poster - tectonic evolution taiwan 2010

Upload: laura-johnson

Post on 04-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    1/16

    Workshop on

    Tectonic

    Evolutionof Taiwan

    .

    Sciences

    Sinica

    Conveners: Bor-ming Jahn & Tzen-Fu Yui

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Time: Friday, March 26, 2010

    9:00 - 17:00

    Venue: Institute of Earth

    Academia

    Agenda:

    1. Review of existing models2. Geophysical constraints3. Petrological, geochemical

    and age constraints4. New results from marine

    and land studies5. Perspectives6. Cooperation opportunities7. Summary

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    2/16

    Program and Abstracts

    Workshop on

    Tectonic Evolution of Taiwan

    26 March, 2010

    Institute of Earth Sciences

    Academia Sinica

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    3/16

    09:00-09:15 Registration

    09:15-09:30 Welcome

    09:30-10:00 Louis S. Teng - Deformation and Exhumation of the Taiwan Orogenic Wedge:

    10:00-10:30 John Suppe - Deep and Shallow Structure of the Taiwan Arc-Continent Collisi10:30-11:00 Char-Shine Liu - Seismic Imaging of the Tectonic Features Offshore Taiwan: A

    11:00-11:30 Coffee Break

    11:30-12:00 Cheng-Horng Lin - Continental Subduction and Active Crustal Exhumation in

    12:00-12:30 Francis T. Wu - Recent Results of Geophysical Imaging of Taiwan and Implica

    12:30-14:00 Lunch

    14:00-14:30 Chia-Yu Lu - The Paradox of an Ocean-dipping Benioff Zone - Example from

    14:30-15:00 J. Bruce H. Shyu - A Tale of Two Sutures: An Alternative Point of View on the

    15:00-15:30 Borming Jahn - The Crustal Development of Taiwan in the Late-Paleozoic to

    the Tectonic Evolution of Taiwan

    15:30-16:00 Coffee Break

    16:00-17:00 Discussion

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    4/16

    The Crustal Development of Taiwan in the Late-Paleozoic to Early Cenozoic:

    Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of Taiwan

    Bor-ming Jahn

    Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

    The purpose of this communication is to address the problem of crustal and

    tectonic evolution of Taiwan, particularly the earliest crustal development of Taiwan

    in the Permo-Triassic time.

    The oldest rocks of Taiwan occur in the Tananao Metamorphic Complex, and

    are composed of a thick marble sequence and associated metasedimentary rocks

    including greenschist, blackschist, metachert, and metasandstone. The still older

    basement rocks underlying the oldest rocks are not exposed but they could be

    hypothesized to have Proterozoic ages as inferred from the geology of SE China. It is

    important to agree for further discussion that the crustal development of Taiwan began

    with the deposition of the oldest rocks occurring in the Tananao Complex.

    The time of the oldest geologic event of Taiwan has been established by Sr-Pb

    isotopic dating of carbonate rocks from (1) Tailuko of the Tananao Complex in

    eastern Taiwan, and (2) Chia-Li Well No. 1 of Peikang High in western Taiwan. Sr

    isotope analyses of marbles from both localities yielded a nearly identical range of87

    Sr/

    86

    Sr ratios (0.7069 to 0.7078), and the lower limit of the ratios (0.7069) was takento determine an age of about 250 Ma for the time of carbonate deposition (Jahn et al.,

    1984, 1992). In fact, the Sr isotope age data is consistent with the inferred late

    Permian age by Yen et al. (1951) based on the fusulinid fauna of the Cathaysina

    affinity. This period coincided with the most spectacular mass extinction and volcanic

    eruption (Siberian Trap and Emeishan Basalt LIPs)

    On the other hand, Pb isotope analyses on the Chia-Li marbles gave a Pb-Pb

    isochron age of 242 22 (2) Ma, with 1 = 8.33 (Jahn et al., 1992); and on the

    Tailuko marbles an age of 193 15 Ma (2) Ma with 1 = 8.29, updaded with

    additional data from the earlier published age data of 166 33 Ma (Jahn, 1988). The

    Pb-Pb isochron ages of recrystallized carbonates constrain the times of the early

    Mesozoic thermal (metamorphic) events at 240 and 190 Ma. In fact, the 190 Ma event

    has been identified by a zircon dating of a granite stock occurring in the southern part

    of the Tailuko Belt of the Tananao Complex (Yui et al., 2009).

