powder characteristics, microstructure and properties of
TRANSCRIPT
ORE Open Research Exeter
TITLE
Powder characteristics, microstructure and properties of graphite platelet reinforced Poly Ether EtherKetone composites in High Temperature Laser Sintering (HT-LS)
AUTHORS
Wang, Yuan; Rouholamin, D; Davies, R; et al.
JOURNAL
Materials & Design
DEPOSITED IN ORE
04 January 2016
This version available at
http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19105
COPYRIGHT AND REUSE
Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies.
A NOTE ON VERSIONS
The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date ofpublication
1
Powder Characteristics, Microstructure and Properties of Graphite Platelet Reinforced
Poly Ether Ether Ketone composites in High Temperature Laser Sintering
Yuan Wang a*, Davood Rouholamin
a, Richard Davies
b Oana R. Ghita
a
a University of Exeter, Department of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences,
North Park Road, EX4 4QF, UK
b Centre for Additive Layer Manufacturing (CALM), University of Exeter, Department of
Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, North Park Road, EX4 4QF, UK
*Corresponding author: [email protected] Tel: +44-1392-725779
Abstract
The properties of graphite platelet reinforced Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK/GP)
composites from powder to laser sintered parts were investigated in this study. The
flowability, particle size and laser absorption characteristics of PEEK/GP powders with
various graphite loadings were studied. It was found that the addition of graphite improved
laser absorption; however, the flowability of powder was reduced. Micro-CT scanning was
used to study the distribution, dispersion and the orientation of graphite platelets as well as
the porosity and maximum pore size of laser sintered PEEK/GP composites. The graphite
platelets were observed to be distributed evenly in the structure without significant
agglomeration. Most of the graphite had their in-plane surface orientated in the X-Y plane of
fabrication, which increased the tensile strength of the composites incorporating 5wt%
graphite. The investigation also demonstrated that the porosity and maximum pore size
increased with increasing amounts of graphite. A significant increase in porosity and pore
size was found in PEEK/GP composites with 7.5wt% graphite, and it is believed to be
responsible for the drop in tensile strength. DMA analysis showed no reduction of the
damping properties in the composites incorporating up to 5wt% graphite, whereas the
composites with 7.5wt% graphite showed increased stiffness.
Keywords: Laser Sintering, PEEK, Composites, Thermomechanical properties, Micro-CT,
Microstructure characterization.
2
1. Introduction
PolyEtherEtherKetones (PEEK) are used in many industry sectors as thermal insulators due
to their high melting temperature (>300 oC), as medical implants due to the material's
biocompatibility and as bearing parts in pumps due to their good wear and chemical
resistance.[1,2,3] PEEK is also often used as a composite material with other additives, and
reinforcements to further increase its mechanical or thermal performance. [4,5] In traditional
manufacturing, PEEK has been reinforced with various types of carbon structures including
carbon fibre, graphite and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [6,7,8]. Depending on the application,
the objective was an improvement of prolonged fatigue stress and strain characteristics [9],
strength or thermal and electrical performance [10]. The freedom of design offered by the
techniques available within additive manufacturing (AM) also triggered interest in the use of
high temperature polymers and their composites for use in medical and aerospace
applications. Unfortunately, the standard laser sintering process was limited to the use of
nylon as the most widely used and best performing engineering polymer. For a long time, the
improvement in performance was sought through the incorporation of reinforcement rather
than improvement of performance of the polymer matrices.
Several methods for developing composites by Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) have been
reported. Goodridge et al., compounded PA12 with 3% by weight carbon nanofibers (CNF)
followed by mechanical cryogenic milling and found a 22% increase in storage modulus. [11]
Although the particle morphology was not extensively investigated, the authors reported a
rough surface finish of SLS composite parts due to the angular shaped powder produced by
mechanical milling. Karevan et al., reported a wet coating method to produce
PA12/exfoliated Graphite nanoPlatelets (GnP) for laser sintering [12]. They found an
increase in tensile modulus and slight decrease in flexural modulus with 3% GnP added by
3
weight. Composite fabricated with 5% GnP presented a lower strength compared with those
incorporating 3% GnP due to agglomeration of the nanofiller. Bai et al.,[13] used a patented
chemical method [14] to create PA12 particles surface coated with CNTs and reported a 44.5%
increase in tensile modulus and 7% increase in tensile strength for 0.1wt% CNTs [10, 11].
