portfolio theory and the capital asset pricing model

32
Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model 723g28 Linköpings Universitet, IEI 1

Upload: clyde

Post on 22-Feb-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. 723g28 Linköpings Universitet , IEI. We have learned from last chapter risk and return: (that for an individual investor) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

1

Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

723g28Linköpings Universitet, IEI

Page 2: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

2

We have learned from last chapter risk and return: (that for an individual investor)Combining stocks into portfolios can reduce standard deviation, below the level obtained from a simple weighted average calculation.

Rational investors maximize the expected return given risks. Or minimize risks given expected return.

Page 3: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

3

Markowitz Portfolio Theory

• Efficient portfolio provides the highest return for a given level of risk, or least risk for a given level of return. The market portfolio is the one that has the highest Sharpe ratio with the return and risk.

• The Sharpe ratio is a measure of risk premium per unit of risk in an investment asset or a trading strategy

p

fp rr

Ratio Sharpe

Page 4: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

4

Effect of diversification on variance

Assuming the following:• N independent assets, i.i.d. with covariance=0,• σ= std of the return• r= expected return• Equally weighted portfolio, Then, we have: the more the assets are in, the lower the standard deviation σ. σ portfolio =

Page 5: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

5

Markowitz Portfolio TheoryPrice changes vs. Normal distribution

IBM - Daily % change 1988-2008

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Prop

ortio

n of

Day

s

Daily % Change

Page 6: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

6

Markowitz Portfolio TheoryStandard Deviation VS. Expected Return

Investment A

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

-50 0 50

%

prob

abili

ty

% return

Page 7: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

7

Markowitz Portfolio TheoryStandard Deviation VS. Expected Return

Investment B

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

-50 0 50

%

prob

abili

ty

% return

Page 8: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

8

Markowitz Portfolio TheoryStandard Deviation VS. Expected Return

Investment C

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

-50 0 50

%

prob

abili

ty

% return

Page 9: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

9

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Campbell Soup

40% in Boeing

Boeing

Standard Deviation

Expe

cted

Ret

urn

(%)

Markowitz Portfolio Theory Expected Returns and Standard Deviations vary given different

weighted combinations of the stocks

Page 10: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

10

A two asset portfolio constructed with % of both assets, allow short selling of one assets

0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.210.015

0.017

0.019

0.021

0.023

0.025

0.027

Series1

Market volatility

Market

Capital Market Line

Page 11: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

11

Efficient FrontierTABLE 8.1 Examples of efficient portfolios chosen from 10 stocks.

Note: Standard deviations and the correlations between stock returns were estimated from monthly returns January 2004-December 2008. Efficient

portfolios are calculated assuming that short sales are prohibited.

Efficient Portfolios – Percentages Allocated to Each Stock

Stock Expected Return Standard Deviation A B C D

Amazon.com 22.8% 50.9% 100 19.1 10.9

Ford 19.0 47.2 19.9 11.0

Dell 13.4 30.9 15.6 10.3

Starbucks 9.0 30.3 13.7 10.7 3.6

Boeing 9.5 23.7 9.2 10.5

Disney 7.7 19.6 8.8 11.2

Newmont 7.0 36.1 9.9 10.2

ExxonMobil 4.7 19.1 9.7 18.4

Johnson & Johnson 3.8 12.6 7.4 33.9

Soup 3.1 15.8 8.4 33.9

Expected portfolio return 22.8 14.1 10.5 4.2

Portfolio standard deviation 50.9 22.0 16.0 8.8

Try graph the efficient frontier and find the market portfolio with the highest Sharpe Ratio!

Page 12: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

12

Efficient Frontier4 Efficient Portfolios all from the same 10 stocks

Page 13: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

13

Efficient Frontier

Standard Deviation

Expected Return (%)

Lending or Borrowing at the risk free rate (rf) allows us to exist outside the efficient frontier.

rf

Lending

BorrowingS

T

The red line is the Capital Market Line, where you can hold a combination of the risk free assets and the market portfolio and get any returns you like.