    The Chia-Li marbles from western Taiwan and the Tailuko marbles from eastern

    Taiwan share the same geochemical and Sr-Pb-C-O isotopic characteristics.

    Consequently, it is reasonable to suggest that the two carbonate sequences were

    formed coevally in late Permian, in the same depositional environment, and

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    5/16

    underwent similar processes of C-O re-equilibrium and U-Th fractionation. This, in

    turn, suggests a widespread carbonate deposition in a vast epeiric platform, and in a

    warm climatic condition. It is well documented that the lithofacies of late Permian to

    early Triassic (Changxing Stage) in SE China is dominated by carbonate rocks (Wang,

    1985, 1986). Consequently, it is highly probable that the carbonate deposits of Taiwan

    were a part of the vast expanse of the Permo-Triassic carbonate formations in SE

    China.

    The oldest rocks of Taiwan were intruded by Cretaceous granitoid plutons at

    about 90 Ma. The granitoids were emplaced in the same period as the numerous

    granitic plutons occurring in the coastal areas of SE China. Besides, in terms of

    chemical and Sr-Nd isotopic compositions, the granitic rocks (granitic gneisses

    included) of Taiwan are indistinguishable from that of the coastal areas of Fujian and

    Guangdong. Such similarity in age and composition is not expected for the granitoid

    suites separated by 350 km (perpendicular to the subduction axis) if they were

    generated in the same subduction system.

    The occurrences of late Permian carbonates and Cretaceous granitoids in Taiwan

    could be best interpreted in a tectonic framework in which the proto-Taiwan was

    initially formed as the southern extension of the South China Craton. The Tailuko Belt

    could be correlated with the Gunanhai Melange, as suggested by Hs et al. (1990), in

    coastal Fujian, where metamorphosed oceanic crust (= amphibolite, greenschists) and

    pelagic sediments (= black schists) also occur. A crustal segment (proto-Taiwan),composed of a carbonate sequence, mlange deposits and granitic intrusions, was then

    translated northeastward to the present position by a sinistral strike-slip fault. The

    process must have taken place after the emplacement of the Cretaceous granites, and

    more likely after the generation of andesitic rocks in Huayu (Penghu Islands) in early

    Cenozoic or Paleocene (65 60 Ma; Chen et al., 2007).

    The tectonic scenario has been supported by two recent works. First, based on the

    extensive measurement of monazite Th-Pb ages (ca. 5000; by EPMA) for Tertiary and

    Quaternary sandstones in Taiwan and Recent sands from six drainage basins in eastern

    China and South Korea, Yokoyama et al. (2007) concluded that the sediments of the

    Hsueshan Range (Eocene) were derived from the drainage basin of Zhujiang

    (Guangdong). Second, the zircon dating (by LA-ICP-MS) of andesites from Huayu

    yielded a magmatic event at 65-60 Ma. Chen et al. (2007) interpreted these rocks as

    the surface exposure of a magmatic belt reflected by the high magnetic anomalies.

    These ages support the idea that this magmatic belt was a continuation of the SCMB

    (Southeast Coast Magmatic Belt) in origin, but offset or split apart by a left-lateral

    fault.

    The proposed tectonic evolution of Mesozoic Taiwan (Jahn et al., 1992; this work)

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    6/16

    could be better appreciated if it is to be compared with that of the Japanese Islands

    (Maruyama et al., 1977; Sengor and Natalin, 1996). The late Paleozoic to Mesozoic

    accretionary complexes of Japan are composed, in significant proportion, of recycled

    ancient (Proterozoic) continental crust, probably of the Yantse craton. The bulk

    composition of Japan, as inferred from Sr-Nd isotopic data, is quite similar to that of

    Taiwan and of the crustal segments in SE China, but is vastly different from that of

    the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (= the Altaids) or the Arabian-Nubian Shield.