The addition of carbon type reinforcement in nylon polymeric powder offered some degree of
improvement in mechanical performance but it did not overcome the intrinsic limitation of
low glass transition temperature of the matrix, which ultimately restricts use of nylon or
nylon composite materials in harsh environments with high operating temperature such as
aerospace, defence, marine or petrol and gas applications. The introduction to the AM market
of the commercial high temperature laser sintering system, the EOSINT P800, allowed this
drawback to be addressed. This system is currently available with the commercial laser
sintering grade Poly Ether Ketone (PEK) HP3 powder [15, 16, 17], and recently researched
and tested Victrex PEEK 450PF powder. [18] Prior to the EOSINT P800 system and the two
grades currently available, there were several attempts to laser sinter PEEK in modified
standard systems. In most cases, the focus was on machine modifications and process
parameters rather than properties of sintered parts. Wagner et al., mixed PEEK with up to
0.15% carbon black powder by intensive shaking procedures and sintered only single layer
specimens with a modified YAG laser system at room temperature [19]. The study
demonstrated that small amounts of carbon black, less than 1wt%, significantly improved the
laser absorption and powder bed temperature. The authors concluded that the laser energy is
initially absorbed by carbon black particles followed by energy transfer from carbon black
particles to the surrounding polymer powder, facilitating the sintering. Rechtenwald et al., [20]
modified an EOSINT P380 laser sintering machine by integrating a circular building platform
and an additional heating device to enable pre-heating at higher temperatures (250 oC).
Following on from this study, researchers within the same group[21] tried to further improve
4
the modified system by adding a “high-temperature inner process chamber” called the
“Heating Dome” to the standard PA12 equipment and manufactured PEEK/ tricalcium
phosphate and PEEK/carbon black composite for medical applications [22]. However, the
mechanical properties of these composites were not studied.
PEEK and PEK belong to the same family of high temperature polymers and have similar
performance but different melting and glass transition temperatures. PEEK is preferred for
manufacturing as it has a lower processing temperature compared with PEK, which
subsequently reduces any degradation effects and potentially uses less processing energy.
PEK HP3 powder has been commercially available as a laser sintering grade for the last few
years [23], where Victrex PEEK 450PF has just recently appeared as the next high
temperature polymeric powder suitable for laser sintering. [18] This paper continues the
investigation into PEEK and HT-LS, by analysing the feasibility of manufacturing
PEEK/graphite composites using the EOSINT P800 system. The current study presents for
the first time properties of PEEK/graphite powder and sintered composites. Small amount of
graphite up to 5% wt improved the mechanical strength of the composites, whereas
incorporating of 7.5%wt graphite leads to the drop in tensile strength. The micro-CT results
provide evidence for the drop in strength noticed at 7.5%wt graphite loadings.
2. Experimental
2.1 Materials preparation
The powder used for fabrication was PEEK150PF powder supplied by Victrex plc with an
average particle size of 60µm. Graphite platelets were supplied by Easy Composites.
According to the manufacture’s specification, 85% of the graphite powder has a particle size
less than 44µm. PEEK powder was thermally treated in an oven at 250oC for 24hrs before dry
5
mixing. The PEEK/ graphite platelets at weight ratios of 99/1, 95/5 and 92.5/7.5 were then
mixed manually in a drum until the mixture achieved a uniform colour. Then, further mixing
was carried out by rolling the drum on an EOS electric powder mixer for 2 hours. The mixed
powder was sieved using an EOS powder sieve with a 245µm mesh screen and used for laser
sintering.
2.2 Fabrication of PEEK/GP by HT-LS
The high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS) process was carried out in a reduced build
mode using the EOSINT P800 system. Descriptions of the build chamber modes and the
PEEK processing parameters are available in previous publications [18]. Tensile specimens
and rectangular bars were built according to ISO527-2 test specimen type A1 and B1,
respectively. Rectangular samples were used for DMA specimens. To allow understanding of
any potential variation in properties of parts related with position of specimens in the build
chamber, the samples build set up is shown in Figure 1.
2.3 Characterisation of powder
2.3.1 FTIR analysis
A Bruker Matrix FTIR was used to determine the absorbance values of the PEEK/GP dry
mixed powder at a wavelength of 943cm-1
, which is equal to the wavelength of the CO2 laser
beam equipped on the high temperature laser sintering equipment.
2.3.2 Angle of repose
The angle of repose test was used to check the powder flowability. The experiment was
performed at room temperature as according to ASTM C144. The powder was poured onto a
horizontal surface through a funnel to form a cone. The nozzle tip of the funnel was placed at
a height of 38.1 mm from the flat surface. Feeding was stopped when the cone reached the tip
6
of the funnel nozzle. Then the diameter of the cone was measured in 4 positions and the angle
of repose (AOR) was calculated by equations (1) and (2):
𝐴𝑂𝑅 = tan−12 ∗ ( 𝐻 𝐷𝑎)⁄ (1)
𝐷𝑎 = ∑ 𝐷𝑖/4 (2)
Where H is the height of the cone (=38.1 mm), Da is average of the 4 diameters and Di is the
measured diameter. Six repeats were carried out for each type of powder.
