planning commission meeting september 16, 2020 at …€¦ · final action may be taken on any item...

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 AT 6:30 PM MEETING HELD VIRTUALLY ON ZOOM – PLEASE SEE BELOW

Please click the link to join the webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84701936010 Webinar ID: 847 0193 6010 Or Telephone: 301 715 8592 or 312 626 6799 or 646 558 8656 Or Join us on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCriqbePBxTucXEzRr6fclhQ/videos

Welcome: Chairman Thomas Invocation: Commissioner Barker Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Lunt

1. Roll Call

2. Minutes Consideration: a. Consideration and action to approve the September 2, 2020, Planning Commission Meeting minutes

3. Opening Meeting Statement and discussion on updated Opening Meeting Statement

4. Ex parte communications or conflicts of interest to disclose

5. Public comments for items not on the agenda

CONSENT AGENDA

6. SUB 2019-03 Consideration and action for extension of final approval of Northview Estates Subdivision, Phase 7, located at approx. 3700 N and 400 E (50 lots)

7. Presentation and Discussion on Mixed-Use Town Centers Presenter: Evan Nelson

8. Remarks - Planning Commissioners

9. Remarks - City Manager/Attorney

10. Adjournment

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF POSTING Public meetings will be held electronically in accordance with Utah Code Ann. §§ 52-4-210 et. seq., Open and Public Meetings Act. Pursuant to a written determination by the Mayor/Council finding that conducting the meeting with an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who may be present due to infectious and potentially dangerous nature of COVID-19 virus, public meetings with be held electronically until further notice. The undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was posted within the North Ogden City limits on this 10th day of September 2020, at North Ogden City Hall, on the City Hall Notice Board, on the Utah State Public Notice Website, at http://www.northogdencity.com, and faxed to the Standard Examiner. The 2020 meeting schedule was also provided to the Standard Examiner on December 22, 2019.

The Planning Commission at its discretion, may rearrange the order of any item(s) on the agenda. Final action may be taken on any item on the agenda. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodation (including auxiliary communicative aids and service) during the meeting should notify Annette Spendlove, City Recorder, at 782-7211 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. In accordance with State Statute, City Ordinance and Council Policy, one or more Planning Commission Members may be connected via speakerphone. S. Annette Spendlove, MMC, City Recorder

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84701936010

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCriqbePBxTucXEzRr6fclhQ/videos

Planning Commission Meeting September 2, 2020 Page 1 of 11

NORTH OGDEN PLANNING COMMISSION

MEETING MINUTES September 2, 2020

The North Ogden Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting on September 2, 2020 at 6:31 p.m. in the North Ogden City Municipal Building, 505 E. 2600 N. North Ogden, Utah. Due to Covid-19 the meeting was held virtually on Zoom. Notice of time, place and agenda of the meeting was furnished to each member of the Planning Commission, posted on the bulletin board at the municipal office and posted to the Utah State Website on August 28, 2020. Notice of the annual meeting schedule was published in the Standard-Examiner on December 22, 2020. COMMISSIONERS: Eric Thomas Chairman Brandon Mason Vice-Chairman Lisa Arner Commissioner Scott Barker Commissioner Alan Lunt Commissioner - arrived @ 7:20pm Nicole Nancarrow Commissioner Don Waite Commissioner STAFF: Rob Scott Planning Director Lynne Bexell Administrative Assistant Jon Call City Attorney/Administrator Brandon Bell Associate Planner Kai Johnsen Planning Tech Evan Nelson Planning Dept. Head VISITORS: Bekah Jay D Dalpias Richard Hall John Hansen

Kyle Kluge Carson Jones Stefanie Casey Mayor Berube

Mark Ensminger Terri McCulloch Jody Deamer Brenda Ashdown

REGULAR MEETING

2.


Chairman Thomas called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. Commissioner Waite offered the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL 1. ROLL

Chairman Thomas conducted the roll call and noted that Commissioner Lunt would arrive later.

2. MINUTES CONSIDERATION a. Consideration and action to approve the August 19, 2020, Planning Commission Meeting minutes

Commissioner Waite made a motion to approve the August 19, 2020, minutes as presented. Commissioner Mason seconded the motion.

Voting on the motion:

Chairman Thomas aye Vice Chairman Mason aye Commissioner Arner aye Commissioner Barker aye Commissioner Lunt excused Commissioner Nancarrow aye Commissioner Waite aye

The motion carried.

3. OPENING MEETING STATEMENT

Planning Director Scott read the opening statement. 4. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS OR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO DISCLOSE

Chairman Thomas asked if any Commissioner needed to disclose ex parte communications or conflicts of interest; no disclosures were made.

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA There were no public comments. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS:

2.


