practical risk communication - safety first · practical risk communication ... – dr. vincent...
TRANSCRIPT
Practical Risk CommunicationFor the OHSE Professional
or Practitioner
Fred Leafloor, CRSP, CHSCSafety First Industrial Safety Services
Regional Vice President, CSSE Atlantic
We Will Begin Shortly
November, 2006
Practical Risk Communication
For the OHSE Professionalor Practitioner
Fred Leafloor, CRSP, CHSCSafety First Industrial Safety Services
Regional Vice President, CSSE Atlantic
3
Session Overview• Introduction• Principles of OHSE Communication• Barriers to Communication• One Model for Effective Communication• Types of “Audiences”• Communications & Organizational
Development• Messaging Techniques• Summary
4
INTRODUCTION
5
Credit to the gods ….• Science of Risk Communication
– Definition – Replication
• Today’s Models– Dr. Peter Sandman– Dr. Vincent Covello
• Other Credits
6
What is Risk?• Most definitions of Risk include:
– A circumstance involving the possibility of suffering harm or loss
– A combination/manipulation of:frequency of exposure,
probability of loss, and
consequences of a specified hazardous event
• The common definitions focus upon the physical effects of risk – the Hazard
7
• A Science-based approach for communicating effectively in: – High-Concern
– High Stress
– Emotionally Charged, or
– Controversial Situations
Risk Communication
8
Risk Communication• Risk Communications is a tool with two
purposes:– Reduce short-term adverse reaction by an
audience– Engage interest and commitment to take
action to prevent or mitigate risk/loss• This means that sometimes the task is
to reduce the concerns of a group, and other times the task is to raise the level of concern to stimulate action
9
Risk Communication• What does Risk Communication
“success” look like?– Avoiding escalation of the problem– Gaining control of the hazard to reduce
the impact on people, property, and the environment
– Working to establish control of the information and build a trustworthy relationship with the involved parties
10
Risk Communication• There are many models of Risk
Communication (Sandman, Covello, Chess, Fischhoff, Greenberg, CPI)
• We will look at a Sandman “energy model” that fits within the industrial environment: Hazard plus Outrage
• We will look at Covello’s Message Mapping to plan our communications content and delivery strategy
11
PRINCIPLESof OHSE Communication
12
Basic UnderstandingsCommunications without intelligence
is noise – Intelligence without communications is irrelevant.
(General A.M. Gray, USMC)
• Just because your message is not understood, don’t automatically assume that the fault is with the receiver…
• In communication:Perception IS Reality
13
The Human Element• Within OHSE, we have not yet stopped
loss. In our history we have tried:– Engineering efficiency into jobs– Creating workplace rules– Developing procedures & practices to
make the human fit the work– Behavioural observation & modification– Ergonomic adjustments to make the work
and working conditions fit the human – Predicting risk exposures and outcomes
14
The Human Element• We haven’t gotten supervision – or the
workforce – to listen, possibly because we haven’t sent our message in a language they hear (“self-interest”?)
• Risk communication does not focus upon the logic of the situation, but appeals to what the people feel about the circumstance
15
Typical Communications Flow• Someone has a non-critical OHSE
problem and brings it to the attention of the Supervisor (or the Safety person)– Stage 1:The “go tell your Mother” syndrome kicks in
and the Supervisor dodges the question or slides it to the safety representativePerson goes away unsatisfiedTalks to other workers and receives
reinforcement regarding the concernPerson stews on it – and brings it up again
16
Typical Communications Failure– Stage 2:The Supervisor / Safety person says “I thought
I told you about that – It is already settled”Person retreats – still unsatisfiedPerson stirs up other people about the issueManagement hears of the dissatisfaction
– Stage 3:Management thinks “What do they really want?
This isn’t about safety – there is something else going on”They look for alternative reasons / blameCommence the “witch hunts”!!
17
Typical Communications Failure– Stage 4:The concern with the issue has grown – it is
interfering with the workManagement now says the magic words:
“ FIX IT ”What do they do?? – They throw money at it
– This didn’t need to happen …– It’s part of your job to see it coming …– It’s part of your job to prevent it …
18
BARRIERSto Communication
19
Barriers to Communication• To effectively get your message out,
you need to be aware that barriers exist and how to get through, or around them
• You need also to be aware that one of the barriers can be You!
20
Types of Barriers• Cognitive• Organizational• Psychological• Social / Societal• Physical
21
Barrier: Cognitive• The “thinking” mind establishes its
expectations and fools the senses into believing that the reality mirrors the expectations– How many “the ’s” ? / How many “f ’s” ?