2.3.3 Particle size distribution
To measure the particle size distribution, the particles were dispersed in deionized water to
form suspensions. Then the suspensions were tested with a Saturn DigiSizer 5200
Micrometrics to obtain the particle size distribution.
2.4 SEM Characterisation
Microstructure analysis of the PEEK powder, graphite powder and the fractured surface of
composite samples was carried out by secondary electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S-
3200N, Japan). The secondary electron images were taken under 25 kV accelerating voltages.
2.5 Micro-CT
Micro-CT was used in this study to investigate the 3D structure of the laser sintered parts.
The mechanism of micro-CT is described in a study by Ho and Hutmacher.[24] Cubic-shaped
samples were cut carefully from the laser sintered tensile test specimens of PEEK and PEEK
composite with 1, 5 and 7.5 wt% GP. These micro-CT samples had dimensions of
approximately 3 × 3 × 3 mm. As indicated in Figure 2, the micro-CT samples were cut from
the centre part of the tensile test specimens which were built according to the ISO standard
ISO527-2. The Micro-CT samples were mounted in the CT machine in the same orientation
as during the sintering process. The prepared samples were scanned using X-Tek Bench top
7
CT 160 Xi (X-Tek Systems Ltd/Nikon Metrology UK Ltd, England) with a current of 95-100
µA, voltage of 65-70 kV, pixel size of 3 µm and 360˚ rotation. According to the mechanism
of micro-CT scanning, each specimen is virtually divided into a series of 2D slices that are
irradiated with X-rays. The CT data produced from scanning was then analysed using
VGStudio MAX software. Morphological characteristics such as porosity, maximum pore
size and maximum graphite size were measured, and orientation of the graphite in the 3D
reconstruction of the PEEK was investigated. Three samples were scanned for each
composition, and three regions of interest were selected for each sample for the porosity
measurements. Hence, the porosity was measured for nine samples for each composition. The
maximum pore size and maximum graphite size in the specimens were measured by
analysing all the 2D images produced from the CT scanning from various depths of the
structure. The sizes of the largest pores and largest graphite platelets were recorded. 22
measurements were noted for each composition, and the maximum values for the two
parameters were then obtained from these measurements.
2.6 Mechanical testing
The tensile tests were performed on a Lloyds EZ20 machine with a crosshead speed of
2mm/min for all samples. Ten specimens for each material were tested. The dimensions of
the tensile testing specimens are presented in Figure 2.
2.7 Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA)
DMTA specimens with dimension of 30 x 7 x 2 mm were milled from rectangular samples.
The dynamic mechanical tests were performed on a Mettler Toledo DMA1 STARe system
using the temperature scanning mode with a three-point bending sample supporting jig. The
length of the supporting span was 20 mm. The temperature range was 40-280oC with a
8
heating rate of 3 K min-1
. Tests were performed with a frequency of 1Hz and a controlled
displacement amplitude of 10µm. Storage modulus (E’), loss modulus (E’’) and the damping
factor (tan δ) were obtained from DMTA testing.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 FTIR analysis
The FTIR absorbance and reflectance of pure PEEK, graphite and PEEK/graphite composites
are shown in Figure 3 (a). The graphite platelets show significantly higher absorbance of light
than PEEK150PF powder. The absorption increased with increasing amounts of graphite,
except for the addition of 1% graphite, which was not observed to affect the optical properties,
as its absorbance values remained similar to those of pure PEEK powder.
3.2 Characterisation of powder
A good powder for laser sintering needs to flow well to spread smoothly and to achieve dense
powder compaction. Table 1 presents the AOR data of various powders. Commercial laser
sintering grade PEK HP3 is studied as a benchmark material. Though the PEEK 150PF
powder showed less flowability than PEK HP3, it dispersed well during powder spreading. It
can also be seen from the AOR data that graphite platelets reduced the flowability of the
composite powder.
PEK HP3 PEEK 150PF PEEK/1%GP PEEK/5%GP PEEK/7.5%GP GP
AOR 37.8±0.4 40.5±0.3 43.6±0.3 45.3±0.2 46.1±0.2 50.2±0.2
Table 1: The AOR of various powders
The particle size distributions of PEK, PEEK and graphite platelets are shown in Figure 3(b).
The PEEK powder has similar particle size distribution compared with the laser sintering
PEK grade. The average particle size is approximately 60µm. The graphite platelets have a
9
broader particle size distribution than the polymer powder with average particle size of
approximately 30µm.
