pre-award risk-based assessment mphande - pre-awar… · risk level monitoring guidelines risk...

31
Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Tawanna Fields-Mphande October 14,2016

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment

    Tawanna Fields-Mphande October 14,2016

  • Overview

    • Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Process

    • Risk-Based Assessment Timeline

    • Agency-Wide Compliance & Monitoring

    Updates

    • Resources

  • Risk-Based Assessment

  • The Law

    • The Uniform Guidance (Super Circular)

    requires all Pass-Through entity to conduct a

    risk-based assessment prior to making

    awards. (OMNI Federal Circular §200.331)

    • To comply with this requirement, the Office of

    Career Technical Education will conduct an

    annual risk assessment of all Perkins

    recipients.

  • Required Monitoring Activities

    Framework for evaluating risks before applicant

    receives funding:

    • Financial stability

    • History of performance

    • Reports from single-audit findings

    • Applicant’s ability to effectively implement

    statutory, regulatory or other requirements

  • Risk-Based Assessment

    The risk-based assessment process is

    designed to conduct a more thorough review

    for Perkins recipients with higher risk factors.

    The risk-based assessment review identifies

    potential problems that could lead to risks in

    the accountability, fiscal accounting and grant

    operations.

  • Purpose and Intent

    Provide preventative assistance before

    mistakes are made

    Increase efficient use of resources &

    transparency

    Reduce, waste, fraud & abuse

    Ensure that subrecipients use federal funds

    for the intended purpose

  • Criteria Selection Process

  • Criteria Selection Process

    Just kidding!

  • Criteria Selection Process

    Risk-based assessment criteria used to

    determine risk for FY17 districts (2016-2017

    school year):

    • Previously non-compliant;

    • Failure to meet accountability measures;

    • New career-technical education personnel;

    • Failure to meet required deadlines; and

    • Single Audit Findings.

  • Pre-Award Risk-Based

    Assessment Tool

  • Assessment Tool

    High

    Medium

    Low

    Based on the results of the risk-based assessment tool, all districts will be categorized as high, medium or low risk.

  • Risk-Based Assessment Tool

  • Assessment Scores

    0 to 1 points low risk

    2 to 3 points medium risk

    4 to 7 points high risk

  • Risk LevelsRisk Level Monitoring Guidelines Risk Levels

    High(4-7)

    Required to submit detailed financial reports such as general ledgers, supporting documentation and performance reports. On-site monitoring will be at the discretion of the education program specialist.

    Medium(2-3)

    Required to receive additional targeted assistance. Required attendance at trainings/conferences. Follow-up with district via phone audit review.

    Low(0-1)

    No known programmatic, financial instability or significant audit findings. No significant program changes. The district shall receive technical assistance upon request.

  • FY18 Pre-Award Risk Assessment Timeline

    May 2017

    High-Risk

    Districts Notified

    April 2017

    Pre-Award Risk

    Assessment

    June 2017

    Monitoring

    Guidelines

    implemented

    July 2017

    Funds allocated to

    field

    Note: The timeline is contingent on the availability of data.

  • Agency-Wide Updates

  • Pre-Award Risk-Assessment

    Agency-Wide Process1

  • Agency-Wide Process

    • All federal programs are required to

    implement the risk-assessment process.

    • Each departments process is unique to their

    grant.

  • Program Monitoring

    Agency-Wide Process2

  • Monitoring • Working collaboratively to reduce our foot-

    print in the field.

    • In FY16:

    – There were a total of 112

    districts/organizations with overlap

    –Team approach – 107 onsite/desk review

    and 5 with desk review only overlap

  • Compliance Dashboard3

  • New Compliance Dashboard

  • In Summary

    • A high-risk assessment score should

    NEVER be interpreted as a negative

    reflection.

    • Technical assistance will be provided

    • FY2017 districts were notified in August,

    2016

    • Notification of high-risk will be sent via the

    CCIP and email to the Superintendent

    • Compliance dashboard coming soon!

  • Resources

  • Scheduled to be Monitored

  • Additional Resources• Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006

    http://www.fldoe.org/workforce/perkins/pdf/Perkins_IV_text.pdf

    • U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/

    • Education Department General Administrative Requirements

    (EDGAR)

    • http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html

  • Resources• Subpart A – Acronyms & Definitions (§200.0 -§200.99)

    • Subpart B – General Provisions (§200.100 - §200.113)

    • Subpart C – Pre-Federal Award Requirements and

    Contents

    • of Federal Awards (§200.200 - §200.211)

    • Subpart D – Post-Federal Award Requirements

    Standards for

    • Financial and Program Management (§200.300 -

    §200.345)

    • Subpart E – Cost Principles (§200.400 - §200.475)

    • Subpart F – Audit Requirements (§200.500 - §200.521

  • Miguel Ruiz

  • education.ohio.gov

  • Social Media

    @OHEducation

    @OHEducationSupt

    OhioFamiliesAndEducation

    OhioEdDept