plastics: microbial degradation, environmental and … · 4 86 end up in our intestines (15, 16) ....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Plastics: Microbial Degradation, Environmental and Biotechnological 1
Perspectives 2
Dominik Danso1, Jennifer Chow1 and Wolfgang R. Streit1 3
4
1Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 5
Germany 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Keywords: microbial plastic degradation, polystyrene, polyamides, polyvinylchloride, 14
polypropylene, polyurethane, polyethylene terephthalate, lipase, cutinase, PET esterase 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
The authors declare no conflict of interest. 23
*Correspondence 24 E-Mail: [email protected] 25 Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 26 University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr.18, 27 D-22609 Hamburg, Germany 28 Tel. (+49) 40-42816-46329
AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 19 July 2019Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01095-19Copyright © 2019 Danso et al.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
2
Plastics are widely used in our economy and each year, at least 350-400 million 30
tons are being produced. Due to poor recycling and low circular use, millions of tons 31
accumulate annually in terrestrial or marine environments. Today it has become clear 32
that plastic causes adverse effects in all ecosystems and that microplastics are of 33
particular concern to our health. Therefore, recent microbial research has addressed 34
the question, if and to which extent microorganisms can degrade plastics in the 35
environment. This review summarizes current knowledge on microbial plastic 36
degradation. Enzymes available act mainly on the high molecular weight polymers of 37
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and ester-based polyurethane (PUR). Unfortunately, 38
the best PUR- and PET-active active enzymes and microorganisms known still have 39
moderate turnover rates. While many reports have been published describing 40
microbial communities degrading chemical additives, no enzymes acting on the high 41
molecular weight polymers polystyrene, polyamides, polyvinylchloride, 42
polypropylene, ether-based polyurethane and polyethylene are known. Altogether 43
these polymers stand for more than 80 % of the annual plastic production. Thus, 44
further research is needed to significantly increase the diversity of enzymes and 45
microorganisms acting on these polymers. This can be achieved by tapping into the 46
global metagenomes of non-cultivated microorganisms and dark matter proteins. 47
Only then, novel biocatalysts and organisms can be delivered that allow rapid 48
degradation, recycling or value-added use of the vast majority of most man-made 49
polymers. 50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
3
58
INTRODUCTION 59
Altogether, synthetic polymers are produced worldwide at a scale of at least 350-400 60
million metric tons annually (1-5). The main polymers that are produced and of importance to 61
our economy are: Polyurethane (PUR), Polyethylene (PE), Polyamide (PA), Polyethylene 62
terephthalate (PET), Polystyrene (PS), Polyvinylchloride (PVC) and Polypropylene (PP 63
(FIGURE 1). With an increasing production and use of plastics it is estimated that 5-13 64
million metric tons of plastic enter the ocean every year with negative consequences for 65
various ecosystems and for health of humans and animals (1, 2, 6). Regarding only the great 66
Pacific garbage patch, more than 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic with an estimated weight of 67
80,000 tons have so far accumulated with no end in sight (7-10). While recently few reviews 68
have been published focusing on the degradation of single types of plastic, only very few 69
articles have addressed plastic degradation on a more global scale addressing the 70
degradation of several synthetic polymers (11). Therefore, the two main questions addressed 71
in this review are: 72
(i) Which enzymes and microorganisms are currently known to be involved 73
in high molecular weight polymer plastic degradation? 74
(ii) What are the future challenges and technologies for identifying better 75
enzymes acting on a highly diverse range of synthetic polymers? 76
Intriguingly, the currently best known route of plastic destruction involves exposure to 77
UV light together with mechanical disruption caused by waves and winds or grinding on 78
marine rocks and sediments which eventually breaks larger plastics into smaller pieces of 79
micro- and nanoplastics (MP, with sizes < 5 mm and NP, with sizes less than 0.1 μm). The 80
so-called “weathering” and “photodegradation” are currently considered the main forces for 81
initial depletion of plastics and it mainly results in a modification of the chemical, physical and 82
mechanical properties of the plastics (12, 13). The resulting particles have a much larger 83
surface area, which makes them amenable to further degradation (14). Notably, MPs and 84
NPs are a concern to our health as it is expected that they enter the food chain and by this 85
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
4
end up in our intestines (15, 16). The fate of MPs or NPs in human or animal intestines has 86
yet to be determined. 87
Therefore, removal of plastics from the environment using microbial enzymes has 88
been in the focus of recent research. The main challenge is that marine and terrestrial 89
displaced plastics are highly stable and durable. Plastics had mainly been introduced since 90
the 60ies of the last century and, given the relatively few decades since these man-made 91
polymers are available, nature only had very short time to evolve highly active enzymes. 92
Besides, many different types of plastics accumulate in the environment and many of the 93
frequently used plastics are mixtures containing additional solubilizers and other chemical 94
agents to alter the mechanical and physical properties. These compounds are further targets 95
for microbial biodegradation but may also interfere with degradative enzyme activities. 96
Thereby, it is assumed that the larger polymers are initially degraded by secreted 97
exoenzymes into smaller subunits (multimers, dimers) that can be incorporated into the cells. 98
Once in the cells, either the oligomers or the degradation products of these are funneled 99
through the classical degradation pathways to yield energy and/or suit as building blocks for 100
catabolism or metabolism. 101
Within this framework, this review summarizes the main findings on microbial 102
degradation of the above listed polymers. The chemical structures and some properties of 103
theses polymers are described at each of the following subchapters. For a first overview on 104
enzymes and microbes acting on the different plastics see FIGUREs 1 & 2. 105
In general, it is believed that the microbial degradation of man-made polymers is a 106
very slow process. This high resistance mainly stems from the high molecular weight of the 107
fiber, the strong C-C bonds and the extremely hydrophobic surface, which is very difficult to 108
attack by enzymes. Notably, polymers are high molecular weight molecules, and they have 109
amorphous and crystalline forms, which have different degradability. 110
111
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET). PET is mainly used for production of PET bottles, 112
PET foil and fibers in textile industry. PET is a polar, linear polymer of repeating units of the 113
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
5
aromatic terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol. The PET monomer is designated bis(2-114
hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (19). PET is a thermoplast and partially shows crystallization. 115
The annual production of PET exceeded 30 million tons in 2017 (3). 116
Currently, only few bacteria and fungi have been described for the partial degradation 117
of PET to oligomers or monomers (11). All known PET hydrolases have relatively low 118
turnover rates. Intriguingly, the trait for PET degradation appears to be limited to a few 119
bacterial phyla and most bacterial isolates with the potential of PET degradation are 120
members of the Gram-positive phylum of Actinobacteria (20). Thereby, the best 121
characterized examples originate from the genera Thermobifida or Thermomonospora (21-122
28). The enzymes involved in the degradation (e.g. PET hydrolase and tannase, MHETase) 123
are typical serine hydrolases e.g. cutinases (EC 3.1.1.74), lipases (EC 3.1.1.3) and 124
carboxylesterases (EC 3.1.1.1). These enzymes possess a typical /-hydrolase fold and the 125
catalytic triad is composed of a serine, a histidine and an aspartate residue (23, 29). They 126
can also contain several disulfide bonds caused by cysteine residues, which promote thermal 127
stability and specific binding to PET as shown on the example of PETase from Ideonella 128
sakaiensis 201-F6 (30). 129