3.3 SEM Characterisation
Figure 4(a) and (b) show the morphology of PEK and PEEK, respectively. The morphology
of the graphite platelets used for fabrication of the composite is shown in Figure 4(c) and (d).
The PEEK particles have elongated shapes and their surface is rougher compared with the
commercial PEK grade. The morphology of the two powders, PEK and PEEK, was presented
in more detail in a previous publication by the same group. [25] Figures 4(e)-(g) show the
morphology of the mixed composite powder; the PEEK particles are predominantly coated by
the small graphite platelets having size less than 30µm. As demonstrated with the FTIR
absorption at 943cm cm-1
(Figure 3), these graphite platelets could effectively improve the
laser absorption and transfer of heat to the PEEK particles.
Figure 5 shows the fracture surface of PEEK and PEEK/GP composite parts with various GP
loadings fabricated by high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS). The pure PEEK shows an
anisotropic layered structure. This has been frequently noticed in laser-sintered structures, it
is an inherent characteristic of the additive manufacturing process, which can be reduced by
changing processing conditions, but not totally eliminated. This microstructure was noticed
also in the previous HT-LS PEEK papers [16, 17, 26,] As a result of the layered structure, the
laser sintered materials showed anisotropic tensile strength in X, Y and Z directions [27, 28].
The layered structure seems to disappear in the PEEK/GP composites as seen in Figure 5 (b),
(c) and (d). This result implies that the addition of graphite improved the fusion between
layers as a result of enhanced heat absorption. The fracture surfaces of the PEEK/GP
composites shown in Figure 6 reveal the presence of some graphite platelets partially pulled
10
out of the matrix. It can be seen that their out-of-plane surface is almost perpendicular to the
fracture surface. Graphite orientation in the laser sintered samples was studied by Micro-CT
and the influence of their orientation on mechanical performance is discussed in the
following sections.
3.4 Micro-CT
Micro-CT was employed to investigate the 3D structure of the laser sintered parts in terms of
the distribution, dispersion and orientation of graphite platelets, porosity and maximum pore
size in the samples. The 3D reconstruction image is sliced into 2D images though x, y, and z
directions (as indicated in Figure 7(a)) to investigate the distribution of the graphite platelets.
Figure 7(a) demonstrates the 3D reconstruction of a PEEK sample with 7.5wt% graphite and
Figures 7(b) to (d) show the sliced 2D images in z direction of pure PEEK and PEEK
composites with 1, 5 and 7.5wt% graphite loadings. During the CT scanning, a higher
intensity of X-ray is reflected and collected for the areas or particles with higher density, and
therefore these areas can be observed as white or bright colour in the images. [36] The black
areas in the 2D images represent the pores in the structure, and the bright areas represent the
denser part of the structure, such as graphite. The pores and graphite in the structures are
highlighted in the images. As demonstrated, it was found that the graphite was uniformly
distributed throughout the structure for each type of sintered composite. Figure 7 also
suggests that the porosity and pore size increase as the amount of graphite in the structure
increases. It was also noticed that the porosity and pore size seem to increase significantly
when the graphite in the PEEK structure increases from 5% to 7.5wt% GP. Figure 8 shows
the sliced 2D image and 3D reconstructions of scanned PEEK/5% GP and PEEK/7.5% GP
samples. It shows that the PEEK/7.5% GP sample possesses a visibly higher porosity with
larger pores in the structure compared to the PEEK/5% GP sample.
11
In order to quantify the maximum pore size and dispersion of graphite in the composites, the
pore size and graphite size in each sliced 2D image were measured to determine the
maximum value. The measured porosity, maximum pore size and maximum graphite size
from micro-CT are presented in Table 2.
Graphite (%) Porosity (%) Maximum pore size (µm) Maximum graphite size (µm)
0 7.4 ± 0.1 40.6±5.2 ---
1 9.4 ± 1.4 89.4±13.2 121.2 ±14.3
5 12.9 ± 1.1 179.4±31.5 157.5±17.2
7.5 27.9 ± 1.6 305.7±37.9 140.5±14.4
Table 2: Porosity, maximum pore size and maximum graphite size of the structures with
various percentages of graphite measured by micro-CT.
