political economy and the comparative method dr roberto espíndola department of development and...
DESCRIPTION
Dominant theories in IPE Mercantilism or economic nationalism Liberalism Critical theories (Marxism, feminism, environmentalism)TRANSCRIPT
Political economy and the comparative method
Dr Roberto EspíndolaDepartment of Development and Economic Studies
Room P1.32 Pemberton ext. [email protected]
The Political Economy perspective... Or rather International Political Economy (IPE) • It studies the interaction of political and
economic structures• It considers that interaction both historically
and comparatively
Dominant theories in IPE
• Mercantilism or economic nationalism• Liberalism• Critical theories (Marxism, feminism,
environmentalism)
Economic nationalism or merchantilism• Key actor: the state• Primacy of the political, the state is prior to
the market• Market relations shaped by political power• IPE constituted through actions of rational
states• Conflict and cooperation? Realism
Liberalism
• Focus on individuals, and from the state to corporations, interest groups, NGOs
• Centred on the market, economic progress results from interaction of market actors
• Oppose intervention in markets• View IPE as essentially cooperative, e.g.
theory of comparative advantage
Critical perspective
• Focus on collectives, e.g. classes, gender groups
• Consider the market as exploitative and in need of control
• Explain IPE in terms of dependency, relations of dominance and exploitation
Our emphases to study the IPE of European integration• Processes and institutions, rather than
history or a characterisation of actors• Seeking to study interactions at the
supranational, national (intergovernmental) and subnational levels
• And we’ll do it from a comparative perspective
How de we compare in the Social Sciences?• Well...• We can compare like with like...• Or can we compare different units?
In terms of method:
• Most similar systems design (MSSD)• Most different systems design(MDSD)
Most similar systems design (MSSD)
• Researchers take cases that appear to be similar in as many ways as possible, in order to explain differences between them
• Example: Morlino's study of
democratisation in Southern Europe
Most different systems design (MDS)
• Researchers take cases that are different, but where similar phenomena have occurred, seeking to explain those phenomena. Most different, similar outcomes.
• Example: Skocpol's analysis of revolutions in France, Russia and China
• MSSD → individualising, variation finding • MDSD → universalising, encompassing
MSSD Case 1Case 2• Var I a a• Var II b b
• Var III c c • Var X x1 x2
• Var Y y1 y2
MDSD Case 1 Case 2
Var I a bVar II c dVar III e fVar X x3 x3
Var Y y3 y3