6. SUB 2020-11 Consideration and action regarding preliminary approval of the Hall Orchard Subdivision (17 lots) located at approx. 2750 N. 800 E. The applicant is requesting preliminary approval of the Hall Orchard subdivision (17 lots) located at approximately 2750 North and 800 East. A portion of the subdivision is owned by North Ogden City and the applicant is proposing a land swap. A development agreement will be required. This subdivision is located on approximately 10.46 acres. The property is zoned R-1-8. The R-1-8 zone requires a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet for interior lots and 9,000 square feet for corner lots, with a lot width requirement of 80 feet. A Technical Review Committee meeting was held for this property on August 4, 2020. The City Engineer has submitted a report dated August 17, 2020. The report references that an existing overhead powerline easement and buildable lot areas are to be identified. The applicant has indicated he is working with Rocky Mountain Power to potentially relocate these lines. If the power lines are not relocated, then the buildable areas will need to be reviewed. A geotechnical report is required and will need to be recorded and referenced on the final plat. A secondary water will serve letter and Central Weber Sewer will serve letter for this subdivision are required for final. The proposed lots will need to be verified to meet the lot width requirements and square footage requirements. Lot 17 will need to be adjusted to meet the area requirement. Additionally, the applicant is required to provide the bearings (the angles) of all side lot boundaries. CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The proposed subdivision can meet the requirements of applicable North Ogden City ordinances and conforms to the North Ogden City General Plan. The General Plan map calls for this property to be developed as low density residential and is within the Old Town Neighborhood. SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS

• Comply with the Staff Report Requirements • Comply with the Engineer Report Requirements • Complete a land swap agreement with North Ogden City to relocate the storm water basin • Obtain the secondary water will serve letter • Obtain the Central Weber Sewer District will serve letter • Provide information regarding the power line easement and buildable areas • Provide lot verifications • Adjust lot 17 to meet the area requirement. • Record and reference the geotechnical report on the final plat

The memo offered the following summary of potential Land Use Authority considerations:

• Does the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the applicable City subdivision and zoning ordinances?

• Is the proposed subdivision consistent with the North Ogden City General Plan?

2.


The memo concluded staff recommends preliminary approval of the Hall Orchard Subdivision subject to the conditions in the Staff report. Mr. Scott reviewed his staff memo. Carson Jones stated he has been working on this project for well over a year and has settled on this plan that meets the City standards; the project includes 17 lots, all of which are well over the minimum size requirement. The issue he is currently most focused on relates to the proposed land swap and ensuring that the City-owned land designated as detention space can actually be traded. He then addressed the recommended conditions of approval, noting most have been satisfied, but that he is still working with Rocky Mountain Power regarding the potential relocation of lines in close proximity to the subject property. He stated that is most concerning to him and he is not completely confident that he can reach an agreeable solution with that entity. If they do not approve rerouting of the lines, he may need to adjust his plan to conform with the Rocky Mountain Power regulations requiring all built structures to be a minimum of 20-feet away from any power line. Vice-Chairman Mason noted that the size of lot 17 in the project, which is a corner lot, is slightly under the minimum size requirement for the zone. Mr. Jones stated he has corrected that and resubmitted a plat to staff indicating the size has been increased. Commissioner Barker asked Mr. Jones if he is concerned about the land swap and the fact that the land is a detention basin. Mr. Jones stated the only issue relates to the increased costs associated with installing storm drain infrastructure; however, the land swap will facilitate an improved layout for the subdivision. Chairman Thomas invited public input. Jay D. Dalpias, 734 E. 2700 N., stated he and his wife live in Warren Acres, just south of the proposed subdivision. He stated that he is in favor of the land swap and asked if the detention basin will be grassy or remain in its natural vegetative state. He asked if the basin will be fenced or open. He also asked if there are plans for fencing along the perimeter of the subdivision, particularly lots 12, 13, 14, and 15 and the detention basin. He stated he knows this is in the ‘old town’ portion of North Ogden and he wondered if there are opportunities for burying large power lines along 700 East and 2750 North in conjunction with this project. This would be a great time to consider those improvements if possible. He concluded the subdivision design and layout is reasonable in his estimation and he does not have any great concerns at this time. Mr. Jones responded to the comments about the basin; it will be City-owned property and will be used and maintained by the City in perpetuity. He would like for it to be beautified and improved, but those decisions are yet to be determined. The basin is no more than three feet deep at its deepest point and will only hold two-acre feet of water when at capacity; given the shallow depth, there is no requirement to fence the basin and he has no plans to do that at this time. He added he also does not plan to fence the back of lots 12 through 15, but he does plan to beautify the area so that it is an asset to the neighborhood. He then noted that any new power lines installed in conjunction with this project will be underground, but he will do everything within his power to pursue the burying of existing power lines in the area.

2.