As platelets, the in-plane surface of graphite is larger than the out of plane surface. By
comparing the 2D images sliced through z direction in Figure 8 (top left corner) to the images
sliced along x and y directions (top right and bottom left corners respectively), it can be
observed that the in-plane surface of graphite lay on the x-y plane of Micro-CT image which
is same as the X-Y plane of fabrication. The same graphite orientation was observed in the
majority of sliced 2D images of all PEEK/GP composites. As presented in Table 2, the
quantified results of porosity are consistent with the SEM image analysis and show that the
sintered pure PEEK structure has the lowest porosity which gradually increases with the
increase of graphite loading. There was a significant increase in porosity from 13% to 28%
when the amount of graphite was increased from 5% to 7.5%. As shown by the FTIR test,
the graphite will absorb more laser energy, allowing a higher temperature to be attained in the
LS system. The presence of more pores in the sintered composite structure could be due to
uneven energy absorption across the deposit layer. The regions where graphite is present will
absorb more energy and have a higher degree of melting and flow, whereas regions without
graphite will absorb less energy and therefore have less flow. This effect is combined with
12
the fact that the PEEK powder particles have a different morphology to the commercial grade
PEK HP3. The PEEK particles are less round, have an elongated shape and sometimes fibrils
which make the sintering of pure PEEK itself less uniform, and when combined with a non-
uniform energy distribution will lead to creation of more pores in the structure. [25] A recent
study by Berretta et al., confirmed this cavity formation mechanism in each powder layer as a
result of powder morphology. [18] In addition, graphite and PEEK materials have
significantly different thermal conductivities (0.32 Wm-1
K-1
for Victrex PEEK 450G [29],
140-500 Wm-1
K-1
for in plane graphite sheet and 3-10 Wm-1
K-1
out of plane graphite sheet
[30,31]) which means that the two components absorb and dissipate heat differently. The heat
transfer and thermal equilibrium might not be fully achieved for each layer deposition and
sintering. Another reason for the increased porosity measurements noticed in composites at
7.5% graphite loadings could be related with the reduced flowability of the composite powder
as shown by the AOR data, which may lead to difficulty in achieving uniform powder
spreading and enhance the probability of having porosity in the sintered structure.
Quantitative analysis also showed that there is no significant change in the maximum
graphite size as the percentage of graphite in the structure increases (Table 1), which is in
agreement with the micro-CT images. The maximum size of graphite measured in all
composites from the micro-CT images is larger than that measured by the particle analyser.
This could be due to a small degree of agglomeration of graphite platelets in the composites.
3.5 Mechanical performance
Figure 9 shows that the addition of 1% and 5% GP (by weight) led to 15 % and 36 % increase
in tensile strength, respectively. However, a further increase in the percentage of graphite
platelets to 7.5 % led to a reduction in tensile strength. PEEK/7.5%GP composite shows less
strength improvement effect compared with those with 1% and 5wt% graphite content. It can
13
also be seen that the strain% increases with increasing graphite content; PEEK/5% GP shows
an increase in tensile strain% of approximately 40%. The study carried out by Ho et al., [32]
clearly showed, through a combination of graphite and polycarbonate single layer tests, that
the addition of graphite platelets greatly promotes the laser absorption, increases the
temperature of the powder bed, and improves the fusion of the polymer powder. A better
fusion of the polymeric powder is expected to lead to parts with higher strength. Such a trend
was noticed here for 1% and 5% GP; followed by a significant drop at 7.5% graphite platelets.
Yasmin and Daniel [33], Agag et al., [34] and Karevan et al. [35] reported similar effects.
Karevan et al., recorded an increase in tensile strength for laser sintered nylon samples with 3%
exfoliated GnP, followed by a decrease in strength values for samples incorporating 5% of
the same nanoplatelets. Agglomeration of the reinforcement particles was assumed to be the
factor responsible for the drop in strength in all referenced studies. However, in our case, the
agglomeration of graphite platelets was not responsible for reduced mechanical performance.
As shown in micro-CT images, the graphite platelets were well dispersed throughout all
samples. The micro-CT data revealed an increase in the porosity and pore size within the
composite structure with increasing graphite platelet content, especially for 7.5% graphite
platelets loading. As previously mentioned, the porosity was associated with the powder
morphology, its poor flowability and laser energy absorption during sintering. Although the
presence of pores in sintered parts can lead to lower mechanical performance of the parts [36,
37, 38], PEEK/GP composites showed improved tensile strength compared with virgin PEEK,
despite the porosity. This implies the graphite platelets act as reinforcement in the direction
of the tensile testing and overall may have a positive effect on the strength of the composite.
