predicting grain size evolution alloy 718

10
Best Paper Award The following paper was selected by the Awards Subcommitteeof the International Symposium on Superalloysas a co-winner of the Best PaperAward for the Ninth Symposium. The selection was basedon the following criteria: originality, technical content, pertinence to the superalloy and gasturbine industries and clarity and style. Predicting Grain Size Evolution of Udimet Alloy 718 during the “Cogging” Process through Use of Numerical Analysis B.F. Antolovich and M.D. Evans

Upload: naderbahrami

Post on 06-Nov-2015

16 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Superalloys Conference 2000

TRANSCRIPT

  • Best Paper Award

    The following paper was selected by the Awards Subcommittee of the International Symposium

    on Superalloys as a co-winner of the Best Paper Award for the Ninth Symposium. The selection

    was based on the following criteria: originality, technical content, pertinence to the superalloy

    and gas turbine industries and clarity and style.

    Predicting Grain Size Evolution of Udimet Alloy 718 during the Cogging Process through Use of Numerical Analysis

    B.F. Antolovich and M.D. Evans

  • Predicting Grain Size Evolution of UDIMET@ alloy 718 During the Cogging Process Through the Use of Numerical Analysis

    Bruce Antolovich* Mike Evans**

    Special Metals Corporation,43 17 Middle Setlement Rd, New Hartford, NY* Electralloy, 175 Main St., Oil City, PA**

    Abstract

    A semi-automated finite element analysis program, in con- junction with user written subroutines, has been demon- strated to successfully predict therm0 mechanical histories and grain size evolution. Double cone compression specimens were found to be highly efficient for generating data for the recrystallization behavior of UDIMET@ alloy 718. Recrystallization behavior was modelled as having two distinct regimes, dynamic and static; both of which were modelled using typical Mehl-Johnson-Avrami forms. This type of modelling capability is expected to improve the efficiency of the ingot-billet conversion process as well as making possible the development of unique products such as dual property billet.

    Introduction

    Historically, higher and higher levels of turbine engine performance have been achieved by increasing their oper- ating temperature. Close control of grain size has been instrumental in allowing these increases in temperature; small grains near the hub are required for crack initiation resistance while large grains are preferred near the rim for creep resistance. Furthermore, ultrasonic inspectability is greatly improved through grain size reduction. Disk-to- disk variations in grain size must be kept to a minimum in order to fully exploit the possible material property and inspectability gains achieved through grain size control.

    A typical manufacturing sequence for a turbine disk starts with the primary melting and consumable electrode remelt- ing of an ingot followed by conversion of the ingot to a billet. The billet is then closed die forged into a disk blank which is

    UDIMET is a registered trademark of Special Metals Corporation

    followed by final machining. Each of these steps is typically, though not always, carried out by a separate manufacturer.

    The conversion process of ingot to billet is called cogging and is accomplished by hot working the ingot; usually with open die forging, to induce recrystallization. In the last decade, this billet has become a controlled grain size product unto itself to enable improved inspectability and reduce operations and costs for the forgers of disks. This process will involve many reheats and forging passes. Its development and improvement can be very costly and time consuming. Reduction of the time and cost of this process can be achieved through numeric simulation of the cogging process and microstructural evolution prior to industrial trials and certification.

    There are many well established grain size evolution models for nickel base superalloys including:

    1. Mehl-Johnson-Avrami type models

    2. dislocation based models 3. simple lookup tables

    Most share the common elements of predicting grain size based upon prior grain size, temperature, strain, strain rate and hold time. A considerable amount of work has been conducted to integrate these models into finite element codes. This work has been quite successful for cases such as disk blanking where you can use an axisymmetric (2D) finite element analysis and only need to model a few deformation strokes. The case of cogging is quite a bit more complicated as you cannot take advantage of axisymmetry and the process typically involves thousands of deformation strokes and several reheats, each of which requires a separate analysis whose initial conditions are derived from the results of the previous analysis.

