pomierski rate swaps

JOURNAL OF TAXATION OF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS 59

Volume 6 Issue 3 2007

W.R. Pomierski

William R. Pomierski is a Partner in the international law fi rm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP, resident in its Chicago

offi ce. He is a former Editor-in-Chief of the JOURNAL OF TAXATION OF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS.

Interest Rate Hedging Considerations for Corporate Taxpayers

By William R. Pomierski

William Pomierski describes the requirements for, as well as the expected tax consequences resulting from entering into, qualifying interest rate hedging transactions relating to current or anticipatory

borrowings by a corporate taxpayer. It is imperative that these taxpayers know of potential tax character and timing mismatches

before they enter into such transactions.

IntroductionCorporate taxpayers entering into interest rate hedging transactions relating to current or anticipated borrow-ings need to be aware of potential tax character and timing mismatches. If interest rate hedging losses are treated as capital losses, for example, they would not be deductible against ordinary business profi ts. Timing mismatches are also possible in interest rate hedging transactions. For example, an interest rate hedge that meets the defi nition of a section 1256 contract under Code Sec. 1256(g) could be subject to mark-to-market taxation, whereas the liability being hedged thereby would not be marked to market.1

Hedging transactions that are intended to manage interest rate risk with respect to a taxpayers U.S. dol-lar denominated borrowings may avoid potential tax character and timing mismatches by taking advan-tage of the hedging rules of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), or under the hedge integration rules of Reg. 1.1275-6.2 To qualify for the special tax rules that apply to qualifying hedging transactions, however, a number

of requirements must be satisfi ed. The balance of this article describes the requirements for, as well as the expected tax consequences resulting from entering into, qualifying interest rate hedging transactions relating to current or anticipatory borrowings by a corporate taxpayer.3

Hedging Under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7)Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) assures ordinary gain or loss treat-ment for qualifi ed hedging transactions by carving them out of capital asset treatment. A qualifi ed hedg-ing transaction is defi ned for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) as a transaction that a taxpayer enters into in the normal course of its trade or business primarily to manage the risk of (1) price changes or currency fl uctuations with respect to ordinary property that is held or to be held by the taxpayer, or (2) interest rate or price changes or currency fl uctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obliga-tions incurred or to be incurred, by the taxpayer.4

It is worth noting that the ordinary income or loss assurances of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) are relevant to the extent that gains or losses from an interest rate

gbe awtches

l l

are o If int

poteerest

gaial

st ordpo

dinssib

abl

rye

buin

sii

nete

s pest

rora

fi tte

s. Timhed

migi

ngn HH dd i

pans ctio

psac

d aseatted

ond tismd titim

traiini

ansngs

imin

sacne

ng

ctiodeedimi m

60 2007 CCH. All Rights Reserved.

hedging transaction would, in the absence of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), be considered capital gain or loss. For example, if a taxpayer hedges a current or anticipated borrowing by entering into a futures contract that is considered a section 1256 contract, gain and loss from such contract would, absent Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), be capital under Code Sec. 1256(a). Certain forms of interest rate hedging transactions, however, result in ordinary income or deductions in their own right. For example, if a taxpayer manages interest rate risk with respect to a borrowing by entering into an interest rate swap transaction that meets the defi nition of a notional principal contract under Reg. 1.446-3, periodic and nonperiodic payments made or received with respect to such swap would be ordinary irrespective of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).5

Risk Management Reg. 1.1221-2(c)(4) states that whether a transaction manages a taxpayers risk is determined based on all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the taxpayers business and the transaction. A taxpayers practices and proceduresas refl ected in its minutes or other business recordsare evidence of whether a hedging transaction manages risk.6

Under the regulations, the general test for risk man-agement is a macro testthat is, does the transaction manage risk after considering the taxpayers overall risk profi le? This is often referred to as the enterprise risk reduction requirement. Notwithstanding this general rule, a hedging transaction that relates to a particular asset or liability generally is treated as managing overall risk if it is undertaken as part of a program reasonably expected to reduce the overall risk of the taxpayers operations.7

If a taxpayer borrows money and agrees to pay stated interest at a fi xed (fl oating) rate, a risk manage-ment transaction whereby the taxpayer synthetically converts the interest rate to a fl oating (fi xed) rate would qualify as a hedging transaction for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).8 Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) also extends to hedging of interest rate risk with respect to a contingent debt instrument governed by Reg. 1.1275-4. For example, consider a debt instrument that provides for contingent interest payable at ma-turity based on the increase, if any, in the value of

a specifi ed share of stock or an equity index. If the issuer hedges its risk relating to this contingent inter-est payment with a derivative (fi nancial) instrument, the hedge should meet the defi nition of a hedge for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).9

Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) allows taxpayers to hedge an expected (or anticipatory) issuance of debt. By contrast, the integrated hedge rules of Reg. 1.1275-

6, which are described below, are more restrictive in the case of anticipatory hedges.

Finally, Reg. 1.1221-2 makes it clear that a tax-payer may hedge all or part of its risk for all or part of the period over which the taxpayer is exposed to

that risk.10 For example, if a taxpayer issues a $100 million debt instrument that calls for the entire prin-cipal balance to be paid at maturity in 10 years, a notional principal contract with a notional principal amount of $40 million and a term of fi ve years could, even though it hedges less than the entire principal amount for less than the entire period of the debt, qualify as a hedging transaction under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7). By contrast, the availability of the inte-grated hedge rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 is limited in the case of partial hedging transactions.

Consolidated Group ConsiderationsAs a general rule, a risk management transaction is a qualifi ed hedging transaction under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) only if the taxpayer manages its own risk. Managing the risk of a related taxpayer generally does not qualify as a hedge for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7). An exception is provided, however, in the case of taxpayers that are members of a U.S. consolidated federal income tax group.

Under Reg. 1.1221-2(e)(1), all of the members of a U.S. consolidated group are generally treated as if they were divisions of a single corporation. This single-entity default rule effectively means that any member of a consolidated federal income tax group may hedge the risks of any other member of the group, and the hedge is eligible to be treated as a Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedge.11 For example, if members of a U.S. consolidated group engage in their own borrowing transactions, a designated member of the group could enter into interest rate hedging transactions with third parties on behalf of members of the group that

Under the regulations, the general test for risk management is a macro

testthat is, does the transaction manage risk after considering the

taxpayers overall risk profi le?

Interest Rate Hedging Considerations

proceness r

edureecord

as sare

ulacr

ions,est

thteha

gat

enis

erd

aloe

est the

foe

r rtra

isk mnsa

macti

n-o Ass a

ngeneral r

axp erspaye

gingheedg

s

buan

bor

tapraxpracr ot

payetictichthe

ersces

ber bus



would still qualify under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7). Note, however, that because consolidated group members are treated as divisions of a single corporation for this purpose, a risk management transaction between members of a consolidated group will not be treated as a qualifi ed hedging transaction for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).12 This is because of the fact that in an intercompany transaction, the risk being hedged does not leave the group unless and until one of the members shifts the risk outside of the group by entering into a transaction with a third party (in which case the third-party transaction would be eligible to be treated as a qualifi ed hedging transaction).

