port mgt 3

Upload: he-nry-so-ediarko

Post on 04-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    1/48

    MSc Investment Management

    Portfolio Management

    Lecture 3Equity Indexing

    February, 08, 2012

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    2/48

    2

    Index definition and uses

    Indices are designed to provide a concise summary of the pricemovements of their constituents

    Uses are:

    To provide a record of historical price movements, which facilitatesdetermination of trends

    To serve as benchmarks in performance measurement

    To act as a basis for index tracking funds, exchange-traded funds(ETFs) and index derivatives

    To support portfolio management research and asset allocationdecisions

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    3/48

    3

    Index weighting schemesThere are three weighting schemes:

    1. Market value or capitalisation weighting

    The largest stock has the largest influence on the index value

    Example: S&P 500, FTSE 100

    2. Price weighting

    The highest price stock has the greatest influence on the indexvalue

    Example: Dow Jones Industrial Average Index

    3. Equal weighting

    All stocks are assigned an equal weight, these are known asunweighted indices

    Example: FT 30

    Difficult to replicate equal weights, so never used as a benchmarkin index tracking

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    4/48

    4

    Methods of averaging an Index

    Arithmetic vs. Geometric average

    All indices are calculated as arithmetic averages nowadays exceptunweighted indices (e.g. FT 30)

    As the price of a stock increases, the weights adjust automatically forthe consistency with the share amount

    Although the weightings change, the share amounts do not,consequently, no rebalancing is necessary

    Therefore, arithmetic indices can be tracked exactly by owning allstocks in the index in the proportions suggested by its weights in theindex

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    5/48

    5

    Example

    Period Stock X(800 shares

    in issue)

    Stock Y(100

    shares inissue)

    Stock Z(100

    shares inissue)

    Priceweightedarithmetic

    index

    Unweightedgeometric

    index

    Valueweightedarithmetic

    index

    t0 100p 100p 100p 100 100 100

    t1 90p 105p 120p 105 104.3 94.5

    t2 100p 0p 100p ? ? ?

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    6/48

    6

    Example calculations for period t1

    1. Price weighted arithmetic index:

    2. Unweighted geometric index:

    105100

    )100100100(

    )12010590(

    /01

    valueindexpreviousPP tt

    3.104100100100100

    120105903

    valueindexpreviouspricessharebaseofproduct

    pricessharecurrentofproductn

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    7/48

    7

    Example calculations for period t1

    3. Value weighted arithmetic index:

    Task: Calculate the value of the index in period t2 using all threemethods

    5.94100100100100100800100

    10012010010580090

    00

    11

    x

    valueindexpreviousqP

    qP

    tt

    tt

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    8/48

    8

    Comparison of index averaging methods: concluding comments

    1. Price weighted arithmetic indices Ignore the number of shares in issue and favour highly priced

    shares

    Not representative of the real world portfolio limited use asperformance measurement benchmarks

    2. Unweighted geometric indices It always understates the price rises and overstates the price

    falls of constituents relative to that of a price weighted index

    It collapses if the price of an index constituent is zero

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    9/48

    9

    3. Value weighted arithmetic indices More complex calculations and significant data requirements

    Replicate the precise effect that changing share values wouldhave on a portfolio comprising the same underlying index

    constituents weighted in accordance with their relative marketcapitalisations

    They have a broad coverage of the market being represented

    Therefore, they are the most suitable indices to asses markettrends, act as performance benchmarks and provide a basisfor index tracking

    Comparison of index averaging methods: concluding comments

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    10/48

    10

    Free flotation

    The value of market value weighted index as a performancemeasurement benchmark can be compromised if those indexconstituents make significantly less than 100% of their equityavailable to the market are accorded a full market value indexweighting

    Restricted supply of the stock prevents a portfolio manager fromholding a full weighting of the stock within their portfolio

    Price of the stock will be distorted given the need of index tracking

    funds to hold the stock in accordance with their index weighting

    Hence, free floating rules were introduced

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    11/48

    11

    Dealing with the free float

    FTSE (source: www.ftse.com) Less than or equal to 5% Ineligible Greater than 5% but less or equal to 15% Actual Greater than 15% but less or equal to 20% 20% Greater than 20% but less or equal to 30% 30% Greater than 30% but less or equal to 40% 40% Greater than 40% but less or equal to 50% 50% Greater than 50% but less or equal to 75% 75% Greater than 75% 100%

    MSCI

    Usually stocks with free-float under 25% are excluded(Lower cut-off for emerging markets)