    Superalloys 2000 Edited by T.M. Pollock, R.D. Kissinger, R.R. Bowman,

    K.A. Green, M. McLean, S. Olson. and J.J. Schima TM.5 (The Minerals, Metals &Materials Society), 2OiXl

    39

  • r

    If run manually, the analyst would perform a finite element analysis for a single deformation stroke. When the analysis of this deformation stroke was finished, the analyst would then invoke the preprocessor to read in the end results of the previous deformation stroke to be used as the initial condition for the next analysis. When any given deformation stroke can take between several minutes and several hours to complete, it is obvious that this process takes considerable amounts of time. If run in a manual mode by a single analyst, the computer would be incapable of computing 24 hours per day but would be restricted to those hours that the analyst is available; thereby introducing an artificial slow-down of over 50%. Furthermore, a mistake early in the process can lead to erroneous results at the end of an extremely long modelling effort (the author is aware of several modelling runs aborted after six weeks of effort). The use of a template in which the cogging parameters including number of reheats, number of passes per reheat, number of deformation strokes per pass are specified and then used to automate this process has been instrumental in carrying out these evaluations. Considerable effort has gone into making this template robust, easy to use yet sufficiently flexible to handle a wide variety of pass scheduling requirements,

    This paper will explore modelling of two cogging processes. The first case is for cogging on a hydraulic radial forge machine in which grain size is directly predicted. The second is a process modification to improve homogeneity of final grain size in billed produced my more traditional open die press forging by changing cogging parameters to improve strain homogeneity throughout the billet. These two examples will show that direct prediction of grain size evolution is possible but that less sophisticated efforts can also yield significant product improvements.

    For the case of the radial forge analysis, grain size will be predicted for a single reheat cogging sequence. For the open die forging, the effects of changing certain cogging param- eters will be examined. The modifications were designed to homogenize the strain and strain rate distributions within the billet in an effort to reduce the variation in grain size.

    Material

    The material chosen for this study was UDIMET@ alloy 7 18. Its nominal composition is shown in Table I.

    Table I: UDIMET Alloy 718 Composition wt% C Cr Fe MO Nb+Ta

    0.020 17.35 17.00 2.80 5.30 Ti Al B Ni

    0.85 0.40 0.0020 Bal

    Recrystallization Models

    The literature contains a great number of articles concerning recrystallization and cogging of nickel base superalloys. [l-6] These models have generally taken one of three forms as stated previously. Regardless of the model, there are two well accepted regimes of recrystallization along with a slightly controversial third type. In general, during load application, an original unrecrystallized grain may recrystallize dynamically. If 100% dynamic recrystalliza- tion is not achieved the remaining unrecrystallized portions of the original grain may undergo further recrystallization without additional strain input. Some authors call this meta-dynamic recrystallization since the principal driving force for recrystallization is the removal of dislocations introduced in the previous deformation. The third regime is static recrystallization and grain growth in which the principal driving force is the reduction of grain boundary energy. The factors affecting each of these types of recrystallization for any given material are :

    1. Static l Hold time l Residual dislocation density l Temperature 0 Initial grain size

    2. Dynamic 0 Strain 0 Strain rate l Temperature

    3. Meta-Dynamic

    l Strain 0 Strain rate l Temperature 0 Initial grain size l Hold time

    Regardless of the recrystallization model chosen, dynam- ically recrystallized and meta-dynamically recrystallized grain size may be reduced by increasing the total strain or strain rate. Increasing the temperature or hold time tends to increase the meta-dynamic or statically recrystallized grain size.

    This author has chosen to model the recrystallization phe- nomenon by breaking it down into dynamic and static components without addressing the meta-dynamic possi- bilities. The modelling is Mehl-Johnson-Avrami based [7,8] with critical strains and strain rates to achieve static and dynamic recrystallization respectively.