Also, for the bacterium I. sakaiensis, usage of PET as a major energy and carbon 130
source was described (30). In addition to the PET hydrolase, the I. sakaiensis genome codes 131
for a second enzyme that appears to be unique so far and which shares high similarity to the 132
group of tannases, capable of degrading mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalic acid. PET 133
hydrolase as secreted enzyme produces the intermediate mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalic 134
acid (MHET). MHET is internalized by the cell and hydrolyzed by the MHETase. The 135
resulting monomers are then used for the bacterial metabolism. I. sakaiensis is affiliated with 136
the phylum of Betaproteobacteria and belongs to Burkholderiales. 137
The I. sakaiensis PETase 3D-structure was elucidated recently (31). The overall 138
structure resembles mostly the structures of cutinases. Austin et al. showed that a double 139
mutation (S238F/W159H), narrowing the active site of the enzyme and making the protein 140
even more like a cutinase resembling the enzyme from Thermobifida fusca, lead to an 141
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
6
improved variant. The majority of the functionally verified PET hydrolases contain a C-142
terminal disulfide bond, promoting thermal stability and also kinetic stability (32-34). The only 143
exception from this so far is a para-nitrobenzylesterase from Bacillus subtilis (35). An 144
additional disulfide bond can be found in I. sakaiensis PETase as well as in structural models 145
of the functionally tested PET hydrolases described by Danso et al. (36). The structural data 146
indicate that PETases bind the polymer with the hydrophobic surface and the substrate-147
binding cleft. In total, 4 MHET moieties are bound to the protein (one to subsite I and three to 148
subsite II), whereby the ester bond to be cleaved is located between both subsites next to 149
the catalytic serine. The MHETase from I. sakaiensis that further hydrolyzes MHET to 150
ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid has been recently crystallized ligand-free (2.05 Å) and 151
with a non-hydrolyzable MHET analogue bound (2.1 Å). The enzyme possesses a lid-domain 152
that almost exclusively confers substrate specificity and activity towards MHET with a kcat of 153
11.1 ± 1.4 s−1 (37). 154
While the I. sakaiensis enzymes are the best-studied models, other enzymes and 155
organisms have been identified as potent PET degraders. Currently, four enzymes from 156
Thermobifida species, one from Saccharomonospora, and one from the phylum of 157
Thermomonospora are known to act on PET. These actinobacterial enzymes are often Ca2+-158
dependent, especially in terms of their thermal stability (38) and they are partially inhibited by 159
their released hydrolysis products MHET and BHET (38). Therefore, efforts have been made 160
to overcome this limitation and one approach lies in the combination of polyester hydrolases 161
with other enzymes to improve substrate binding and catalytic properties (31, 39, 40). 162
Besides the actinobacterial PET hydrolases, fungal cutinases showed activity on PET 163
substrates as well. The most prominent examples are cutinases of the phyla Fusarium and 164
Humicola. The latter was also used together with the lipase CalB from Candida antarctica in 165
order to circumvent the before mentioned product inhibition by bis-(hydroxyethyl) 166
terephthalate (BHET) and MHET (41). While CalB completely converted to terephthalic acid, 167
the Humicola-derived enzyme was limited in the last reaction step and accumulated the 168
intermediate MHET. 169
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
7
Complementary to the above outlined activity-based approaches, a HMM (Hidden-170
Markov-Model) motif-based large-scale global search of existing genome and metagenome 171
databases has been developed for the presence of potential PET hydrolases (36). Using this 172
approach, >800 potential PET hydrolases were identified in bacteria, archaeal genomes and 173
metagenomes and several enzymes were functionally verified (e.g. PET2, PET4, PET6 and 174
PET12). These findings imply that PET hydrolase-encoding genes are globally distributed in 175
marine and terrestrial metagenomes (36). 176
Using an in silico genome mining approach, a cutinase from Pseudomonas 177
pseudoalcaligenes (PpCutA) and a putative lipase from Pseudomonas pelagia (PpelaLip) 178
were identified as potential enzymes acting on polyesters in general. Further experimental 179
work using recombinant enzymes of PpCutA and PpelaLip verified the hydrolytic activities of 180
both enzymes on different types of polyesters including the hydrolysis of polyoxyethylene 181
terephthalate (42). In their study, the authors used structurally different ionic phthalic acid-182
based polyesters with an average molecular weight ranging from 1,770 to 10,000 g/mol and 183
semi crystalline polyesters with crystallinity below 1% to test and verify the microbial 184
degradation. Notably, the identified organism belongs to a biotechnologically important novel 185
species within the genus Pseudomonas designated P. pertucinogena (43). 186
In addition to the metagenome-derived PET esterases described above, colleagues 187
recently reported on the functional screening of metagenomes and the characterization of 188
selected enzymes. Among those, the metagenome-derived esterases MGS0156 and 189
GEN0105, which hydrolyzed polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone as well as 190
bis(benzoyloxyethyl)-terephthalate. For MGS0156, 3D-structural data at 1.95 Å indicate a 191
modified α/β-hydrolase fold, with a lid domain and a highly hydrophobic active site (44). The 192
closest homologue to MGS0156 is an enzyme from Desulfovibrio fructosivorans with 70% 193
sequence similarity. 194
In summary, PETases represent the best explored and studied class of enzymes with 195
respect to the hydrolysis of synthetic polymers. 196
197
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
8
Polyurethanes (PUR) can be synthesized by using different polyether or polyester 198
polyols. PUR is a polymer of organic units connected by carbamate. The additional 199
incorporation of aromatic ring structures has further impact on the physical and chemical 200
properties of the polymer. PUR is a widely used synthetic polymer for the production of 201
foams, insulation materials, textile coatings and paint to prevent corrosion (45). With over 27 202
tons produced annually (2) it ranks as number 5 of the most often produced synthetic 203
polymers. 204
Up to date, only bioactivities have been reported that act on the ester-based PUR 205
(46, 47). Biodegradation was achieved by either bacteria or fungi. With respect to bacteria 206
capable to degrade PUR, most frequently Gram-negative ß-Proteobacteria from the genus 207
Pseudomonas have been linked with PUR activities. One of the first enzymes identified to act 208
on PUR was the PueB lipase from Pseudomonas chlororaphis (48, 49). This organism codes 209
for at least one additional enzyme active on PUR which was designated PueA (50). Both 210
enzymes are lipases and PUR is degraded by the secreted hydrolases and the degradation 211
is tightly regulated. The respective genes are part of a larger gene cluster encompassing 212
seven ORFs (51). P. protegens strain Pf-5 uses a similar mechanism to degrade dispersions 213
of the polyester PUR. In this strain, it was however shown that PUR degradation is tightly 214
regulated by mechanisms of carbon catabolite control and that both lipase genes, designated 215
pueE and pueB appear to be essential for growth on PUR dispersions (52). In a similar 216
manner Pseudomonas putida was reported to degrade PUR at relatively high rates (53). The 217
bacterium needed four days to grow and consume the added colloidal PUR. Yet another 218
example comes from Comamonas acidovorans TB-35. The strain produces a PUR-active 219
enzyme which is an esterase, and which was designated PudA (54, 55). PudA shows a 220
hydrophobic PUR-surface-binding domain and a distinct catalytic domain and its surface-221
binding domain was considered as being essential for PUR degradation. PudA acts as a 62 222
kDa monomer and it releases diethylene glycol and adipic acid at an optimum temperature of 223
45 °C and a pH optimum of 6.5. 224
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
9
Within this context, it is perhaps notable that often enzyme activities are reported 225
which are based on clearing zones in agar plates. However, these assays are not fully 226
reliable. For instance, different enzymes from Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp. showed 227
significant esterase activities and partially or even completely cleared plates containing 228
colloidal PUR. However, only the Pseudomonas sp. lipase significantly degraded the added 229
PUR based on NMR and IR data (56). Furthermore, there is strong evidence that some B. 230
