pms unit 1
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
1/58
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS
Introduction to Performance Management
Unit I, Session 1
18th Aug, 2011
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
2/58
What is Performance?
Performance is what is expected to be delivered
by an individual or a set of individuals (team(s))
within a time frame.
The expectations may be in terms of,
Results or efforts
Tasks Quality, with specification of conditions under which it
is to be delivered.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
3/58
DimensionsofPerformance Management
1. Output or result dimension Measurable dimension
Consequence of inputs in a summary form or a
final or semi-final product form or service form.
Describes the standard
Measurable in terms of figures like targets,
completion of tasks to meet the deadlines,
customer numbers.
These are called as Key Result Areas (KRAs)
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
4/58
2. Input dimension Activities or tasks to be accomplished by the
individual.
Influential factors for inputs are,
Ability or competence to perform these tasks
Motivation
Organizational support
Performance (o/p) = {work effort(i/p) + [motivation + Support]}
(Intervening Variables)
DimensionsofPerformance Management
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
5/58
3. Time Dimension Performance can be defined for a task, for a day, for a
week, month, year or life
For IT, Banking, Manufacturing companies the timedimension is for quarter / a three-month period.
Normally, individual performance is judged in relationto a role and across a short period.
Some organizations which are project driven are
interested in the individual performance in a projectas well as in a role.
Thus, in context of organization, performancemanagement is time bound as well as role specific.
DimensionsofPerformance Management
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
6/58
4. Focus dimension
Focus may be on profits, market share, new areas
covered, quality, cost or financial dimensions.
5. Input-Output Relationships
Competencies
Interest
Internal environment External environment
DimensionsofPerformance Management
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
7/58
6. Dyadic performance
The role played by the boss or subordinate or team
member in determining performance.
This is normally neglected and less discussed about.
Dyadic performance measured in two aspects
Outcomes measures
Situational variations and are based on assumptions
Process measures
Deals with interpersonal processes
Motivation to other person, extent to which there is
mutuality, help, synergy and learning.
DimensionsofPerformance Management
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
8/58
7. Team Performance It is widely recognized
Often mixed with individual performance.
Finally, Performance of an individual inorganizational setting may therefore be definedas the output delivered by an individual in
relation to a given role during a particular period of time under the set of circumstancesoperating at that point of time.
DimensionsofPerformance Management
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
9/58
ProcessofPerformance
Management
Unit I, Session 2
19th Aug, 2011
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
10/58
It is an organization wide management
program that provides a structured approach
to:
Communicate business strategy
Establish a shared understanding of what is to be
achieved and how it is to be achieved
Facilitate management of self and others
Measure and motivate performance
(organizational and individual)
Performance Management System
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
11/58
A process for communicating employee performanceexpectations, maintaining ongoing performancedialogue, and conducting annual performanceappraisals;
A procedure for addressing employee performancethat falls below expectations;
A procedure for encouraging and facilitating employeedevelopment;
Training in managing performance and administeringthe system; and
A procedure for resolving performance pay disputes.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
12/58
The performancemanagementcycle
Performanceand
development
agreement
(PLANNING)
Performancereview
(REVIEWING)
Managing
performance
throughoutthe year
(ACTING)
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
13/58
1. PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
Performance Agreements form the basis for Development
Assessment
Feedback in the Performance management process
Performance agreements incorporates Performance improvement plans
Performance development plans
Performance agreements emerge from Analysis of role requirements
Performance review
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
14/58
Defining role requirements in terms of: Key results expected
What role holders need?
Competencies required Upholding the organizations core values
Objectives
On-going role or work objectives
Targets
Tasks/projects
Behaviour
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
15/58
Criteria for Objectives S = Specific/stretching clear, unambiguous,
straightforward, understandable and challenging.
M = Measurable quantity, quality, time, money. A = Achievable challenging but within the reach of a
competent and committed person.
R = Relevant relevant to the objectives of the
organization so that the goal of the individual isaligned to corporate goals.
T = Time framed to be completed within an agreedtime scale.
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
16/58
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
17/58
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
18/58
2. MANAGING PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT
THE YEAR
performance management is a continuous
process that reflects,
Direction
Monitoring
Measuring performance
Actions taken
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
19/58
3. REVIEWING PERFORMANCE
A formal review in an organization takes place
once or twice yearly.
This provides a focal point for the consideration
of key performance and development issues.
This performance review meeting is the means
through which the five primary performance
management elements agreement, measurement, feedback, positive
reinforcement and dialogue can be put to good use.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
20/58
The review should be rooted
in the reality of the employees performance.
Concrete
not abstract
it allows managers and individuals to take a
positive look together at how performance can
become better in the future and Problem solving
REVIEWING PERFORMANCE
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
21/58
Criteriaforassessing performance
The criteria for assessing performance should bebalanced between:
i. achievements in relation to objectives;ii. the level of knowledge and skills possessed and
applied (competences);
iii. behaviour in the job as it affects performance(competencies);
iv. the degree to which behaviour upholds the corevalues of the organization;
v. day-to-day effectiveness.
REVIEWING PERFORMANCE
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
22/58
REVIEWING PERFORMANCE
Be prepared
W
ork to a clear structure.
Create the right atmosphere
Provide good feedback
Use time productively
Use praise Let individuals do most of
the talking
Invite self-assessment.
Discuss performance notpersonality
Encourage analysis of
performance
Dont deliver unexpected
criticisms
Agree measurable
objectives and a plan of
action
Conductinga performancereviewmeeting:
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
23/58
Designing Performance
Management Systems
Unit I, Session 3
22nd Aug, 2011
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
24/58
Introduction
Organizations use strategic planning to,
Identify objectives/ initiatives,
Linking objectives to the organizational vision,
Daily activities
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
25/58
DesigningofPMS
Performance management systems are not generic or
easily passed from one company to another; their
design and administration must be tailor-made to
match employee and organizational characteristicsand qualities.
PMS should focus on
Employee performance w.r.t supervisors expectation
Employee should know how the performance is viewed.
Communication between employee superior
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
26/58
Whatshoulda PMS cover?
1. Organizational and employee objectives:
2. Training
3. Frequency of appraisal
4. Maintaining records
5. Measurement systems
6. Conducting the performance appraisal
7. Pay for performance
8. Legal issues
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
27/58
1. Organizationalandemployeeobjectives:
Effective performance evaluation system is todetermine the organizations objectives.
These are then translated into departmental
and then individual position objectives (KPAs)
personal performance targets. This allows the employee to know up front the
standards by which his/her performance will be
evaluated. This process involves clarifying the job role, job
description and responsibilities to wider goals.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
28/58
2. Training
Training should start with a focus on providing the
manager a systematic approach for effective people management.
the process of managing, motivating and evaluatingemployee performance.
Training should include: supervision skills;
coaching and counselling;
conflict resolution;
setting performance standards; linking the system to pay (assuming this is an aim of
the appraisal system);
providing employee feedback (Evans, 1991)
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
29/58
3. Frequency ofappraisal
Employee reviews should be performed on afrequent and ongoing basis.
By conducting reviews frequently two situations areeliminated:
selective memory by the supervisor or the employee; and
surprises at an annual review.
Frequent reviews also allow for clarification andrevision of objectives
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
30/58
4. Maintainingrecords
They establish patterns in an employees behaviour that may
be difficult to spot by typical incident-by-incident supervision
(Crane, 1991).
Careful review of the records helps avoid the selective memory
and helps plot appropriate actions.
Well maintained records are essential if the need arises to
discipline, demote or dismiss an employee.
It is particularly helpful if employees are themselves
responsible for part of the process of record-keeping.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
31/58
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
32/58
6. Conductingthe performanceappraisal
the front-line supervisor is responsible for conducting the
performance review.
However, a multiple rater system provide a form of
triangulation that results in ratings in which employees and
managers have greater confidence.
With large spans of control, several supervisors may work with
an individual employee. The input from all supervisors about
the employees performance is required to complete athorough performance review.
Appraisal techniques
Self appraisal, rating, ranking, 360-degree feedback
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
33/58
7. Pay for performance
Research says the link is often unsatisfactorily established
and even less often maintained to the satisfaction of
employees and supervisor/ organization.
Helps motivate and commit the employee to the
appraisal process.