    40

  • Dynamic Recrystallization

    Dynamic recrystallization will only occur if sufficient strain rates and strains are achieved. (Le. if E > ~~,.it and d > EDRXCrit. If these conditions are achieved then the recrystallized fraction and grain size will be given by:

    Xdyn = I-exp [-+J] (1)

    ddarn = clz (2)

    Where E is the applied strain, k, n, Cl and m are mate- rial constants, 60.6 is the strain required to achieve 50% recrystallization and Z is the traditional Zener-Hollomon parameter given by:

    z * Q = Eexp RT ( > (3)

    Static Recrystallization

    Static recrystallization will only ocurr if there has been sufficient accumulation of plastic strain. (i.e. Ep > ~SRXC& If this is achieved, then the fraction recrystallized and recrystallized grain size will be given by:

    X sta = I-exp [-hk(&)n] (4)

    with trJ.5 = to.5 (do, 4 Z)

    d sta = C $-donzZn~ 2 (5)

    Where t is the incremental time, to.5 is the time required to achieve 50% recrystallization, k, Cs, n are material constants and d, is the initial grain size.

    Experimental Procedures

    Numeric Simulation of Cogging:

    All thermomechanical simulation of the cogging process was done using the commercially available finite element package, DEFORM3@. This is a large 3D deformation code specialized for the forging environment. A template was developed by Scientific Forming Technologies Corpora- tion2 in order to make more tractable the problem of running many simulations sequentially. Essentially, this template sets up a batch job to run thousands of linked simulations with the output from one simulation serving as the input for the next simulation. In this template, the following parameters are specified:

    *Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation 5038 Reed Road Columbus, Ohio 43220-2514 (614) 451-8313 www.deform.com

    1. Material 2. Heat exchange environment 3. Billet geometry 4. Die geometry 5. Die movement parameters 6. Reheat furnace temperature 7. Number of reheats 8. Number of passes per reheat 9. Billet advance per bite(trave1 increment across dies)

    10. Draft per bite 11. Billet rotation per pass

    After obtaining the complete thermomechanical history (strain, strain rate and temperature as a function of time) of a billet undergoing conversion, the grain size was pre- dicted using Mehl-Johnson-Avrami type models. A user written subroutine was integrated into the DEFORM3 post- processor. This subroutine is of a modular nature and thus will permit easy incorporation of different recrystallization models as they are developed and effectiveness proven.

    Although there is a dependence of yield stress upon grain size, flow behavior was modelled to be only a function of temperature and strain rate and taken from material of intermediate grain size. Although this will cause errors in the prediction of adiabatic heating, the degree of error is relatively small and did not justify increasing either the complexity of the yield constitutive equation or the increase in computational time required. In other words, all predictions of grain size refinement were done on a post- processing basis.

    Recrystallization Data Generation:

    Generating recrystallization data for the three recrystalliza- tion modes requires samples with different initial grain size, temperature, hold time, strain and strain rate. In order to reduce the time and expense of testing, double cone compression specimens were chosen due to their ability to generate a wide variety of strains and strain rates within a single specimen. A typical double cone geometry and strain variation is shown in Figure 1. Similar variations are found for the strain rate as shown in Figure 2.

    Typical microstructures for different specimen locations for a specimen tested at 1074OC with a post test hold time of 60 seconds are in Figures 3 and 4.

    Analysis and Results

    As mentioned in the introduction, two different types of cogging were modelled; traditional open die cogging and radial forge machine cogging in order to show that:

    41

  • Double Cone Strains

    Figure 1: Strain evolution in double cone speci- men.

    Double Cone Strain Rates

    lime (see)

    Figure 2: Strain rate evolution in double cone specimen.

    1. Analysis of strain and strain rate fields often gives sufficient information to improve a process without the need for grain size refinement modelling.

    2. The relatively simple breakdown of recrystallization phenomena into dynamic and static regimes give suffi- cient information to make good grain size predictions.

    For the case of traditional open die forging, modifications were made to a set of existing forging sequences in order to decrease the variation in grain size as a function of position within the billet and to reduce the grain size. Changes were made to the cogging parameters for all reheats of the conversion process including the total reduction per reheats. The two cases modelled were cogging of a 430mm round comer square (RCS) billet to a 380mm octagon billet and a 460mm RCS billet to a 406mm octagon billet. These are practices 1 and 2 respectively. The total reduction in cross

    Figure 3: Recrystallization near specimen edge with low deformation.