    In conclusion, the crustal history of Taiwan began in the late Permian. The

    proto-Taiwan was initially formed as the southern extension of SE China. It

    underwent at least two periods of thermal events at ca. 190 Ma and ca. 90 Ma.

    Metamorphic recrystallization and associated crustal deformation would have

    occurred prior to the large-scale strike-slip faulting. In this scenario, the

    metamorphism and deformation of the Tananao Complex was unrelated to the late

    Cenozoic arc-continent collision as incorrectly envisaged by many existing tectonic

    models. However, the collision event is expected to accentuate the deformation and

    uplift of the Central Range.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    7/16

    Continental Subduction and Active Crustal Exhumation in Central Taiwan

    Cheng-Horng Lin

    Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

    Abstract

    The island of Taiwan is located at one part of the convergence zones between the

    Eurasian Plate (EUP) and the Philippine Sea Plate (PSP). To the northeast of Taiwan,

    the PSP subducts beneath the EUP while the EUP underthrusts the PSP to the south.

    However, the strong convergence behavior between the two plates in central Taiwan

    has long remained unclear due to the absence of reliable deep structures image in the

    past. Recently, several different seismic observations show that the EUP has beensubducted beneath Central Taiwan (Chen et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2006; Lin, 2009).

    Although there is no earthquake to show the Wadati-Benioff zone in the Central

    Taiwan between the Latitudes of 23oN and 24

    oN, the eastward subduction of velocity

    anomalies has been consistently imaged from seismological data. Such a result

    provides an important evidence to examine all of the proposed models in the past.

    Among them, the tectonic model of Continental Subduction and Active Crustal

    Exhumation proposed by Lin et al., (1998) and Lin (2002) might be one of the

    suitable models to explain the tectonic mechanism for Taiwan Orogeny.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    8/16

    Seismic Imaging of the Tectonic Features Offshore Taiwan: An Overview

    Char-Shine Liu

    Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Situated at the juncture of two flipped subduction systems, morpho-structural

    features observed on land and offshore Taiwan shed lights on the tectonic processes of

    an arc-continent collision (the Luzon subduction system) off southern Taiwan and the

    Ryukyu subduction-collision system off eastern Taiwan. Multichannel seismic

    reflection profiles have revealed structural and sedimentary characters of the upper

    crust in the past two decades, deep seismic reflection profiles collected during the

    1995 TAICRUST and 2009 TAIGER surveys help to image the structures of the deep

    crust. This paper presents an overview of the morpho-tectonic features offshore

    southern and eastern Taiwan as imaged by seismic reflection profiles.

    The area offshore southern Taiwan is the place where the Luzon subduction

    complex transforms into an incipient arc-continent collision complex near Taiwan.

    Morphologically, the subduction complex shows a classic trench (Manila Trench) -

    accretionary wedge (Hengchun Ridge) - forearc basin (North Luzon Trough) -

    volcanic arc (Luzon Arc) system north of the Luzon Island. The accretionary wedge

    expanded toward north, the forearc basin was closed north of 21.5oN offshore SE

    Taiwan while the frontal portion of the accretionary wedge encroached on the passive

    China continental margin off SW Taiwan. A prominent out-of-sequence thrust was

    developed that divides the accretionary wedge into an upper slope domain and a lower

    slope domain. The closure of the forearc basin near Taiwan has been attributed to the

    development of a back thrust system along the rare side of the accretionary wedge.

    However, strike-slip faulting and block rotation due to oblique arc-continent collision

    also played significant roles in creating the present morphology off SE Taiwan. At the

    frontal portion of the accretionary wedge, folds and thrusts are the prominent

    structural features in the lower slope domain. The distances between the

    fault-bend-folds increase north of 21.5oN, the sediment thickness also increases

    northward, from about 1000 m thick at 20.5oN to about 4000 m thick at 21.5

    oN. The

    upper slope domain consists of highly deformed accretionary wedge material that was

    uplifted probably due to under-plating processes. The deep seismic images from the

    TAIGER survey have shown that there are some west-dipping deep reflections,

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    9/16

    interpreted as Moho reflections, lie underneath the thick accretionary wedge material

    offshore SW Taiwan, suggesting thickening of the crust toward China continental

    margin.

