polk county comprehensive plan · -67% owner-occupied, 27% rental, 6% vacant • housing values...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Polk CountyComprehensive Plan
Economic Development Task Force“Kick off” MeetingFebruary 2, 2005
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
AgendaAgenda
• Introduction of Task Force• Mission of Economic Development Task Force• Introduction of URS Team• Review of Comprehensive Plan Process• “Where is Polk County in the Midwest Economy
and Where is it Going?”• Discussion
• Collection of Handout Material
2
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Introduction of Task ForceIntroduction of Task Force
• AIB College of Business• Accu-Mold Corporation• Neighborhood Development
Corporation• Keystone• ITA• Eastern Polk Regional
Development• Warren County Economic• Community Federal Bank• ABS Virtual• R&R• Ladco• Gilotti• Commercial Federal Bank
• Koehler• MidAmerican• Pioneer• Albaugh, Inc• BDF• Coldwell• Ankeny Industrial• Charter Bank• Hubbell• Dallas County Economic
Development• Greater Des Moines
Partnership• Des Moines Economic
Development
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Introduction of the TeamIntroduction of the Team
Jon DeVries, AICPTimothy Butler, AICP
Stina FishBrian Ross
3
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Review of the Comprehensive Plan ProcessReview of the Comprehensive Plan Process
Purposes of the PlanPurposes of the Plan•• LongLong--term strategyterm strategy
•• ShorterShorter--term decisions term decisions
•• Development reviewsDevelopment reviews
•• Basis for zoning Basis for zoning
•• Guide to capital budgetGuide to capital budget
•• Intergovernmental coordination Intergovernmental coordination
•• Private sector communication and Private sector communication and leadershipleadership
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Review of the Comprehensive Plan ProcessReview of the Comprehensive Plan Process
4
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Review of the Comprehensive Plan ProcessReview of the Comprehensive Plan Process
Purposes of the PlanPurposes of the Plan•• Link Land Use, Link Land Use,
Transportation, Transportation, UtilitiesUtilities
•• Focus on Focus on ImplementaImplementa--tiontion, Usability, Usability
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Review of the Comprehensive Plan ProcessReview of the Comprehensive Plan Process
Matching city and county land usesMatching city and county land uses•• City expansion plans, annexation City expansion plans, annexation
agreementsagreements
•• Regional highway plans (i.e., Northeast Regional highway plans (i.e., Northeast Beltway)Beltway)
•• Utility extensionsUtility extensions
•• Understanding community character Understanding community character and form of developmentand form of development
5
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Review of the Comprehensive Plan ProcessReview of the Comprehensive Plan Process
Primary Participation MethodsPrimary Participation Methods
•• Steering CommitteeSteering Committee•• Area Plan CommitteesArea Plan Committees•• Housing Task Force Housing Task Force •• Economic Development Task Economic Development Task
ForceForce•• Open HousesOpen Houses•• Resources for staff Resources for staff
presentationspresentations
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural ResourcesComprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural Resources
Land Base Land Base -- GeologyGeology
Abandoned coal mines Abandoned coal mines ––
Known LocationsKnown Locations
Geology Geology ––
Alluvial DepositsAlluvial Deposits
6
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural ResourcesComprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural Resources
LandformsLandforms
Topography and ElevationTopography and Elevation
HydrologyHydrology
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural ResourcesComprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural Resources
Vegetation Vegetation –– Land CoverLand Cover
Vegetation Vegetation -- HistoricHistoric
Hydrology Hydrology –– Flood Zones andFlood Zones and
Watershed BoundariesWatershed Boundaries
7
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural ResourcesComprehensive Plan Base Information –Natural Resources
Soil AssociationsSoil Associations
Steep slopes and Steep slopes and ErodibleErodible SoilsSoils
Known and Potential Known and Potential Contamination SitesContamination Sites
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic Data
• Population Density by Census Tract
8
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic Data
050,000
100,000
150,000
200,000250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000450,000
1970 1980 1990 2000 2003
Popu
latio
n
Unincorporated Areas(est.)
Other Cities (est.)
West Des Moines
Urbandale
Ankeny
Des Moines
Comparative Population Change in Polk County, 1970-2003
Percentage Population Change, 1980-2003
1%12%-13%5%Unincorporated Areas (est.)
10%39%22%57%Other Cities (est.)
10%34%45%33%West Des Moines
8%22%32%24%Urbandale
15%47%20%69%Ankeny
-1%3%1%-5%Des Moines
4%15%8%6%Polk County Total
2000-03200019901980Population Area
Ten years endingPercentage Population Change,
1980-2003
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
1980 1990 2000 2000-03
Polk County Total Des MoinesAnkeny UrbandaleWest Des Moines Other Cities (est.)Unincorporated Areas (est.)
