: Temperature and Water vapor mixing ratio PDF Temperature and Water vapor mixing ratio PDF Conclusions : Conclusions : Definition of the LES case study (initial profile, surface fluxes and large-scale advection). Tools available to study turbulence and water vapor heterogeneities. Perspectives : Perspectives : To determine and analyze water vapor variability simulated by Méso-NH in the lower levels of atmosphere (diurnal variations, horizontal heterogeneities...) To compare this variability to the observed one focusing on LEANDRE II data To use the model as a tool to understand : - processes involved in this variability - the different sources of this variability (e.g., using Lagrangian trajectories) ible satellite at 2000 UTC Profiles at 1130 UTC rv Profiles at 1130 UTC Sensitivity to initial profile Sensitivity to surface fluxes Sensitivity to L-S forcings Profiles at 1800 UTC rv Profiles at 1800 UTC This day is characterized by a high pressure and a North(-)-South(+) humidity gradient over the region. Several dry layers are visible on soundings (for example VICI) - complexe structures. The definition of initial profiles, surface fluxes and large- scale advection is not straightforward. A significative small- scale variability (1-2 K in and 1-2 g/kg in rv). Large-scale advection cannot be neglected. 1D simulation First 3D simulation Radiation Turbulence 100m, 100m, 100m to be increased ECMWF radiation code 1D (Bougeault-Lacarrere) 1.5 order 3D (Deardoff) The 1D simulations : With different initial profiles (MGL2- 1120UTC, MGL2-1216UTC, composite of soundings) With different surface fluxes (station ISSF 1, station ISFF 2, Bo=1/2, surface scheme ISBA) Without or with L-S forcings deduced from MM5 or from soundings Large variability (v, rv, w…) in the CBL, strongest variability in the inversion zone. Available diagnostics to study statistical properties of the turbulence. Importance of the role of thermals as a source of water vapor and potential temperature variability. Statistical tools available to study the distribution of water vapor Vertical cross section of and w at 2100 UTC Vertical cross section of rv and w at 2100 UTC x, y, z MGL1-11h DDC VICI AMA MGL1-others MGL2-14h.. IS S SPol MCLASS-11h ISSF-3 ISSF -2 ISSF-1 MGL2-11-13 MGL2_1216 MGL2_1120 Composite_1130 Vertical profile of w² after 21h Vertical velocity Horizontal cross section in the middle of CBL (700 m) at 2100 UTC altitude =800m altitude =1500m Potential temperature Water vapor mixing ratio Virtual potential temperature r v w v M i x i n g r a t i o N S N S I.P.=MGL2- 1120 I.P.=MGL2- 1216 I.P.=composi te I.P.=MGL2-1120 I.P.=MGL2-1216 I.P.=composite Fx=Bo=2/ 3 Fx=Bo=1/ 2 Fx=isba Fx=ISSF2 Fx=ISSF1 Fx=Bo=2/ 3 Fx=Bo=1/ 2 Fx=isba Fx=ISSF2 Fx=ISSF1 Forc=adv h. MM5 Forc=adv h. soundings Forc=None Forc=adv h. +w MM5 Forc=adv h. MM5 Forc=adv h. soundings Forc=None Forc=adv h. +w MM5

Upload: corey-porter

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Preliminary LES simulations with Méso-NH to investigate water vapor variability during IHOP_2002 F. Couvreux (fleur.couvreux@meteo.fr), F. Guichard, V

Preliminary LES simulations with Méso-NH to investigate water vapor variability during IHOP_2002

F. Couvreux ([email protected]), F. Guichard, V. Masson, J.-L. Redelsperger, J.-P. Lafore CNRM-GAME, Météo-France,42,av. G. Coriolis 31057 Toulouse France

Méso-NH:Méso-NH: a non-hydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model of the french community (Lafore et al., 1998, Ann. Geoph.)