subtilis and Alicycliphilus sp. isolates are able to degrade PUR (57-59). 231
In a recent publication, Schmidt and colleagues reported on microbial degradation of 232
PUR (i.e. Impranil DLN). The authors of this study employed the known polyester hydrolases 233
LC cutinase, TfCut2, Tcur1278 and Tcur0390 in their assays and observed significant weight 234
loss of the tested foils when incubated for extended time periods (200 hours) at a 235
temperature of 70 °C (60). The observation that cutinases, otherwise known to degrade 236
polyethylene terephthalate, also act on PUR could be attributed to a promiscuous nature of 237
the Thermobifida-derived cutinases. Recent research on promiscuity of enzymes implies that 238
especially lipolytic enzymes such as cutinases, are very often highly promiscuous and can 239
convert up to 78 different substrates (61). 240
While the list of PUR-active bacteria is steadily increasing, also a larger number of 241
fungi have been reported to degrade polyurethane (47). Notably, the authors of this study 242
identified a 21 kDa metallo-hydrolase from Pestalotiopsis microspora as the responsible 243
enzyme. 244
Additional studies identified Fusarium solani and Candida ethanolica (62) and C. 245
rugosa (63) as PUR degraders. While for C. rugosa, a lipase has been identified as the key 246
enzyme involved in PUR metabolism, no enzymes were yet identified for C. ethanolica and 247
S. solani. Other fungi reported belong to the Cladosporium cladosporioides complex, 248
including the species C. pseudocladosporioides, C. tenuissimum, C. asperulatum, and C. 249
montecillanum, and the three others were identified as Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium 250
chrysogenum (64) and Aspergillus flavus (65). In the case of A. flavus, it is assumed that 251
secreted esterases are responsible for the degradation. However, no defined enzyme has 252
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
10
yet been linked to the observed activities. In a similar study, it was recently reported that 253
Aspergillus tubingensis colonizes PUR and acts on the surface of films made of PUR. 254
However, no enzyme was linked with the PUR activities (66). 255
Noteworthy, the above mentioned PUR-active enzymes and organisms were all 256
acting on ester-linked PUR. However, to the best of our knowledge, no enzymes have yet 257
been described acting on polyurethane ethers. 258
259
Polyethylene (PE) consists of long chain polymers of ethylene and it is produced 260
as either high-density (HD-PE) or low-density polyethylene (LD-PE). PE is chemically 261
synthesized by polymerization of ethane and is highly variable, since side chains can be 262
obtained depending on the manufacturing process. Such modifications have mainly 263
influence on crystallinity and molecular weight. The polymer is most frequently used in the 264
packaging industry as one of the main packaging materials and more than 100 million tons 265
of PE are globally produced (2, 67) (FIGURE 2). 266
Possible PE degradation has been affiliated with a surprisingly large number of 267
bacterial genera. Among those were Gram-negatives affiliated with the genera of 268
Pseudomonas, Ralstonia and Stenotrophomonas and but also many Gram-positives (e.g. 269
Rhodococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptomyces, Bacillus, and others) see references in (68) 270
and (69). In addition, fungal genera affiliated with assumed PE-degradation were reported 271
including Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Penicillium, and others (see references in (68, 69 70-272
75)). In addition, few studies linked the PE-degrading microbes with complex gut 273
microbiomes of invertebrates (76, 77). 274
It is notable, that in almost all the above-mentioned studies on PE-degrading 275
microorganisms, the authors reported on degradation of the polymers using commercial 276
polymers that possibly contained chemical additives and degradation was determined by 277
measuring weight loss and by FTIR spectroscopy. Since weight loss and surface structure 278
changes are most likely attributed to the degradation of chemical additives, often making a 279
significant fraction of the polymer, the results in these studies need to be verified using more 280
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
11
advanced technologies. None of these studies reveled biochemical mechanisms and 281
enzymes involved in PE-breakdown. Within this framework, a more recent publication 282
identified a Penicillium-derived laccase as potentially involved in PE-breakdown (78). 283
Unfortunately, no detailed biochemical characterization was performed and no sequence of 284
the protein or the corresponding gene was deposited. 285
286
Polyamide (PA) is a polymer of repeating units of aliphatic, semi-aromatic or 287
aromatic molecules linked via amide bonds. Since the monomers for making this polymer 288
can be very versatile, there are many different types of synthetic polyamides, with the most 289
popular being Nylon and Kevlar. Synthetic polyamides are mainly used in textiles, automotive 290
applications, carpets and sportswear (79). 291
Remarkably, proteins as well as natural silk are polyamides per se. Based on this, it 292
should be expected that nature has evolved enzymes acting on these non-native polymers. 293
However, to date, there is no microorganism known being able to fully degrade the intact 294
high molecular weight polymer. On the contrary, several studies are available on bacteria 295
acting on either linear or cyclic nylon oligomers with rather short chain lengths. In one of the 296
first studies, different bacteria were described to grow on various oligomers derived from 297
nylon production (80). In wastewater of nylon factories, 8-caprolactam, 6-aminohexanoic 298
acid, 6-aminohexanoic acid cyclic dimer and 6-aminohexanoic acid oligomers accumulate. 299
These compounds can serve as carbon and nitrogen source for specially adapted bacteria. 300
One of the first bacteria described growing on these mixtures of oligomers was 301
Flavobacterium sp. KI72, which was later renamed to Achromatobacter guttatus KI72 and 302
only recently named Arthrobacter sp. KI72 (80, 81). Nylon oligomer-degrading Arthrobacter 303
isolates code in their genomes for different hydrolases and several aminotransferases 304
involved in the initial degradation of the oligomers and the subsequent metabolism. In the 305
case of the strain KI72, the respective genes are located on an accessory plasmid pOAD2 306
(82-84). 307
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
12
Mainly three enzymes are essential for the initial hydrolysis of cyclic and linear 6-308
aminohexanoate oligomers. The first one is a cyclic-dimer hydrolase (NylA), the second a 309
dimer hydrolase (NylB) and finally, the third an endo-type oligomer hydrolase (NylC). NylC is 310
a typical esterase, but its 3-D structure also reveals motifs with ß-lactamase folds (85-93). 311
Once the oligomers are hydrolyzed, the monomers are metabolized by different amino 312
transferases. The draft genome of Arthrobacter sp. KI72 carries, among others, two genes 313
designated nylD1 and nylE1 that are responsible for the secondary 6-aminohexanoate 314
metabolism. The 6-aminohexanoate aminotransferase (NylD1) catalyzes the reaction of 6-315
aminohexanoate to adipate semialdehyde. It uses α-ketoglutarate, pyruvate and glyoxylate 316
as amino acceptors and generates glutamate, alanine, and glycine, respectively. The 317
reaction relies on pyridoxal phosphate as a cofactor. The second enzyme, the adipate 318
semialdehyde dehydrogenase (NylE1) catalyzes the reaction leading from adipate 319
semialdehyde to adipate. This enzyme requires NADP+ as a cofactor and is an 320
oxidoreductase (94, 95). 321
More recently, diverse marine bacteria were reported to act on nylon. The authors of 322
this study reported a significant weight loss over a time period of three months. In their study, 323
Bacillus cereus, Bacillus sphaericus, Vibrio furnisii and Brevundimonas vesicularis were 324
identified as potential nylon degraders (96). The genes and enzymes associated with the 325
nylon degradation, however, remain to be identified and it cannot be excluded that the weight 326
loss observed was primarily linked to the degradation of chemical additives as outlined 327
above. 328
Rather than using the synthetic polymer, Oppermann and colleagues reported on 12 329
bacterial species capable to degrade the natural polymer poly-γ-glutamic acid. The high 330
molecular weight polymer is synthesized by many Gram-positive bacteria as a major 331
component of capsules and slime. In contrast to the synthetic polymer, it is, however, a 332
water-soluble molecule and thus easier accessible to microbial degradation (97). 333
The only enzyme that was so far reported to act on high molecular weight nylon fibers 334
was classified as a manganese-depending peroxidase and originated from a white rot 335
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
13