– Editing a document just written
22
Barrier: Cognitive• Symptoms of Cognitive Barriers
– Isolation from the realities of the situation
– Apathetic participants and audiences
– Someone MUST win – others must lose
– Outrage is not real and detracts from the real business of controlling the hazard
– Acknowledging outrage and taking steps to mange it will increase liability
23
Barrier: Cognitive• Coping Strategies:
– Recognize that outrage is not irrational, but has predictable behaviours, much like chemical substances in toxicology
– Plan early for outrage to ariseEstablish likely avenues for concern (and
develop your technical solutions)
Develop the messaging plan (the messages that will satisfy the emotions)
Follow the reduction in concern with the hazard control informationMake it “we” rather than “them and us”
24
Barrier: Organizational• Will they let me? (resistance to change)• Vertical hierarchy• Established communications flows• Clannish mindset• Obvious resistance to communicate:
– Stonewall Stage (unwillingness / contempt)
– Missionary Stage (we will teach you)
– Dialogue Stage (we will speak/listen to you)
– Organizational Stage (we will change)
25
Barrier: Organizational• Coping Strategies:
– Acknowledge that change is needed and may result in a better place
– Guide the organization through the stages of communication
– Rewards and punishments suited to reach the established goal (act like you mean it)
– People learn/practice the required skills– Start with small projects/examples
26
Barrier: Psychological• Will “I” let me? (resistance to change)• Maslow got it Right!! – we are “esteem”
animals and we resist doing what does not “feel good”
• We do not like to be questioned on our expertise or skills (we ignore it or hit back)
• We must not show that “they got to us”
27
Barrier: Psychological• Coping Strategies:
– Recognize and acknowledge your own outrage
– Separate the psychological appeal to do it “the old way” and the real effectiveness of a communications strategy and activity
– Remember that their perceptions are as real to them as your perceptions of what is “true” are to you
28
Barrier: Social / Societal• Culture and Societal Values Vary
– The beliefs and basic needs of most “individuals” are fairly similar (Maslow):Physiological, Safety, Love/BelongingEsteem, Self-Actualization
– The beliefs of a society vary widelyReligious, Social, Morality, “Value of Life”
• Coping Strategy– Be aware of the impact of the differences– Work within the restrictions – to deviate
from them will increase audience outrage
29
Barrier: Physical• Distance• Medium of Communication• Lack of body language cues• Environment (i.e.: Noise )
• Coping Strategy– Recognize that human communication is
55% body language, 38% tone of voice and only 7% in words *
* Carnagie/Mellon
30
A MODELfor Effective Communication
31
Sandman Hazard + Outrage• Risk = Hazard + Outrage
(are you outraged, yet?)
OUTRAGE
Outrage Management3
Crisis Communication2
(Waiting for the Next Problem)4
Precaution Advocacy1
H A Z A R D
32
Communication Priorities• In Risk Communication
– The HAZARD is not always your first fix…
• To fix the hazard, you will have to get past their barriers:– “They” will not hear messages from
behind the walls of outrage– Reduce the outrage – Get their attention– THEN give them the important information
33
Communications Tools• What fuels the Outrage?
– Things you Say / Don’t Say– Things you Do / Don’t Do
• Messages have 2 key areas:– The information itself– The messenger
34
Components of Outrage (~30)
• The Message:– Voluntary / Coerced– Natural / Industrial– Familiar / Exotic– Memorability– Dread (Fear of the Unknowable)– How much Control do you have?– Fair / Unfair (Risk vs Benefits)– Moral Issues
35
Components of Outrage (~30)
• The Messenger– Trusted / Trustworthy or Not ??– Responsive, or Not ??
• Using the components of outrage, craft messages to reduce or increase the level of outrage necessary to drive the focus on fixing the hazard.
36
Risk Communication Flow• Assess the hazard situation and level of
outrage
• Identify the principal components of outrage
• Get a feel for the OHS culture of the organization – what can they absorb?