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    12/48

    12

    The main equity indices

    FTSE Index Constituents % of FTSEAll Share

    FTSE 100 100 largest companies 80%

    FTSE 250 The next 250 largestcompanies

    15%

    FTSE 350 FTSE100+

    FTSE250

    95%

    FTSE SmallCap FTSE All Share

    FTSE 350

    5%

    FTSE All Share FTSE 350+ FTSESmallCap 100%

    FTSE Fledgling Those that do not meetthe size criteria for FTSEAll Share

    1.5%

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    13/48

    13

    The main equity indices

    Examples of other Indices: FTSE All World Index (2700 stocks, 49 countries, 90-95%

    capitalisation of each of the markets, in US$)

    MSCI World Index (1700 stocks, 23 countries, 85% capitalisation of

    each market, in US$ and local currency)

    S&P 500 (500 most widely held NYSE stocks, 80% of NYSE marketcapitalisation)

    Nikkei Indices (Nikkei 225 price weighted index of 225 Japanesecompanies representative of the market; more suitable is Nikkei 300which is value weighted)

    There are around 3000 indices globally available

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    14/48

    14

    Fundamental Weighted Indices

    What are Fundamental Weighted Indices?

    Selects, ranks and weights companies, not by marketcapitalisation, but by financial data points, such as sales, cashflow, book value, or dividend yield.

    How do they work?

    Stocks are reviewed using fundamental factors not the stockprice/mkt cap

    The constituents are then weighted in the index according to thefactors themselves notthe mkt cap

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    15/48

    15

    Why the move away from market cap weighted?

    Short term share prices are volatile and consequentlymisleadcausing misdirected capital

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    1985

    1986

    1987

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    Telecom & IT Financials

    Non-Cyclical Services Other Sectors

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    16/48

    16

    The FTSE GWA (Global Wealth Allocation) Index Series

    The FTSE GWA Index Series therefore constructs portfolioswithout referring to share prices stocks should be weightedaccording to their proven ability to create wealth

    Wealth is measured by three fundamentals net income, cash

    flow & book value

    The review process holds every company in the index, but

    weights it according to wealth

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    17/48

    17

    FTSE GWA UK Index Top Five

    Overweights/Underweights in 2008

    Overweight

    Company Sector

    Wgt in FTSE GWA

    UK Index

    Wgt in FTSE All-

    Share Index Difference

    Vodafone Group Mobile Telecommunications 7.02% 5.68% 1.34%

    Royal Bank Of Scotland Group Banks 4.36% 3.09% 1.27%

    HBOS Banks 3.03% 2.01% 1.03%Barclays Banks 3.13% 2.24% 0.89%

    British Energy Group Electricity 0.91% 0.16% 0.75%

    Underweight

    Company Sector

    Wgt in FTSE GWA

    UK Index

    Wgt in FTSE All-

    Share Index Difference

    GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 2.97% 5.14% -2.17%

    AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 1.59% 2.56% -0.97%HSBC Hldgs Banks 5.72% 6.25% -0.53%

    Diageo Beverages 1.00% 1.47% -0.47%

    British American Tobacco Tobacco 0.74% 1.15% -0.41%

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    18/48

    18

    FTSE GWA UK Index vs. the FTSE All-Share Index vs. FTSE GWADeveloped markets index; source: www.ftse.com

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    19/48

    19

    Definition of indexing

    Index fund: portfolio of securities that replicates the returns of a selectedindex

    Process of investing in such a portfolio: indexing

    Index funds exist across asset classes but are predominant in equities hence equity indexing

    Achievement of optimal diversificationThis strategy is response to both theoretical aspirations and practical

    needs

    responds to the concept of the efficient market hypothesis andCAPM

    maximises control over investment outcomes and minimises costs ofinvestment

    no outperformance but assurance of no underperformance

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    20/48

    20

    Development of index funds

    In 1970 Wells Fargo Bank introduced the Stagecoach Fund tracking NYSE Composite Index lack of interest, so discontinued

    published research helped in understanding how difficult it is tooutperform the market through active strategies

    In 1973, Wells Fargo introduced the fund to track more widelyfollowed S&P 500 Index

    J. Bogle introduced one of the most popular index tracking fundsVanguard 500 Index Fund in 1976 which also tracks S&P 500

    Increased popularity in 1990s

    In the US, 20-30% of funds are managed passively nowadays

    Three largest pension fund managers in the UK 800bn pensionfund market are index-tracking specialists

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    21/48

    21

    First step in creating an index fund: selecting abenchmark Funds performance may be measured against the market

    portfolio or a subset or sector on the market

    Pure index fund by definition would tend to perfectly replicate themarket portfolio

