pontormo analysis
DESCRIPTION
discussion of ambiguity in Pontormo's Deposition paintingTRANSCRIPT
Wasserman Reading Response
One argument Jack Wasserman makes in this criticism of Pontormo’s painting in the
Capponi Chapel in Florence is that the painting depicts and expanded look at the Pietá by
showing a crowd bringing the corpse of Christ to a weeping Virgin Mary. I agree with this
interpretation of the painting, especially considering the interpretations of other scholars where
they stress Eucharistic imagery and the fact that Jesus is moving away from the Virgin rather
than towards her. I feel as though Wasserman makes a really good point when he examines the
preliminary drawing done by Pontormo in which the youth carrying the top half of Jesus’ body is
more clearly shown moving to the right. This suggests that in the actual painting, even though
the direction of the crowd’s movement is not completely clear, they are halted after moving
toward the right, essentially bringing Jesus to Mary. This is how I interpreted the piece at first, so
I was glad to read Wasserman’s breakdown of why this movement is apparent.
Wasserman also backs up his claim that this is an expanded Pietá narrative by noting that
there is a path in the bottom left of the painting. I don’t know if I agree with him about this or its
supposed significance. I was a bit confused as to what he was trying to say about this “path”
(which I have trouble seeing), and also didn’t see how a path’s existence helps support his theory
that the narrative shows Jesus being carried toward the Virgin Mother. However it was
interesting that he noted the possible backstories and meanings of the cloth the woman is holding
in the middle as she offers it the Virgin Mary.
The idea of an expanded narrative leading up to a Pietá is also explored in terms of the
iconography of the scene and earlier renditions using this iconography. I feel that Wasserman’s
comparison of Fra Bartolommeo’s Deposition scene and its components’ parallels within the
Pontormo piece give substantial credibility to his interpretation of the scene as the presentation
of Christ’s body to the Virgin that will become the Pietá.
I can see how the job of interpreting this painting by Pontormo is difficult given the
ambiguity of which direction Jesus is moving, but Wasserman seems to make some very
reasonable and logical points in his attempt to prove that this is a narrative scene of Jesus being
brought to Mary after he has been taken down from the cross. One possibility that I don’t think
Wasserman considered was that perhaps Pontormo makes the direction of Christ’s movement a
little ambiguous on purpose. I think this would make sense since given the context of the
situation, it shouldn’t matter whether this is before or after the Pietá because Mary should be just
as sad either way. I think the beauty in this painting is the mystery surrounding the sequencing of
events. This way the viewer becomes more engaged in the painting and is allowed to come to his
own conclusions. This interaction with the art probably made viewers feel more deeply
connected with their faith, which is probably what artists like Pontormo who decorated these
religious spaces would have wanted.