fungus. The activity of the native and purified enzyme, however, differed from that of 336
lignolytic enzymes. Nylon-degrading activity was quantified by measuring the structural 337
disintegration of nylon-66 membranes. The enzyme had a molecular weight of 43 kDa and 338
was dependent on the presence of lactate and other alpha-hydroxy acids. Unfortunately, no 339
gene or protein sequence was determined (98). 340
While the first reports have been published already in 1965 stating that among others 341
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is able to convert oligomeric nylon, further studies have confirmed 342
this and evolved strain PAO1 to efficiently degrade 6-aminohexanoate linear dimers (80, 99). 343
The main enzymatic activities were assigned to a 6-aminohexanoate cyclic dimer hydrolase 344
and a 6-aminohexanoate dimer hydrolase. Other Pseudomonas species have, however, also 345
been reported to utilize 6-aminohexanoate-dimers as sole carbon and nitrogen source (100). 346
347
Polystyrene (PS) (poly(1-phenylethene) polymer consists of styrene monomers. PS 348
is a widely used synthetic polymer for packaging industries but also many daily use articles 349
(CD cases, plastic cutlery, petri dishes, etc.) are produced from this polymer (101). In 2016, 350
about 14 million tons were produced (3). 351
Unfortunately, today there is no enzyme known that can degrade the high molecular 352
weight polymer. With this respect, a first report was published recently by Krueger and 353
colleagues on the identification of brown-rot fungi able to attack polystrol employing 354
hydroquinone-driven Fenton reactions. In this preliminary study, Gloeophyllum striatum DSM 355
9592 and Gloeophyllum trabeum DSM 1398 caused substantial depolymerization after 20 356
days of incubation. The most active Gloeophyllum strains caused almost 50% reductions of 357
the molecular weight (102). In an earlier study, the white rot fungi Pleurotus ostreatus, 358
Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Trametes versicolor and the brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum 359
trabeum have been affiliated with the depolymerization of polystyrene when co-incubation 360
together with lignin was performed (103). While these are first and promising reports on the 361
degradation of the high molecular weight polymer, the enzymes involved in the 362
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
14
depolymerizing reaction, however, remain to be elucidated. As already outlined above, 363
weight loss may have been caused by the degradation of chemical additives. 364
Similarly, several bacteria have been reported to form either alone or as members of 365
consortia biofilms on polystyrene films and particles and thereby degrading the polymer. In 366
these studies, mainly weight loss has been assayed. Unfortunately, in none of these studies 367
enzymes were linked to the assumed depolymerization (104, 105). 368
While not a single bacterium is known to degrade the polymer, a larger number of bacterial 369
genera are known that are capable of metabolizing the monomer styrene as a sole source of 370
carbon. The biochemistry of styrene metabolism is well understood and for reviews that are 371
more detailed see (104, 106-109) and references therein. Styrene degradation in bacteria is 372
well studied in Pseudomonas, Xanthobacter, Rhodococcus, Corynebacterium and others. It 373
appears to be a widespread metabolism. Under aerobic conditions, styrene is oxidized by 374
two different pathways: (i) attacking the vinyl side chain and (ii) a rather unspecific aromatic 375
ring. Thereby, mainly the intermediates 3-vinylcatechol, phenylacetic acid, and 2-376
phenylethanol are formed. These intermediates are channeled into the Krebs cycle after ring 377
cleavage. The degradation of the vinyl side chain involves the action of three key enzymes: a 378
styrene monooxygenase, a styrene oxide isomerase, and a phenylacetaldehyde 379
dehydrogenase (110). The styrene monooxygenase attacks the vinyl side chain to release 380
epoxystyrene, which is then subjected to isomerization to form phenylacetaldehyde. The 381
latter is oxidized to phenylacetic acid though the involvement of a dehydrogenase. In P. 382
putida, the phenylacetic acid is activated to phenylacetyl-CoA and then subjected to ß-383
oxidation to yield acetyl-CoA, which is directly fed into the Krebs-cycle. The respective genes 384
for the side-chain oxygenation are frequently located in a single conserved gene cluster often 385
designated styABC(D) (111). Thereby, the styA and styB genes code for the styrene 386
monooxygenase complex. The styrene monooxygenase is a two-component flavoprotein that 387
catalyzes the NADH- and FAD-dependent epoxidation of styrene to styrene oxide. StyA is 388
the actual monooxygenase and StyB functions as FAD reductase that transfers the electrons 389
from NADH to FAD+, to supply StyA with the required electrons (112). The styC gene codes 390
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
15
for the styrene isomerase (113) and styD is a phenylacetaldehyde dehydrogenase gene 391
(114). The expression of the conserved cluster is regulated through either a two-component 392
regulatory systems or LysR-type regulators (115-117). 393
The direct ring cleavage of styrene is initiated by a dihydroxylation of the aromatic 394
ring. This reaction is catalyzed by a 2,3-dioxygenase and followed by a 2,3-dihydrodiol 395
dehydrogenase. The two key products that are formed are styrene cis-glycol and 3-396
vinylcatechol. The latter can then be degraded by subsequent meta- or ortho-cleavage to 397
form acrylic acid, acetaldehyde and pyruvate. The pathway is rather unspecific for the 398
general degradation of various aromatic compounds such as phenol or toluene (106-108). 399
The produced phenylacetaldehydes are of interest to different industries as they can 400
be considered as building blocks for the production of different fine chemicals or 401
pharmaceutical compounds. They can serve as the starting material to synthesize 402
fragrances, flavors, pharmaceuticals, insecticides, fungicides or herbicides (118). With this 403
respect, recent studies have also shown that Pseudomonas putida, Rhodococcus zopfii, and 404
other Gram-negatives can convert polystyrene (i.e. styrene oil) into the biodegradable 405
polymer polyhydroxyalkanoate or other valuable compounds. The approach involves as a 406
first step the pyrolysis of polystyrene to styrene oil. The styrene oil is then converted in a 407
second step to polyhydroxyalkanoate or other compounds. While the overall concept of this 408
two-step process is intriguing, it may not be feasible on large scale as the pyrolysis is a 409
process that runs at 520°C and this is energetically very demanding (119-121). 410
411
Polyvinylchloride (PVC) and Polypropylene (PP) are both important polymers 412
produced at higher levels compared to the above-named polymers. PVC is the third most 413
frequently produced polymer and only PE and PP are produced at higher levels. PVC is 414
composed of repeating chloroethyl units and PP of repeating units of propane-1,2-diyl units 415
(122, 123). In sharp contrast to their huge global production rate, hardly any reliable 416
information is available on microbial degradation of both of these important polymers. Only 417
very few reports have been published that describe the degradation of the polymers based 418
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
16
on weight loss and using mixed species microbial communities (124, 125). However, it is 419
likely, that these reports were in part misled by the degradation of the chemical additives 420
rather than the polymer. Consequently, no defined enzymes or pathways are known that are 421
responsible for the degradation of any of these two high molecular weight polymers. 422
423
Microbiomes of invertebrates as possible sources of plastic degrading 424
bacteria 425
Recently, it was reported that invertebrates can degrade different plastics (76, 426
77,126-129). While these studies demonstrated that the insects perform a mechanical 427
grinding and shredding of the plastics, it has been critically discussed, if, and to which extent, 428
the microbiomes associated with the different insects are capable to truly degrade the 429
synthetic polymers. In one of those studies, Yang and colleagues provided convincing 430
evidence that Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (mealworms) digested Styrofoam. The larvae lived 431
over a month, when fed on the Styrofoam. Within a 16-day period, nearly 50% of the 432
ingested Styrofoam carbon was converted into CO2 and the residual Styrofoam was found in 433
the feces. Labeling studies using α 13C- or β 13C-labeled polystyrol implied that the carbon 434
compound was preferentially used to build lipids (77). One of the earliest reports on insects 435
digesting plastics came from caterpillars. In 2017, a Spanish team reported on the fast bio-436
degradation of PE by larvae of the wax moth (Galleria mellonella). The authors of this study 437