    Selection of appropriate benchmark is primarily driven by thedesired level of diversification and cost effectiveness

    FTSE 100 (large, mature firms)

    feasible to buy and hold with no need for particular adjustments

    Less diversified and more cost effective

    FTSE All Share index (includes younger, smaller-cap firms)

    illiquid, more expensive stocks, more frequent revision needed

    More diversified and less cost effective

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    22/48

    22

    Customised benchmarks

    Choosing the right benchmark is crucial

    With an increasing trend in global investing, benchmark error ismagnified as the inappropriate international index is chosen as abenchmark

    Customised benchmarks are available used in performancemeasurement of specific, custom-made portfolios

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    23/48

    23

    Approaches to replicating an indexHow perfect should the replication be?

    Censusapproach/full replication

    perfect replication, buying every stock in the index

    stocks in the same weight as in the index

    Samplingapproach

    select a subset of index optimised to track the benchmark as closelyas possible

    needed when: certain securities in the index are very illiquid or wheninvestor is restricted by policy from owning them

    Includes: optimisation, stratified sampling and capitalisation

    replication approach Consider the availability of derivative products on the index

    possibility to create a synthetic index fund as an alternative toholding underlying equities that make up the index

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    24/48

    24

    Sampling approach: Optimization Mathematical algorithm approach

    The solution obtained through optimization is the efficient frontier

    Investors utility defines where the optimal portfolio lies

    Equalise the beta of the replicating portfolio with the beta of thebenchmark

    Problem: optimisation relies on the historical estimates of expected

    returns, variances, covariances; it assumes normal distribution ofreturns; mathematics that underlies optimisation is difficult to apply toheterogeneous groups of stocks

    Not the most widely used approach for tracking a benchmark

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    25/48

    25

    Sampling approach: Capitalisation

    Method involves constructing a basket with fewer stocks than inthe index

    Purchasing a number of top capitalization stocks in actual

    weights and equally weighting the residual stock weightings inthe basket

    Example: if top 100 stocks according to size are selected for thebasket, and this accounts for 80% of the total capitalisation of

    the index (as FTSE 100 is 80% of capitalisation of FTSE AllShare), the remaining 20% is evenly proportioned among the100 stocks

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    26/48

    26

    Sampling approach: Stratified sampling

    The universe of stocks stratified according to certain criteria(industry)

    Stock selection within each stratum

    matching the weight of the stratum in the basket portfolio as itnaturally exists in the index

    Stocks within each stratum are selected using eithercapitalisationranking, valuation methods or optimisation

    Problem: no mathematical backing

    Strength: not concerned with historical data

    Appropriate for high turnover indexes, since historical estimatesare less relevant

    Widely used approach forreplication of a benchmark

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    27/48

    27

    Purchasing a basket/replicating portfolio

    Program trading or package trading Refers to the purchase or sale of a diversified portfolio of stocks

    The cost of executing such a transaction should be smaller thanfor individual stocks as the risk of portfolio is smaller than the riskof individual stock

    Informationless trade

    Investors transfer execution risk to the broker

    broker provides investor with an insurance protection option, the costof which is negotiated with a broker

    price protection - bestefforts basis

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    28/48

    28

    Measuring Tracking Error (TE)

    Index tracking objective: minimise the cost while retaining the replicating portfolios ability totrack the benchmark index

    Holding fewer stocks than in the index generates tracking error

    Tracking error represents the risk that the replicating portfoliowill perform differently to benchmark

    In statistical terms, there are two commonly used definitions ofex-post tracking error:

    Tracking error as Residual risk and Tracking error as Performance volatility

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    29/48

    29

    TE as Residual Risk

    Market model suggests that:

    where Rp is return of the replicating portfolio, Rb is return of thebenchmark portfolio and is residual risk

    TE is then defined as:

    TE is model dependant in this definition (model risk!)

