MG Jeff SorensonDeputy for Acquisition and Systems ManagementOffice of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)April 19, 2006

MG Jeff SorensonDeputy for Acquisition and Systems ManagementOffice of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)April 19, 2006

Precision Strike Association

Agenda

• Current Strategic Environment

• What is Precision?

• Jerry McGuire – “Show Me The Money!”

• Future Investment Strategy

• Industrial Base – Viable or Declining?

A Complex Strategic Environment

Role ofRole of NATO/UN/NGOsNATO/UN/NGOs

DoD TransformationDoD TransformationRecruiting and RetentionRecruiting and Retention

Progress of GWOTProgress of GWOT Public WillPublic WillIntInt’’l Coalitionsl Coalitions

= WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITYWARTIME FOCUS + WARTIME RESOURCES

Hostile RegimesHostile RegimesThreatening IdeologiesThreatening Ideologies

Irregular WarfareIrregular WarfareWeapons ProliferationWeapons Proliferation

AdversityAdversity

UncertaintyUncertainty

Current Future

0607

08 xx

SupplementalsSupplementals

01-05

Munitions TerminologyMunitions TerminologyPrecision Munitions

Capable of self locating and maneuvering to a specific location with an accuracy sufficient to yield a high probability of destruction within its inherent capabilities.

Smart MunitionsSelf-contained capability to search, detect, acquire, and engage individual targets by detecting the general target characteristics in order to provide terminal guidance for the munition or submunitions.

Discriminating MunitionsSelf-contained capability to search, detect, acquire, and engage individual targets by distinguishing specific characteristics ofthe target to selectively identify and engage only the desired target types.

Precision Munitions -- Why?Precision Munitions -- Why?

• All-weather, terrain, and operational environment engagement capability that reduces operational risk by providing immediate responsive fires and scalable effects

• Minimize collateral damage, especially in urban settings; allows for discriminating use of force

• Reduce number of rounds needed to defeat targets at all ranges (same CEP at any range)

• Reduce logistics footprint and force burden

• Essential to fulfill objectives of Transformation and Joint opns

• Compliment -- not replace – unguided or ‘dumb’ munitions

Precision Munitions – Why Not?Precision Munitions – Why Not?

• Not every target needs to be destroyed – suppression, masking, or harassing fire is often needed to shape the battle

• Unaffordable – if chasing too many programs with limited resources

• Insufficient numbers – if they become the weapon of choice

• Dependent on sensor system data, rapidly passed networked information, especially when addressing fleeting targets

• PGM technology is developing ahead of doctrine and infrastructure – modernizing weapons without modernizing doctrine may lead to ineffective use of PGMs

MisconceptionsMisconceptions

• A replacement for unguided munitions – but “dumb” is still good

• A leap-ahead advantage – but temporary since eventually precision will proliferate and put our own forces at risk

• Leads to quick victory – but the enemy does not always behave the way we think we would

• Technology Will Save Us…-- PGMs are not a replacement for sound tactics or strategy (do

not confuse the ways and means of war with its end)

-- PGMs as the ‘silver bullet’ – but weapons break; human error; enemy countermeasures; not a replacement for doctrine, tactics, or the human element (leadership; will towin; luck)

President’s Budget (FY01-FY11)

U.S. Army Total (FY01 to FY11) = $1.3 Trillion

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

FY01

FY02

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

FY09

FY10

FY11

Mill

ions

Procurement

RDTE

O&M

Family Housing

MilCon

Personnel

Other

Army Research, Development And Acquisition Summary (FY01-FY11)

RDA Total (FY01 to FY11)= $304.4 Billion

$0

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

$14

FY01

FY02

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

FY09

FY10

FY11

Mill

ions

CHEMACFTAMMOMSLSOPAWTCVRDTE

Top Ten Army Programs (2000 vs. 2006)

FY 2006 Top MDEPsFY 2000 Top MDEPs

•BLACKHAWK•BRADLEY FIGHTING VEHICLE SYSTEM (BFVS)

•Apache AH-64D Upgrade Recap•COMANCHE

•ARMY TEST INFRASTRUCTURE•HORIZONTAL BATTLEFIELD DIGITIZATION

•CH-47F Upgrade Recap•JAVELIN

•TACTICAL RADIOS•MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE (MTV) SYSTEMS

•Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS)