    Figure 4: Recrystallization near specimen center with high deformation.

    sectional areas are only very slightly different; M 28% for practice 1 and ~5: 27% for practice 2. Most pertinent details of the cogging sequences are shown in Tables II and III.

    Pass

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Table II: Orig Forge to Size

    q (mm) 381.0 381.0 381.0 381.0 419.1 419.1 381.0 381.0 381.0 381.0 381.0 381.0

    inr

    r

    11 reheat seque Bite Advance

    (mm) 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5

    : Rotation (deg) 90 90 90 90 45 90 90 90 45 90 -45 90

    42

  • Pass Forge to size Bite Advance (mm> (mm>

    147.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    444.5 444.5 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4 406.4

    147.3 134.6 134.6 203.2 203.2 203.2 203.2 228.6 228.6 254.0 254.0

    Table III: Modified reheat sequence

    c

    Rotation

    (de@ 45 90 45 90 90 45 90 90 45 90 -45 90

    For the case of the radial forge machine cogging, pertinent Three different line sections of the billet were examined for details of the cogging sequences are shown in Table IV. homogeneity of final cumulative strain. These sections are:

    Table IV: SMX-420 sequence

    to size Advance per Bite

    (mm> (mm)

    Thermomechanical histories of open die cogging sequences

    The evolution of strain, strain rate and temperature for various points in the billet for Practice 1 and 2 was predicted by finite element analysis. The final state of strain is shown graphically in Figures 5 and 6. (Color versions offigures 5 & 6 appear on page 839.)

    Figure 6: Practice 2: Final state of strain.

    1. Along the centerline in a longitudinal direction in the middle (lengthwise) of the billet, away from end effects

    2. 12.7 mm beneath the surface along a longitudinal direction line in the middle of the billet

    3. In a radial direction from the billet centerline to the surface

    The results are shown in Figures 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. It is quite clear that changing the pass schedules has substantially changed the thermomechanical history experienced throughout the billet. Practice 1 produced billets with significant variations in the edge grain size as one moved longitudinally along the billet whereas Practice 2 produced much more uniform edge grain sizes. This is clearly a result of changing the near edge strain distribution. The first sequence produced cumulative strains that varied between 0.55 and 0.80 whereas the modified sequence var- ied between 0.70 and 0.84. This is particularly noteworthy in light of the fact that Practice 1 had a greater overall reduction in cross sectional area of the billet. Not only was the variation reduced, the average cumulative strain experienced near the outer surface was increased which resulted in finer grain sizes. The variation in strain experienced along the centerline was increased somewhat for Practice 2 but was still quite low on an overall basis. Finally, Practice 2 clearly biased the deformation towards the surface of the billet whereas Practice 1 biased the deformation towards the center of the billet. This is clearly shown in Figures 11 and 12.

    Figure 5: Practice 1: Final state of strain. 43

  • Longitudinal Strain Distribution: Practice 1

    Llx@tinal Position (ml) ,,o.am -760 -mo 6Yl bw -550 -600 460 40 454 -wJ

    o.60 .x2 40 -28 -26 -24 a -20 48 16 14 12 -10 Longituc#nal Posilian (In)

    Figure 7: Practice 1: Longitudinal strain variations measured 25 mm from the surface.

    Longitudinal Strain Distribution: Practice 2

    ~tinsl wi (mm, ,,oa.a -750 -ml 650 a9 -550 -Km 460 4l -33 400

    0.6 - 1:: d

    0.6

    t 0.6 c m c m c

    -32 -xl .a -26 -24 22 a -18 -16 -14 -18 -10 L!JngibJdnal Posillon (In)

    Figure 8: Practice 2: Longitudinal strain variations measured 25 mm from the surface.

