platform cooperativism
TRANSCRIPT
+
Imparare il Cambiamento @ProgettoRENA, Milano
Commoditized Workers Taking digital unionizing seriously
Antonio Aloisi – Bocconi University, Milan | @_Aloisi
+All we need is sharing. Really? 2
Global trend towards:
1. casualization of work
1.b decentralization of structures 1.c. creation of dispersed production
networks
Opportunities for people willing to find a job or to
top up their salaries
[flexibility]
Circumvent employment regulation, by operating informally in traditionally
regulated markets
[informalisation] Companies benefit thanks to technologies that allow cutting transaction costs
by outsourcing
[computerization]
+Why #platformcoop?
n Facing a digital version of Taylorism, i.e. the efficient exploitation (or expropriation) of work at the detriment of education and skill development of workers à invisible workers
n Websites like TaskRabbit, Elance, Lift, Handy (“commodities market” vs “knowledge economy”) threaten to dismantle traditional labour markets as they do not seem to ensure a fair protection of workers’ rights
n This new configuration implies wages fixed by a dynamic calculation of supply and demand, and every worker’s act constantly traced, appraised and “subject to the sometimes harsh light of customer satisfaction”
3
+“Employing humans-as-a-service” Jeff Bezos said
n A preliminary definition of “crowd-working”: n “the act of taking a job traditionally performed by a designated agent
(usually an employee) and outsourcing it to an undefined,
generally large group of people in the form of an open call”
n These tools have the potential to “chop up” a broad array of traditional jobs into detached tasks that can be allocated to workers just when they are needed à on-demand economy / workers on tap
n Rating system à monitor and discourage n This new configuration implies wages fixed by a dynamic calculation of
supply and demand, and every worker’s act constantly traced, appraised and “subject to the sometimes harsh light of customer satisfaction”
4
+
? 5
Legal issue: do workers in the on-demand economy continue to be independent contractors (according to participation agreements: not employees, in a word) even though many indicators reveal a disguised employment relationship (disproportionate presence of vulnerable players)?
+
n Whether a worker is an employee or a contractor depends on a “multifactorial” test based on the facts emerging from the employment relationship. n the possibility of having free
personal judgement and control over one’s own work,
n the way in which tasks are performed,
n the power of termination, n the “economic realities” and
the concrete dependency in relation with the employer,
n the permanency of the relationship,
n the number of working hours, n the power of direction exercised
by the employee, n the freedom of managing its own
time schedule, n the ownership of equipment, n the method of payment (hours vs
project), n the degree of flexibility and
protections, n the disparity of relative
bargaining power.
6
The multifactorial test
+Class actions
n A federal judge granted class-action status to a lawsuit that examine the employment classification of Uber drivers, this could be the beginning of a slow legal challenge: the ride-hailing company’s business model could be “disrupted” (does this set a precedent?) n Lyft, a competitor to Uber that has also raised venture capital, faces a
similar class action.
n The California Labor Commissioner’s Office (administrative organ)
ruled that Barbara Ann Berwick, a former Uber driver, should have been considered an employee.
7
+
n “Rather than forcing workers to litigate the issue of employee status on a case-by-case basis, policymakers could provide for direct, automatic coverage of on-demand workers under core labor laws” (Rebecca Smith and Sarah Leberstein)
n Provide a social safety net: n Health coverage, insurance against workplace injuries,
paid vacations and maternity leave: these have long been universal entitlements in many economies. (Arun Sundararajan)
8
A social safety net
+From ownership to membership
n Nothing new: companies such as term agencies have long made workers “bid for jobs on a daily basis, work for piece rate, or contract for short-term jobs”. What changes here is scale and speed.
n “Use the past to inform the fight to revive the labor movement today”
n Organizations: Freelancers Union, the NYC Taxi Alliance,
CADA, TurkerNation, the Domestic Workers Alliance
9
+
n Rubeny and Wilkinson: considerations at the basis of the contemporary use of home-based outsourcing: (1) technology; (2) work organization; (3) avoidance of collective action; (4) product market; (5) labor cost.