•FIRE SUPPORT MISSILES

•STRYKER•ABRAMS

•TECHNOLOGY BASE•TECHNOLOGY BASE

•TRAINING AMMUNITION•LONGBOW APACHE

•FUTURE COMBAT SYSTEM (FCS)•TRAINING AMMUNITION

Tactical Missile Procurement Dollars In Thousands

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11

FIRE SPRT

GROUND

AVIATION

$52M TOW add$93M Javelin Supp (Modularity)$69M ITAS Reprog/Supp (Modularity)$92.9M ATACMS Supp

Missiles/Ammo Initial Unit Cost

0100000200000300000400000500000600000700000800000900000

1000000

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

HELLFIREJAVELINTOWGMLRSATACMS Blk IATACMS Blk IAATACMS UnitaryEXCALIBURPGMMJCM

TOW HELLFIRE

GMLRS

JAVELIN

ATACMS BLK IA

ATACMS Unitary

ATACMS BLK I

JCM

?

?

Precision Munitions(Fielded & Developmental)

FIELDED PRODUCTION SYSTEMS:

TOW 2BJAVELINHELLFIRE variants -- SAL (K, M, or N) and LONGBOW (L)ATACMS Block IV – Quick Reaction Unitary (QRU)

SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPMENT OR S&T:PEO AMMO: PEO MISSILES and SPACE:ExcaliburPGMM CKEM NLOS LS -- PAMMRM APKWS II NLOS LS -- LAMPGK JCM – Technical GMLRS

Maturation

Joint Fires Capabilities

Responsiveness for Close Fight

Range

FCSMortar

FCSCannon

W/Excalibur

PAM/LAMClose

AirSupport

7-12km

30-40km

100km (LAM)

150-180km

300kmAir

Interdiction

>300km

NavalGunfire

70km

ATACMSTLAM

Long Range Precision Strike

Shaping Fires

Fires to Isolate

Fires to Protect

Close Support

Fires

AttackAVN

GMLRS

Destructive Fires at Depth

Variety of:- Targets- Dwell Times- Effects

UCAV

40-50km (PAM)40-50km (PAM)

Missiles Expenditures

GULF WAR 1 GWOTAirHellfire/Longbow 1770 3441

Anti-Tank InfantryJavelin N/A 682TOW 2202 5430

ArtilleryMLRS 10,572 840GMLRS N/A 54Unitary N/A 16ATACMS (Blk 1) 32 371ATACMS (Blk 2) N/A 69

Capabilities for a Joint and Expeditionary Army

Future Force

Science and Technology—develop and mature technology to enable

transformational capabilitiesfor the Future Modular Force while seeking opportunities

to accelerate technologydirectly into the Current

Modular Force

Fully networkedFully networked

< 30 tons

> 40 mph> 40 mph

< 40 lb.load

70+ tons

< 10 mph

Current Force

~100 lb. load

Enhancing the Current ForceEnhancing the Current Force

Enabling the Future ForceEnabling the Future Force

Today’s Science & Technology Investments for Future

Precision Strike Capabilities

Next Gen NLOS-LSLoitering AttackMissile Increased Loiter time(> 30 min)Precision AttackMissile Increased Range(>40km)

Smaller, Lighter, CheaperMunition Components (SLMC) • Miniaturize electronic assemblies• Chip-scale packaging• Advanced sensors and gimbals

Missiles

Ultra-short Pulsed Lasers for Laser Guided Energy

120mm Mid Range Munition• Range 2-12km (BLOS)• Autonomous or Laser

Designated Seeker Modes• Hit to Kill

Guidance & Control Control Actuators IMU

GPS Receiver Future Missile Technology

High Energy Solid State Laser

Munitions

Lasers

Common Smart Submunition

• Discriminating I2R & LADAR Sensors

• Long, Aerostable EFP• 155mm, 105mm, PGMM

& GMLRS Applications

Multi-purpose Warheads• Single warhead defeats

bunkers, heavy/light armor & personnel

• Enhanced Shaped Charge blast/fragmentation warhead

• Hardened for bash-through capability against reinforced structures

• Counter-rocket, artillery & mortars

• Disrupt/defeat EO/IR sensors

• Scaleable effects

S&T Investments Enabling Precision Strike Capabilities

FY97-11, $3B*

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11

Missiles$1.4B

Guns & Munitions

$1.1BHigh Energy

Lasers$475M

$M Applied Research & Advanced Technology Development

*Then year dollars

Compact Solid State Laser

Industrial Base – Family Tree

Fairchild Weston Systems Inc.Loral

Honeywell-Electro-Optics

Ford AerospaceBDM International Inc.