    Cenlettine Strain Distribution: Practice 1

    Lc+.&nsl poritm olvn, ,,o8M -,M .7ca d50 -Em -5.53 -5x 454 ua -350 -300

    I . . I

    :j , , , , , , , * , ,I

    a -30 .a .a -2, a .a -18 -16 -14 -12 -10

    Lmpitudinal PosiUon ia)

    Figure 9: Practice 1: Centerline strain variations.

    CenterlinepSpmDlbution:

    Lonpihldnal -&ml, ,,oBM -7m -700 xE.3 UN -633 -500 -453 -4a -SE0 .wl -2uI

    I 0.0 - f! a.8 jo.,. - ~ /

    ::i: -32 -24 .28 -26 -24 .P a 46 46 4, 42 -10

    Lonpitudinal PosRion (in)

    Figure 10: Practice 2: Centerline strain variations.

    Radial .%aka~s~bution:

    Rsdia, pEai& (ml,

    0.6(~ - = -

    .a $ 0.6 -

    i? 3 ; 0.7 . 3

    0.6 -

    0.6 0 2 4 6 8 10

    Radial Position (in)

    Figure 11: Practice 1: Radial strain variations.

    Radial SP~t~s;button:

    Rdbl Poritm (mm)

    0.0 .

    5 5;: 0.6 .

    0.6 -

    0.6 0 2 4 6 8 10

    Radial Position (ill)

    Figure 12: Practice 2: Radial strain variations.

    The results of changing the cogging sequence upon final grain size are shown in Figure 13. The modified cogging sequence has clearly reduced the size of both the primary and as large as edge grain size while not significantly

    44

  • affecting the center grain size.

    10 Fine Grain Udimet@ alloy 718 Billet Grain Size Comparison

    10 I I 9 1 m Practice 1 0 Practbce 2

    F1n.4 dynamlcslly recrystslhzed graa 5128

    Center Primary Center ALA Edge Primary Edge ALA

    Figure 15: Dynamically recrystallized grain size. Predicted grain size ranges from ASTM 3.5 at center to 7.0 near edge where grain size measurements are made.

    Figure 13: Grain size comparison for the two cogging sequences.

    For the case of the cogging with a radial forge ma- chine, predictions of statically recrystallized grain size, dynamically recrystallized grain size and percent fraction dynamic recrystallization are shown in Figures 14, 15 and 16 respectively. It must be noted that these are plots of billet prior to final grinding and polishing in which approximately lO-20mm of material in the radial direction is removed. Therefore, when comparing the predicted and measured grain sizes at the billet edge as shown in Table V, one must be careful to examine the predicted grain size on the finite element plots at approximately lO--20mm beneath the surface. (Figures 14- I6 uppewr in color iwz pages 839-840. )

    tle : 0355R266lNC716

    Volume ,,aot,on 0, dyrrrlllL rocrystullllulloll

    Figure 16: Dynamically recrystallized grain size fraction Rx

    Grain size predictions for Rotary forge cogging

    Using the previously discussed models, dynamically recrys- tallized grain size, statically recrystallized grain size and fraction dynamic recrystallization were predicted. Compari- son between measured values and predicted values is shown in Table V.

    Figure 14: Statically recrystallized grain size. Predicted grain size ranges from ASTM 5.5 at center to 6.0 near edge.

    4.5

  • Table V: Comparison of predicted and measured grain sizes Center Mid-Radius Near Edge

    (A=W (ASTM) (ASTM) Prediction 5.5 5.5 6.0

    (SW Prediction 3.5 5.0 7.0

    (D=) 7.0

    v, s3 30% Measured 6.0 3

    15% 5.5

    Examination of the finite element plots and tabulated date for static recrystallization, dynamic recrystallization and volume fraction of dynamic recrystallization shows that:

    Near the center, there is insufficient strain to achieve significant volume fractions of dynamic recrystalliza- tion

    Near the center, there is sufficient strain to achieve static recrystallization

    Near the surface& lo-15 mm subsurface, there is sufficient strain to achieve approximately 30-40% dynamically recrystallized grains of ASTM 7.