presented evidence that larvae of the wax moth produced holes in PE films with considerable 438
speed (126). The finding of this study was critically discussed later on, as the occurrence of 439
ethylene glycol as well as the correct usage of the FTIR method could not be immediately 440
verified (127). Further work by a Chinese and US-based research team identified Bacillus sp. 441
YP1 as polyethylene-degrading bacterium responsible for the PE-degradation in Indian 442
mealworms (76, 128). A related study from the same group identified bacteria affiliated with 443
the genera Citrobacter and Kosakonia as main degraders for PE and PS in the guts of 444
Tenebrio molitor (129). 445
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
17
Thus, grinding of larger plastic pieces into smaller parts might offer a solution that it 446
increases the surface and thereby allows microorganisms to better attach to the surfaces. 447
448
Future challenges in microbial plastic degradation research. 449
The diversity of known enzymes and microbes acting on synthetic polymers is still 450
rather limited. Therefore, future work has to address the identification of organisms acting on 451
the most dominant polymers. Thereby, the main bottleneck lies in the initial breakdown of the 452
high molecular weight and highly robust polymer and its crystalline structure. Further, the 453
implementation of enzymes in processes that would allow the degradation of plastic polluting 454
environmental niches is a challenge for future generations of microbiologist. Since current 455
cultivation technologies have not yet resulted in the identification of highly active enzymes for 456
most plastics, the diversity of the non-cultivated (i.e. global metagenomes) and the so-called 457
dark matter proteins offer a promising source for the identification of such biocatalysts. Thus, 458
the further development of smart search algorithms for mining metagenome data sets is 459
certainly a rewarding task. In parallel, the set-up of reliable function-based assays for the 460
detection of high molecular weight polymer-active enzymes is important as well. 461
Since often commercially available polymers and films thereof are used as substrate, 462
they contain additives, plasticizers and other biodegradable impurities (for example 463
phthalates), which are much easier broken down than the actual backbone. This however 464
interferes with the results and frequently leads to the identification of false positives. Thus, 465
the overall methodology linked to the analysis of microbial plastic degradation needs to be 466
standardized and optimized. 467
Similarly, the development of cellulosome-like structures (i.e. “plastosomes”) in 468
microbes to attack the intact and crystalline fiber would certainly be a worthwhile project. In 469
this line, the simple development of highly active enzymes for textile industries could already 470
significantly reduce the annual plastic pollution and would perhaps be one of the more 471
realistic short-term goals. 472
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
18
Further, using synthetic biology to generate microorganisms that would produce high-473
value compounds from plastic waste would be a future challenge and it would contribute to 474
an improved circular use of plastics. Thereby monomers and oligomers formed after the 475
degradation could be used to build value-added products or even new (biodegradable) 476
polymers. 477
Lastly, obtaining plastic-active enzymes and implementing them in the production of 478
true biopolymers is a highly rewarding research task and would significantly reduce our 479
global plastic problem. 480
REFERENCES 481
1. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. 2017. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever 482 made. Science Advances 3:e1700782. 483 2. Plasticseurope. 2018. PlasticsEurope, Plastics—The Facts 2018 :An analysis of 484 european plastics production, demand and waste data (PlasticsEurope, 2018. 485 3. Plasticsinsight. 2016. Global PET resin production capacity, on plasticsinsight. 486 https://www.plasticsinsight.com/global-pet-resin-production-capacity. Accessed 01.12.2017. 487 4. Plasticsinsight. 2016. Resin prices. https://www.plasticsinsight.com/resin-488 intelligence/resin-prices/polyamide/ 489 5. Plasticsinsight. 2016. world plastics production. 490 https://www.plasticsinsight.com/world-plastics-production/ 491 6. Ellen MacArthrur foundation. 2017. The new plastics economy. 492 7. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, 493 Law KL. 2015. Marine pollution. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 494 347:768-71. 495 8. Derraik JGB. 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a 496 review. Mar Pollut Bull 44:842-852. 497 9. Cózar A, Echevarría F, González-Gordillo JI, Irigoien X, Úbeda B, Hernández-León S, 498 Palma ÁT, Navarro S, García-de-Lomas J, Ruiz A, Fernández-de-Puelles ML, Duarte CM. 499 2014. Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 500 111:10239-10244. 501 10. Lebreton L, Slat B, Ferrari F, Sainte-Rose B, Aitken J, Marthouse R, Hajbane S, 502 Cunsolo S, Schwarz A, Levivier A, Noble K, Debeljak P, Maral H, Schoeneich-Argent R, 503 Brambini R, Reisser J. 2018. Evidence that the great pacific garbage patch is rapidly 504 accumulating plastic. Scientific Reports 8:4666. 505 11. Wei R, Zimmermann W. 2017. Microbial enzymes for the recycling of recalcitrant 506 petroleum-based plastics: how far are we? Microbial Biotechnology doi:10.1111/1751-507 7915.12710:n/a-n/a. 508 12. Day M, Wiles DM. 1972. Photochemical degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate). 509 II. Effect of wavelength and environment on the decomposition process. J Appl Polym Sci 510 16:191-202. 511 13. Mohammadian M, Allen NS, Edge M, Jones K. 1991. Environmental degradation of 512 poly ( ethylene terephthalate ). Textile Research Journal 61:690-696. 513 14. Welzel K, Müller RJ, Deckwer WD. 2002. Enzymatischer Abbau von Polyester-514 Nanopartikeln. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 74:1496-1500. 515 15. Smith M, Love DC, Rochman CM, Neff RA. 2018. Microplastics in seafood and the 516 implications for human health. Curr Environ Health Rep 5:375-386. 517 16. de Souza Machado AA, Kloas W, Zarfl C, Hempel S, Rillig MC. 2018. Microplastics 518 as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biol 24:1405-1416. 519
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
19
17. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. 2000. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and 520 accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302:205-217. 521 18. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular 522 evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725-2729. 523 19. Gubbels E, Heitz T, Yamamoto M, Chilekar V, Zarbakhsh S, Gepraegs M, Köpnick H, 524 Schmidt M, Brügging W, Rüter J, Kaminsky W. 2018. Polyesters, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of 525 Industrial Chemistry doi:10.1002/14356007.a21_227.pub2. Wiley, VCH, Weinheim. 526 20. Acero EH, Ribitsch D, Steinkellner G, Gruber K, Greimel K, Eiteljoerg I, Trotscha E, 527 Wei R, Zimmermann W, Zinn M, Cavaco-Paulo A, Freddi G, Schwab H, Guebitz G. 2011. 528 Enzymatic surface hydrolysis of PET: Effect of structural diversity on kinetic properties of 529 cutinases from Thermobifida. Macromolecules 44:4632-4640. 530 21. Kleeberg I, Hetz C, Kroppenstedt RM, Muller RJ, Deckwer WD. 1998. Biodegradation 531 of aliphatic-aromatic copolyesters by Thermomonospora fusca and other thermophilic 532 compost isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1731-1735. 533 22. Hu X, Thumarat U, Zhang X, Tang M, Kawai F. 2010. Diversity of polyester-degrading 534 bacteria in compost and molecular analysis of a thermoactive esterase from Thermobifida 535 alba AHK119. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:771-9. 536 23. Wei R, Oeser T, Then J, Kuhn N, Barth M, Schmidt J, Zimmermann W. 2014. 537 Functional characterization and structural modeling of synthetic polyester-degrading 538 hydrolases from Thermomonospora curvata. AMB Express 4:44. 539 24. Wei R, Oeser T, Zimmermann W. 2014. Synthetic Polyester-Hydrolyzing Enzymes 540 From Thermophilic Actinomycetes. Advances in Applied Microbiology, Vol 89 89:267-305. 541 25. Chen S, Tong X, Woodard RW, Du GC, Wu J, Chen J. 2008. Identification and 542 characterization of bacterial cutinase. J Biol Chem 283:25854-25862. 543 26. Zimmermann W, Billig S. 2011. Enzymes for the biofunctionalization of poly(ethylene 544 terephthalate). biofunctionalization of polymers and their applications 125:97-120. 545 27. Ribitsch D, Acero EH, Greimel K, Dellacher A, Zitzenbacher S, Marold A, Rodriguez 546 RD, Steinkellner G, Gruber K, Schwab H, Guebitz GM. 2012. A new esterase from 547 thermobifida halotolerans hydrolyses polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polylactic acid 548 (pla). polymers 4:617-629. 