    Residuals and Variance of residuals can easily be obtained inexcel and more sophisticated statistical packages

    bp RR

    2var ( ) var ( ) (1 ( , ) )TE iance iance p correlation Rp Rb

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    30/48

    30

    TE as Performance Volatility

    TE is defined as the standard deviation of the difference inexpected returns between the replicating/basket portfolio andthe benchmark portfolio:

    TE = Standard Deviation (Rp - Rb)

    TE depends on benchmark volatility which cannot be controlledby investment manager

    For all portfolio betas not equal to 1, the volatility of performanceis larger than residual risk, so TE will be different

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    31/48

    31

    Relationship between TE and size of the replicating/basket portfolio

    Hypothetical replication of a benchmark that has 500 stocks willresult in the following tracking errors for different sizes of thebasket portfolio:

    Tracking error vs. Size of basket

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600

    Number of stocks in the basket

    Trackingerror(%

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    32/48

    32

    Reasons for existence of tracking errors of perfect baskets

    Example shows that even if we have perfect replication ofbenchmark, TE is present. The reasons for this are:

    1. Odd-lot purchases of stocks vs. round-lots

    Index funds are comprised of round lots: the number of shares ofeach stock in the basket is rounded off to the nearest hundred

    from the exact number of shares indicated by basket buildingmodel. This might affect the ability of smaller baskets to track theindex

    2. Changing composition of the benchmark index

    weights of stocks in the index are changing

    hold all the stocks as in the index and the weights will be self-adjusting

    if fewer stocks held, rebalancing is needed

    list of stocks is changing

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    33/48

    33

    Tracking error interpretation

    TE statistic has some desirable properties:A fund with a TE of 2% p.a. is expected to have 2/3 of its annualreturns fall within -2% and +2% of the benchmark and 95% of itsreturns within -4% and +4% of the benchmark

    Is 2% TE small or large?

    This depends on the volatility of the underlying benchmark, the type ofbenchmark and the method used to construct the basket/replicatingportfolio

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    34/48

    34

    Empirical evidence on Tracking Errors

    Larsen & Resnick (1998) Data: US, 200 high capitalisation (HC) and 200 low

    capitalisation (LC) stocks used to create value weighted andequally weighted indices

    Period 1981-1997

    Main conclusions: Indexed portfolios from HC indexes have less tracking error and

    lower standard deviation of tracking error than indexed portfolios

    of LC indexes Value weighted portfolio can be indexed more accurately thanequally weighted ones

    The more stocks there is in a tracking basket portfolio, thesmaller the tracking error

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    35/48

    35

    Empirical evidence on Tracking Errors- results of the study

    TRACKING ERROR(TE)/STANDARD DEV OF TE FOR ALL INDEXED PORTFOLIOS

    No of EW VW

    stocks Stratif ied Non-stratif ied Stratif ied Non-stratif ie

    HC PORTFOLIOS

    10 1.60/1.29 1.89/1.38 1.50/1.19 1.53/1.1320 1.40/1.11 1.47/1.08 1.37/1.01 1.22/0.95

    40 1.14/0.79 1.27/0.91 1.02/0.74 1.06/0.80

    80 0.78/0.64 0.82/0.65 0.75/0.57 0.71/0.56

    LC PORTFOLIOS

    10 2.50/2.07 2.59/1.85 2.43/1.90 2.42/1.75

    20 1.84/1.38 1.75/1.36 1.79/1.19 1.68/1.27

    40 1.51/1.24 1.44/1.04 1.42/1.10 1.43/0.99

    80 1.08/0.84 1.08/0.81 1.04/0.89 1.08/0.81

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    36/48

    36

    Difficulties in trading the basket portfolio

    Difficult situation arises when stocks are deleted from or added tothe benchmark index

    Benchmark is calculated as though the changes were made atclosing prices

    However, changes are not publicly announced until the markethas already closed

    Therefore, the index fund managers must trade the following dayat prevailing prices which may be less advantageous than theprevious days closing price

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    37/48

    37

    Minimising the costs with indexing

    Costs are minimised in three important ways:

    1. Minimising of brokerage commission by minimising necessityto transact

    almost a buy and hold strategy with a very low turnover

    need to transact only to contribute or withdraw funds,

    reinvest income or accommodate for the changes in thebenchmark index

    2. Market impact is minimised when transaction costs do occur

    investment in securities in proportion to their actual weightson the market

    largest investment in securities with greatest liquidity3. No asset selection or market timing research involved, so

    management fees are low

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    38/48

    38

    Market Impact The price at which a basket of stocks can be bought or sold will

    differ substantially from the cash index price which is based onthe prices at which each of the individual stocks comprising theindex last traded

    To sell a basket of stocks, the seller would receive the current

    bid prices of the individual stocks and vice versa

    Market impact is that difference between the cash index and thecost of buying /selling a basket of stocks

    major component of transaction costs of index funds

    Level of market impact varies over time and depends upon: liquidity (better liquidity implies smaller bid/ask spread and smaller

    market impact)

    size of the basket (market impact increases with the size of thebasket)

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    39/48

    39

    Return enhancement strategies

    There are two strategies by which the indexer can enhance thereturns of his portfolio without compromising the goal oftracking the benchmark index:

