power knowledge and politics policy analysis in the states
DESCRIPTION
Reviewed by Trever Pearson PA 715 Policymaking and Implementation August 3, 2011. POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States. John A. Hird. OVERVIEW. “Two Communities Theory” Critiques of Policy Analysis Various Definitions of the term “Use” Findings Conclusion. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICSPolicy Analysis in the States
Reviewed by Trever PearsonPA 715 Policymaking and Implementation
August 3, 2011
John A. Hird
![Page 2: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OVERVIEW
• “Two Communities Theory”• Critiques of Policy Analysis• Various Definitions of the term “Use”• Findings• Conclusion
![Page 3: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“TWO COMMUNITIES THEORY”
Social Scientists
• Esoteric• Written for academic
audience• Pedantic• Emphasis on
scientific values
Legislators
• Seeking information to support pre-existing policy choices, increase status or deflect criticism
• Emphasis on values of the constituent
![Page 4: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CRITIQUES OF POLICY ANALYSIS
• Fear of technocracy
• Bureaucratic obstacles prevent the use of policy analysis
• Policy analysis is always political, and can never be truly nonpartisan
![Page 5: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DEFINITIONS OF THE TERM: “USE”Carol Weiss (1979)
We actually USE policy analysis to inform decision making
We use policy analysis to solve problems, or we commission research to understand it better
We use everything to inform our decisions… Not just policy analysis
We use it as ammunition to support our pre-conceived notions and to justify our decisions/mistakes
We use it to delay decisions we don’t want to make, to convince you we’re not as wrong as you thought, and to show you just how good we are
Everyone knows what the data suggests, it’s just that no one has a clue who said it or where it came from
We use it simply to make ourselves smarter. Wait, which policy were we talking about?
• Knowledge Driven Model
• Problem Solving Model
• Interactive Model
• Political Model
• Tactical Model
• Enlightenment Model
• Intellectual Enterprise Model
![Page 6: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
POLITICAL CULTURE DANIEL ELAZAR (Zoellick, 2000)
MORALISTIC
Commitment to public good/welfare
Communal power
Citizen participation
Greater government intervention
TRADITIONALIST
Elitist construct to maintain social order
Established hierarchy
Public participation is limited
INDIVIDUALIST• Focus on private concerns• Limit community involvement• Control government• Democracy as a marketplace where politicians rely on public demand
![Page 7: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FINDINGS Nonpartisan valued more highly than
partisan However – legislative term limits increase the
partisan nature of debate (short-term vs. long-term analysis)
Most NPROs conduct short term, descriptive analysis In 66 of the 82 NPROs, only 16% self-initiated
policy analysis and only 5 NPROs self-initiate 40% of the time or more.
![Page 8: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Factors Affecting NPRO Size and Type
NPRO Size NPRO Analytical Capacity
Professional LegislatureStrong Party Strong Party
Policy LiberalismThink Tank Presence Think Tank PresenceLegislators with more staff Legislators with more staffLarge Economies (aggregate)Party CompetitionInterest Group StrengthUnified Government Unified GovernmentMoralistic Political Culture Moralistic Political Culture
![Page 9: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Legislative Professionalism
The more professional the legislature, the more capacity its NPRO is likely to have
EXCEPT
Kentucky and Massachusetts
![Page 10: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Importance of Policy Analysis
![Page 11: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Influence of Policy Analysis
![Page 12: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Political Ideology – The Use and Perception of Analysis
REPUBLICAN/CONSERVATIVE
Greater emphasis on Governor and Constituents
Believe NPRO staff support sufficient
Little time spent developing policy expertise
Believe that NPROs are not truly nonpartisan
DEMOCRAT/LIBERAL
Greater emphasis on wide range of sources
Believe NPRO staff support insufficient
Much time spent developing policy expertise
Believe that NPROs are truly nonpartisan
![Page 13: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Political Ideology – The Use and Perception of Analysis
NO POLICY ANALYSIS
Republicans/Conservatives
Older Legislators Less Formal Education Men
POLICY ANALYSIS
Democrats/Liberals Professional Legislators More Formal Education Younger Legislators Women
![Page 14: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
District vs. State – Delegate vs. Trustee Legislators who promote their own district rather
than the state as a whole are more likely to view their NPROs as influential than legislators who promote the state as a whole over their own district.
Legislators who view their roles as delegates (constituent viewpoint more important than their own) are more likely to view their NPROs as influential than legislators who view their roles as trustees.
![Page 15: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CALIFORNIA The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), the Senate
Office of Research and the California Research Bureau conducts long-term, analytical research throughout the legislative session in addition to short-term, descriptive work.
California legislators rate the importance of their NPRO with a higher mean score than any other state.
![Page 16: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
IMPLICATIONS
NPROs must continuously adapt to the changing political environments in which they work. Although short-term information provision is important, providing basic information is a necessary but not sufficient role for NPROs. Females, liberals, Democrats, young, and well-educated legislators are more likely to support greater use of policy analysis. In contrast, older legislators, those with less formal education, Republicans, economic conservatives, and males are more likely to believe that the legislature has all the information and analysis it needs to make decisions. Therefore, states considering expansion of the NPRO staff should be attentive both to the costs of expansion and to the types of legislators that would be likely to support or oppose the change. (p. 201).
![Page 17: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
IMPLICATIONS Most NPRO directors echoed the scholarly supported
sentiment suggesting the increase in partisanship among the federal and state levels. These developments, coupled with and possibly exacerbated by term limits, have potentially important implications for NPROs as strong parties are associated with smaller and more descriptive analysis. Therefore, the more politicized and partisan legislatures become, the less likely are they to support NPROs, especially ones that go beyond simple information gathering and analysis. (p. 202).
![Page 18: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CONCLUSION NPROs do not have substantial influence over the
policy making process, although larger and more analytical ones are more likely to.
NPROs are widely valued by legislatures, although those with higher capacity are valued more.
Highly politicized legislatures value short-term, descriptive analysis, indicating that non-partisan research cannot survive in highly political environments
As influential policy analysis may or may not be, the extent to which politics influences analysis is not clearly known.
![Page 19: POWER KNOWLEDGE AND POLITICS Policy Analysis in the States](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062411/5681667d550346895dda2453/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS