pm-chap11

31
Herman Aguinis, University of Colo at Denver Prentice Hall, Inc. Managing Team Performance: Managing Team Performance: Overview Overview • Definition and Importance of Teams • Types of Teams and Implications for PM • Purposes and Challenges of Team PM • Including Team Performance in the PM System • Rewarding Team Performance

Upload: saba-jogezai

Post on 28-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

performance managment

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Managing Team Performance:Managing Team Performance:OverviewOverview

• Definition and Importance of Teams• Types of Teams and Implications for PM• Purposes and Challenges of Team PM• Including Team Performance in the PM

System• Rewarding Team Performance

Page 2: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Definition of TeamDefinition of Team

Two or more people – Interact

• Dynamically• Independently

– Share common and valued• Goal, Objective or Mission

Page 3: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Importance of TeamsImportance of Teams

• Global pressures• Flexibility in flatter organizations• Complexity of products and services• Rapidly changing environments

Page 4: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management & TeamsPerformance Management & Teams

• PM systems should target:– Individual performance– Individual’s contribution to team performance– Performance of entire team

Page 5: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

General principles of PM relating to teamsGeneral principles of PM relating to teams

1. Design and implement best possible system2. Consider dangers of poorly implemented

system

Page 6: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Managing for Improved Team PerformanceManaging for Improved Team Performance

• Don’t limit team processes with other task or organizational requirements

• Provide good team design and organizational support

• Give feedback only on processes that the team members can control

Page 7: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of TeamsTypes of Teams

• Classified by– Complexity of task– Membership configuration

Page 8: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Complexity of Task ranges from:Complexity of Task ranges from:

• Routine– Well defined– Few deviations in how work is done– Outcomes easily assessed

- to -• Non-routine

– Not defined well– No clear specifications on how to do the work– Outcomes are long term and difficult to assess

Page 9: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Membership Configuration includesMembership Configuration includes

• Length of time team expects to work together• Stability of team membership

Static Dynamic

Page 10: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of Teams Based on Types of Teams Based on Membership Configuration and Task ComplexityMembership Configuration and Task Complexity

Dynamic ° Network

Teams Membership Configuration

° Project Teams

Static ° Work and

Service Teams

Routine Non-Routine Task Complexity

Page 11: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of TeamsTypes of Teams

• Work or Service Teams• Project Teams• Network Teams

Page 12: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Work or Service TeamsWork or Service Teams

• Intact • Routine tasks• Share similar skill sets

Page 13: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Project TeamsProject Teams

• Assembled for specific purpose• Tasks outside core product or service • Members from different functional areas

Page 14: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Network TeamsNetwork Teams

• Membership not constrained by – Time or space– Organizational boundaries

• Teams may include– Temporary or full-time workers– Customers– Vendors– Consultants

• Work is extremely non-routine

Page 15: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Examples of PM Approaches by Type of TeamExamples of PM Approaches by Type of Team

• Type of Team– Work & Service Team

– Project Team

– Network Team

• Type of PM Approach– Peer ratings

– Ongoing measurements

– Development of competencies

Page 16: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Purposes of Team PMPurposes of Team PM

• Traditional goals of any PM System• Specific to Team performance:

– Make all team members accountable– Motivate all team members to have a stake in team

performance

Page 17: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Challenges of Team PMChallenges of Team PM

• How do we assess relative individual contribution?

• How do we balance individual and team performance?

• How do we identify individual and team measures of performance?

Page 18: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Including Team Performance in the PM SystemIncluding Team Performance in the PM System

• Prerequisites• Performance Planning• Performance Execution• Performance Assessment• Performance Review• Performance Renewal and Re-Contracting

Page 19: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management ProcessPerformance Management Process

Performance Review

Performance Renewal and

Re-contracting

Performance Assessment

Performance Execution

Performance PlanningPrerequisites

Page 20: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PrerequisitesPrerequisites

• Knowledge of mission– Organization– Team

• Knowledge of job to be performed by the team

Page 21: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance PlanningPerformance Planning

• Results expected of the team• Behaviors expected of team members• Developmental objectives to be achieved by

team and its members

Page 22: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance ExecutionPerformance Execution

Team responsibilities1. Commit to goal achievement2. Seek feedback from

• Each other• Supervisor

3. Communicate openly & regularly4. Conduct regular & realistic peer-

appraisals

Page 23: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance ExecutionPerformance Execution

Supervisor responsibilities1. Observe and document

• Team performance• Relative contribution of team members

2. Update team on any changes in goals of the organization

3. Provide resources & reinforcement

Page 24: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance AssessmentPerformance Assessment

Types of Assessments• Self-appraisals• Peer evaluations• Supervisor evaluation• Outsider appraisals (if appropriate)

Page 25: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance AssessmentPerformance Assessment

Kinds of Performance to be Assessed• Individual task performance• Individual contextual performance• Team performance

Page 26: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Dimensions of Team Performance to assess:Dimensions of Team Performance to assess:

• Effectiveness• Efficiency• Learning and growth• Team member satisfaction

Page 27: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance ReviewPerformance Review

• Two meetings with supervisor or review board– Team meeting– Individual meeting

• Emphasis on past, present and future

Page 28: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Team meetingTeam meeting

• Discuss overall team – Performance– Results

• Information comes from:– Team members– Other teams/outsiders– Supervisor’s evaluation

Page 29: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Individual meetingIndividual meeting

• Discuss how individual behavior contributed to team performance

• Information comes from:– Self-appraisal– Peer ratings– Supervisor’s evaluation

Page 30: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Renewal and Re-ContractingPerformance Renewal and Re-Contracting

• Make adjustments to performance plan• Include plan for individual performance as it

affects team functioning

Page 31: PM-Chap11

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Making Team-based Rewards EffectiveMaking Team-based Rewards Effective

• All employees should be eligible• Rewards should be

– Visible– Contingent– Reversible

• Avoid factors which cause reward systems to fail

• Consider variable pay systems (in addition to individual bonuses)