Notwithstanding the single-entity default rule, a consolidated group may elect to treat each member of the group as a separate taxpayer for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).13 This separate-entity election is made by fi ling an appropriate statement on a timely fi led federal income tax return for the fi rst taxable year for which the election is to apply.14 Once made, a separate-entity election may only be revoked with the consent of the IRS. If a separate entity election is made, a risk management transaction will be eligible to be treated as a Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedging trans-action only if the risk being hedged is the taxpayers own risk. Special rules are provided for intercompany hedging transactions entered into among members of a consolidated group that has made a separate entity election.15

Identifi cation RequirementsCode Sec. 1221(a)(7) states that a hedging (risk management) transaction must be clearly identifi ed before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated or entered into, or at such other time as the Treasury may determine by regulations.16 There are two components to the identifi cation requirement. First, Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(1) provides that a taxpayer must identify the hedging transactionmeaning the futures contract, option, forward, swap or similar transaction that manages riskon the same day that the hedging transaction is entered into.

In addition to identifying the hedging (risk manage-ment) transaction, the asset, ordinary obligation or borrowing being hedged thereby (the hedged item) must also be identifi ed.17 The hedged item must be identifi ed substantially contemporaneously with the hedging transaction, but in no event more than 35 days later.18 The only exception to the requirement that the hedged item be specifi cally identifi ed is in the context of aggregate or macro hedging activities,

where the adoption of an aggregate tax hedge policy replaces the requirement of specifi cally identifying each hedged item.19

Method of Hedge Identifi cationReg. 1.1221-2(f)(4) provides limited guidance regarding the manner in which the hedge identi-fi cation requirements can be met. The regulations require that the hedge identifi cation be made on, and retained as part of, the taxpayers books and records. To qualify, an identifi cation must be clear and unambiguous. The regulations also indicate that identifi cation of a hedging transaction for fi nancial accounting or regulatory purposes will not satisfy this requirement unless the taxpayers books and records indicate that the identifi cation is also being made for tax purposes. Note that hedge identifi ca-tions under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) need not be fi led with the IRS, but are simply retained as part of the taxpayers books and records.

Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(4)(iv) provides that a taxpayer may either separately make each identifi cation or, so long as the identifi cation is unambiguous, may establish a system pursuant to which the identifi cation is indicated either by the type of transaction or by the manner in which the transaction is consummated or recorded. The hedging regulations offer three exam-ples of permissible forms of identifi cation: (1) hedge accounts, (2) a designation in the taxpayers books and records and (3) stamped trade records.20

In addition to identifying the hedging (risk manage-ment) transaction, the regulations also provide for identifi cation of the hedged item (e.g., the liability being hedged). With respect to hedges of existing debt, the taxpayer should specify the issue and, if the hedge is for less than the full issue price or the full term of the debt, the amount of the issue price and the term covered by the hedge.21 If a taxpayer hedges anticipatory debt,22 the identifi cation should include all of the following information:

Expected maturity or maturities of the debtTotal expected issue price of the issueExpected interest provisionsIf the hedge is for less than the entire expected amount of the issue price of the debt or the full term of the debt, a taxpayer must identify the amount being hedged and/or the term being hedged, as appropriate.

The identifi cation of anticipatory debt may indicate a range of dates, terms and amounts instead of specifi c dates, terms and amounts.

ated n.

group that

21

Req(7)

qsta

uiat

ires that

tsheeddging (ris m

nen

atadd

tritioan

onsa

toct

edg ng tgin tr

ctso

en

hefofedgff a

intit

ginco

ty e

ng tonslele tio


If a taxpayer enters into infrequent interest rate hedging transactions, a common practice is to iden-tify both the hedging (risk management) transaction and the debt being hedged thereby pursuant to a same-day identification form/memorandum that describes (1) the terms of the hedging transaction (including the type of risk management transaction (e.g., futures contract, option, swap contract), the name of the taxpayers counterparty in the case of an over-the-counter transaction or the exchange on which the risk management transaction is traded in the case of an exchange-traded position, the notional amount or number of contracts, maturity date, cash fl ows, etc.) and (2) the terms of the borrowing (such as the principal amount, interest rate, payment dates and maturity). If, however, a taxpayer enters into nu-merous interest rate hedging transactions or enters into hedging transactions on an aggregate (or macro) basis such that the hedging transactions cannot be associated with any particular borrowing, another form of hedge identifi cation may be required.

Misidentifi cation IssuesCode Sec. 1221(b)(2)(B) authorizes the Treasury Secretary to prescribe regulations to properly char-acterize any income, gain, expense or loss arising from a transaction that is either a qualifi ed hedging transaction that is not identifi ed as such, or that is not a qualifi ed hedging transaction but is identifi ed as a hedge.

Reg. 1.1221-2(g) includes two separate provisions for misidentifi ed hedging transactions.23 First, in the case of nonqualifying transactions that are identifi ed as Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedging transactions, the regulations state that the identifi cation is binding with respect to any gain resulting from the transaction (meaning that gain will be ordinary), whereas losses from the particular transaction will be characterized under the general rules for the type of transaction.24 Note that there is an inadvertent error exception that may be applicable in certain cases to avoid this character mismatch potential.25

A second misidentifi cation provision potentially applies to transactions that meet the defi nition of a qualifi ed hedging transaction, but are not identifi ed as such. In such cases, the regulations provide that,

as a general rule, both gains and losses from such transactions are to be determined without regard to Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), meaning that the character of gains and losses would be determined under the gen-

eral rules for the particular type of transaction.

The regulations then set out two exceptions to this characterization rule. The fi rst exception is referred to as the inadvertent er-ror exception.26 Under Reg. 1.1221-2(g)(2)(ii), if a taxpayer does not iden-

tify a qualifi ed hedging transaction, the taxpayer maybut is not required to 27treat gain or loss from the transaction as ordinary income or loss if each of the following requirements are satisfi ed:(1) The transaction qualifi es as a hedging transac-

tion within the meaning of Code 1221(b)(2).(2) The failure to identify the transaction was due

to inadvertent error.(3) All of the taxpayers qualifi ed hedging trans-

actions in all open years are being treated on either original or, if necessary, amended returns as qualifi ed hedging transactions.

Unfortunately, there is limited guidance regarding the meaning of inadvertent error.28

Finally, the regulations include an anti-abuse rule for transactions that meet the defi nition of a qualifi ed hedging transaction, but are not identifi ed as such. Under this anti-abuse rule, the regulations authorize the IRS to treat gains from such transactions as ordi-nary.29 The anti-abuse rule applies, however, only if the taxpayer has no reasonable grounds for treating the transaction as other than a hedging transaction. The reasonableness of the taxpayers failure to identify a transaction is to be determined by taking into ac-count not only the requirements of Reg. 1.1221-2(b), but also the taxpayers treatment of the transaction for other purposes, as well as by taking into account the taxpayers identifi cation of similar transactions as hedging transactions.

Hedge Timing ConsiderationsIf a taxpayer enters into a qualifi ed hedging transac-tion within the meaning of Code Sec. 1221(b)(2), regardless of whether the transaction is identifi ed as such, the timing of any gains and losses from the hedge must be accounted for under Reg. 1.446-4. Note that the hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4

[T]he regulations include an anti-abuse rule for transactions that

meet the defi nition of a qualifi ed hedging transaction, but are not

identifi ed as such.


catio221(b

n Issb)(2)(

uesB) aut

ncoon

me, ghat

gaiis

nei

, ethexper

pea

nsq

oralififie

osed

s arhed

isigi

ngn

heU

dnd

ge

g ngr th

trhis

anan

santi

aryecrreta

ntic.

ntifiCMMCMisMis

dodsidsiddde

dendenSSec



only apply to the hedging (risk management) transac-tion; the hedge timing rules do not, however, affect the timing of income, deduction, gain or loss with respect to the hedged item. Accordingly, in the case of a hedging transaction relating to a borrowing, the hedge timing rules do not alter the tax accrual principles that apply to determine the timing of the issuers interest deductions with respect to the debt instrument itself.

General Matching RequirementNo particular hedge timing method is prescribed under Reg. 1.446-4. Instead, the hedge timing rules simply require that hedge gains and losses be ac-counted for under a method that clearly matches the timing of income, deductions, gains, or losses attributable to the item being hedged. As a general rule, the hedge timing provisions of Reg. 1.446-4 trump the timing rules that would otherwise apply to the risk management (hedging) transaction.

Special timing rules are provided for hedges of debt instruments.30 Under Reg. 1.446-4(e)(4), gain or loss from transactions that hedge a debt instrument must be accounted for by reference to the terms of the debt instrument and the period or periods to which the hedge applies. This regulation further provides that hedges of debt instruments that provide for fi xed or fl oating rates of interest are generally accounted for using constant yield principles, which effectively require a taxpayer to take hedging gains or losses into account over the same periods in which they would be taken into account as if the hedging gains or losses were to adjust the yield of the debt instrument.

In the case of hedges of anticipatory borrowings, the constant yield principles of Reg. 1.446-4(e)(4) require taxpayers to take gains and losses from hedges of anticipatory borrowings that are consummated into account as if the hedge adjusted the issue price of the debt instrument. Under Reg. 1.446-4(e)(8), gains and losses from hedges of anticipatory borrowings that are not consummated, however, are generally taken into account when realized.31 A taxpayer con-summates an anticipatory borrowing when it issues either the anticipated debt or a different but similar transaction for which the hedge serves to reasonably reduce risk.

Under special rules for hedges involving notional principal contracts, the rules of Reg. 1.446-3 will generally continue to govern the timing of income and deductions with respect to a notional principal con-tract that qualifi es as a hedging transaction unless the

application of those rules would not otherwise result in the matching needed to satisfy the clear refl ection requirement of Reg. 1.446-4.32 For example, if a no-tional principal contract hedges a debt instrument, the method of accounting for periodic payments described in Reg. 1.446-3(e) and the methods of accounting for nonperiodic payments described in Reg. 1.446-3(f)(2)(iii) and (v) generally satisfy the clear refl ection requirement of the hedge timing regulations. The methods described in Reg. 1.446-3(f)(2)(ii) and (iv), however, generally do not clearly refl ect the taxpayers income in that situation.

Identifi cationThe hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4 automati-cally apply to any risk management transaction that meets the defi nition of a qualifi ed hedging transac-tion set out in Code Sec. 1221(b)(2). In other words, application of the hedge timing rules is not depen-dent on identifi cation of the transaction as a hedging transaction under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).33

Reg. 1.446-4, however, includes its own iden-tifi cation requirements. Specifi cally, a taxpayers books and records are to include a description of the accounting method used for each type of hedg-ing transaction. This description must be suffi cient to show how the clear refl ection requirement of Reg. 1.446-4 is being satisfi ed. In addition, a taxpayers books and records should contain additional infor-mation suffi cient to verify that the taxpayers hedge method of accounting is being used for the particular transaction or transactions. This identifi cation is to be made on or before the date the hedging transaction is entered into, and is made on, and retained as part of, the taxpayers books and records.34 If a taxpayer does not timely identify its hedge method of tax ac-counting, the IRS may be more likely to challenge the taxpayers hedge accounting method.

Legging inA taxpayer legs in to a hedging transaction in situa-tions where the risk management transaction and the hedged item are not entered into on the same day. For example, if a taxpayer issues a debt instrument and subsequently enters into an interest rate hedg-ing transaction intended to manage interest rate risk with respect to the borrowing, the taxpayer would be viewed as having legged in at the time the risk management transaction is entered into. Under Reg. 1.446-4, no special timing rules are provided for a legging-in transaction where the taxpayer incurs

of intnt yie

erest eld pr

k

are geincip

e co

ame pnt as

perif

ithode

s ihe

n d

wgin

chg gaai

hens

y wor l

ouoss

lde

mmtra

etan

hsahood

ctof on

acn o

cor t

gedg s of

gges

e aequuire

f t

onat

us

heflfl oedg

toatisin

gestiting

g

s ofg raconst


a borrowing and subsequently engages in a related hedging transaction.35 The absence of a legging-in rule under those circumstances is consistent with the notion that Reg. 1.446-4 does not alter the timing of income, deduction, etc., with respect to the hedged item itself (e.g., the liability being hedged).

Legging outOnce a hedging transaction is established, a tax-payer may leg out of the hedge by disposing of or terminating either the liability being hedged, the hedging (risk management) transaction itself, or both. The hedge timing rules set out two separate legging-out provisions.

First, if the taxpayer disposes of or terminates the liability being hedged, but does not dispose of or terminate the related hedging (risk management) transaction, Reg. 1.446-4(e)(6) requires that the taxpayer match the unrealized (built-in) gain or loss on the hedging transaction to the gain or loss on the hedged item (liability) being disposed of. To meet this requirement, Reg. 1.446-4 provides that the taxpayer may mark the hedging transaction to market on the date it disposes of or terminates the liability being hedged.36 After the legging-out transaction, the hedg-ing transaction would no longer be governed by Reg. 1.446-4 unless it is recycled to serve as a hedge with respect to another hedged item.37

Second, a taxpayer may engage in a legging-out transaction by terminating the hedging (risk manage-ment) transaction without disposing of or terminating the liability being hedged. In that case, the hedge timing rules do not require that the taxpayer take any income, deduction, gain or loss into account with respect to the liability being hedged. Instead, the taxpayer is required to account for any gain or loss resulting from the disposition (termination) of the hedging transaction in a manner that matches such gain or loss to the income, gain, loss or deductions to be realized in the future with respect to the liability being hedged.

In LTR 199951038, the IRS considered whether a taxpayers payments to terminate a hedging agree-ment could be deducted in the year paid.38 In its analysis of Reg. 1.446-4(b), the IRS stated that, under certain circumstances, taking gains and losses from hedging transactions into account in the period in which they are realized may clearly refl ect income. As explained in LTR 199951038, such an accounting result would clearly refl ect income if the hedge and the hedged item are disposed of in

the same taxable year. In this ruling, the taxpayer terminated its interest rate hedge agreement and its lender fi nancing agreement (borrowing) in the same tax year. Thus, the IRS concluded that the taxpayers termination of the hedging transaction should be taken into account in the same tax year as the ter-mination of the hedged borrowing.

In LTR 9706002, the IRS addressed the applica-tion of the hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4 to an anticipatory hedge with respect to a borrowing.39 Spe-cifi cally, the taxpayer planned to issue fi xed-rate debt. To protect itself from an increase in interest rates, and to lock-in its interest rate obligation on the anticipated borrowing, the taxpayer entered into a Treasury lock agreement. A Treasury lock agreement is es-sentially a forward rate agreement that provides that if the interest rate on Treasury notes upon the maturity of the rate lock agreement is greater than a threshold amount, the taxpayer will receive money from the counterparty. If rates decrease, on the other hand, the taxpayer will pay money to the counterparty. The taxpayers rate-lock agreement was to mature at or around the time that the related borrowing was to be incurred by the taxpayer. The IRS concluded that under Reg. 1.446-4(e)(4), the taxpayer was required to account for income or loss from the anticipatory debt hedge in a manner that treats such gain (or loss) as if it decreased (or increased) the issue price of the debt instrument. As a result, the gain or loss from the hedge was to be spread out over the term of the debt instrument.

In FSA 199932012, the IRS disallowed a taxpayers attempt to take hedging losses into account before the taxpayer realized gains or losses from the hedged item.40 In this ruling, the taxpayer was in the business of leasing equipment to end-users. As part of its busi-ness operations, the taxpayer pooled its leases and sold securities that were collateralized by the pool of leases. The profi tability of these transactions depend-ed on the market rate of interest when the taxpayer offered these securities to the public. Prior to the is-suance of the collateralized securities, the taxpayer entered into hedging transactions intended to lock-in an interest rate. The IRS disallowed the taxpayers attempt to deduct losses from these hedging transac-tions in the year realized because the IRS believed that such accounting treatment would violate the clear refl ection of income standard of Reg. 1.446-4(b). The IRS concluded that the taxpayers hedging gains or losses must be accounted for by reference to the terms of the debt instrument and the period to


o anoaxpay

other yer m

yhedgeay en

n ng

ithouhed

ut dged

d spInposn t

inhng at

f oase

ermth

minae h

atied

ngg

debtIn F

nsSA

tru19

m99

en93

g1 4 6 4446

ctioanssac

u

d, ec

d

1w1.4ithwithSSe

446hh reeco

6-4 esp

dond a b



which the hedge relates, meaning the hedge losses were to be deferred and matched to the income or deductions on the collateralized securities.

Finally, Rev. Rul. 2002-71 deals with the applica-tion of the hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4(e) to a legging-out transaction involving an early termina-tion of an interest rate swap.41 In Rev. Rul. 2002-71, the taxpayer issued a debt instrument with a 10-year term that provided for interest to be paid annually at a fi xed rate. Contemporaneously with the issuance of the debt instrument, the taxpayer entered into an interest rate swap (the Swap) with a fi ve-year term that converted the fi xed rate payments under the debt instrument into fl oating rate payments. The taxpayer then terminated the Swap on the last day of Year 2.

According to Rev. Rul. 2002-71, prior to its termina-tion on the last day of Year 2, the Swap would have continued to hedge interest payments on the debt instrument during Year 3 through Year 5, and the tax-payer generally would have been required to take into account the remaining income, deduction, gain or loss on the Swap over the period from Year 3 through Year 5. Since any termination payment made or received by the taxpayer upon termination of the Swap repre-sented the present value of the extinguished rights and obligations under the Swap for Year 3 through Year 5, the IRS ruled that the taxpayer should amortize the gain or loss resulting from terminating the Swap over the period from Year 3 through Year 5.42

Coordination with Temporary Reg. 1.861-9TFor foreign tax credit calculation purposes, in deter-mining how to allocate or apportion interest expense between U.S. source and foreign source income, a taxpayer must fi rst determine whether a given item of income or expense is interest. Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T automatically treats certain losses from fi nancial products that alter the effective cost of bor-rowing as an item of interest expense for purposes of the apportionment and allocation rules. This includes losses from swaps, options, forwards, caps, collars, and similar fi nancial instruments.43

Unfortunately, gains from fi nancial products that alter the effective cost of a borrowing are not auto-

matically treated as an offset (reduction) to interest expense for foreign tax credit calculation purposes. Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T(b)(6)(iv)(B) allows tax-payers to use gains from such fi nancial products to reduce total interest expense, but only if the fi nancial products are properly identifi ed as hedges. In order to take advantage of this rule for gains from interest rate

hedges, Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T(b)(6)(iv)(C) provides that taxpayers must identify a fi nancial product as a hedge on the same day as it enters into the hedging transac-tion. Taxpayers have up to 120 days to identify an-ticipatory debt hedges.44 A taxpayer can satisfy the

rules of Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T(b)(6)(iv)(C) by meeting the debt hedge identifi cation requirements of Reg. 1.1221-2.

Coordination with Straddle Rules of Code Sec. 1092Although a taxpayers own debt instrument is gener-ally not viewed as a position in personal property that is potentially considered part of a tax straddle under Code Sec. 1092, the IRS has recently taken the position that, in limited circumstances, a taxpayers own debt may be considered part of a tax straddle.45 Even if a taxpayers own debt is not considered part of a tax straddle, a risk management (hedging) transaction entered into with the intent of managing interest rate risk on a borrowing could potentially be matched up with some other offsetting position of the taxpayer and therefore be considered part of a tax straddle. Fortunately, an exception to the ap-plication of the straddle rules is provided in the case of hedging transactions that meet the defi nition of a hedge under Code Sec. 1221(b)(2).

Code Sec. 1092(e) provides a hedge exception to the application of the straddle rules. Code Sec. 1092(e) provides simply that the straddle rules will not apply in the case of any hedging transaction as defi ned in Code Sec. 1256(e). Code Sec. 1256(e), in turn, defi nes a hedging transaction as any transaction that meets the defi nition in Code Sec. 1221(b)(2)(A), if before the close of the day on which such transac-tion was entered into (or at such earlier time as the Secretary may prescribe by regulations), the taxpayer clearly identifi es the transaction as being a hedging

Unfortunately, gains from fi nancial products that alter the effective cost of a borrowing are not automatically

treated as an offset (reduction) to interest expense for foreign tax

credit calculation purposes.

ver thermin

ghe pernation

,od fropaym

nter

alue e Sw

of wap

thphe fo

exr Y

tine

ngar

shthr

eod rug

ghtsh Ye

s aar

nd5

Evpa

enart

n o

n if f a

a ta

taax

xpst

ycco

gnt thg

oun

taxy thhe

he

anwa

5.

acon5

ccothn thSi. Si

ounhhe iinc

nt thSSw

ce anyy


transaction. This means that a hedging transaction that satisfi es the Code Sec. 1221(b)(2) defi nition of a hedge, and is identifi ed in a manner that satisfi es the requirements of Reg. 1.1221-2(f), is exempt from the straddle rules of Code Sec. 1092. Note further that the regulations issued under Code Sec. 1256(e) provide that a hedging transaction that is identifi ed under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) is automatically treated as an identifi cation for purposes of Code 1256(e) and Reg. 1.1256(e)-1.46

The straddle exemption provided for qualifi ed hedg-ing transactions under Code Sec. 1256(e) is twofold. First, the hedging transaction and the hedged item (borrowing) are not considered straddles with respect to each other. Second, neither the risk management (hedging) transaction nor the hedged item can be con-sidered part of a tax straddle with respect to any other potentially offsetting positions of the taxpayer.

Integrated Hedge Treatment Under Reg. 1.1275-6As described above, the hedging rules of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) and Reg. 1.446-4 generally provide for matching of the tax character and timing of income, gains, deductions, and losses from a qualifi ed hedg-ing transaction to the character and timing of the income, gains, deductions or losses resulting from the liability being hedged thereby. Although Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) and Reg. 1.446-4 provide for con-sistent treatment of the hedging transaction and the liability being hedged thereby, the income, gains, deductions and losses from the hedging transaction would need to be reported separately from the li-ability being hedged.

By contrast, Reg. 1.1275-6(a) provides for tax integration of a qualifying debt instrument and a hedge or combination of hedges that meet the re-quirements of that regulation. The integration rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 trump other federal income tax rules that would otherwise govern the tax character and timing consequences of each individual component of the hedge. In other words, if a qualifying debt in-strument and a qualifying hedge are integrated under Reg. 1.1275-6, during the period of integration the taxpayer ignores the separate existence of the hedg-ing transaction and accounts for the qualifying debt instrument on a synthetic basis, meaning that the debt instrument is treated for all tax purposes as the combination of the debt instrument being hedged in combination with the hedging transaction itself.

Qualifying TransactionsReg. 1.1275-6 provides for integration of a qualifying debt instrument (a QDI) and a qualifying hedging transaction (hereinafter a section 1275-6 hedge). The regulation defi nes a QDI to include all debt instruments subject to three enumerated exceptions.47 This can include QDIs issued by a taxpayer, as well as QDIs held as an asset by the taxpayer.48

A section 1275-6 hedge is broadly defi ned to include any financial instrumentsuch as spot, forward, or futures contracts, options, swaps, debt instruments or combinations thereof49that, when combined with the QDI, will permit the calculation of a yield to maturity or would qualify as a variable debt instrument under Reg. 1.1275-5. In order to qualify as a section 1275-6 hedge, the resulting synthetic debt instrument must have the same term to matu-rity as the remaining term of the QDI.50 By contrast, Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) simply requires that the hedging transaction manage the taxpayers risk. As such, Reg. 1.1275-6 requires a high degree of correlation between the terms of the hedging transaction and the terms of the QDI being hedged thereby.

A transaction is eligible for integrated treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 only if the QDI is issued or acquired by the taxpayer on or before, or substan-tially contemporaneously with, the date of the fi rst payment on the hedging transaction.51 Unlike Code. Sec. 1221(a)(7), this means that anticipatory hedging is limited under Reg. 1.1275-6.

As stated above, under Reg. 1.1275-6, a QDI cannot be hedged for less than its entire remaining term. However, an instrument that hedges only a portion of the principal amount of a QDI can qualify for integration under Reg. 1.1275-6 as long as the proportional hedge is for the entire remaining term of the QDI.52 By contrast, Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) and Reg. 1.1221-2 make it clear that a taxpayer may hedge all or part of its risk with respect to a borrowing for all or any portion of the period that it is subjected to such risk.53

RequirementsIn addition to the basic rules described above, a tax-payer may take advantage of Reg. 1.1275-6 only if the following requirements are met:

There must be same-day identifi cation under Reg. 1.1275-6(e).The parties to the hedge are not related, or, if they are related, the party proposing the hedge uses a mark-to-market method of accounting for the


s, dedeing

ductiohedg

ons ored the

nt ohe

the ed

hethe

der

gieb

ngby

trrahe

acnc

toonme

andgd tain

hens ca

Asnnno

staot b

tedbe

d he

abed

ng t nsa,

tra

221ec 12

ac

itygaith

iniinh

ng tncohhe

traomeli bliab

nsae, gbilbil y y



hedge and all similar or related transactions.The same taxpayer enters into both the hedge and the QDI.If the taxpayer is a foreign person engaged in a U.S. trade or business, all items of income and expense (other than interest expense subject to Reg. 1.882-5) are effectively connected with the U.S. trade or business for the period of the QDI had Reg. 1.1275-6 not applied.Neither the hedge or the QDI nor any other debt instrument that is part of the same issue as the QDI was part of an integrated transaction with respect to the taxpayer or otherwise legged out of in the 30 days preceding the issue date of the QDI.The taxpayer issues the QDI on or before the date on which the taxpayer makes or receives the fi rst payment on the section 1275-6 hedge.54Neither the hedge nor the QDI may have previ-ously been a part of a Code Sec. 1092 straddle.

Note that the third requirement, which is that the same taxpayer must enter into both the hedge and the QDI, effectively precludes Reg. 1.1275-6 integrated hedge treatment in situations where one member of a consolidated group directly hedges a QDI of another member of the group. The related-party hedging rule set out above also makes it diffi cult to qualify for integrated treatment if the issuer of a QDI enters into a hedge with a related taxpayer.

Identifi cationTo integrate a section 1275-6 hedge with a QDI under Reg. 1.1275-6, a taxpayer must identify the resulting synthetic debt instrument by entering the required information in its books and records on or before the day that it enters into the section 1275-6 hedge.

Method of Hedge Identifi cationNo particular form of identifi cation is required under Reg. 1.1275-6. However, the identifi cation should indicate that it is being made for purposes of Reg. 1.1275-6, and should include the following infor-mation:

The issue date of the QDI and the date that the hedge was entered intoA description of the QDI and the section 1275-6 hedgeA summary of the cash fl ows and accruals that result from integration of the QDI and the section 1275-6 hedge55

Note that hedge identifi cations under Reg. 1.1275-6 need not be fi led with the IRS, but are simply

retained as part of the taxpayers books and records. The common practice is for taxpayers to identify both the QDI and the qualifying section 1275-6 hedging transaction pursuant to a same-day identifi cation form/memorandum that satisfi es the requirements of Reg. 1.1275-6.

Misidentifi cation IssuesUnlike Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), Reg. 1.1275-6 does not include misidentifi cation rules. Reg. 1.1275-6(c)(2), however, provides that the IRS may, in limited circum-stances, integrate a QDI and a section 1275-6 hedge where the taxpayer has not elected to do so.56

The circumstances under which integration may be imposed by the IRS include (1) a failure by a taxpayer to identify an otherwise qualifying transaction, (2) a related party entering into a section 1275-6 hedge and the taxpayer holding a QDI, (3) a taxpayer hold-ing a QDI and entering into a hedge with a related party, or (4) a taxpayer legging out of an integrated transaction and entering into a new section 1275-6 hedge within 30 days with respect to the same QDI or another QDI that is part of the same issue. The IRS may deem a taxpayer to have made an integration election under Reg. 1.1275-6, however, only if (1) the QDI is subject to the rules of Reg. 1.1275-4 (relating to contingent payment debt instruments), or (2) the QDI is subject to the rules of Reg. 1.1275-5 (relating to variable rate debt instruments) and the QDI pays interest at an objective rate.

Consolidated Group ConsiderationsAs noted above, one of the requirements for inte-grated treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 is that the same taxpayer must enter into both the section 1275-6 hedge and the QDI. This limitation denies integrated treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 in a situ-ation where one member of a consolidated group enters into a hedge with respect to a QDI held or entered into by another member of the group. As a result, Reg. 1.1275-6 is more restrictive than the rules under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), which generally allows members of a consolidated group to hedge the risks of other members.

Consequences of Integration Under Reg. 1.1275-6If an integration election is made with respect to a QDI and a qualifying section 1275-6 hedge, the result is that the QDI and the hedge are generally treated as a single transaction by the taxpayer for all

a rela

ionated taxpay

ctia

n 127xpa

75yer

-6m6 hmu

edust

gei

e wde

th ify

ath

Qhe

DI uesu

ndlti

ern Consoolidat

nteg atedgra

tifi deent

d

ficwi

Id

ina nteghhe

de

gradedg

ent

atedge w

tifica


federal income tax purposes during the period that the transaction qualifi es as an integrated transaction. This means that while a QDI and a qualifying hedge are part of an integrated transaction, neither the QDI nor the hedge will be subject to the rules that would otherwise apply on a separate basis, includ-ing but not limited to, the straddle rules of Code Sec. 1092.57 Note, however, that an issuers election to integrate a QDI and a qualifying hedging trans-action has no impact on holders of the QDI.

During the period of integrated treatment, the resulting synthetic debt instrument is subject to the general rules for debt instruments under Code Sec. 163(e) and Code Sec. 1271 through 1275. The terms of the resulting synthetic debt instrument, such as the issue date, issue price, etc., are determined under Reg. 1.1275-6(f)(2) through (13).

Legging inA taxpayer may leg in to a Reg. 1.1275-6 hedge with respect to an outstanding QDI, which means that the taxpayer can enter into the hedge at any time after the date on which the QDI is issued. In order to leg in, a taxpayer must ensure that all of the integration re-quirements described above are met.58 The synthetic instrument would become eligible for Reg. 1.1275-6 treatment from and after the leg-in date. The taxpayer would account for the separate debt instrument under applicable interest and original issue discount rules prior to the leg-in date, and would account for the resulting synthetic debt instrument under the integra-tion rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 thereafter. No income, deduction, gain or loss is generally recognized with respect to the QDI upon a legging-in transaction.59

Legging outA taxpayer may also leg out of a Reg. 1.1275-6 hedge by disposing of one or both of the components of the hedging transaction. A legging-out will also occur if any of the integration requirements of Reg. 1.1275-6 are no longer met. Immediately before leg-ging out, a taxpayer is treated as having disposed of the synthetic debt instrument for its fair market value, and is required to take into account any gain or loss resulting from the deemed disposition. In the context

of a legging-out transaction relating to a QDI that is a liability of the taxpayer, the transaction may result in the taxpayer being able to take an interest expense deduction as if the synthetic debt instrument were

retired at a premium.60 If the taxpayer retains the QDI after legging out of in-tegrated treatment, it must make appropriate adjust-ments to the QDI to refl ect any differences between the fair market value and issue price of the debt instrument. Any losses or deductions arising from legging out are disallowed

if a taxpayer legs out of a Reg. 1.1275-6 hedge within 30 days of legging in to the transaction.

The legging-out rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 should be contrasted to the legging-out provisions of Reg. 1.446-4, as it relates to a Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedg-ing transaction. As described above, the legging-out rules of Reg. 1.446-4 are one-sided, meaning that if a taxpayer legs out of a Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedge by terminating or disposing of the risk management transaction itself, the legging-out will have no impact on the debt instrument being hedged thereby.

Coordination with Temporary Reg. 1.861-9TBy reason of the integrated treatment resulting from Reg. 1.1275-6, the taxpayers interest expense from a QDI that is part of a qualifying section 1275-6 hedge would be determined on a synthetic basis. As such, during the period a section 1275-6 hedge is integrated with a QDI, no separate gains or losses from fi nancial products that alter the effective cost of borrowing would arise for purposes of the rules under Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T.

Coordination with Straddle Rules of Code Sec. 1092As noted above, during the period that a QDI and a qualifying hedge are part of an integrated transaction under Reg. 1.1275-6, the QDI and the related sec-tion 1275-6 hedge cannot be considered offsetting positions with respect to each other for purposes of the straddle rules of Code Sec. 1092. However, in contrast to the consequences resulting from a quali-fi ed hedging transaction under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) and Code Sec. 1256(e), the resulting synthetic debt

By reason of the integrated treatment resulting from Reg.

1.1275-6, the taxpayers interest expense from a QDI that is part

of a qualifying section 1275-6 hedge would be determined on a

synthetic basis.


enter h the

gnto thQDI

Qe heds issu

crild

abd aedcom

bovme

vee aigareib

memefo

58 TReg

hg

se1

thny12

he75

tic ByRe

y reg

eeaso1

on 12

of75

th5 6

espy

t top

ect

ayetaxxpa

o a

whcahda

rettad

espaxpate

ectpayee on

t toer cn whic



instrument could potentially be part of a straddle under Code Sec. 1092 to the extent the synthetic debt instrument is considered an offsetting position with respect to another position of the taxpayer.

ComparisonIf a taxpayer borrows money and agrees to pay interest at a fi xed (fl oating) rate, a risk management transac-tion whereby the taxpayer synthetically converts the interest rate to a fl oating (fi xed) rate may qualify under the integration rules of Reg. 1.1275-6, as well as under the hedging rules of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).

If an interest rate hedging transaction hedges the entire remaining life of a debt instrument and both the hedge and the debt instrument remain in place through their originally scheduled maturity dates, there may be little practical difference between the integrated transaction rules of Reg. 1.1275-6, and the coordinated hedge character and timing rules of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7)/Reg. 1.446-4. In each case, the net effect should be a matching of the character and timing of income, gain, deduction and loss resulting from the hedge to the interest expense deduction on the debt instrument being hedged thereby. In fact, the differences between the two approaches may be limited to slight timing differences and the manner in which the transactions are reported.61

If integrated treatment is adopted, no separate gain or loss is reported with respect to the hedging transaction itself, and the interest expense deduc-tion resulting from the synthetic debt instrument must be determined and reported as a single item. By contrast, in a Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedging situ-ation, the timing and amount of interest expense deductions with respect to the debt being hedged remains unchanged, and the income or loss with respect to the hedging transaction is separately reported. As a result, separate reporting of the hedge gain or loss under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7)/Reg. 1.446-4 may necessitate a separate hedge identifi cation for foreign tax credit purposes under Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T.

