polar instruments why effective er is not the same as bulk er ken taylor september 2002 © polar...

15
Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002 www.polarinstruments.com

Upload: ethan-porter

Post on 17-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Polar InstrumentsWhy Effective Er is not the same as

Bulk ErKen Taylor

September 2002

© Polar Instruments 2002www.polarinstruments.com

Page 2: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

FR4 Dielectric

• Core and Prepreg have different r

• Both are Mixtures of Resin and Glass Fibers• Materials are non-homogenous

– r specified for laminate is the bulk value

– r for glass ~ 6.1 r for epoxy ~ 3.2

• So significant local variations occur for r

Page 3: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Typical E-field distribution

Embedded Microstripr

Page 4: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Microphotograph of FR4 structure

5 mil

Prepreg

P

P

C

Core Glass fibers Er = 6

Resin Er = 3.2

Page 5: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

FR4 structure

Er = 3.2

Er = 6.0

Bulk Er value in this direction is 4.2 approx

Page 6: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Field in FR4 structure

3.1

3.1

4.2

Page 7: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Field distribution in Differential Pair

Impedance value

Increases as

Er and C decrease

Page 8: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

FR4 structure

3.1

3.1

4.2Impedance Value Increases

Page 9: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Resin Layer in Differential Microstrip

Glass/Epoxy mixture

Resin-only region

Page 10: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Resin Layer in Differential Stripline

Page 11: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Conclusions

• Over simplified modeling of differential structures leads to impedance discrepancies of several ohms

• Resin flow into region coplanar with tracks increases the impedance of typical embedded microstrip or stripline by 4%

Page 12: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Conclusions

•Your predictions must consider–Structure–Track dimensions

•Thickness•Widths•Spacing•Etch taper•Symmetry

–Dielectric layer composition and Effective r values

Page 13: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Conclusions

• Accurate implementation of predicted impedance requires– Accurate knowledge of dielectric composition

• Dielectric layers

• Resin region and local r value

– Accurate build of predicted dimensions• Track width• Track spacing• Track etch taper

– Increased etch taper leads to enlarged resin region

• Track symmetry– Loss of symmetry also affects differential performance

Page 14: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

Recommendation

• Build samples of small differential structures• Measure impedance using CITS500s• Microsection and micro-dimension the sample• “Back” calculate to obtain the Effective Er using Si6000• In future, use that value of Er for

– similar structures– same dimension range– same materials

• For small differential structures in FR4, expect Er(effective) ~ 3.7 (About 10% less than spec.)

Page 15: Polar Instruments Why Effective Er is not the same as Bulk Er Ken Taylor September 2002 © Polar Instruments 2002

• Questions?…[email protected]

Thank You