During tensile test, these aligned graphite platelets may delay the crack propagation. The
crack will travel a longer path around the polymer/graphite interface rather than straight
through a pure PEEK matrix. The incorporation of the graphite may have changed the crystal
14
structure of the matrix and changed the deformation behaviour, for example, increasing the %
strain as shown in Figure 9(b). The review by Diez-Pascual et al discussed unusual melting
and crystallization behaviour of PEEK and PEK with carbon fibres (Cf), carbon nano-fibres
(Cnf) and graphite and found an increase in % strain for certain combinations and conditions
of matrix and reinforcement. [39]
3.6 Thermo-mechanical performance
Figure 10 shows the damping factor Tan δ, storage modulus (E’) and loss modulus (E”) of
PEEK and PEEK/GP composites with 1%, 5%, 7.5% graphite loadings. The E’ and E” were
found to increase in value with the increase of graphite platelet content. Addition of 1% and 5%
graphite has no influence on the damping peak maximum of PEEK and its location, which is
associated with Tg. Similar results were reported by Karevan et al.[35] who demonstrated that
the addition of a small amount of graphite nanoplates had no effect on the Tg of laser sintered
PA12 composites. In our study, the incorporation of 7.5% graphite platelets led to an
increase in Tg of approximately 10oC and a slight decrease in the damping factor, tan δ,
which indicates an increase in the rigidity of the structure. The DMA results here have a
similar behaviour to those observed in several previous studies which showed that the
incorporation of rigid filler into polymer immobilizes the motion of polymer chains as a
result of interface interaction between filler and polymer. [40, 41, 42].
4 Conclusion
Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of laser sintered PEEK/GP composites were
studied. The Micro-CT study demonstrated that the graphite was well distributed in all
composites with no obvious agglomeration throughout their structure, but revealed an
increase in porosity and maximum pore size in the composite with increasing loading of
15
graphite. It is believed that the pores were the results of a poor powder morphology, which
led to lower flowability (shown by the AOR data) and uneven laser energy absorption.
Despite the porosity, the in-plane graphite platelets aligned along the X-Y plane of sintering
and reinforced the tensile strength of the composites. PEEK/5%GP composite had the highest
strength improvement, 36%, compared to other samples. The graphite orientation also led to
an increase in tensile strain %. Incorporation of 7.5 wt% GP resulted in a 40 % increase in
strain %. The DMA analysis demonstrated that the graphite improved the modulus of the
PEEK composite. The results clearly demonstrated the importance of powder morphology
and powder preparation in laser sintering and its influence on the mechanical performance of
the composite.
Reference
[1] Attwood TE, Dawson PC, Freeman JL, Hoy LRJ, Rose JB, Staniland PA. Synthesis and
properties of polyaryletherketones. Polymer. 1981;22(8):1096-103.
[2] Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.
Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845-69.
[3] Jones DP, Leach DC, Moore DR. Mechanical properties of poly(ether-ether-ketone) for
engineering applications. Polymer. 1985;26(9):1385-93.
[4] Wu G-M, Schultz JM., Processing, microstructure, and failure behavior in short-fiber-
reinforced poly(ether ether ketone) composites. Polymer Composites. 1990;11(2):126-32.
[5] Voss H, Friedrich K. On the wear behaviour of short-fibre-reinforced PEEK composites.
Wear. 1987;116(1):1-18.
[6] Gao S-L, Kim J-K., Cooling rate influences in carbon fibre/PEEK composites. Part 1.
Crystallinity and interface adhesion. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing.
2000;31(6):517-30.
[7] Tripathy BS, Furey MJ. Tribological behavior of unidirectional graphite-epoxy and
carbon-PEEK composites. Wear. 1993;162–164, Part A(0):385-96.
16
[8] Díez-Pascual AM, Naffakh M, González-Domínguez JM, Ansón A, Martínez-Rubi Y,
Martínez MT, High performance PEEK/carbon nanotube composites compatibilized with
polysulfones-II. Mechanical and electrical properties. Carbon. 2010;48(12):3500-11.
[9] Steinberg EL, Rath E, Shlaifer A, Chechik O, Maman E, Salai M. Carbon fiber reinforced
PEEK Optima—A composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris
characteristics of CF-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. Journal of the
Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2013;17(0):221-8.
[10] Díez-Pascual AM, Ashrafi B, Naffakh M, González-Domínguez JM, Johnston A, Simard
B, Influence of carbon nanotubes on the thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of
poly(ether ether ketone)/glass fiber laminates. Carbon. 2011; 49 (8): 2817-33.
[11] Goodridge RD, Shofner ML, Hague RJM, McClelland M, Schlea MR, Johnson RB, et al.
Processing of a Polyamide-12/carbon nanofibre composite by laser sintering. Polymer
Testing. 2011;30(1):94-100.
[12] Athreya SR, Kalaitzidou K, Das S. Mechanical and microstructural properties of Nylon-
12/carbon black composites: Selective laser sintering versus melt compounding and injection
molding. Composites Science and Technology. 2011;71(4):506-10.