    The Ryukyu forearc region offshore eastern Taiwan is the area where the Ryukyusubduction zone terminates against the Taiwan island. Extremely active seismicity

    with frequently occurred large earthquakes (M > 6.5) makes this area a potential

    earthquake hazard zone. Morphotectonic features of this trench-accretionary

    wedge-forearc region have been studied quite extensively, but deep structures of the

    seismogenic zone are still unclear. Based on the different structural styles, the

    southernmost section of the Ryukyu arc-trench system can be divided into three zones.

    The first zone lies to the east of 123oE. It presents structures of a typical oblique

    subduction zone with frontal accretion of trench sediments, imbricated thrusts and

    folds in the accretionary wedge (the Yaeyama Ridge), and slightly folded forearc

    basin strata. A prominent right-lateral strike-slip fault has developed at the rear of the

    accretionary wedge which accounts for, at least particially, the lateral component of

    the oblique plate convergence. The second zone lies between 123oE and 122o10E.

    The active frontal accretion may have ceased, and strong shearing is observed in the

    accretionary wedge. The forearc basin here (the Nanao Basin) undergoes

    trench-parallel tension, as demonstrated by series of normal faults that cut through

    very thick (up to 4 s twt) basin strata. Between zone 1 and zone 2 at 123oE, a

    subducted asperity, the Gagua Ridge, has uplifted the basement of the forearc basin,

    and created a prominent reentrant at the frontal portion of the accretionary wedge. The

    third zone lies to the west of 122o10E where the Ryukyu subduction system is

    terminated by the Luzon volcanic arc and the Taiwan mountain belt. Series of NW-SE

    trending shear faults cut through the thrusted and folded ridges in the accretionary

    wedge. A NW-SE trending forearc basin (the Hoping Basin) lies between the

    accretionary wedge and the Ryukyu arc. Seismic reflection profiles show that

    underneath the young Hoping Basin strata, there is a thick (up to 3 s twt) old

    sedimentary layer (the Suao basin strata) lies above the Ryukyu arc basement. ThisSuao basin strata are tilted but otherwise little deformed in the northern Hoping Basin,

    however, in the southern Hoping Basin, they are highly folded and probably thrusted

    in a SW direction. The Hoping Basin strata display mainly submarine depositional

    and erosional structures, such as channel cut and fill and slumping deposits. The

    structures in the studied forearc region are mainly controlled by the high obliquity of

    convergence between the Philippine Sea and Eurasia plates, and by the collision of the

    Luzon arc with the Eurasia continental margin that terminates the Ryukyu subduction

    system to the west. Furthermore, the subduction of asperities and active submarinesedimentary processes have also played important roles in shaping the structures of

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    10/16

    the accretionary wedge and forearc basins here.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    11/16

    The Paradox of an Ocean-dipping Benioff Zone - Example from Taiwan

    Chia-Yu Lu

    Institute of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    In Taiwan, the Paleozoic/ Mesozoic basement is regarded as a rifted continental

    margin by back-arc spreading from the southeastern coast of the China mainland. The

    Backbone Range Slate Belt is interpreted as a part of the Miocene accretionary wedge.

    The Lishan Fault is referred to as the suture between the Philippine Sea plate and the

    Eurasia. Following the concept of tectonic facies in an archipelago model of intraplate

    orogenesis, a back-arc basin collapse orogenesis model is proposed to interpret the

    ocean-dipping Benioff zone of Taiwan. The back-arc basin collapse orogenesis model

    explains the mechanism, which transforms continental-dipping into oceanic-dipping

    Benioff zone as well as oceanic subduction into continental subduction.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    12/16

    A Tale of Two Sutures: An Alternative Point of View on the Tectonic Evolution of

    Taiwan

    J. Bruce H. Shyu

    Institute of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Taiwans numerous active faults and folds demarcate distinct eastern and western

    neotectonic belts. The western belt results from the attachment and subsequent

    detachment of a sliver of continental lithosphere to the Eurasian continental margin.