549 28. Kawai F, Oda M, Tamashiro T, Waku T, Tanaka N, Yamamoto M, Mizushima H, 550 Miyakawa T, Tanokura M. 2014. A novel Ca2+-activated, thermostabilized polyesterase 551 capable of hydrolyzing polyethylene terephthalate from Saccharomonospora viridis AHK190. 552 Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:10053-10064. 553 29. Ollis DL, Cheah E, Cygler M, Dijkstra B, Frolow F, Franken SM, Harel M, Remington 554 SJ, Silman I, Schrag J, et al. 1992. The alpha/beta hydrolase fold. Protein Eng 5:197-211. 555 30. Yoshida S, Hiraga K, Takehana T, Taniguchi I, Yamaji H, Maeda Y, Toyohara K, 556 Miyamoto K, Kimura Y, Oda K. 2016. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates 557 poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 351:1196-1199. 558 31. Austin HP, Allen MD, Donohoe BS, Rorrer NA, Kearns FL, Silveira RL, Pollard BC, 559 Dominick G, Duman R, El Omari K, Mykhaylyk V, Wagner A, Michener WE, Amore A, Skaf 560 MS, Crowley MF, Thorne AW, Johnson CW, Woodcock HL, McGeehan JE, Beckham GT. 561 2018. Characterization and engineering of a plastic-degrading aromatic polyesterase. 562 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 563 115:E4350-E4357. 564 32. Roth C, Wei R, Oeser T, Then J, Follner C, Zimmermann W, Strater N. 2014. 565 Structural and functional studies on a thermostable polyethylene terephthalate degrading 566 hydrolase from Thermobifida fusca. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:7815-7823. 567 33. Sulaiman S, You DJ, Kanaya E, Koga Y, Kanaya S. 2014. Crystal structure and 568 thermodynamic and kinetic stability of metagenome-derived LC-cutinase. Biochemistry 569 53:1858-1869. 570 34. Then J, Wei R, Oeser T, Gerdts A, Schmidt J, Barth M, Zimmermann W. 2016. A 571 disulfide bridge in the calcium binding site of a polyester hydrolase increases its thermal 572 stability and activity against polyethylene terephthalate. Febs Open Bio 6:425-432. 573 35. Ribitsch D, Heumann S, Trotscha E, Acero EH, Greimel K, Leber R, Birner-574 Gruenberger R, Deller S, Eiteljoerg I, Remler P, Weber T, Siegert P, Maurer KH, Donelli I, 575
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
20
Freddi G, Schwab H, Guebitz GM. 2011. Hydrolysis of polyethyleneterephthalate by p-576 nitrobenzylesterase from Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol Prog 27:951-960. 577 36. Danso D, Schmeisser C, Chow J, Zimmermann W, Wei R, Leggewie C, Li X, Hazen 578 T, Streit WR. 2018. New insights into the function and global distribution of polyethylene 579 terephthalate (PET)-degrading bacteria and enzymes in marine and terrestrial 580 metagenomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 84. 581 37. Palm GJ, Reisky L, Böttcher D, Müller H, Michels EAP, Walczak MC, Berndt L, Weiss 582 MS, Bornscheuer UT, Weber G. 2019. Structure of the plastic-degrading Ideonella 583 sakaiensis MHETase bound to a substrate. Nature Communications 10:1717. 584 38. Barth M, Oeser T, Wei R, Then J, Schmidt J, Zimmermann W. 2015. Effect of 585 hydrolysis products on the enzymatic degradation of polyethylene terephthalate 586 nanoparticles by a polyester hydrolase from Thermobifida fusca. Biochem Eng J 93:222-228. 587 39. Carniel A, Valoni E, Nicomedes J, Gomes AD, de Castro AM. 2017. Lipase from 588 Candida antarctica (CALB) and cutinase from Humicola insolens act synergistically for PET 589 hydrolysis to terephthalic acid. Process Biochem 59:84-90. 590 40. Wei R, Oeser T, Schmidt J, Meier R, Barth M, Then J, Zimmermann W. 2016. 591 Engineered bacterial polyester hydrolases efficiently degrade polyethylene terephthalate due 592 to relieved product inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:1658-1665. 593 41. Carniel A, Valoni É, Nicomedes J, Gomes AdC, Castro AMd. 2017. Lipase from 594 Candida antarctica (CALB) and cutinase from Humicola insolens act synergistically for PET 595 hydrolysis to terephthalic acid. Process Biochem 59:84-90. 596 42. Haernvall K, Zitzenbacher S, Wallig K, Yamamoto M, Schick MB, Ribitsch D, Guebitz 597 GM. 2017. Hydrolysis of ionic phthalic acid based polyesters by wastewater microorganisms 598 and their enzymes. Environ Sci Technol 51:4596-4605. 599 43. Bollinger A, Thies S, Katzke N, Jaeger KE. 2018. The biotechnological potential of 600 marine bacteria in the novel lineage of Pseudomonas pertucinogena. Microb Biotechnol 601 doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13288. 602 44. Hajighasemi M, Tchigvintsev A, Nocek BP, Flick R, Popovic A, Hai T, Khusnutdinova 603 AN, Brown G, Xu X, Cui H, Anstett J, Chernikova TN, Bruls T, Le Paslier D, Yakimov MM, 604 Joachimiak A, Golyshina OV, Savchenko A, Golyshin PN, Edwards EA, Yakunin AF. 2018. 605 Screening and characterization of novel polyesterases from environmental metagenomes 606 with high hydrolytic activity against synthetic polyesters. Environ Sci Technol 607 doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04252. 608 45. Seymour RB, Kauffman GB. 1992. Polyurethanes: A class of modern versatile 609 materials. Journal of Chemical Education 69:909. 610 46. Darby RT, Kaplan AM. 1968. Fungal susceptibility of polyurethanes. Applied 611 microbiology 16:900-905. 612 47. Russell JR, Huang J, Anand P, Kucera K, Sandoval AG, Dantzler KW, Hickman D, 613 Jee J, Kimovec FM, Koppstein D, Marks DH, Mittermiller PA, Núñez SJ, Santiago M, Townes 614 MA, Vishnevetsky M, Williams NE, Vargas MPN, Boulanger L-A, Bascom-Slack C, Strobel 615 SA. 2011. Biodegradation of polyester polyurethane by endophytic fungi. Appl Environ 616 Microbiol 77:6076-6084. 617 48. Howard GT, Crother B, Vicknair J. 2001. Cloning, nucleotide sequencing and 618 characterization of a polyurethanase gene (pueB) from Pseudomonas chlororaphis. Int 619 Biodeterior Biodegrad 47:141-149. 620 49. Howard GT, Blake RC. 1998. Growth of Pseudomonas fluorescens on a polyester–621 polyurethane and the purification and characterization of a polyurethanase–protease 622 enzyme. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 42:213-220. 623 50. Stern RV, Howard GT. 2000. The polyester polyurethanase gene (pueA) from 624 Pseudomonas chlororaphis encodes a lipase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 185:163-168. 625 51. Howard GT, Mackie RI, Cann IK, Ohene-Adjei S, Aboudehen KS, Duos BG, Childers 626 GW. 2007. Effect of insertional mutations in the pueA and pueB genes encoding two 627 polyurethanases in Pseudomonas chlororaphis contained within a gene cluster. J Appl 628 Microbiol 103:2074-83. 629 52. Hung CS, Zingarelli S, Nadeau LJ, Biffinger JC, Drake CA, Crouch AL, Barlow DE, 630 Russell JN, Jr., Crookes-Goodson WJ. 2016. carbon catabolite repression and impranil 631
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
21
polyurethane degradation in Pseudomonas protegens strain Pf-5. Appl Environ Microbiol 632 82:6080-6090. 633 53. Peng YH, Shih YH, Lai YC, Liu YZ, Liu YT, Lin NC. 2014. Degradation of 634 polyurethane by bacterium isolated from soil and assessment of polyurethanolytic activity of 635 a Pseudomonas putida strain. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:9529-37. 636 54. Akutsu Y, Nakajima-Kambe T, Nomura N, Nakahara T. 1998. purification and 637 properties of a polyester polyurethane-degrading enzyme from Comamonas acidovorans TB-638 35. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:62-7. 639 55. Shigeno-Akutsu Y, Nakajima-Kambe T, Nomura N, Nakahara T. 1999. Purification 640 and properties of culture-broth-secreted esterase from the polyurethane degrader 641 Comamonas acidovorans TB-35. J Biosci Bioeng 88:484-7. 642 56. Biffinger JC, Barlow DE, Cockrell AL, Cusick KD, Hervey WJ, Fitzgerald LA, Nadeau 643 LJ, Hung CS, Crookes-Goodson WJ, Russell JN. 2015. The applicability of Impranil®DLN for 644 gauging the biodegradation of polyurethanes. Polym Degradation Stab 120:178-185. 645 57. Shah Z, Krumholz L, Aktas DF, Hasan F, Khattak M, Shah AA. 2013. Degradation of 646 polyester polyurethane by a newly isolated soil bacterium, Bacillus subtilis strain MZA-75. 647 Biodegradation 24:865-77. 648 58. Rowe L, Howard GT. 2002. Growth of Bacillus subtilis on polyurethane and the 649 purification and characterization of a polyurethanase-lipase enzyme. Int Biodeterior 650 Biodegrad 50:33-40. 651 59. Oceguera-Cervantes A, Carrillo-García A, López N, Bolaños-Nuñez S, Cruz-Gómez 652 MJ, Wacher C, Loza-Tavera H. 2007. Characterization of the polyurethanolytic activity of two 653 Alicycliphilus sp. strains able to degrade polyurethane and n-methylpyrrolidone. Appl Environ 654 Microbiol 73:6214-6223. 655 60. Schmidt J RW, T Oeser , L A. D e Silva, D Breite, A Schulze, W Zimmermann 2017. 656 Degradation of polyester polyurethane by bacterial polyester hydrolases. Polymers 9:65. 