[13] Bai J, Goodridge RD, Hague RJM, Song M. Improving the mechanical properties of
laser-sintered polyamide 12 through incorporation of carbon nanotubes. Polymer Engineering
& Science. 2013;53(9):1937-46.
[14] Cai D, Jin J and Song M. Process. UK Patent WO/2009/034361, 2009.
[15] Ghita OR, James E, Trimble R, Evans KE. Physico-chemical behaviour of Poly (Ether
Ketone) (PEK) in High Temperature Laser Sintering (HT-LS), Journal of Materials
Processing Technology. 2014; 214(4): 969-978,
[16] Ajoku U, Saleh N, Hopkinson N, Hague R, Erasenthiran P. Investigating mechanical
anisotropy and end-of-vector effect in laser-sintered nylon parts. Proceedings of the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture.
2006;220(7):1077-86.
[17] Wang Y, James E, Ghita OR. Glass bead filled Polyetherketone (PEK) composite by
High Temperature Laser Sintering (HT-LS), Materials & Design, 2015;83:545-51.
[18] Berretta S, Evans KE, Ghita OR. Processability of PEEK, a new polymer for High
Temperature Laser Sintering (HT-LS), European Polymer Journal.2015;68:243-66.
17
[19] Wagner T, Höfer T, Knies S, Eyerer P. Laser Sintering of High Temperature Resistant
Polymers with Carbon Black Additives. International Polymer Processing. 2004;19(4):395-
401.
[20] Rechtenwald T, Eßer G, Schmidt M, Pohle D, Comparison between Laser Sintering of
PEEK and PA using Design of Experiment Methods, Lasers in Manufacturing 2005.
Munich(Germany): Proceedings of the 3rd International WLT-Conference on Lasers in
Manufacturing, 2005; p. 263–7.
[21] Schmidt M, Pohle D, Rechtenwald T. Selective Laser Sintering of PEEK. CIRP Annals -
Manufacturing Technology. 2007;56(1):205-8.
[22] Pohle D, Ponader S, Rechtenwald T, Schmidt M, Schlegel KA, Münstedt H, et al.
Processing of Three-Dimensional Laser Sintered Polyetheretherketone Composites and
Testing of Osteoblast Proliferation in vitro. Macromolecular Symposia. 2007;253(1):65-70.
[23] EOS materials data sheet: http://eos.materialdatacenter.com/eo/en
[24] S.T. Ho and D.W. Hutmacher, A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in
the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006; 27(8): 1362-1376.
[25] Berretta S, Ghita O, Evans KE. Morphology of polymeric powders in Laser Sintering
(LS): From Polyamide to new PEEK powders. European Polymer Journal. 2014;59(0):218-29.
[26] Beard MA, Ghita OR, Bradbury J, Flint S, Evans KE. Material characterisation of
additive manufacturing components made from a polyetherketone (PEK) high temperature
thermoplastic polymer. 5th
International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and
Rapid Prototyping. Leiria (Portugal): Innovative Developments in Virtual and Physical
Prototyping, 2011;329-32.
[27] Ghita O, James E, Davies R, Berretta S, Singh B, Flint S, Evans E., High Temperature
Laser Sintering (HT-LS): An investigation into mechanical properties and shrinkage
characteristics of Poly (Ether Ketone) (PEK) structures. Materials & Design. 2014;61(0):124-
32.
[28] Gibson I, Shi D. Material properties and fabrication parameters in selective laser
sintering process. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 1997;3(4):129-36.
[29] Victrex materials datasheet: http://www.victrex.com/en/victrex-peek
[30 ] Kang. S, Cook. R, Gailus. D, Testing the thermal resistance and power capacity of
producetion heat pipe, Proceedings of IPACK2005 ASME. 2005; 635-640.
18
[31]Smalc. M, Shives. G, Chen. G, Guggari. S, Norley. J and Reynolds. R. A, Thermal
Performance of Natural Graphite Heat Spreaders, Proceedings of IPACK2005 ASME. 2005:
79-89.
[32] Ho HCH, Cheung WL, Gibson I. Effects of graphite powder on the laser sintering
behaviour of polycarbonate. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2002;8(4):233-42.
[33] Yasmin A, Daniel IM. Mechanical and thermal properties of graphite platelet/epoxy
composites. Polymer. 2004;45(24):8211-9.
[34] Agag T, Koga T, Takeichi T. Studies on thermal and mechanical properties of
polyimide–clay nanocomposites. Polymer. 2001;42(8):3399-408.
[35] Karevan M, Eshraghi S, Gerhardt R, Das S, Kalaitzidou K. Effect of processing method
on the properties of multifunctional exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets/polyamide 12
composites. Carbon. 2013;64(0):122-31.