    The eastern belt is the product of the same continental sliver docking with and then

    separating from the Luzon volcanic arc. Thus, the active Taiwan orogen can be

    viewed as a tandem suturing and tandem disengagement of a volcanic arc and a

    continental sliver to and from the Eurasian continental margin. This progressive

    suturing and separation is a superb, living demonstration of the fundamental weakness

    of lithospheric sutures.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    13/16

    Deep and Shallow Structure of the Taiwan Arc-Continent Collision

    John Suppe1, Yih-Min Wu

    1, Sara Carena

    2and Kamil Ustaszewski

    3

    1Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University. Taipei, Taiwan

    2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt,

    Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Mnchen, Germany3Lithospheric Dynamics 3.1, GFZ Helmholtz Zentrum, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany

    The on-going oblique arc-continent collision in Taiwan between the Luzon arc and

    the Eurasian continental margin provides a classic spatial view of the temporal

    evolution of the collision. In addition Taiwan is a well-known site of critical-taper

    wedge mechanics and erosional forcing of deformation, leading to a mountain belt

    that is approximately in topographic steady state, with erosion balancing the

    compressive flux. This classic picture, based largely on surface and upper-crustal data,

    is now being illuminated at lower crustal and upper mantle levels with high-resolution

    local seismic tomography and earthquake locations. These new data document in 3D

    that the deep structure is remarkably independent of the shallow thinned-skinned

    mountain belt. Here we show that the lower crust and upper mantle of the Eurasian

    plate undergoes a transition from normal subduction and accretionary-wedge tectonics

    south of Taiwan to a strongly localized progressively bent geometry with a vertical to

    overturned plate interface. The lower crust and Moho of the Eurasian plate is verticalto overturned to depths of 70-80 km under central and northern Taiwan. In this region

    the deep plate shortening is accomplished by folding of both the Eurasian and

    Philippine-Sea lower lithospheres without a classic active subduction zone, whereas

    the crust of both plates above the main detachment is mechanically and kinematically

    separated from this deep shortening.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    14/16

    Deformation and Exhumation of the Taiwan Orogenic Wedge:

    A View from the East

    Louis S. Teng1

    and En-Chao Yeh2

    1Institute of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan2Department of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

    The eastern Taiwan orogenic wedge comprises the Tananao Metamorphic

    Complex (TMC) and overlying slate formations that represent the deepest-buried rock

    suites ever exhumed during the late Cenozoic collisional orogeny. These rocks exhibit

    a whole gamut of petrological and structural features that help unraveling the

    deformation and exhumation history of the Taiwan mountain belt.

    Before the collision took place in late Miocene, TMC was part of the

    pre-Cenozoic basement of the outer China continental margin and the slate formations

    were the sedimentary cover. During the collision, these rocks were first pulled into the

    deep subduction zone, underplated into the orogenic wedge, stacked up by continued

    underplating, and then exhumed and exposed by erosion. Compilation of petrological

    data of TMC shows a clockwise P-T path with a maximum metamorphism of low- to

    medium-greenschist facies. Field mapping and shear sense analyses indicate that

    TMC and overlying slate formations have undergone an early-stage west-vergent,

    left-lateral transpressional deformation followed by a late-stage east-vergentbackfolding and thrusting with minor normal faulting. Coupled with available

    geochronological data, the metamorphic history of the eastern Taiwan orogenic wedge

    can be interpreted to reflect an early-stage wedge thickening and heating followed by

    rapid uplift and exhumation around 3 Ma.