Librascope

IBM–Federal SystemsUnisys Defense

General Dynamics–Ft. WorthMEL

Lockheed

General Electric–Aerospace

Martin Marietta

LTV–Missile Business

Gould Ocean System Division

COMSAT Corp.Affiliated Computer Services Inc. (ACS)

Loral

BDM (Carlyle)

Aerospace Electronic Systems

Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical

General Dynamics Space Business

LTV–Aircraft OperationsGrumman Corp.

Ryan AeronauticalKistler Aerospace Corp.

Alvis Logistics–EDD Business

Northrop

Logicon

Westinghouse El. Defense

TASC (Primark)PRC (Black & Decker)

General Instruments–DefenseVarian–Solid State Devices

Taratin

Litton IndustriesAvandale Industries

Newport News ShipbuildingTRW

Commercial Aerostructures

Northrop – West Virginia

Federal Data Corp.

Rockwell

Argo Systems

Litton Precision Gear

Hughes Electronics Satellite

Boeing

McDonnell Douglas

Jeppesen Sanderson

HughesGeneral Motors

BET PLC's Rediffusion Simulation

MagnavoxREMCO SA

STC PLC–Navigation SystemsTRW-LSI Products Inc.

Corporate JetsE-Systems

Chrysler Techn. AirborneTexas Instr. El. Defense

Raytheon

General Dynamics Missile Division

Eng & Const.

Int’l

Aircraft Integration

Systems Segment

Vertex Aerospace

Hughes Electronics

Raytheon – Flight Simulation Raython Co-Plant, Quincy

Northrop Grumman

Raytheon

Boeing

Lockheed Martin

ockheed Martin Defense Sys, Armament Sys

GM DefenseVeridian Corp

Primex Technologies

Computing Devices International, Inc

GTE Government Systems Corp. Units

Motorola Integrated Info Sys

Gulfstream Aerospace

General Dynamics

Lucent Advanced Technology Systems

NASSCO Holdings, Inc.

Galaxy Aerospace

Bath Iron Works Chrysler Defense, Inc

Santa Barbara

General Dynamics

Space PropulsionsMissile

OperationsElectronicDivision

Fort Worth Div.

s Space Systems

Source: SDC, DACIS DM&A

199019881980 1982 1984 1986 1992 1994 1996 1997 1998 1999

First Wave Second Wave

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Missile Sector Industrial Base Consolidations

Martin MariettaLockheed

LoralLockheed MartinLockheed MartinLockheed

LoralLTV

BoeingRockwell

McDonnell DouglasBoeing

RockwellBoeingBoeing

HughesRaytheon

Texas Instruments

GD MissilesHughes

Raytheon

GD MissilesHughes

Raytheon

GD Missiles

RaytheonRaytheonRaytheon

9390 91 92 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05

Active Army Ammunition Plants (AAPs) -Government Owned

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

WW II KOREA POST-KOREA

VIETNAM 2006 2011

912

1726

12

38

84

Number varied

70’s-90’s

Numbers shown do not include plants in layaway and “semi-active” status.

• Army’s shrinking and aging organic ammo production base supports all Services

• Modernization is essential• Must meet tough environmental

standards• Must implement BRAC, preserve

critical core capabilities, right-size, and reduce costs.

AAPs ShutDown.

Little or NoMaintenance.

POST-WW II

Success StoryProgram of Record (2001)• Did not Include Unitary• Focused on DPICM “Only” Solution

Program of Record (2003)• Included Unitary• Envisioned Urgent Need Variant• Considered Warhead Improvements

World Events Change&

New Requirements Evolve

Urgent Need Variant(Dual Mode Fuze & Basic Motor)

Fielded and 41 Operationally Employed2005

Way Ahead

•Investment Strategy for Precision Weapons Portfolio Needs Review

•Precision Lethality – System of Systems Evaluation

•Enormous Stockpile – Demil or Refit?

•S&T Strategy: Sub-Components Improvements or New Technology?

• Industrial Base Declining; Cost of Weapons Increasing