[36] Rouholamin D, Hopkinson N. An investigation on the suitability of micro-computed
tomography as a non-destructive technique to assess the morphology of laser sintered nylon
12 parts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of
Engineering Manufacture. 2014;228(12):1529-42.
[37] Hopkinson N, Majewski CE, Zarringhalam H. Quantifying the degree of particle melt in
Selective Laser Sintering®. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 2009;58(1):197-200.
[38] H. Zarringhalam and N. Hopkinson, Post-processing of DuraformTM
parts for rapid
manufacture, 14th
solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium. University of Texas(Austin):
Proceedings of the 14th solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium, 2003; p596-606.
[39] Díez-Pascual AM, Naffakh M, Marco C, Ellis G, Gómez-Fatou MA. High-performance
nanocomposites based on polyetherketones. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57(7):1106-
90.
[40] Russo P, Acierno D, Rosa R, Leonelli C, Corradi A, Rizzuti A. Mechanical and
dynamic-mechanical behavior and morphology of polystyrene/perovskite composites: Effects
of filler size. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2014;243(0):65-70.
[41] d’Almeida JRM, Monteiro SN, Menezes GW, Rodriguez RJS. Diamond-Epoxy
Composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2007;26(3):321-30.
[42] Manikandan Nair KC, Thomas S, Groeninckx G. Thermal and dynamic mechanical
analysis of polystyrene composites reinforced with short sisal fibres. Composites Science and
Technology. 2001;61(16):2519-29.
19
Figure 1: Build positions of PEEK/GP composite samples. Dog bone and rectangular samples
are manufactured for tensile testing and DMA tests respectively. The two samples located in
the middle of the build were manufactured for demonstration purposes. They were designed
for an aerospace application.
Figure 2: Schematic image showing a typical laser sintered tensile test specimen and the
location of a micro-CT sample cut from it.
20
(a)
21
(b)
Figure 3: (a) FTIR spectra and absorbance of PEEK and PEEK/GP composite with 1%, 5%
and 7.5wt% loadings and pure graphite platelets at 943cm-1
wavenumbers. (b) Particle size
distribution of PEK HP3, PEEK 150PF and graphite powders.
22
Figure 4: SEM image of (a) PEK powder, (b) PEEK powder, (c) graphite platelets, (d) high
magnification image of graphite platelets and (e) (f) (g) the surface of PEEK powder coated
with graphite platelets in the dry mixed powder with 1wt%, 5wt% and 7.5wt %GP. High
magnification images of PEK and PEEK powder are displayed in the upper right corner of (a)
and (b). The PEEK particles (b) have elongated shapes and their surfaces are rougher
compared with the commercial PEK grade (a). (c) and (d) show the shape of the graphite
flakes. The increased surface roughness leads to increased friction amongst particles which
reduces the flowability. The PEEK particles are predominantly coated by the small graphite
platelets with sizes of less than 30µm (e)-(g). These graphite platelets could effectively
improve the laser absorption and help transfer the heat to the PEEK particles.
23
Figure 5: The fracture surface image of laser sintered materials (a) pure PEEK, (b)
PEEK/1%GP composite, (c) PEEK/5%GP composite and (d) PEEK/7.5%GP composite. (a)
shows the layered microstructure induced by the manufacturing process. The presence of
graphite improves the fusion between layers and leads to a more homogeneous structure, as
seen in (b), (c) and (d).
24
Figure 6: Fracture surface SEM image of PEEK/graphite composites (a), (b) and (c) showing
the orientation of graphite platelets within the laser sintered composites at different
magnifications. The images reveal the presence of some graphite platelets partially pulled out
of the matrix with an out-of-plane orientation.
25
(a)
(b) (c)
(d) (e)
Figure 7: (a) Micro-CT 3D image of a PEEK/7.5% GP sample, (b) 2D image in z direction of
PEEK sample (c) 2D image in z direction of a PEEK/1% GP sample, (d) 2D image in z
direction of a PEEK/5% GP sample, (e) 2D image in z direction of a PEEK/7.5% GP sample.
Pore
Graphite
Pore
Graphite
Pore
Graphite
26
(a)
(b)
Figure 8: Micro-CT 3D and 2D images from different directions for PEEK structures with (a)
5% graphite, (b) 7.5% graphite loadings
27
(a)
(b)
Figure 9: (a) Strain-Stress curve of PEEK and PEEK composites and (b) % increase in tensile
strength for composites (with varying percentages of graphite platelets.)
28
Figure 10: Thermal mechanical behaviour of PEEK and PEEK/GP composites
29