poli sci clothing order ‘08 we are doing our clothing order this year on slightly short notice....
TRANSCRIPT
Poli Sci Clothing Order ‘08
We are doing our clothing order this year on slightly short notice. Hopefully that’s cool!
• Jackets, Fleeces, and Hoodies againForms are in the Poli Sci office, and we will
be taking them in with the deposits in the Poli Sci society room (UC 6015) on 3 different dates:
• Thursday Feb. 21: 11-2• Monday Feb. 25: 11-2• Tuesday Feb. 26: 11-2
Doing Democracy Differently
The Netherlands and Belgium
What’s different?
• Said to be consociational democracies characterized by:–power-sharing among significant
groups or subcultures
–a politics of accommodation different from majoritarian forms of democracy
Consociational democracyAccording to Arend Lijphart, a form of liberal
democracy in plural or divided societies, characterized by
• Elite Accommodation• Power-sharing: government by grand or
extra large coalitions• Proportional allocation• Subcultures (or pillars) accorded mutual
vetoes over matters
Consensus vs. adversarial democracy
Consensus democracy (also Lijphart)• Decisions by (seeking) consensus rather
than imposition of majority will• Society not necessarily segmented• But more likely in federal & plural societies
• e.g. Germany, NL, Belgium, Austria
• Other examples:– Scandinavia, because of involvement of
‘social partners’ in policy processes
Adversarial democracy
• Characterized by the interplay between government and opposition
• Dominant decision-mode: majority rule
• Examples?
Netherlands and Belgium• Multiple divisions:
– Religion & class– Language in Belgium
• Formation of subcultures or pillars – extended networks of religious or ideologically based organizations – made imposition of majority will problematic
• Both end up with a politics of accommodation
• But plays out differently in each country
Netherlands• Late 19th, early 20th c mobilization results in
– Calvinist, Catholic, Socialist, and general pillars
– A segmented or pillarized society• Liphart’s claim: Netherlands held together
only by the efforts of subcultural elites who – Understand the consequences of conflict– Are willing and able to conclude compromises
to avoid it– Accommodation facilitated by segmentation
Problems
• Which came first: pillarization or the politics of accommodation?
• Was the Netherlands necessarily going to fly apart if compromises were not struck?
• Why does accommodation occur in some societies and not in others?
Pillarization today
• far less important today than in the past
• Institutional vestiges remain– Parties & party system– institutions
• Consensus democracy with extensive recourse to expert opinion– Policy processes described as viscous
• But still difficult to form governments
Belgium• Religious and class divisions shape party
system• Pillars remain important• Linguistic divisions now most salient• Clientelistic politics• Accommodation anything but complete
– Frequent conflicts– Open disintegrative tendencies