n Outsourcing stops workers entering into contact and the rise of “sodality” by fragmenting the labor force
n Competition could prevent from cooperating, so that opportunistic behaviours may be easily incentivised
10
Collective action
+
n The importance of social media in creating a “sense of community”
(or a “fantasy of community in an atomized population”): n all these platforms use gadgets, instant marketing, and partnerships in order to
engage people and get them involved towards these challenges between “old/boring/institutionalized” and “new/amazing/entrepreneurial”
n Just think of Lyft: pink moustaches. “a brand identity and emblematize
the touchy-feely spirit that Lyft
has adopted as its credo. Drivers bump
fists with their passengers at the end of each ride”.
“a more human vision for the service industry”
11
A sense of community
+ 12
+
n The company added a “de Blasio’s Uber” widget, available for over 2 million NYC users, that will either always show no cars available or wait times of 25 minutes.
n The feature prompts users to take action and send an email to Mayor Bill de Blasio and the city council opposing the new bill.
n Uber told that the new feature will “demonstrate what life for NYC riders would be like if de Blasio’s plan to limit Uber is passed into law”.
13
The Uber-ization of activism
+
n “Most models focus either on leveraging networks of existing resources, capital and volunteers then charging rents for platform use or on forging platform monopolies that lock-in users so that their data can then be monetised”. Izabella Kaminska
n Technology may be neutral, but grass roots should be built bottom up, not top down.
n We should be able to recognize the profound difference between Uber’s capitalistic populism and “authentic” organizing for action. Edward T. Walker
14
Avoid the Uber-ization of activism
+The ‘Fight-For-15’ campaign’s legacy
n Nearly 3 years ago, about 200 NYC fast-food workers interrupted their jobs, demanding higher pay.
n The protest was not small. It is debateable whether it has obtained what it asked for: wage gains for low-wage workers.
n The major “big chain” employers - retailers Wal-Mart, McDonald’s stores – not exceeding the hourly rate of $9 today
n The #FF15’s most significant mission accomplished - the approval of modest minimum-wage hikes in more than ten states – is still on-going (gradually). We cannot say “they won the war”.
15
+
n Next step: “15 and a union” n Service Employees International Union (SEIU) has made some inroads organizing home-care agencies like Hill’s, framing the
efforts as part of the same fight to boost fast-food worker pay and lift wage floors in urban areas. And union contracts, while they can take a considerable amount of time to achieve, tend to produce meaningful wage gains. (Cole Stangler)
16
Gaining momentum after #FF15
§ Like great unions’ campaigns of the past, FF15 is raising questions about social citizenship and worker rights in America.
+
o Turkopticon a potential source of worker organizing in virtue of class-consciousness “an activist system that allows workers to publicize and evaluate their relationships with employers”. o The website permits Turkers “to engage one another in mutual aid”.
n Researchers put a provocative task on the platform, asking workers to define an ideal “Workers’ Bill of Rights” from their point of view.
o Dynamo a community founded by scholars, which could be seen as the first step toward granting Turkers a collective voice.
17
Amazon Mechanical Turk An attempt to organize
+
n The website (actually a browser extension for Firefox and Chrome, see turkopticon.ucsd.edu) also permits Turkers “to engage one another in mutual aid”.
n Launched in late 2008, Turkopticon is a browser plug-in application that offers a way for workers to rate MTurk employers and avoid those with bad reputations.
n Irani and Silberman, during a survey, received 67 responses and found out that “35 workers felt that their work was regularly rejected unfairly or arbitrarily, 26 workers demanded faster payment (Amazon allows employers 30-days to evaluate and pay for work), 7 explicitly mentioned a ‘minimum wage’ or ‘minimum payment’ per HIT, 14 mentioned ‘fair’ compensation generally, 8 expressed dissatisfaction with employers’ and Amazon’s lack of response to their concerns”
18
Amazon Mechanical Turk Turkoptikon
+
n It is a community designed, founded, adapted by scholars
n “Dynamo is more like a virtual union hall, a worker-only safe space where workers can post ideas about activist actions anonymously,” Irani said.