Configuration: Large Eddies Simulation from an initial sounding

\, \, from 20m to 250m

IHOP data used and data we wish to use :IHOP data used and data we wish to use :•Model input:

-soundings (Mobile, ISS, NWS)

- ISSF (surface fluxes)

•Evaluation:

-AERI, MAPR, HARLIE, FMCW

-satellite

-radars (S-Pol: reflectivity and refractivity fields)

-lidars (LEANDRE II, DIAL,Scaning Raman Lidar)

-surface stations

- soundings

-King-Air in-situ data 14 June 2002, a Boundary Layer Evolution case14 June 2002, a Boundary Layer Evolution case

Clouds : scattered cirrus Past : precipitation the two days before => wet soils Winds : light winds (< 6m/s) from N and NE BL structure observed: convective plumes and growing thermals in the afternoon, hCBL1500 m

Definition of the LES: some 1D sensitivity testsDefinition of the LES: some 1D sensitivity tests

3D-preliminary results of BL structures :3D-preliminary results of BL structures :

3D-preliminary results:3D-preliminary results:Temperature and Water vapor mixing ratio PDFTemperature and Water vapor mixing ratio PDF

Conclusions :Conclusions :•Definition of the LES case study (initial profile, surface fluxes and large-scale advection).•Tools available to study turbulence and water vapor heterogeneities.

Perspectives :Perspectives :•To determine and analyze water vapor variability simulated by Méso-NH in the lower levels of atmosphere (diurnal variations, horizontal heterogeneities...)• To compare this variability to the observed one focusing on LEANDRE II data• To use the model as a tool to understand : - processes involved in this variability - the different sources of this variability (e.g., using Lagrangian trajectories)

Visible satellite at 2000 UTC Profiles at 1130 UTC rv Profiles at 1130 UTC

Sensitivity to initial profile

Sensitivity to surface fluxes

Sensitivity to L-S forcings

Profiles at 1800 UTC rv Profiles at 1800 UTC

This day is characterized by a high pressure and a North(-)-South(+) humidity gradient over the region. Several dry layers are visible on soundings (for example VICI) - complexe structures.

The definition of initial profiles, surface fluxes and large-scale advection is not straightforward. A significative small-scale variability (1-2 K in and 1-2 g/kg in rv).

Large-scale advection cannot be neglected.

1D simulation First 3D simulation

RadiationTurbulence

100m, 100m, 100m to be increased

ECMWF radiation code1D (Bougeault-Lacarrere) 1.5 order 3D (Deardoff)

The 1D simulations :

With different initial profiles (MGL2-1120UTC, MGL2-1216UTC, composite of soundings)

With different surface fluxes (station ISSF 1, station ISFF 2, Bo=1/2, surface scheme ISBA)

Without or with L-S forcings deduced from MM5 or from soundings

Large variability (v, rv, w…) in the CBL, strongest variability in the inversion zone. Available diagnostics to study statistical properties of the turbulence.

Importance of the role of thermals as a source of water vapor and potential temperature variability. Statistical tools available to study the distribution of water vapor

Vertical cross section of and w at 2100 UTC

Vertical cross section of rv and w at 2100 UTC

x, y, z

MGL1-11h

DDC

VICI

AMA

MGL1-others

MGL2-14h..

ISS

SPol

MCLASS-11h

ISSF-3

ISSF-2

ISSF-1MGL2-11-13

MGL2_1216MGL2_1120

Composite_1130

Vertical profile of w² after 21h Vertical velocity

Horizontal cross section in the middle of CBL (700 m) at 2100 UTC

altitude =800m altitude =1500m

Potential temperature

Water vapor mixing ratioVirtual potential temperature

rv

w

v

Mixing ratio

N S

N S

I.P.=MGL2-1120I.P.=MGL2-1216I.P.=composite

I.P.=MGL2-1120I.P.=MGL2-1216I.P.=composite

Fx=Bo=2/3Fx=Bo=1/2Fx=isbaFx=ISSF2Fx=ISSF1

Fx=Bo=2/3Fx=Bo=1/2Fx=isbaFx=ISSF2Fx=ISSF1

Forc=adv h. MM5Forc=adv h. soundingsForc=NoneForc=adv h. +w MM5

Forc=adv h. MM5Forc=adv h. soundingsForc=NoneForc=adv h. +w MM5