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic Data
• Both County and cities grew faster than 1990 plan had predicted
• Unincorporated Polk County stayed fairly constant in population as its land base shrank
Actual Population 2000 Forecasts in 1990 Plan
Population Area Baseline Spill-over Target Policy
Actual 2000
Population
Des Moines 174,656 174,656 183,675 198,682
Suburban Municipalities 122,657 112,872 108,348 144,379
Exurban Municipalities* 3,537 3,537 3,537 5,714
Unincorporated Areas 26,050 26,050 31,340 25,826
Polk County Total 326,900 317,115 326,900 374,601
* Exurban municipalities in 2000: Alleman, Carlisle, Elkhart, Mitchellville, Polk City, Runnells, Sheldahl
Source: 1990 Comprehensive Plan, U.S. Census
9
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic Data
• County median age declined (counter to national trends) in 1990s from 38.2 to 34.4
• Largest age cohort is 35-44
Age D istributionP olk C ounty
010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,000
Under
5 5-9
10-
14
15-
19
20-
24
25-
34
35-
44
45-
54
55-
59
60-
64
65-
74
75-
84 85+
1990 Cens us 2000 Cens us
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Socio Economic Data
• Increasing racial and ethnic diversity (black, Asian, Latino)
• Overall increase in total households• Declining household size• More non-family households• More senior heads of household; female heads
of household
10
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Housing DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Housing Data
• 166,010 housing units (2003)- 6% increase since 2000- 22% since 1990- Grimes and Johnston saw largest increases
• 90% within municipalities (2000) • Tenure
- 67% owner-occupied, 27% rental, 6% vacant• Housing values increased over 50% in 1990s in all municipalities
- Highest values in Johnston, Clive, West Des Moines - Median value increased from $73,200 in 1990 to $103,100 in
2000 (40.8%)• Rental costs increased 31%
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Housing DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Housing Data
• Distribution of affordable housing• Continued market demand for larger, more
expensive housing; related impacts on housing affordability.
• Median household income for nonfamily households not keeping pace with housing costs
• 10.9% owner-occupied households are “cost-burdened,” 9.6% renter households
• County involvement primarily through Housing Trust Fund
11
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Water/Wastewater DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Water/Wastewater Data
• WRA Facility Plan Update- Ankeny, Altoona and Bondurant to
connect to regional system- “Expansion projects” -
• Four Mile Interceptor improvements, extension
• Little Four Mile Interceptor extension
• Mud Creek Interceptor and Little Four Mile Interceptor – South Branch
- Local projects: Saylor Creek Sewer• Water, sewer, land use relationships
Water Service Areas
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Land Use DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Land Use Data
12
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Land Use DataComprehensive Plan Base Information –Land Use Data
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –County ZoningComprehensive Plan Base Information –County Zoning
13
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –AgricultureComprehensive Plan Base Information –Agriculture
• Northern 2/3 of County• 63% of County lies outside municipal
boundaries• Approximately 62% total County area in farms• Number of farms and farmers has declined• Acreage in farms, size of farms
have increased• Slight rise in farm income
Best Farmland Best Farmland Soils (CSR)Soils (CSR) Number of Farms
700
750
800
850
900
1997 2002
Total Acreage in Farms
224500
225000
225500
226000
226500
227000
227500
1997 2002
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –Community ResourcesComprehensive Plan Base Information –Community Resources
Community Facilities
Regional Facilities
Parks and Open Space
14
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –TransportationComprehensive Plan Base Information –Transportation
• Multimodal:- Roadways- Transit- Non-motorized
• What is Included in the Transportation Element:- Roadway Improvements Major Routes/ Important
Secondary Outside Municipalities- Local/Regional Transit System Changes/
Improvements Outside Municipalities- Major Bicycle/Pedestrian System Elements- Airports – From Master Plan- Freight Movement
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Comprehensive Plan Base Information –TransportationComprehensive Plan Base Information –Transportation
• What is NOT Included in the Transportation Element:
- Locations inside municipalities- Nuisance Issues (speeding, cut through traffic,
etc.- Local Street Projects- Local Bus System Routing Recommendations- Local Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects
15
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• “Where is Polk County in the Iowa and Midwestern Economy and Where is it Going?”- Reviewed existing market conditions- Interviewed planning and business professionals- Profiled Midwest growth trends
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Growth returned to the Midwest during the 1990sGrowth returned to the Midwest during the 1990s
Population Growth (Midwest vs. United States)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1969-79 1979-89 1989-1999
Perc
ent C
hang
e
United States Midwest
16
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Michigan lags, Wisconsin leadsMichigan lags, Wisconsin leads
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1990 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04
Total employment
MI
IL
US
IN
percent change from year ago
WI
IA
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Historic perspectiveHistoric perspective
• Region became high-income during late 19th and early 20th century through agriculture, resources, manufacturing & urbanization
17
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Agriculture and manufacturing--MW mainstays--will continue to shrinkAgriculture and manufacturing--MW mainstays--will continue to shrink
Industry Employment as percent of Total Employment: 1900 - 1997
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991Year
Perc
ent
Manufacturing/Total Agricultural/TotalSources: Historical Statistics of US, BLS, USDA
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Region of manufacturing--both then and nowRegion of manufacturing--both then and now
Manufacturing share of total employment
10
15
20
25
30
35
1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002
perc
ent
Midw est
United States
18
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Per capita income vs. U.S.Per capita income vs. U.S.