    Applications

    As is well known, there is a great desire on the part of engine manufacturers to produce so called dual property disks with small grains on the hub for LCF resistance and large grains on the circumference for good creep resistance. Efforts in the past to accomplish this have taken the form of selective induction heating on the disk circumference as well as welding different materials together to form a single disk. Both of these have obvious drawbacks including:

    1. Extra processing on the part of the billet supplier to produce uniform fine grain which is subsequently removed

    2. Difficulty in achieving uniformly large grain size in the geometrically complex blade attachment points

    3. Crack initiation at the heat affected zone

    Given the fact that the disk forger has areas in the disk which receive little deformation and little potential for grain size refinement, one elegant solution is to supply billet with an appropriate heterogeneous grain size. Through careful attention to reheat temperatures, bite advance, bite draft and die speed, it is theoretically possible to produce such a billet. The amount of industrial trials required in the past to perfect this process were prohibitive. In theory and practice, these billets may now be produced.

    Conclusions

    It has been shown conclusively that the use of finite element modelling can adequately predict billet thermo-mechanical histories and associated microstructural evolution during the cogging process. The development and use of a cogging template has been instrumental in allowing the analysis of real world cogging problems by allowing extremely complicated simulations with many bites per pass, mul- tiple passes per reheat and multiple reheats. When used in conjunction with post processing based recrystallization models, sufficiently accurate grain size evolution predictions can be made to reduce the amount of required full scale testing to validate new cogging sequences. This process is now sufficiently robust, with sufficient ease of use, to be used on a regular basis as a critical tool in pass scheduling development. The trials conducted have also numerically confirmed and quntified the benefits of precise control of cogging parameters such as draft, bite, rotational orientation of workpiece, etc., for the manufacture of billet for todays turbine engine disks.

    PI

    PI

    r31

    141

    [51

    Eel

    171

    46

    References

    G. Shen, S.L. Semiatin, and R. Shivpuri. Modeling microstructural development during the forging of Waspaloy. Metallurgical Transactions A, 26A,p1795- 1803,1995.

    C.A. Dandre, S.M. Roberts, R.W. Evans, andR.C. Reed. Microstructural evolution of Inconel 718 during ingot breakdown process modelling and validation. Materials Science and Technology, 16,1,p14-25,200O.

    F.J. Humphreys and M. Hatherly. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena. Oxford; New York; Yushimi: Pegramon Press, 1995,l edition, 1995.

    D. Zhao, S. Guillard, and A.T. Male. High Temperature Deformation Behavior of Cast Alloy 718. In Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives, pages 193-204,1997.

    Laurance A. Jackman, M.S. Ramesh, and Robin Forbes Jones. Development of a Finite Element Model For Radial Forging of Superalloys. In SuperaZloys 1992, pages 103-l 12,1992.

    A.K. Chakrabarti, M.R. Emptage, and K.P. Kinnear. Grain Refinement in IN-706 Disc Forgings Using Statistical Experimental Design and Analysis. In Superalloys 1992, pages 5 17-526,1992.

    Melvin Avrami. Kinetics of Phase Change. General Theory. Journal of Chemical Physics, 7,pl103-1112, 1939.

  • [8] Melvin Avrami. Kinetics of Phase Change. Transformation-Time Relations for Random Distribution of Nuclei. JourmzZ of Chemical Physics, S,p212-224,194O.

    47

    Table of Contents-------------------------Next PagePrevious Page-------------------------Next HitPrevious HitSearch ResultsNew Search-------------------------Keynote AddressSuperalloys: The Utility Gas Turbine Perspective