n “A platform to gather, gain critical mass, and mobilize” + “it generates
change, whether that take the form of pixels, profit, or progress”.
n This trend deserves attention, Providers are a platform’s best economic inputs, they should be protected, though AMT can tolerate the loss of accounts that do not accept the system’s terms
19
Amazon Mechanical Turk Dynamo
+
n In August 2014, a group of drivers established the California App-based Drivers Association, a sort of Uber drivers union.
n The same happened in Seattle and New York City...
n Threats of work stoppage are the order of the day.
n People want to join forces.
n A feeling of dissatisfaction and outrage towards Uber employment – and price, too – models and unilateral changes in T&C.
20
Uber Strikes and protests
+ 21 ht
tps://w
ww
.fb.com
/ube
rfre
edom
+Organizing or unionizing?
ü Workers will gather in communities where it is feasible to exchange knowledge and tricks.
ü The blog “Ride share guy” provides guidance and instructions to drivers on maximizing incomes from the diverse car sharing apps.
ü “Peers.org” could be considered a “power-organizer”;
o a system of pooling many accounts into one, organizing, caring, supporting participants in the sharing economy, both its freelance population
ü Guilds like “Peers.org” and “Freelancers Union” are starting to engage in a struggle aimed at pooling bargaining power, also in order to let contractors access promotional health insurance
22
+A new model is possible #1
n BlueCrew provides on-demand labor but pays workers as employees. n The company prefers this model since it can avoid potential tax liability
and other problems arising from an incorrect classification, while workers get stable and secure work.
n InstaCart, grocery delivery service, allows its personal shoppers the possibility to switch from contractor to employee status. n The decision follows a change to Instacart’s business model.
23
+
n The food preparation and delivery service Munchery,
the personal assistant company Alfred,
and the office cleaning service Managed by Qii hire workers as employees, not independent contractors
à tales of Responsible Business Practices in the On-Demand Economy
n In addition to avoiding lawsuits, companies consider increased efficiency, strong commitment and worker retention as reasons to (re)classify their workers as employees.
24
A new model is possible #2
+Platform “cooperativism” According to Scholz and Schneider’s manifesto
n New forms of solidarity aimed at fighting for better conditions for “cloud workers” and vulnerable workforce.
n Cooperatives are facing copious amounts of challenges on the level of competition from players like Uber, in terms of public awareness, allocation of work, as well as wage levels.
n An app with the basic functionality of UberX can be duplicated and improved upon by independent developers who are working in tandem with cooperatives.
n Taxi drivers and technologists can coalesce to build an app that equals or is able to compete with their corporate equivalent.
25
+A movement of interests?
n Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops
without plowing up the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning. They want
the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters.
— Frederick Douglass, 1857
n Facilitate organizing by on-demand workers.
n The opportunity to join forces in unions and bargain collectively is pivotal in the on-demand economy. In the light of the fact that work is distributed on a piece-rate basis, competition for getting job is inhumane, and the conditions of work are by definition isolating for citizens.
n A considerable mass of workers can define its sectoral priorities, a sector-specific approach may be an effective way to set standards.
26
+
ü Infrastructures are just a shell / packaging
ü We need to build constituencies
ü People matter
ü Act on the side of the demand, rather than on the side of the offer à generate advocacy
ü Genuine bottom up workers movements + government intervention and – if needed – law making
27
Not to reinvent the wheel
+ 28
“Sharing” = “an equitable split in wealth and responsibility”
§ tighten up international codes of good practice and make worldwide firms respect them;;
§ reduce up to eliminate discrimination based on geographical preferences or rating charts;;
§ avoid and hinder child labour or forced labour;;
§ prevent “labor brokerage” from shifting into “social arbitrage” (Hill, 2015);;
§ make ratings “portable” across platforms, leading to a unique “digital identity”;;
§ overcome the exclusivity clause that ties workers to a special platform;;
§ ensure better protection to whom is behind the scene of the sharing economy.
Workers’ goals (in my opinion)