It also allows the employee to distinguish clearly howsuccessful or unsuccessful completion of objectives
affects them directly.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
34/58
8. Legalissues
An effective PMS is to make a company
more productive,
profitable and
to let employees know their level of performance,
legal reasons Failure to conduct appraisal properly (failing to
maintain adequate records)
may result in employees (or their trades unions) takinglegal action. It is extremely important that all strengths
weakness be clearly documented in the performancereview and follow up action on unsatisfactoryperformance pursued and be used in case of terminationof an unsatisfactory employee.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
35/58
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
36/58
Why PMS Fail?
T
horough knowledge on PMS both employee and supervisor.
Interpreting performance information.
Poor performance should be tackled in a timely manner.
Working practices should be reviewed regularly
Effective staff recruitment, training & development areessential in maximizing organizations performance.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
37/58
Implementing PMS
Unit I, Session 4
23rd Aug, 2011
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
38/58
Implementation Process
Reinforce
Implementation
Practices:
9. delegate decision-makingwith accountability
10. Create incentives
11. Build expertise
12. Integrate management
reforms
STEP 1Define Mission &
Desired Outcomes
Practices:
1. Involve stakeholders
2. Assess environment
3. Align activities, core
processes, &
resources STEP 2Measure Performance
Practices:
4. Produce measures at each
organizational level that
demonstrate results, respond to multiple
priorities, and
link to responsible
programs
5. Collect data
STEP 3Use Performance
Information
Practices:
6. Identify performanceGaps
7. Report information
8. Use information
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
39/58
Key Lessons Learnedfor Effective Implementation
1. Assess Organizational Readiness involvement,
commitment, and
day-to-day support of enterprise senior managers if they have adequate resources, including staffallocation, skills, time, tools, and use ofconsultants or technical assistance if needed.
Organizational readiness also means makingsure that existing planning and decision makingstructures can accept performance results sothey can be used
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
40/58
2. Followa Simple Measure Selection Process
Extremely complex
should take a balanced approach to goals,
objectives, and related measures
Should measure, establish baselines and targets,
comparing against benchmarks, and monitoring
progress for continual improvement.
3. Develop Performance Management System
Maturity Over Time
Key Lessons Learnedfor Effective Implementation
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
41/58
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
42/58
Implementationmistakes
Over criticism of the past and over projection of the new orchanged system
System introduced with fanfare but inadequate effort to help
in its implementation
Lack of organizational support Lack of competencies in HR department
Image of the HR department and inability to promote a sense
of ownership of the system among the line managers
Lack of follow up on the part ofH
R department Top management commitment
Past experience with all the systems
Nature of the system
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
43/58
Nature of Goals
Goals are written statements of measurable conditions that will exist
when a job is satisfactorily done Goals link actual performance with role responsibilities
Taken together, these constitute the role purpose
Goals describe how accountabilities are actualised
Achievable goals spell out requisites that provide guidance to the goal-
seeker: Person, or the role, which has primary responsibilityfor achieving the goal
Key activities or means for achieving the goal
Measurable indicators, targets or levels of achievement for key-result areas
Completion date
Job Content(Accountabilities)
Performance Requirements
(Goals)
Performanceon the Job
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
44/58
Writing Performance Goals
A well-written goal has two parts: Operationaland Outcome
Operational partconsists of the accountability, specific activity andtime frame
Outcome parthas measurable standards
Well-written goals respond to following minimum requirements:
Inform what the most important things to do
Inform what the employee is expected to achieve
Specify how all concerned will know whether or not goal has beenachieved
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
45/58
Three-Step Goal Writing Process
Step 1: Decide which accountability or accountabilities will the goalrespond to
Step 2: Specify activities to be undertaken and the time frame for
execution
Step 3: Provide measurable indicator. Describe it by stating
Outcome meets expectations when
Example: The goal is - Marketing Manager increases company
profit margins, through a 10 per cent increase in return-on-
investment, by end of the performance year. Then,
Marketing Manageris having the primary responsibility.
Increase in return-on-investmentis the means or the key activity.
10 per centis the target, or the measurable indicator.