    Ingot, Powder and Deformation Processing Characterization of Freckles in a High Strength Wrought Nickel SuperalloySimulation of Intrinsic Inclusion Motion and Dissolution during the Vacuum Arc Remelting of Nickel Based SuperalloysPredicting Grain Size Evolution of UDIMET(r) Alloy 718 during the "Cogging" Process through Use of Numerical AnalysisControl of Grain Size Via Forging Strain Rate Limits for R'88DTSub-Solvus Recrystallization Mechanisms in UDIMET(r) Alloy 720LIThe Mechanical Property Response of Turbine Disks Produced Using Advanced PM Processing TechniquesSegregation and Solid Evolution during the Solidification of Niobium-Containing SuperalloysMicrostructural Evolution of Nickel-Base Superalloy Forgings during Ingot-to-Billet Conversion: Process Modeling and ValidationRemoval of Ceramic Defects from a Superalloy Powder Using Triboelectric ProcessingProduction Evaluation of 718ER(r) AlloyQuench Cracking Characterization of Superalloys Using Fracture Mechanics ApproachDevelopment and Characterization of a Damage Tolerant Microstructure for a Nickel Base Turbine Disc AlloyThe Microstructure Prediction of Alloy 720LI for Turbine Disk ApplicationsCharacteristics and Properties of As-HIP P/M Alloy 720Enhanced Powder Metallurgy (P/M) Processing of UDIMET(r)Alloy 720 Turbine Disks - Modeling StudiesCharacterization and Thermomechanical Processing of Sprayformed Allvac(r) 720Alloy

    Solidification and Casting ProcessingProperties of RS5 and Other Superalloys Cast Using Thermally Controlled SolidificationAdvanced Superalloys and Tailored Microstructures for Integrally Cast Turbine WheelsImproved Quality and Economics of Investment Castings by Liquid Metal Cooling - The Selection of Cooling MediaA Novel Casting Process for Single Crystal Gas Turbine ComponentsCarbon Additions and Grain Defect Formation in High Refractory Nickel-Base Single Crystal SuperalloysNew Aspects of Freckle Formation during Single Crystal Solidification of CMSX-4Competitive Grain Growth and Texture Evolution during Directional Solidification of SuperalloysRecrystallization in Single Crystals of Nickel Base SuperalloysStructure of the Ni-Base Superalloy IN713C after Continuous CastingThe Thermal Analysis of the Mushy Zone and Grain Structure Changes during Directional Solidification of SuperalloysFreckle Formation in SuperalloysModelling of the Microsegregation in CMSX-4 Superalloy and its Homogenisation during Heat TreatmentEnhancement of the High Temperature Tensile Creep Strength of Monocrystalline Nickel-Base Superalloys by Pre-rafting in Compression

    Blade AlloysAlloying Effects on Surface Stability and Creep Strength of Nickel Based Single Crystal Superalloys Containing 12 Mass% CrEvaluation of PWA 1483 for Large Single Crystal IGT Blade ApplicationsEffect of Ru Addition on Cast Nickel Base Superalloy with Low Content of Cr and High Content of WPrediction and Measurement of Microsegregation and Microstructural Evolution in Directionally Solidified SuperalloysDevelopment of a Third Generation DS SuperalloyThe Development and Long-Time Structural Stability of a Low Segregation Hf-free Superalloy - DZ125LThe Growth of Small Cracks in the Single Crystal Superalloy CMSX-4 at 750 and 1000 CThe Influence of Load Ratio, Temperature, Orientation and Hold Time on Fatigue Crack Growth of CMSX-4Modelling the Anisotropic and Biaxial Creep Behaviour of Ni-Base Single Crystal Superalloys CMSX-4 and SRR99 at 1223KCBED Measurement of Residual Internal Strains in the Neighbourhood of TCP Phases in Ni-Base SuperalloysThe Influence of Dislocation Substructure on Creep Rate During Accelerating Creep Stage of Single Crystal Nickel-based Superalloy CMSX-4Oxidation Improvements of Low Sulfur Processed Superalloys

    Disk AlloysOptimisation of the Mechanical Properties of a New PM Superalloy for Disk Applicationsg' Formation in a Nickel-Base Disk SuperalloyMicrostructure and Mechanical Property Development in Superalloy U720LISub-Solidus HIP Process for P/M Superalloy Conventional Billet ConversionEffect of Oxidation on High Temperature Fatigue Crack Initiation and Short Crack Growth in Inconel 718The Effects of Processing on Stability of Alloy 718Long Term Thermal Stability of Inconel Alloys 718, 706, 909 and Waspaloy at 593 C and 704 CEffects of Microstructure and Loading Parameters on Fatigue Crack Propagation Rates in AF2-1DA-6The Common Strengthening Effect of Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon in Lower Contents and the Problem of a Net SuperalloySimulation of Microstructure of Nickel-Base Alloy 706 in Production of Power Generation Turbine Disks