Per capita personal income, MW vs. US
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
1978 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00
US
avg
= 10
0
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Large cities are performing best...Large cities are performing best...
Midwest Growth in Population, 1990-2001
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Non MetropolitanAreas
Metro Area < 1million
Metro Areas > 1million
Chicago PMSA
Percent Change (%)
19
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Some urban areas (i.e Chicago) have morphed to services….can others do so?Some urban areas (i.e Chicago) have morphed to services….can others do so?
Chicago MSA Employment by sector, 1970-1997
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1970 1980 1990 1997
thou
sand
s
Financial, Legal and Business Services ManufacturingSource: U.S. Department of Commerce, County Business Patterns, author's calculations
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Educational Attainment 2000Educational Attainment 2000
<H.S. H.S. Grad Some College
College Adv. Degree
U.S. 19.6 28.6 27.3 15.5 8.9Illinois 18.6 27.7 27.7 16.5 9.5Chicago PMSA 17.0 26.0 26.0 19.0 11.0Indiana 17.9 37.2 25.5 12.2 7.2IowaIowa 13.913.9 36.136.1 28.828.8 14.714.7 6.56.5Michigan 16.6 31.3 30.3 13.7 8.1Wisconsin 15.0 34.6 28.1 15.3 7.2
Educational Attainment 2000
20
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Two Pillars of Biotech DevelopmentTwo Pillars of Biotech Development
• NIH Grants• Patents• new Ph.D.s
• Venture Capital• R&D Partnerships• Startup Firms• Established Firms
Research
Commercialization
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Midwest commercial biotechnology is weak…despite strong research activityMidwest commercial biotechnology is weak…despite strong research activity
Biotech CentersNIH funds ($M) bio Ph.Ds bio patents
Boston 1,433 355 3,007S.F. Bay area 704 215 3,991San Diego 681 82 1,632Raleigh-Durham 469 166 796Seattle 504 68 770New York 1,383 519 6,806Philadelphia 596 139 3,214Los Angeles 594 218 1,399Wash.-Balt. 952 241 2,162
Research CentersChicago 417 177 1,444Detroit 349 105 655Houston 420 135 634St. Louis 324 73 780
21
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
The Midwest produces more nanotechnology papers than any other region--Can it produce the commercialization?The Midwest produces more nanotechnology papers than any other region--Can it produce the commercialization?