Minimum variance portfolio

Page 14: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

14

Efficient FrontierAnother Example Correlation Coefficient = .4Stocks % of Portfolio Avg ReturnABC Corp 28 60% 15%Big Corp 42 40% 21%

Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 33.6 Standard Deviation = Portfolio = 28.1 Return = weighted avg = Portfolio = 17.4%

Let’s Add stock New Corp to the portfolio

Page 15: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

15

Efficient Frontier

A

B

Return

Risk (measured as )

Page 16: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

16

Efficient Frontier

A

B

Return

Risk

AB

Page 17: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

17

Efficient Frontier

A

BN

Return

Risk

AB

Page 18: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

18

Efficient Frontier

A

BN

Return

Risk

ABABN

Page 19: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

19

Efficient Frontier

A

BN

Return

Risk

AB

Goal is to move up and left.

WHY?

ABN

Page 20: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

20

Efficient FrontierThe ratio of the risk premium to the standard deviation is the Sharpe ratio.In a competitive market, the expected risk premium varies in proportion to portfolio standard deviation. P denotes portfolio. Along the Capital Market Line one holds the risky assets and a risk free loan.

p

fp rr

Ratio Sharpem

fm

p

fp rrrr

Page 21: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

21

Capital Asset Pricing Model

CAPM

2

( )i f i m f

imi

m

r r r r

Page 22: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

22

Security Market LineStock Return

.

rf

Market Portfolio

Market Return = rm

BETA

risk

1.0

Risk Free Return =

(Treasury bills)2,0

ri

𝑟 𝑖=2 (𝑟𝑚−𝑟 𝑓 )

Page 23: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

23

Efficient FrontierReturn

Risk

Low Risk

High Return

High Risk

High Return

Low Risk

Low Return

High Risk

Low Return

Page 24: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

24

Capital Market LineReturn

Risk

.

rfRisk Free Return =

(Treasury bills)

Market Portfolio

Market Return = rm

Tangent portfolio

Page 25: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

25

Security Market LineReturn

.

rf

Market Portfolio

Market Return = rm

BETA1.0

Risk Free Return =

(Treasury bills)

Page 26: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

Market Risk Premium: Example

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1

Beta

Expe

cted

Ret

urn

(%)

Let, 4%

12%Market Risk Premium = 8%

f

m

r

r

Example:

4%fr

8%market risk premium Market Portfolio (market return = 12%)

According to CAPM, the expected return on the asset is( ) 4% 1.2 (8%) 13.6%f m fr r r r

Page 27: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

27

Security Market Line: depicts the CAPMReturn

BETA

rf

1.0

SML

SML Equation = rf + β( rm - rf )

Security Market Line

Page 28: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

28

Expected Returns

Stock Beta (β) Expected Return [rf + β(rm – rf)]

Amazon 2.16 15.4Ford 1.75 12.6Dell 1.41 10.2Starbucks 1.16 8.4Boeing 1.14 8.3Disney .96 7.0Newmont .63 4.7ExxonMobil .55 4.2Johnson & Johnson .50 3.8Soup .30 2.4

These estimates of the returns expected by investors in February 2009 were based on the capital asset pricing model. We assumed 0.2% for the interest rate r f and 7 % for the expected risk premium r m − r f .

Page 29: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

29

SML Equilibrium• In equilibrium no stock can lie below the security market line. For

example, instead of buying stock A, investors would prefer to lend part of their money and put the balance in the market portfolio. And instead of buying stock B, they would prefer to borrow and invest in the market portfolio. (lend=save, borrow is leveraging.) risk free assets and the market portfolio can span the whole Security market line)

Higher risk lower return

Page 30: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

30

Testing the CAPM

Average Risk Premium 1931-2008

Portfolio Beta1.0

SML20

12

0

Investors

Market Portfolio

Beta vs. Average Risk Premium: low beta portfolio fared better than high beta

portfolio 1931-2008

Page 31: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

31

Testing the CAPM

Portfolio Beta1.0

SML

12

8

4

0

Investors

Market Portfolio

Beta vs. Average Risk Premium

Average Risk Premium 1966-2008

Page 32: Portfolio Theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

32

Testing the CAPM: Return vs. Book-to-Market

0,1

1

10

10019

26

1936

1946

1956

1966

1976

1986

1996

2006

High-minus low book-to-market

Dollars(log scale)

Small minus big

http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html

2008

Cumulated difference of Small minus big firm stocks

Cumulated difference of High minus low book-to-market firm stocks