End of the performance yearis the time-frame or the completion date.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
46/58
Actual Goal-Setting Discussion
Goals proposed by the employee reviewed, critiqued, clarified
Their outcome for managers and organisational goals understood
Manager may propose additional or substitute goals
employee goals finalised as proposed or mutually revised
Broad discussion on implementation plan: strategies, methods,approaches
Manager and employee agree on date and agenda for first progressreview meeting
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
47/58
Performance Measures
Provide evidence of the extent to which goal is achieved
Becomes basis for monitoring, control and feedback on performance
Good-quality performance measures
Relate to results (outputs) not efforts (inputs)
Are within the employees control to achieve Are observable and quantitative for which measurement data are
available
Indicate positive or negative performance
P
ositive standard: What organisation wants that goal toachieve
Negative standard: What organisation doesnt want tosee intermediate or final outcomes that show that thegoal has not been achieved
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
48/58
Potential Appraisal
Unit I, Session 7
26th Aug, 2011
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
49/58
Potential Appraisal
In a competitive world, past achievements do not always
guarantee future success.
To face competition, firms need to advance at a highspeed in all areas:
technology, processes, management, finances, quality, costs,
new market creation, new product development, and above all
increased efficiency, motivation and productivity on the part of
employees.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
50/58
In the present scenario, organizations have become,
Technology driven,
Market sensitive and customer focused,
Quality centered, cost effective,
Systems driven and
Managerially effective.
To achieve these, it is necessary to have competent
managers in strategic roles.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
51/58
Potential Appraisal is a Necessity
Need to constantly identify competent people. Competency requirements, Job profile / tasks, Reliable and valid method of
assessing
Potential Appraisal is an assessment of the extent to which a givenindividual has the potential to perform a new task/job. (Unlike
promoting in the same vertical)
The best way to judge a persons potential and therefore ability tosucceed in the new role is to actually put the person on job andassess him.
However the organization cannot afford to take risks by assigningnew roles.
For this the Assessment Centre methodology gains significance
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
52/58
Advantages & Disadvantages
Potential is about the future while performance deals with the
past.
Potential should relate to competencies while performance
related to KPAs and other tasks assigned.
It is only fair to create the conditions under which the
individual is likely to perform the now job and test him in
relation with the situation as well as his competencies
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
53/58
Assessment Centre
An assessment centre is a comprehensive, standardized
procedure in which multiple assessment techniques such as
situational exercises and job simulation (business games,
discussions, reports and presentation) are used to evaluate
individual employees for a variety of decisions.
Most frequently the approach has been applied to individuals
being considered for selection, promotion, placement or
special training and development in management.
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
54/58
1. Psychometric Tests Aptitude tests (verbal & numerical reasoning)
Ability tests (knowledge, awareness, problem solving)
Personality tests
The tests are selected for assessment taking the
following points into consideration
Objective what needs to be measured;
Reliability and validity;
Length of time
Availability of qualified experts
Cost involved
Tools used in Assessment Centre
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
55/58
2. Interviews: Background interviews(current / previous jobs)
Situational interviews(hypothetical/job knowledge
Behavior event interviews(BEI)(behavioral description)
3. Leaderless Group Discussion:
Consists of 6 participants to solve a problem(real life) within a
specified time period.
No one is assigned as the chairperson/roles to team
Tools used in Assessment Centre
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
56/58
4. In-basket techniques:
It is a simulation exercise
Day-to-day decision-making situation
Memos, correspondence, telephone messages, notes,
requests, etc. for participants attention. The participant asked to deal with the tasks within a time
period, putting his reaction as much as possible in
writing.
Based on the reactions, his/her activity level, problem
solving, planning, organizing, time management,
delegation, etc. can be assessed.
Tools used in Assessment Centre
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
57/58
5. Management Games/Simulation Exercises:
A real life situation is simulated for an entire group stock
trading, running a manufacturing operation.
Degree of complexity varies in these games.
Often a computer program is used to generate information and
stimulate the game.
Participants are not allowed to use the computer, but a person
acts as a mediator(neutral /observer) between computer and the
group.
The interactive nature of the game provides strategic planning,
team work & skills, leadership, analytical ability, etc.
Assessor training is also very extensive
Tools used in Assessment Centre
-
8/3/2019 PMS Unit 1
58/58
6. Role Plays
Method of adopting roles from real situations.
It can be described as method of studying the nature of
certain roles by acting out its concrete details in contrived
situation that permits better and more objective
observation.(Pareek and Rao, 1981) Gains insights on persons attitudes and behavior in a
particular role.
Conflict management, leadership sills, group problem
solving, team skills, flexibility can be evaluated.
This technique minimizes the distortions and magnifies
the situation to focus on certain aspects.
7. Presentations
Tools used in Assessment Centre