poster 1 presented at qcor baltimore 2014 mlobo

1
0,3 0,1 7,7 1,1 0,2 0,1 6,8 0,9 0 2 4 6 8 0,5 0,4 7,2 1,4 7,2 1,7 8 6 4 2 0 SOURCES: * Area Health Resources Files (AHRF). 2012-2013. HCUP, PT Medical Association, Government reports, ** NHANES 2006-08 and AMÁLIA study 2006/07, Age-standardized rates, Overweight prevalence based on BMI ^ OECD + CDC Wonder and Eurostat, Age-sex-standardized deaths rates † Year of approval in the US Sources: FDA, personal communication with BBraun PT, SPC-interventional cardiology group *PT dates refer to first use dates in Santa Cruz Hospital ** Not aproved in the US, March 31st 2014 was used to produce the difference † Year of approval in the US Sources: FDA/approval dates and INFARMED/commercialization dates **Not available/commercialized in one of the countries, March 31st 2014 was used to produce the difference Healthcare Systems Comparison Between the United States and Portugal | Epidemiology and Management of Coronary Heart Disease Lobo MF Azzone V Melica B Freitas A Rocha-Gonçalves F Soares AJ Normand SLT Teixeira-Pinto A Pereira-Miguel J Costa-Pereira A What is Known Findings // The United States (US) and Portugal (PT) have health care systems with different characteristics // Different health systems have different abilities to adopt new technologies // Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains one of the leading causes of death with significant economic costs // Comprehensive literature review based on data from governmental agencies, international organizations, professional associations and scientific journals // Personal communication with the medical device industry representatives // Health technologies access lag defined by the difference of approval/commercialization/first use dates (US – PT) // Direct standardization of mortality and self-reported risk factors rates to the PT 2006 population To expose the main similarities and differences between the health care systems of the US and PT in the context of CHD management Aim Disclosures: Nothing to disclose. Funded by FCT, QREN, COMPETE (HMSP-ICT/0013/2011) Methods Country United States Portugal Year Population Total (million) 65 years (% of population) Uninsured (% of population) Total hospital beds (1,000 population) Beds in public hospitals (1,000 population) Health Status Life expectancy at birth (years) All-cause Deaths per 100,000* 2000 281.4 12.4 13.1 3.5 0.9 76.7 1,486 2010 308.7 13.1 16.3 3.1 0.8 78.71 1,329.9 2000 10.3 16.2 0 3.7 2.9 76.71 1,153.7 2010 10.6 18.4 0 Total expenditure (% of GDP) 13.7 17.7 9.3 10.8 Government share (% of total expenditure) 43.0 47.6 66.6 65.9 Out-of-Pocket (% of total expenditure) 14.9 11.7 24.3 25.8 3.4 2.5 79.8 916 Health Coverage Health Costs Hospital Capacity Sources: OECD, CDC, US Bureau Statistics, Statistics Portugal, Eurostat *All years, Age-sex standardize death rates Technologies Approval Mechanisms MEDICAL DEVICES: // Centralized medical device approval system in the US (federal level, FDA), but decentralized in PT (EU – European Union level) // The EU approval system is faster than the US without more recalls DRUGS: // Centralized drug approval system in the US, may vary in PT // Approval and commercialization dates may differ in PT, whereas, in the US, they are coincidental // Access and use of health technologies differ greatly between the two health care systems for CHD care // The approval and commercialization process of drugs may delay their availability to PT patients // Access lag favors the US and use patterns are larger in US // Compared to the US, lower deaths due to AMI or CHD in PT What this Study Adds Cardiothoracic surgeon Cardiologist Hospital with PCI Hos pital with Cardiac Surgery Overweight/Obesity Hypercholesterolemia Hypertension Daily Smoking Diabetes Inpatient cases (per 100,000 population) ^ CABG PTCA Deaths (per 100,000 population) + Aged 20 years or more AMI or Recurrent AMI CHD Drug-Eluting Stent US rst year year PT rst Medical Device/Procedure 1980 1990 1993 1993 2000 2003 2014 Drug-Eluting Balloon Catheter** Rotablator* Coronary Brachytherapy* Bare-Metal Stent* Directional Atherectomy* PTCA Balloon Catheter Dierence (in months) Health Technologies Access Lag US rst PT rst Active Substance -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 Nicorandil** Apixaban** Ticagrelor Rivaroxaban Dabigatran etexilate Prasugrel** Ranolazine** Bivalirudin GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - Epti batide GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - Tiro ban Clopidogrel GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - Abciximab Ticlopidine Dierence (in months) www.cuteheart.com [email protected] 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2009 2000 2009 2000 2010 2000 2010 193,3 79,0 195,7 111,0 250 200 150 100 50 0 118,1 39,7 45,5 22,9 0 50 100 150 200 250 183,9 59,2 305,0 114,5 400 300 200 100 0 81,9 54,6 125,2 88,6 0 100 200 300 400 12,7 19,1 44,1 42,4 71,5 80 60 40 20 0 8,9 16,3 23,5 19,7 51,6 80 60 40 20 0 1991 1993 1997 1998 1998 2000 2006 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2014 -200 -100 -50 50 -150 0 100 150 200