657 61. Martinez-Martinez M, Coscolin C, Santiago G, Chow J, Stogios PJ, Bargiela R, 658 Gertler C, Navarro-Fernandez J, Bollinger A, Thies S, Mendez-Garcia C, Popovic A, Brown 659 G, Chernikova TN, Garcia-Moyano A, Bjerga GEK, Perez-Garcia P, Hai T, Del Pozo MV, 660 Stokke R, Steen IH, Cui H, Xu X, Nocek BP, Alcaide M, Distaso M, Mesa V, Pelaez AI, 661 Sanchez J, Buchholz PCF, Pleiss J, Fernandez-Guerra A, Glockner FO, Golyshina OV, 662 Yakimov MM, Savchenko A, Jaeger KE, Yakunin AF, Streit WR, Golyshin PN, Guallar V, 663 Ferrer M, The Inmare C. 2018. Determinants and prediction of esterase substrate 664 promiscuity patterns. ACS Chem Biol 13:225-234. 665 62. Zafar U, Houlden A, Robson GD. 2013. Fungal communities associated with the 666 biodegradation of polyester polyurethane buried under compost at different temperatures. 667 Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7313-24. 668 63. Gautam R, Bassi AS, Yanful EK. 2007. Candida rugosa lipase-catalyzed 669 polyurethane degradation in aqueous medium. Biotechnol Lett 29:1081-6. 670 64. Alvarez-Barragan J, Dominguez-Malfavon L, Vargas-Suarez M, Gonzalez-Hernandez 671 R, Aguilar-Osorio G, Loza-Tavera H. 2016. Biodegradative activities of selected 672 environmental fungi on a polyester polyurethane varnish and polyether polyurethane foams. 673 Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5225-35. 674 65. Mathur G, Prasad R. 2012. Degradation of polyurethane by Aspergillus flavus (ITCC 675 6051) isolated from soil. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167:1595-1602. 676 66. Khan S, Nadir S, Shah ZU, Shah AA, Karunarathna SC, Xu J, Khan A, Munir S, 677 Hasan F. 2017. Biodegradation of polyester polyurethane by Aspergillus tubingensis. Environ 678 Pollut 225:469-480. 679 67. Nowlin T. 2014. Global Polyethylene Business Overview. In T.E. N (ed), global 680 polyethylene business overview in business and technology of the global polyethylene 681 industry doi:10.1002/9781118946039.ch1. Wiley, VCH. 682 68. Kumar Sen S, Raut S. 2015. Microbial degradation of low density polyethylene 683 (LDPE): A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 3:462-473. 684 69. Restrepo-Florez JM, Bassi A, Thompson MR. 2014. Microbial degradation and 685 deterioration of polyethylene - A review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 88:83-90. 686
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
22
70. Pathak VM, Navneet. 2017. Review on the current status of polymer degradation: a 687 microbial approach. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 4:15. 688 71. Ojha N, Pradhan N, Singh S, Barla A, Shrivastava A, Khatua P, Rai V, Bose S. 2017. 689 Evaluation of HDPE and LDPE degradation by fungus, implemented by statistical 690 optimization. Scientific Reports 7:39515. 691 72. Yamada-Onodera K, Mukumoto H, Katsuyaya Y, Saiganji A, Tani Y. 2001. 692 Degradation of polyethylene by a fungus, Penicillium simplicissimum YK. Polym Degradation 693 Stab 72:323-327. 694 73. Bonhomme S, Cuer A, Delort A, Lemaire J, Sancelme M, Scott G. 2003. 695 Environmental biodegradation of polyethylene. Polym Degradation Stab 81:441-452. 696 74. Veethahavya KS, Rajath BS, Noobia S, Kumar BM. 2016. Biodegradation of low 697 density polyethylene in aqueous media. Procedia Environmental Sciences 35:709-713. 698 75. Vimala PP, Mathew L. 2016. Biodegradation of polyethylene using Bacillus subtilis. 699 Procedia Technology 24:232-239. 700 76. Yang J, Yang Y, Wu W-M, Zhao J, Jiang L. 2014. Evidence of polyethylene 701 biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating waxworms. Environ Sci 702 Technol 48:13776-13784. 703 77. Yang Y, Yang J, Wu W-M, Zhao J, Song Y, Gao L, Yang R, Jiang L. 2015. 704 Biodegradation and mineralization of polystyrene by plastic-eating mealworms: Part 1. 705 Chemical and physical characterization and isotopic tests. Environ Sci Technol 49:12080-706 12086. 707 78. Sowmya HV, Ramalingappa, Krishnappa M, Thippeswamy B. 2015. Degradation of 708 polyethylene by Penicillium simplicissimum isolated from local dumpsite of Shivamogga 709 district. Environ Dev Sustainability 17:731-745. 710 79. Palmer R. 2001. Polyamides, Plastics, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and 711 Technology doi:10.1002/0471440264.pst251. 712 80. Tosa T, Chibata I. 1965. Utilization of cyclic amides and formation of omega-amino 713 acids by microorganisms. J Bacteriol 89:919-20. 714 81. Takehara I, Kato DI, Takeo M, Negoro S. 2017. draft genome sequence of the nylon 715 oligomer-degrading bacterium Arthrobacter sp. strain KI72. Genome Announc 5. 716 82. Negoro S, Taniguchi T, Kanaoka M, Kimura H, Okada H. 1983. Plasmid-determined 717 enzymatic degradation of nylon oligomers. J Bacteriol 155:22-31. 718 83. Negoro S, Kakudo S, Urabe I, Okada H. 1992. A new nylon oligomer degradation 719 gene (nylC) on plasmid pOAD2 from a Flavobacterium sp. J Bacteriol 174:7948-7953. 720 84. Kakudo S, Negoro S, Urabe I, Okada H. 1993. Nylon oligomer degradation gene, 721 nylC, on plasmid pOAD2 from a Flavobacterium strain encodes endo-type 6-722 aminohexanoate oligomer hydrolase: purification and characterization of the nylC gene 723 product. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3978. 724 85. Negoro S, Ohki T, Shibata N, Sasa K, Hayashi H, Nakano H, Yasuhira K, Kato D-i, 725 Takeo M, Higuchi Y. 2007. Nylon-oligomer degrading enzyme/substrate complex: Catalytic 726 mechanism of 6-aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase. J Mol Biol 370:142-156. 727 86. Yasuhira K, Uedo Y, Shibata N, Negoro S, Takeo M, Higuchi Y. 2006. Crystallization 728 and X-ray diffraction analysis of 6-aminohexanoate-cyclic-dimer hydrolase from Arthrobacter 729 sp. KI72. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 62:1209-11. 730 87. Ohki T, Mizuno N, Shibata N, Takeo M, Negoro S, Higuchi Y. 2005. Crystallization 731 and X-ray diffraction analysis of 6-aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase from Arthrobacter sp. 732 KI72. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 61:928-30. 733 88. Nagai K, Yasuhira K, Tanaka Y, Kato D, Takeo M, Higuchi Y, Negoro S, Shibata N. 734 2013. Crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of nylon hydrolase (NylC) from 735 Arthrobacter sp. KI72. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 69:1151-4. 736 89. Kinoshita S, Terada T, Taniguchi T, Takene Y, Masuda S, Matsunaga N, Okada H. 737 1981. Purification and characterization of 6-aminohexanoic-acid-oligomer hydrolase of 738 Flavobacterium sp. Ki72. Eur J Biochem 116:547-51. 739 90. Yasuhira K, Tanaka Y, Shibata H, Kawashima Y, Ohara A, Kato D, Takeo M, Negoro 740 S. 2007. 6-Aminohexanoate oligomer hydrolases from the alkalophilic bacteria Agromyces 741 sp. strain KY5R and Kocuria sp. strain KY2. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:7099-102. 742
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
23
91. Negoro S, Ohki T, Shibata N, Mizuno N, Wakitani Y, Tsurukame J, Matsumoto K, 743 Kawamoto I, Takeo M, Higuchi Y. 2005. X-ray Crystallographic Analysis of 6-744 Aminohexanoate-Dimer Hydrolase: Molecular basis for the birth of a nylon oligomer-745 degrading enzyme. J Biol Chem 280:39644-39652. 746 92. Kinoshita S, Negoro S, Muramatsu M, Bisaria VS, Sawada S, Okada H. 1977. 6-747 Aminohexanoic acid cyclic dimer hydrolase. A new cyclic amide hydrolase produced by 748 Achromobacter guttatus KI74. Eur J Biochem 80:489-95. 749 93. Kinoshita S, Kageyama S, Iba K, Yamada Y, Okada H. 1975. Utilization of a Cyclic 750 Dimer and Linear Oligomers of ε-Aminocaproic Acid by Achrornobacter guttatus KI 72. Agric 751 Biol Chem 39:1219-1223. 752 94. Takehara I, Fujii T, Tanimoto Y, Kato DI, Takeo M, Negoro S. 2018. Correction to: 753 Metabolic pathway of 6-aminohexanoate in the nylon oligomer-degrading bacterium 754 Arthrobacter sp. KI72: identification of the enzymes responsible for the conversion of 6-755 aminohexanoate to adipate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:815. 756 95. Takehara I, Fujii T, Tanimoto Y, Kato DI, Takeo M, Negoro S. 2018. Metabolic 757 pathway of 6-aminohexanoate in the nylon oligomer-degrading bacterium Arthrobacter sp. 758 KI72: identification of the enzymes responsible for the conversion of 6-aminohexanoate to 759 adipate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:801-814. 760 96. Sudhakar M, Priyadarshini C, Doble M, Sriyutha Murthy P, Venkatesan R. 2007. 761 Marine bacteria mediated degradation of nylon 66 and 6. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 60:144-762 151. 763 97. Oppermann FB, Pickartz S, Steinbüchel A. 1998. Biodegradation of polyamides. 764 Polym Degradation Stab 59:337-344. 765 98. Deguchi T, Kitaoka Y, Kakezawa M, Nishida T. 1998. Purification and 766 characterization of a nylon-degrading enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1366-1371. 767 99. Prijambada ID, Negoro S, Yomo T, Urabe I. 1995. Emergence of nylon oligomer 768 degradation enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO through experimental evolution. 769 Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2020-2022. 770 100. Kanagawa K, Oishi M, Negoro S, Urabe I, Okada H. 1993. Characterization of the 6-771 aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. NK87. J Gen Microbiol 139:787-772 95. 