    1. He can lend securities in basket portfolio to brokerage firms whoneed them for short-sales for example

    2. Indexer can engage in index futures arbitrage: they can sell basketportfolio and replace it with a position in the futures (when they areundervalued), investing the cash proceeds in money marketinstruments until the futures are settled use of synthetic indexation

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    40/48

    40

    Synthetic Indexation

    By purchasing futures contracts and Treasury bills it is possibleto create a synthetic index fund that will have the same returnsprofile as if one was holding the equities that make up the index

    Bare in mind that benchmark with available liquid futures

    contract has to be chosen

    Advantages of holding long stock position rather than syntheticfund are mainly related to special events such as dividend

    payments and special dividends

    However, the major drawbacks of holding portfolio of stocks thatreplicates the index are high initial transaction costs, marketimpact, custodial costs and tracking error

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    41/48

    41

    Advantages and disadvantages of a synthetic fund

    Advantages are: low transaction costs, no tracking error, noproblems due to dividend reinvestment

    Disadvantages are:

    price risk related to the fact that futures will be overpriced whenpurchased or that the futures position may have to be rolled out to

    the next contract (spread overpriced) variation margin that arises from the fact that futures are marked-

    to-the market daily

    futures position will outperform the index in the upmarket and viceversa

    underhedging technique is used to minimise the risk ofunderperformance due to variation margin:

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    42/48

    42

    The dollar(pound) size of the basket should be stated in terms

    of a number of futures contracts

    Calculation of the appropriate number of futures contracts:

    It HAS to be a round number of futures contracts

    If we have a basket portfolio worth 25M replicating FTSE 100

    currently trading at 4714 points, the number of futures

    contracts to buy to replicate that basket is (note: multiplier forFTSE 100 is 10):

    valueindexmultiplier

    basketofvaluecontractsfuturesofNo

    53033.530471410

    25000000

    Buying futures for synthetic indexation

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    43/48

    43

    Link between active and passive management

    Purely passive plainvanilla index funds vs. purely active styles(market timing and stock picking)

    Pure passive funds assume beta of portfolio equal to one, i.e.tracking the stock market index

    Pure active fund assumes constant deviation from the market

    portfolio in search for positive alphas

    Index fund management can be extended into active to a fairlymodest degree being aimed at controlling risk in the following

    ways:1. Tilted index funds or Core-satellite approach to indexation

    2. Exploiting different sector exposures in indices

    3. Asset allocation model applied to the question of rebalancing

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    44/48

    44

    Passive & Active: Core-satellite approach Build a low-risk, low-cost core to a portfolio using index funds, while

    pursuing higher returns with more aggressive, satellite active funds orindividual stock proportions

    It is based on the belief that only some sectors of the market (e.g. largecap equities) are efficient and they should be indexed and a proportionshould be invested in a less efficient market sector

    Exposure of a portfolio to factors that are expected to outperform: P/Eratio, growth etc.

    Allows investor to place active bets in the market while retaining thediversification of the index fund

    Tilted fund is unlikely to outperform the benchmark index dramatically

    Presence of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    45/48

    45

    Passive & Active: Exploiting different sector exposure of indices

    By combining a long basket/replicating portfolio with one or moreshort futures positions, sector exposure can be realised at alow cost and additional returns could be generated:

    Low Cap exposure can be achieved when holding a portfoliowhich is tracking Russell 1000 Index and shorting the S&P 500futures contract

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    46/48

    46

    Passive & Active: Asset allocation applied to rebalancing

    Additional cash is not added to the basket unless the expectedreturn of the stock exceeds that of the short-term investmentfund or money market instrument (MMI)

    Basically, investor holds an option to exchange one asset (MMI)

    for another (equity in the basket portfolio)

    The cost of having this choice is the price of the option

    Strategy may involve stock index and bonds futures forimplementation of asset allocation decisions to reduce the costsof investing in actual equities and MMIs

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    47/48

    47

    Indexing in emerging markets

    Example: Asia & Pacific

    Liu (2000)

    Passive management relies on the notion of market efficiency are emerging markets efficient?

    Index funds have combined expense advantage and increasedturnover advantage of up to 2.26% in the emerging markets

    Difficult task of persuading investors that index funds canaccurately track emerging market indices and educating themabout the benefits of indexation

  • 7/29/2019 Port mgt 3

    48/48

    48

    Reading

    Chapter 9 and 10 in Portfolio and Investment Management: State-of-the-art Research, Analysis and Strategies, edited by F.Fabozzi