Although the consequences under Reg. 1.1275-6 and Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) may be similar, the require-ments for integrated treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 are, as described above, potentially more diffi cult to satisfy than the defi nition of a hedging transaction under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7). In particular, integrated treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 requires a higher de-gree of correlation between the combined cash fl ows

of the QDI and the offsetting hedging transaction than would be required under the risk management standard of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).

Other differences between these hedging pro-visions exist. For example, Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) allows taxpayers to hedge an expected (or anticipa-tory) issuance of debt. By contrast, the integrated hedge rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 are more restrictive in the case of anticipatory hedges. Further, Reg. 1.1221-2 makes it clear that a taxpayer may hedge all or part of its risk for all or part of the period over which the taxpayer is exposed to that risk.62 By contrast, the integration rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 are more restrictive in the case of partial hedging transactions. Further, identifi cation of a hedging transaction under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) results in the hedging transaction and the hedged item being exempt from application of the straddle rules, both relative to each other and relative to other positions of the taxpayer. By contrast, in the case of an inte-grated hedging transaction under Reg. 1.1275-6, although the QDI and the section 1275-6 hedge will not subject to the straddle rules relative to each other, the resulting synthetic instrument could be subject to application of the straddle rules in relation to other offsetting positions of the taxpayer.

Finally, differences between the results under Reg. 1.1275-6 versus Code Sec. 1221(a)(7)/Reg. 1.446-4 may arise in the context of a legging-out transaction. As described above, if a taxpayer legs out of a synthetic debt instrument under Reg. 1.1275-6, but retains the QDI being hedged, the taxpayer would be treated as having sold or dis-posed of the synthetic debt instrument immediately prior to the legging-out transaction. By contrast, if a taxpayer legs out of a Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) hedge by disposing of the hedging transaction and retaining the debt instrument being hedged, no gain or loss would be taken into account with respect to the debt instrument upon the legging-out transaction, and any resulting gain or loss on the termination of the hedge would generally be deferred and taken into account over the remaining term of the debt instrument. Since it is impossible to predict whether and to what extent a legging-out transaction may occur in the future, it is diffi cult to judge whether the legging out rules of Reg. 1.1275-6 would provide an advantage or a dis-advantage, relative to Code Sec. 1221(a)(7)/Reg. 1.446-4, depending on which side of the transac-tion is retained and which is terminated early.

ransad tre

gction

atmend

s are t is a

lf,fro

and tthe

hee syn

nnt

terhe

est

st c

xpeebt

ensens

detru

dume

c-n

le1

gs1

o2oout75

of6

abs

bu

mit d toted

r loainn or

o th

grath

limiinmitn wIfIf

tedhiwhiciint

d tohch

teg at


1 All references to the Code are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2 This article assumes that the taxpayer issues debt in its functional currency. A detailed discussion of the issues associated with hedging of nonfunctional currency de-nominated debt under Code Sec. 988(d) and Reg. 1.988-5(a) is beyond the scope of this article.

3 This article does not address the special tax issues that arise in the case of taxpayers that are dealers in securities for federal income tax purposes.

4 Code Sec. 1221(a)(7); Reg. 1.1221-2(b). Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) is effective for hedg-ing transactions entered into after Decem-ber 17, 1999. Except as otherwise specifi -cally noted, all references to Reg. 1.1221-2 are to the regulations that were fi nalized in 2002 under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7). The 2002 version of Reg. 1.1221-2 is effective for hedging transactions entered into on or after March 20, 2002.

5 See Proposed Reg. 1.162-30 (2004) and Proposed Reg. 1.212-1(q) (2004).

6 Reg. 1.1221-2(c)(4). 7 Reg. 1.1221-2(d)(1)(ii)(A).8 See Reg. 1.1221-2(d)(2) ([a] transaction

that economically converts an interest rate from a fi xed rate to a fl oating rate or that converts an interest rate from a fl oating rate to a fi xed rate manages risk). Under the 1994 version of Reg. 1.1221-2, the regu-lations also made it clear that a hedge of a borrowing met the defi nition of a qualifi ed hedging transaction without regard to the use of the proceeds of the borrowing. See Reg. 1.1221-2(c)(6) (1994).

9 See Reg. 1.1221-2(d)(5)(i), however, providing that except as otherwise deter-mined by published guidance or private letter ruling, the purchase or sale of a debt instrument, an equity security or an annu-ity contract is not a hedging transaction even if the transaction limits or reduces the taxpayers risk with respect to ordinary property, borrowings or ordinary obliga-tions. This provision refl ects the IRSs view that certain traditional investment positions generally may not serve as tax hedging transactions for purposes of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).

10 Reg. 1.1221-2(d)(1).11 This exception does not extend to related

entities that are outside of the consolidated federal income tax group even if such related entities are 100 percent owned by members of a group. For example, if two subsidiaries that are part of a consolidated federal income tax group are each 50-per-cent members of a state law limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, a direct

hedge of the risks of the limited liability company by either such member would not qualify under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).

12 Reg. 1.1221-2(e)(1). However, the transaction would be recognized by both members as an actual transaction, subject to the consistency requirements of Reg. 1.1502-13.

13 Note that the separate entity election is effective solely for purposes of determining hedge status under Code Sec. 1221(a)(7).

14 See Reg. 1.1221-2(e)(2). 15 See Reg. 1.1221-2(e)(2)(ii). An intercom-

pany transaction is a hedging transaction with respect to a member of a consolidated group if and only if it meets the follow-ing requirements: (1) the position of the member in the intercompany transaction would qualify as a hedging transaction with respect to the member if the member had entered into the transaction with an unrelated party, and (2) the position of the other member (the marking member) in the transaction is marked to market under the marking members method of accounting. If an intercompany hedging transaction meets the above requirements, the char-acter and timing rules of Reg. 1.1502-13 will not apply to the income, deduction, gain or loss from the intercompany hedging transaction and, subject to the identifi ca-tion requirements, the marking members gain or loss from the transaction is ordi-nary.

16 It should be noted that an identifi cation that satisfies the requirements of Reg. 1.1221-2(f) is treated as an identifi cation for purposes of Code Sec. 1256(e) and Reg. 1.1256(e)-1. An identifi cation of a transaction as a hedge for purposes of Code Sec. 1256(e) avoids the potential application of the straddle rules of Code Sec. 1092, as well as the mark-to-market rules for section 1256 contracts that are entered into as part of a qualifying hedging transaction.

17 The only exception to the requirement that the hedged item be identifi ed is in the context of aggregate or macro hedg-ing activities, where an aggregate tax hedge policy replaces the requirement of identifying the hedged item. See Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(3)(iv).

18 Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(2).19 See Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(3)(iv). If a transaction

hedges aggregate risk, by defi nition the taxpayer is unable to identify the ordinary asset or borrowing/ordinary obligation be-ing hedged with suffi cient detail to satisfy the requirements of the regulations. In that case, the identifi cation requirements for the hedged item(s) or risk(s) can be met by placing in the taxpayers books and records a description of the hedging program and

by establishing a system under which individual transactions are identifi ed as being entered into pursuant to the hedg-ing program. This program is commonly referred to as an aggregate hedge policy statement.