773 101. Maul J, Frushour BG, Kontoff JR, Eichenauer H, Ott K-H, Schade C. Polystyrene and 774 styrene copolymers, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 775 doi:10.1002/14356007.a21_615.pub2. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. 776 102. Krueger MC, Hofmann U, Moeder M, Schlosser D. 2015. Potential of wood-rotting 777 fungi to attack polystyrene sulfonate and its depolymerisation by Gloeophyllum trabeum via 778 hydroquinone-driven fenton chemistry. PLOS ONE 10:e0131773. 779 103. Milstein O, Gersonde R, Huttermann A, Chen MJ, Meister JJ. 1992. Fungal 780 biodegradation of lignopolystyrene graft copolymers. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3225-3232. 781 104. Ho BT, Roberts TK, Lucas S. 2018. An overview on biodegradation of polystyrene 782 and modified polystyrene: the microbial approach. Crit Rev Biotechnol 38:308-320. 783 105. Chauhan D, Agrawal G, Deshmukh S, Roy SS, Priyadarshini R. 2018. Biofilm 784 formation by Exiguobacterium sp. DR11 and DR14 alter polystyrene surface properties and 785 initiate biodegradation. RSC Advances 8:37590-37599. 786 106. Mooney A, Ward PG, O’Connor KE. 2006. Microbial degradation of styrene: 787 biochemistry, molecular genetics, and perspectives for biotechnological applications. Appl 788 Microbiol Biotechnol 72:1. 789 107. Dobson ADW, O'Leary ND, O'Connor KE. 2002. Biochemistry, genetics and 790 physiology of microbial styrene degradation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:403-417. 791 108. Tischler D. 2015. Pathways for the Degradation of Styrene, p 7-22, Microbial Styrene 792 Degradation doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24862-2_2. Springer International Publishing, Cham. 793 109. Oelschlägel M, Zimmerling J, Tischler D. 2018. A Review: The styrene metabolizing 794 cascade of side-chain oxygenation as biotechnological basis to gain various valuable 795 compounds. Frontiers in microbiology 9:490-490. 796
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
24
110. Tischler D, Eulberg D, Lakner S, Kaschabek SR, van Berkel WJH, Schlömann M. 797 2009. Identification of a novel self-sufficient styrene monooxygenase from Rhodococcus 798 opacus 1CP. J Bacteriol 191:4996-5009. 799 111. Velasco A, Alonso S, García JL, Perera J, Díaz E. 1998. Genetic and functional 800 analysis of the styrene catabolic cluster of Pseudomonas sp. Strain Y2. J Bacteriol 180:1063-801 1071. 802 112. Morrison E, Kantz A, Gassner GT, Sazinsky MH. 2013. Structure and mechanism of 803 styrene monooxygenase reductase: new insight into the FAD-transfer reaction. Biochemistry 804 52:6063-75. 805 113. Oelschlägel M, Gröning JAD, Tischler D, Kaschabek SR, Schlömann M. 2012. 806 Styrene oxide isomerase of Rhodococcus opacus 1CP, a highly stable and considerably 807 active enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4330-4337. 808 114. Crabo AG, Singh B, Nguyen T, Emami S, Gassner GT, Sazinsky MH. 2017. Structure 809 and biochemistry of phenylacetaldehyde dehydrogenase from the Pseudomonas putida S12 810 styrene catabolic pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys 616:47-58. 811 115. ND OL, MM OM, Dobson AD. 2011. Regulation of phenylacetic acid uptake is 812 sigma54 dependent in Pseudomonas putida CA-3. BMC Microbiol 11:229. 813 116. O'Leary ND, Duetz WA, Dobson AD, O'Connor KE. 2002. Induction and repression of 814 the sty operon in Pseudomonas putida CA-3 during growth on phenylacetic acid under 815 organic and inorganic nutrient-limiting continuous culture conditions. FEMS Microbiol Lett 816 208:263-8. 817 117. O'Leary ND, Mooney A, O'Mahony M, Dobson AD. 2014. Functional characterization 818 of a StyS sensor kinase reveals distinct domains associated with intracellular and 819 extracellular sensing of styrene in P. putida CA-3. Bioengineered 5:114-22. 820 118. Sheldon RA, Van Bekkum H. 2008. Fine chemicals through heterogeneous catalysis. 821 John Wiley & Sons. 822 119. O'Leary ND, O'Connor KE, Ward P, Goff M, Dobson AD. 2005. Genetic 823 characterization of accumulation of polyhydroxyalkanoate from styrene in Pseudomonas 824 putida CA-3. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4380-7. 825 120. Ward PG, Goff M, Donner M, Kaminsky W, O'Connor KE. 2006. A two step chemo-826 biotechnological conversion of polystyrene to a biodegradable thermoplastic. Environ Sci 827 Technol 40:2433-2437. 828 121. Savoldelli J, Tomback D, Savoldelli H. 2017. Breaking down polystyrene through the 829 application of a two-step thermal degradation and bacterial method to produce usable 830 byproducts. Waste Manage 60:123-126. 831 122. Fischer I, Schmitt WF, Porth H, Allsopp MW, Vianello G. 2014. Poly(Vinyl Chloride). 832 In ED (ed), Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 833 doi:10.1002/14356007.a21_717.pub2. Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & CoKGaA. 834 123. J. K-K, T. B. 2019. Polypropylene Handbook. Springer Nature Switzerland. 835 124. Cacciari I, Quatrini P, Zirletta G, Mincione E, Vinciguerra V, Lupattelli P, Giovannozzi 836 Sermanni G. 1993. Isotactic polypropylene biodegradation by a microbial community: 837 physicochemical characterization of metabolites produced. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3695-838 3700. 839 125. Iakovlev VV, Guelcher SA, Bendavid R. 2017. Degradation of polypropylene in vivo: A 840 microscopic analysis of meshes explanted from patients. Journal of Biomedical Materials 841 Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 105:237-248. 842 126. Bombelli P, Howe CJ, Bertocchini F. 2017. Polyethylene bio-degradation by 843 caterpillars of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. Curr Biol 27:R292-R293. 844 127. Weber C, Pusch S, Opatz T. 2017. Polyethylene bio-degradation by caterpillars? Curr 845 Biol 27:R744-R745. 846 128. Yang Y, Chen J, Wu W-M, Zhao J, Yang J. 2015. Complete genome sequence of 847 Bacillus sp. YP1, a polyethylene-degrading bacterium from waxworm's gut. J Biotechnol 848 200:77-78. 849 129. Brandon AM, Gao S-H, Tian R, Ning D, Yang S-S, Zhou J, Wu W-M, Criddle CS. 850 2018. biodegradation of polyethylene and plastic mixtures in mealworms (Larvae of Tenebrio 851 molitor) and effects on the gut microbiome. Environ Sci Technol 52:6526-6533. 852
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
25
853 854
855
856
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 857
This work was in part supported by the BMBF within the program MarBiotech (FKZ 858
031A565), the EU Horizon 2020 project INMARE and MetaGenLig (FKZ 031B0571B) 859
at the University of Hamburg. 860
861
FIGURE LEGENDS 862
863
FIGURE 1: Main synthetic polymers globally produced in 2016. Numbers in the chart 864
indicate the global annual production (millions of tons) of the specified synthetic 865
polymer. Global annual plastic production was extracted from references (1-7). 866
Monomers are depicted above the chart. Indicated are the names of bacterial genera 867
producing verified enzymes with available protein sequences that are known to be 868
involved in the breakdown of the high molecular weight polymers (not the additives, 869
plasticizers, etc.). For detailed references on the individual enzymes, we refer to the 870
main text. For PA, PE, PS, PVC and PP no defined enzymes on the level of amino 871
acid or DNA sequences haven been identified that act on the polymer. For enzymes 872
acting on dimers or oligomers and feeding them into the different metabolic pathways 873
see main text. For additional structural information on the polymers we refer to 874
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/init.do. 875
876
FIGURE 2: A) Electron microscopic images of Comamonas sp. strain DDHH 01 877
attached and hydrolyzing PET fibers. Comamonas sp. DDHH 01 was isolated from a 878
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from
26
sewage enrichment culture. Red arrows indicate PET fibers. Black and white arrows 879
indicate bacterial cells. Top image: Transmission electron microscopy image of a 880
PET fiber with attached Comamonas sp. cells. Middle image: Scanning electron 881
microscope image of PET yarn with microcolonies. Bottom: Close‐up of a single cell 882
on the surface of a single PET fiber. B) Topology of a neighbor joining tree 883
containing representative sequences of most of the currently known synthetic 884
polymer or oligomer/monomer degrading enzymes. The tree is based on amino acid 885
sequence homologies. Overall, 886
27 known functional and verified enzymes were included in this alignment. This 887
represents the majority of the currently known and biochemically characterized 888
enzymes. PET hydrolases represent the largest fraction of known and studied 889
enzymes. The alignment was calculated using T-Coffee in accurate mode (17). The 890
tree was calculated with Mega6 (18) and is not rooted. A similarity and identity matrix 891
for all included sequences is provided in the supplementary material as TABLE S1 892
together with their accession numbers. 893
on April 8, 2020 by guest
http://aem.asm
.org/D
ownloaded from