    Mechanical BehaviorInfluence of Long Term Exposure in Air on Microstructure, Surface Stability and Mechanical Properties of UDIMET 720LIEffects of Grain and Precipitate Size Variation on Creep-Fatigue Behaviour of UDIMET 720LI in Both Air and VacuumEffects of Local Cellular Transformation on Fatigue Small Crack Growth in CMSX-4 and CMSX-2 at High TemperatureMultiaxial Creep Deformation of Single Crystal Superalloys: Modelling and ValidationInvestigations of the Origin and Effect of Anomalous RaftingStress Rupture Behavior of Waspaloy and IN738LC at 600 C in Low Oxygen Gaseous Environments Containing SulfurIsothermal and Thermomechanical Fatigue of Superalloy C263Structure/Property Interactions in a Long Range Order Strengthened SuperalloyMicrostructural Changes in MA 760 during High Temperature Low Cycle FatigueHigh Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Haynes 230 SuperalloyHigh Cycle Fatigue of ULTIMET AlloyThe Effect of Strain Rate and Temperature on the LCF Behavior of the ODS Nickel-Base Superalloy PM 1000Effect of Thermomechanical Processing on Fatigue Crack Propagation in INCONEL Alloy 783The Ductility of Haynes(r) 242 Alloy as a Function of Temperature, Strain Rate and Environment

    Coatings, Welding and RepairProcessing Effects on the Failure of EBPVD TBCs on MCrAlY and Platinum Aluminide Bond CoatsCompositional Effects on Aluminide Oxidation Performance: Objectives for Improved Bond CoatsModelling and Neutron Diffraction Measurement of Stresses in Sprayed TBCsInterdiffusion Behavior in NiCoCrAlYRe-Coated IN-738 at 940 C and 1050 CEffect of Coating on the TMF Lives of Single Crystal and Columnar Grained CM186 Blade AlloyProcess Modelling of Electron Beam Welding of Aeroengine ComponentsNovel Techniques for Investigating the High Temperature Degradation of Protective Coatings on Nickel Base SuperalloysSintering of the Top Coat in Thermal Spray TBC Systems Under Service ConditionsOveraluminising of NiCoCrAlY Coatings by Arc PVD on Ni-Base SuperalloysThe Influence of B, P and C on Heat Affected Zone Micro-Fissuring in INCONEL type SuperalloyImproving Repair Quality of Turbine Nozzles Using SA650 Braze AlloyImproving Properties of Single Crystal to Polycrystalline Cast Alloy Welds through Heat Treatment

    Alloy DevelopmentDevelopment of a New Single Crystal Superalloy for Industrial Gas TurbinesHigh g' Solvus New Generation Nickel-Based Superalloys for Single Crystal Turbine Blade ApplicationsDistribution of Platinum Group Metals in Ni-Base Single Crystal SuperalloysDevelopment of A Low Angle Grain Boundary Resistant Single Crystal Superalloy YH61Topologically Close Packed Phases in an Experimental Rhenium Containing Single Crystal SuperalloyA Low-Cost Second Generation Single Crystal Superalloy DD6The Development of Improved Performance PM UDIMET(r) 720 Turbine DisksMicrostructural Stability and Crack Growth Behaviour of a Polycrystalline Nickel-Base SuperalloyThe Application of CALPHAD Calculations to Ni-Based SuperalloysFormation of a Pt2Mo Type Phase in Long-Term Aged INCONEL Alloy 686Development of New Nitrided Nickel-Base Alloys for High Temperature ApplicationsMC-NG: A 4th Generation Single-Crystal Superalloy for Future Aeronautical Turbine Blades and Vanes