20 Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(4)(iv). 21 Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(3)(iii)(A).22 Reg. 1.1221-2(f)(3)(iii)(B). 23 See Note 4, above, relating to the effective

date of Reg. 1.1221-2(g).24 Reg. 1.1221-2(g)(1).25 Reg. 1.1221-2(g)(1)(ii)26 Reg. 1.1221-2(g)(2)(ii).27 See TAM 200510028 (Dec. 17, 2004).

(Where a failure to identify a hedging transaction is inadvertent and certain specifi ed requirements have been satis-fi ed, a taxpayer may, but is not required, to treat gain or loss from a hedging trans-action as ordinary income or loss under section 1.1221-2(a)(1) and (2). (Emphasis added.))

28 Limited guidance is found in letter rul-ings relating to Code Sec. 1221(a)(7), but none of these rulings includes a specifi c conclusion by the IRS as to the availability of the inadvertent error exception. See, e.g., LTR 9706002 (Oct. 24, 1996); and LTR 200052010 (Sept. 25, 2000). See also LTR 200051035 (Sept. 26, 2000) and LTR 200051033 (Sept. 25, 2000), which are nearly identical except for the fact that LTR 200051035 deals with tax years governed by the 1994 hedging regulations.

29 Reg. 1.1221-2(g)(2).30 To the extent an integration election is

made under Reg. 1.1275-6, the hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4 will not ap-ply.

31 Reg. 1.446-4(e)(8).32 Reg. 1.446-4(e)(5). 33 The IRS has confirmed in Rev. Rul.

2003-127, IRB 2003-52, 1245, that, for purposes of the hedge timing rules under Reg. 1.446-4, the defi nition of a hedging transaction under Reg. 1.1221-2(b) is not modifi ed by Reg. 1.1221-2(g)(2), dealing with income mischaracterization.

34 Reg. 1.446-4(d)(1) and (2).35 If, however, a taxpayer legs in to a hedg-

ing transaction by fi rst entering into the hedging transaction and then incurring a borrowing, such a transaction would be covered by the anticipatory hedging rules of Reg. 1.446-4(e)(4).

36 Reg. 1.446-4(e)(6).37 Even though a hedging transaction is no

longer governed by the hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4 following a legging-out transaction, the hedging (risk management) transaction should still be governed by the tax character provisions of Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) and Reg. 1.1221-2.

ENDNOTES


Reg. dethe defi

1.1221eanition

h t

-2, the a hedgef a qua

d t

)(621

994).)(5 )

w

h

fReg.

t1.1256(e

C1.

hAn d

idfen

tifi ccation off

to fixedo a fi

ing heedg

drsi

ng t

lso

to19laboh

o a fi994ationorrod

fi xed4 verns aowini ans



38 LTR 199951038 (Sept. 24, 1999).39 LTR 9706002 (Oct. 24, 1996).40 FSA 199932012 (May 4, 1999).41 Rev. Rul. 2002-71, IRB 2002-44, 763.42 Rev. Rul. 2002-71 also provides an al-

ternative example in which the Swap is terminated at the end of Year 2, and that the debt instrument being hedged is then terminated at the end of Year 4. The ruling concludes that, upon the termination of the debt instrument at the end of Year 4, any remaining unamortized gain or loss with respect to the early termination of the Swap has to be taken into account at the time the debt is extinguished.

43 Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T(b)(6)(i).44 Temporary Reg. 1.861-9T(b)(6)(iv)(C).45 See, e.g., TAM 200541040 (Oct. 14, 2005);

TAM 200530027 (July 29, 2005); and TAM 200509022 (October 6, 2004). In each of these TAMs, the IRS concluded that debt instruments issued by the taxpayers were positions in personal property subject to the straddle rules of Code Sec. 1092, thereby resulting in capitalization of inter-est deductions with respect to such debt instruments under Code Sec. 263(g). See also Proposed Reg. 1.263(g)-3(c)(3), is-sued on January 18, 2001.

46 See Reg. 1.1256(e)-1.47 Reg. 1.1275-6(b)(1). The enumerated

exceptions are (1) Code Sec. 1275(a)(3) tax exempt obligations, (2) Code Sec. 1272(a)(6) instruments (such as mortgages held by REMICs), and (3) certain contingent debt instruments issued for nonpublicly traded property.

48 Although either of Reg. 1.1275-6 or Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) potentially applied to hedg-ing transactions relating to a taxpayers own debt, Reg. 1.1275-6 may have broader application in the case of a taxpayer that hedges a debt instrument that it owns as an asset in light of the fact that integration treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 is not con-tingent on the debt instrument qualifying as an ordinary asset in the taxpayers hands. By contrast, a taxpayer intending to hedge a debt instrument held as an asset would be eligible to utilize Code Sec. 1221(a)(7) only if the debt instrument is an ordinary asset in the taxpayers hands.

49 Stock is not a financial instrument for purposes of Reg. 1.1275-6(b)(3).

50 Reg. 1.1275-6(b)(2)(i).51 See Reg. 1.1275-6(c)(1)(vi).52 For example, if a taxpayer entered into

a $1 million borrowing for a term of 10 years, the taxpayer would not be permit-ted to elect integrated treatment under Reg. 1.1275-6 for a hedge with a term of less than 10 years. However, the taxpayer

could enter into a hedge with respect to $500,000 of the $1 million amount of the liability provided that such hedge was for the full 10-year term of the debt instru-ment.

53 See Reg. 1.1221-2(d)(7)(i).54 This provision effectively limits a taxpayers

ability to engage in anticipatory hedging under Reg. 1.1275-6. However, the QDI may be entered into substantially contemporaneously with the hedge if it is acquired or issued after the date of fi rst payment on section 1275-6 hedge.

55 Reg. 1.1275-6(e).56 Reg. 1.1275-6(c)(2). See, e.g., Rev. Rul.

2000-12, 2000-1 CB 744, pursuant to which the IRS deemed integration of two offsetting bull-bear bonds.

57 Reg. 1.1275-6(f)(1). 58 Reg. 1.1275-6(d)(1).59 Reg. 1.1275-6(d)(1). Special rules are pro-

vided for abusive legging-in transactions.60 See Reg. 1.163-7.61 There may be slight differences in timing

resulting from the application of the OID principles under Code Secs. 1271 through 1275 as applied to the resulting synthetic debt instrument under a section 1275-6 hedge, in contrast to the application of the hedge timing rules of Reg. 1.446-4.

62 Reg. 1.1221-2(d)(1).

ENDNOTES

This article is reprinted with the publishers permission from the JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL PLANNING, a quarterly journal published by CCH, a Wolters Kluwer business. Copying or distribution without the publishers permission is prohibited. To subscribe to the JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL PLANNING or other CCH Journals please call 800-449-8114 or visit www.CCHGroup.com. All views expressed in the articles

and columns are those of the author and not necessarily those of CCH.

pomierski rate swaps

Documents