Upload: lbnicolau

Post on 13-Apr-2017

22 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

0,3

0,1

7,7

1,1

0,2

0,1

6,8

0,9

0 2 4 6 8

0,5

0,4

7,2

1,47,2

1,7

8 6 4 2 0

SOURCES: * Area Health Resources Files (AHRF). 2012-2013. HCUP, PT Medical Association, Government reports, ** NHANES 2006-08 and AMÁLIA study 2006/07, Age-standardized rates, Overweight prevalence based on BMI^ OECD+ CDC Wonder and Eurostat, Age-sex-standardized deaths rates

† Year of approval in the USSources: FDA, personal communication with BBraun PT, SPC-interventional cardiology group*PT dates refer to first use dates in Santa Cruz Hospital** Not aproved in the US, March 31st 2014 was used to produce the difference

† Year of approval in the USSources: FDA/approval dates and INFARMED/commercialization dates **Not available/commercialized in one of the countries, March 31st 2014 was used to produce the difference

Healthcare Systems Comparison Between the United States and Portugal | Epidemiology and Management of Coronary Heart DiseaseLobo MF • Azzone V • Melica B • Freitas A • Rocha-Gonçalves F • Soares AJ • Normand SLT • Teixeira-Pinto A • Pereira-Miguel J • Costa-Pereira A

What is Known Findings

// The United States (US) and Portugal (PT) have health care systems with different characteristics

// Different health systems have different abilities to adopt new technologies

// Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains one of the leading causes of death with significant economic costs

// Comprehensive literature review based on data from governmental agencies, international organizations, professional associations and scientific journals// Personal communication with the medical device industry representatives// Health technologies access lag defined by the difference of approval/commercialization/first use dates (US – PT)// Direct standardization of mortality and self-reported risk factors rates to the PT 2006 population

To expose the main similarities and differences between the health care systems of the US and PT

in the context of CHD management

Aim

Disclosures: Nothing to disclose. Funded by FCT, QREN, COMPETE (HMSP-ICT/0013/2011)

Methods

Country United States Portugal

Year

Population

Total (million)

≥ 65 years (% of population)

Uninsured (% of population)

Total hospital beds (1,000 population)

Beds in public hospitals (1,000 population)

Health Status

Life expectancy at birth (years)

All-cause Deaths per 100,000*

2000

281.4

12.4

13.1

3.5

0.9

76.7

1,486

2010

308.7

13.1

16.3

3.1

0.8

78.71

1,329.9

2000

10.3

16.2

0

3.7

2.9

76.71

1,153.7

2010

10.6

18.4

0

Total expenditure (% of GDP) 13.7 17.7 9.3 10.8

Government share (% of total expenditure) 43.0 47.6 66.6 65.9

Out-of-Pocket (% of total expenditure) 14.9 11.7 24.3 25.8

3.4

2.5

79.8

916

Health Coverage

Health Costs

Hospital Capacity

Sources: OECD, CDC, US Bureau Statistics, Statistics Portugal, Eurostat*All years, Age-sex standardize death rates

Technologies Approval Mechanisms

MEDICAL DEVICES:// Centralized medical device approval system in the US (federal level, FDA), but decentralized in PT (EU – European Union level)// The EU approval system is faster than the US without more recalls

DRUGS:// Centralized drug approval system in the US, may vary in PT// Approval and commercialization dates may differ in PT, whereas, in the US, they are coincidental

// Access and use of health technologies differ greatly between the two health care systems for CHD care// The approval and commercialization process of drugs may delay their availability to PT patients// Access lag favors the US and use patterns are larger in US// Compared to the US, lower deaths due to AMI or CHD in PT

What this Study Adds

Cardiothoracic surgeon

Cardiologist

Hospital with PCI

Hospital with Cardiac Surgery

Overweight/Obesity

Hypercholesterolemia

Hypertension

Daily Smoking

Diabetes

Inpatient cases(per 100,000 population)^

CABG

PTCA

Deaths (per 100,000 population)+

Aged 20 years or moreAMI or

Recurrent AMI

CHD

Drug-Eluting Stent

US first year†

year†

PT firstMedical Device/Procedure

1980

1990

1993

1993

2000

2003

2014Drug-Eluting Balloon Catheter**

Rotablator*

Coronary Brachytherapy*

Bare-Metal Stent*

Directional Atherectomy*

PTCA Balloon Catheter

Difference (in months)

Health Technologies Access Lag

US first PT firstActive Substance

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200

Nicorandil**Apixaban**

TicagrelorRivaroxaban

Dabigatran etexilatePrasugrel**

Ranolazine**Bivalirudin

GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - EptifibatideGP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - Tirofiban

ClopidogrelGP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - Abciximab

Ticlopidine

Difference (in months)

www.cuteheart.com

[email protected]

20002010

20002010

20002009

20002009

20002010

20002010

193,3

79,0195,7

111,0

250 200 150 100 50 0

118,1

39,745,5

22,9

0 50 100 150 200 250

183,9

59,2305,0

114,5

400 300 200 100 0

81,9

54,6125,2

88,6

0 100 200 300 400

12,7

19,1

44,1

42,4

71,5

80 60 40 20 0

8,9

16,3

23,5

19,7

51,6

806040200

199119931997199819982000200620092010

20112011

20122014

-200 -100 -50 50-150 0 100 150 200