• SAMPLE your audience(s) to establish what type of messaging they will need
37
Risk Communication Flow• Craft messages to deal with outrage
and stimulate action on the hazard
• Negotiate support from your company resources to put the changes in place (support from above and below)
• Use Changed Management principles to implement the changes
38
Culture Matters• Cultural Assessment Tools:
– Survey / opinion polls
– Documentation assessment
– Leading / Trailing Indicators
– Personnel issues (discipline, absenteeism,EAP “hits”)
– Physical conditions
– Worker belief in empowerment
39
TYPESof Audiences
40
What Are Audiences?• Individuals or Groups that have an
interest in the situation• Their interests may be supportive of
your position or in opposition to you• Some Audiences may remain neutral or
responsive to the “last” opinion• Audiences can be internal to your
organization or externally-based• Each Audience has different drivers
41
Common Audiences• Industry• Regulators (at all levels)• Elected officials (at all levels)• Activists (at all levels)• Employees (and retirees)• Neighbours (those who are impacted)• Concerned citizens• Experts (specialized knowledge)• The Media (and those that they reach)
42
Audience Evaluation• “Sample” Your Audience:
– S situational stressors– A audience parameters– M motivations– P perceptions– L listening– E engagement
SAMPLE ©
43
Audiences• The larger and more diverse the
audience, the less effective the communication
• What are the Implications of this?
44
COMMUNICATIONSand Organizational Development
45
Organizational Development
46
Negligence to Compliance– Work from within to demonstrate the
advantages of compliance and the potential operational and financial disadvantages of non-compliance
– Use impact examples from other areas
– Work with the management mindset of concern for potential productivity loss as a result of accident or an unplanned enforced compliance activity
47
Negligence to Compliance– Waving around a rules book rarely works
for very long and may brand you as a disruptive force rather than a helpful resource, thereby limiting your effectiveness
48
Compliance to Due Diligence– You already have workplace recognition
that safety provides benefit. Now is the time to maximize the value of your prevention activity
– Identify / Quantify reduction in WCB costs
– Provide workplace training in the concept of Due Diligence
49
Compliance to Due Diligence– Provide “easy” ways of collecting and
recording information
– Reinforce positive examples of “taking care of business”
– Initiate “feedback loops” to lead into self-improvement
– Establish a credible planned OHS Audit System
50
Due Diligence to C-Improvement– A baseline of Due Diligence provides the
framework for Health & Safety Continuous Improvement.
– Formalize OHS feedback loop systems to incorporate changes in policies and procedures to enhance health and safety.
– Demonstrate wherever possible the advantages of a proactive response to Near Miss Reports or “minor” incidents.
51
Due Diligence to C-Improvement– OHS Document control standards should
be initiated
– This is the first level of movement from a “safety program” towards a “safety management system”
52
C-Improvement to TQM– OHS culture at some level is established
and stable
– Build upon the OHS improvements experienced and the lessons learned in the OHS Continuous Improvement process
– Coach local management on how the application of these principles can assist in other areas:procurementmaintenance
53
C-Improvement to TQM– Policies for operational activities of the
company will need to be standardized and Document Control established under a central authority
54
TQM to Evolution/Integration– This is an organizational change rather
than that which would occur only within the OHS department (transformational change rather than transactional change).
– Feedback loops have been established in multiple divisions or departments.
– Centralized Documentation Control exists.
55
TQM to Evolution/Integration– Change management has been adopted
as an organizational effort– An organizational Vision has been
established, with a powerful guiding coalition of workplace parties, and is fully resourced.
– OHS staff are integral to the change team to assess and provide controls for the potential hazards of the change.
56
MESSAGINGTechniques
57
Messaging• Risk Communication is a science based
discipline
• High stress, high concern situations change the rules of communication
• The key to success is anticipation, preparation and coordination
58
Message Development• The “95% Rule”
– 95% of all questions and concerns that will be raised by any stakeholder in any controversy can be anticipated and predicted in advance.”
• What are the Implications of this?
59
Covello Message Mapping• Message Map
– Tiered layers of triplet messages– Know what you want to say– Keep messages short & clear– One idea per message/sentence
• Key Message or Fact– Keyword (memory jogger)
– Supporting Fact
60
Covello Message Mapping• Key Message x 3
– Here is what you need to hear
• Key Word Reinforcing x 3– Here is what makes it more important
• Supporting Fact (Factoid) x 3– Here is something additional or related
that you can check for yourself
61
SUMMARY
62
Session Overview• Introduction• Principles of OHSE Communication• Barriers to Communication• One Model for Effective Communication• Types of “Audiences”• Communications & Organizational
Development• Messaging Techniques• Summary
63
What Did He Say??• Risk Communication:
– is a tool to help you become more effective– has rules. If you follow them, they have a
good chance of working– audiences vary. Work with the differences– models are effective, if properly applied– is not easy, but the rewards to you and
your company should be worth the effort– messages have a point – and when they
are needed, they are needed badly
64
QUESTIONS ?
Practical Risk Communication
For the OHSE Professionalor Practitioner
Fred Leafloor, CRSP, CHSCSafety First Industrial Safety Services
Regional Vice President, CSSE Atlantic