344344
259259
754 754
175175
346346
323323
18071807
312312
543543
11731173
628628
976976
255255278278 479479354354
174174
294294
243243
1986 - 1987USA ~120WW Total ~450
1986 - 1987USA ~120WW Total ~450
1991 - 1992USA ~1,500WW Total ~3,800
1991 - 1992USA ~1,500WW Total ~3,800
2001 - 2002USA ~10,000WW Total ~34,000
2001 - 2002USA ~10,000WW Total ~34,000
211211
156156
122122
139139 128128
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Preliminary SWOT- Strengths – Employment Base, Transportation
Linkages, Available Properties- Weaknesses – Attraction of Young Professionals,
Changes in Financial Sector- Opportunities – Reinvestment in Downtown Des
Moines and in Brownfields- Threats – Unbalanced Suburban Growth, Loss of
New Technology growth to other centers
22
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Locational Advantage
17%242,835 / 1,403,989TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
20%14,184 / 71,635Public administration
24%14,679 / 60,785Administrative and waste services
42%3,574 / 8,597Management of companies and enterprises
29%10,846 / 37,833Professional and technical services
28%4,186 / 14,950Real estate and rental and leasing
49%39,669 / 80,594Finance and insurance
26%8,835 / 34,182Information
23%14,987 / 65,349Wholesale trade
20%13,010 / 66,575Construction
State of Iowa EmploymentINDUSTRY
Percentage of State
Employment in Industry
Polk County Employment
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Migration of residents from other Counties 2000 - 2003
In Migration Out Migration Net MigrationIowa 25,071 23,219 1,852Other 11,046 10,830 216Foreign 422 248 174Northeast 1,236 1,333 -97Midwest 10,626 11,110 -484West 4,771 5,498 -727South 4,914 6,758 -1,844
Migration 58,086 58,996 -910
23
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – State of IowaEmployment Base – State of Iowa
• Iowa vs. Peer States - Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska and Missouri
• Key Employment Categories- Manufacturing- Transportation and warehousing- Finance and Insurance- Public Administration- Total Employment
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Iowa vs. Peer StatesEmployment Base – Iowa vs. Peer States
• Manufacturing
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
Illinois Iowa Minnesota Missouri Nebraska
2001 2002 2003 2004
24
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Iowa vs. Peer StatesEmployment Base – Iowa vs. Peer States
• Transportation and warehousing
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Illinois Iowa M innesota M issouri Nebraska
2001 2002 2003 2004
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Iowa vs. Peer StatesEmployment Base – Iowa vs. Peer States
• Finance and Insurance
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
Illinois Iowa M innesota M issouri Nebraska
2001 2002 2003 2004
25
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Iowa vs. Peer StatesEmployment Base – Iowa vs. Peer States
• Public Administration
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Illinois Iowa M innesota M issouri Nebraska
2001 2002 2003 2004
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Illinois
Iowa
Minnesota
Missouri
Nebraska
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
2001 2002 2003 2004
Employment Base – Iowa vs. Peer StatesEmployment Base – Iowa vs. Peer States
Total EmploymentTotal Employment
26
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Des Moines MSAEmployment Base – Des Moines MSA
• Des Moines vs. Peer MSAs- Minneapolis, Omaha, Springfield MO, Iowa City
• Key Employment Categories- Manufacturing- Transportation and warehousing- Finance and Insurance- Public Administration- Total Employment
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAsEmployment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAs
• Manufacturing
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
Des M oines Iowa City M SA M inneapolis M SA Omaha M SA Springf ield M O M SA
2001 2002 2003
27
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAsEmployment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAs
• Transportation and warehousing
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Des M oines Iowa City M SA M inneapolis M SA Omaha M SA Springf ield M O M SA
2001 2002 2003
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAsEmployment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAs
• Finance and Insurance
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
Des M oines Iowa City M SA M inneapolis M SA Omaha M SA Springf ield M O M SA
2001 2002 2003
28
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAsEmployment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAs
• Public Administration
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Des M oines Iowa City M SA M inneapolis M SA Omaha M SA Springf ield M O M SA
2001 2002 2003
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Employment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAsEmployment Base – Des Moines MSA vs. Peer MSAs
• Total Employment
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
Des Moines Iowa City MSA Minneapolis MSA Omaha MSA Springfield MO MSA
200120022003
29
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Retail Sales In-flow- 37% of all retail sales originated from non-Polk
County residents in 2003• Recent Expansion of Retail Space
- Jordan Creek Mall, a General Growth property opened in the summer of 2004 in West Des Moines
• More retail potential possible?
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Strong Office Base- Occupancy above 90% for all office classifications- 95% Class “A” office space- Core Des Moines Business District is retaining and
expanding premier office space- New expansions to the west of back office and flex
space
30
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Industrial Space is being condensed- Firestone’s 850,000 sf distribution facility
consolidated other facilities- RR Donnelley’s 640,000 sf shuttered facility remains
vacant- Strong Occupancy / Weak Absorption
• Manufacturing space is declining• <700,000 sq ft of Warehouse space absorbed
annually since 2002- Manufacturing continues to contract – Can
distribution and intermodal grow?
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Economic Base AnalysisEconomic Base Analysis
• Next Research Steps- Summarize Task Force Input- Business Retention/Attraction Targets- Residential Development/In-fill Potentials- Education Institutions – Polk County Potentials- Regional Retail/Entertainment Potentials
• Economic Development Task Force- Continued Input- Next Meeting – March 2nd
31
Strategic Development PlanningStrategic Development Planning
Polk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task ForcePolk County Comprehensive Plan – Economic Development Task Force
Task Force DiscussionTask Force Discussion
• What are the three strongest attributes of the Polk County economy?
• What are three weaknesses/threats for improving Polk County’s economy?
• What opportunities do you see in regards to Economic Development in Polk County over the next five (5) years?
• What are three threats to the economic growth of Polk County in the next five (5) years?