    The orogenic history interpreted above can be further substantiated by the

    sedimentary records of the northern Coastal Range where a complete Luzon forearc

    basin sequence is exposed. The dominance of arc-derived andesitic fragments in the

    Miocene lower forearc sequence shows that the thickening orogenic wedge had

    remained submerged and was not uplifted as a hilly terrane until 5 Ma. Afterwards the

    wedge rapidly grew to a high mountain chain that supplied an increasing amount of

    sediment to the forearc basin, as shown by the coarse-grained orogenic detritus in the

    Plio-Pleistocene upper forearc sequence. The successive appearances of slate and

    schist fragments in the forearc sequence indicate that the slate formations and TMC

    were consecutively exhumed to the surface at 3 and 0.4 Ma.

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    15/16

    Recent Results of Geophysical Imaging of Taiwan and Implications

    Francis T. Wu1, Kuo-Chen, Hao

    1and Taiwan TAIGER teams

    1SUNY Binghamton, US

    Based on recently derived subsurface structures we can distinguish clearly the

    collision/subduction characteristics between northern (north of ~23.7ON), central

    (between ~23ON and ~23.7

    ON) and southern (south of ~23

    ON). In central Taiwan full

    collision is taking place, with distinctive lower crust and upper mantle structures

    suggesting arrested subduction. Northern Taiwan is subjected to collision of a

    subducting indenter, with diminishing collision toward the north as subduction

    deepens. In the south, active subduction is taking place. Do all these subsurface

    processes have corresponding identifiable surface structures? Certainly the northern

    Taiwan bight (bend) has long been associated with the geometry of the subduction

    zone. Simple elastic models indicate that the recent deformation of northern Taiwan

    agree with that of subducting indenter. However, one of the most puzzling features is

    the boundary around 23ON, between the well-defined subduction and the collision

    zone; although the subsurface feature is clear, in terms of deep seismicity, the overall

    plate tectonic environment, GPS measurements etc., a geological boundary has not

    been identified.

    One of the properties that the Taiwan orogen clearly shares with mountain rangesof the world is the pattern of S-wave splitting. As is true with South Island, New

    Zealand, Tibet, Tienshan etc., the fast direction of the S waves are parallel to the

    structural trend the delay times between the fast and slow S-waves are around 2

    seconds. The source of these splits is usually ascribed to be anisotropy owing to the

    lattice-preferred-orientation of minerals. LPO can occur as a result of shearing or of

    flow. Although, the metamorphic rocks in the eastern Central Range is highly foliated

    and isotropic the measured crustal delay time has a maximum of about 0.3 seconds.,

    so the source for S-splitting must reside in the upper mantle, down to 200-300

    kilometers. No precise way is currently available to invert the S-splitting

    measurements for 3-D anisotropy. We do have limited information in Taiwan of how

    extensive the anisotropic zone is perpendicular to strike by using scant broadband

    OBS data to the east and using pattern of S-split delays across Taiwan for data from

    the eastern and western back-azimuths, it is mainly limited to Taiwan.

    Intriguing magnetotelluric profiles across Taiwan obtained recently show a feature

    that could perhaps be explored in terms of dehydration in metamorphism, strength of

    foliated rocks etc. Both profiles in Central Taiwan (~24ON) and southern Taiwan

    (Southern Cross-Island highway) show a remarkable (vertical) high resistivity zone

  • 7/29/2019 Poster - Tectonic Evolution Taiwan 2010

    16/16

    (>500 -m). It is bordered by a low resistivity zone to the west, generally under the

    Lishan fault. The Eastern Central Range is undergoing the most rapid uplift (Ching et

    al., 2010, personal communication; Hu et al., 2010, personal communication). The

    expectation is that water would be needed to facilitate deformation. But high

    resistivity implies that, 1) water may be present in significant quantity but they are not

    connected, then the effective pressure effect would not operate, or 2) the water has

    been expelled during metamorphism (Ferry, 1994) and the foliated rocks are weak.

    Understanding the metamorphism, deformation and erosion in the Central Range will

    advance the knowledge of Taiwan orogeny.

    Orogeny involves complex processes. Taiwan orogen, being compact and variable,

    remains to be one of the best locations for further data acquisition, modeling and

    testing for the basic processes of mountain building.