Mr. Scott noted that design of detention basins is usually proposed by developers. The detention basin that is related to this project is nearly an acre in size and he recommended that the Planning Commission include language in their motion to recommend that the Parks and Recreation Department evaluate options for using the detention basin as a small neighborhood park. Mr. Jones then readdressed power infrastructure serving the subject property. He identified one power pole located in the park strip along Monroe Boulevard and indicated that pole will remain in the southeast corner of lot 17. There will be no additional poles in the project area for overhead power line service.

Vice Chairman Mason made a motion to approve application SUB 2020-11 granting preliminary approval of the Hall Orchard Subdivision (17 lots) located at approximately 2750 N. 800 E., based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed in the staff report, and with the additional recommended condition that the Parks and Recreation Department consider options for dual use of the detention basin as a neighborhood park. Commissioner Nancarrow seconded the motion. Commissioner Barker stated it is important to understand that Rocky Mountain Power will not allow placement of a permanent structure within 20 feet of power lines, not just power poles. Vice-Chairman Mason indicated he believes the applicant and the Commission understand that regulation.



The motion carried.

7. SUB 2020-13 Consideration and action regarding final approval for The Towns at Patriot Pointe Subdivision, Phase 2, (3 lots) located at approx. 150 E. 2300 N. On December 19, 2019 North Ogden City signed a development agreement as part of a rezone of this property with the Double Ott Ranch, LLC, to subdivide and develop the property as a Master Planned Community consisting of 389 dwelling units on approximately 32.917 acres of developable area and 6.621 acre in City Pond/Park for a gross area of 39.538 acres with integrated open space and related amenities. The overall density of this project is 11.8 units to the acre. (See Exhibit B) The project received preliminary approval on February 19, 2020 for three phases. This application is for final approval of Phase 2 which consists of 3 lots. This phase has 71 units with 14 buildings ranging in size from triplexes to 8-plexes. The final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat approval.

2.


The Technical Review Committee reviewed this project on May 15, 2019. (See Exhibit E) The City Engineer’s report dated August 26, 2020. (See Exhibit D) The improvements to 150 East will be constructed as part of a grant for the city detention pond. The building permit review process compares the permit application to the site plan, development agreement, and subdivision approvals. Discrepancies will be resolved by the site plan. GENERAL PLAN The proposal is located in the Southtown neighborhood. The General Plan map calls for this property to be developed as Medium Density Residential, 6 to 18 units per acre. The proposed subdivision meets the requirements of applicable North Ogden City ordinances and conforms to the North Ogden City General Plan. The memo offered the following summary of potential Land Use Authority considerations:

• Does the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the applicable City subdivision and zoning ordinances?

Relative to recommended conditions of approval, if there are any discrepancies found between the site plan contained in the development agreement and the subdivision plat, the site plan will control. The memo concluded staff recommends final approval of Phase 2 the Towns at Patriot Pointe, Phase 2 subdivision subject to the conditions in the Staff report, City Engineers report, Development Agreement, and Technical Review Committee Notes. Mr. Scott reviewed his staff memo. Commissioner Waite asked if the construction method in this project will be slab on grade. Mr. Scott deferred to the applicant to answer that question. John Hansen stated there will be no basements in the homes in the project. He indicated he has nothing to add to Mr. Scott’s presentation, but thanked staff for their assistance. Chairman Thomas invited public input. There were no comments made.

Vice Commissioner Mason made a motion to approve application SUB 2020-13 granting final approval for The Towns at Patriot Pointe Subdivision, Phase 2 (3 lots) located at approximately 150 E. 2300 N., based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Commissioner Arner seconded the motion.


Chairman Thomas aye Vice Chairman Mason aye Commissioner Arner aye Commissioner Barker aye Commissioner Lunt aye

2.


Commissioner Nancarrow aye Commissioner Waite aye

The motion carried.

LEGISLATIVE ITEMS: 8. ZTA 2020-08 Public hearing, discussion, and recommendation on a swimming pool.

Katie and Kyle Kluge have submitted an application requesting an amendment to the standards for family swimming pools. (See Exhibit A) They are requesting an amendment that would allow for a family swimming pool to be allowed in the side yard of corner lot with specific setback standards. The current ordinance allows family swimming pools only in rear yards. 11-10-16: FAMILY SWIMMING POOL A family swimming pool shall be permitted in the rear yard of a dwelling as an accessory use, provided the following requirements are met:

1. Location: The location of such family swimming pool or accessory machinery shall be not less than thirty-five feet (35') from any dwelling on an adjoining lot and not less than ten feet (10') from any interior property line. On corner lots, the distance from said pool to the property line facing on a street shall not be less than the required side yard for an accessory building in that zone.

2. Fence; Lights: An outside family swimming pool shall be completely enclosed by a fence structurally adequate to resist wind load conforming to the international building code (IBC), and not less than six feet (6') in height. Any lights used to illuminate said pool or its accessories shall be so arranged as to reflect the light away from the adjoining premises. Staff has reviewed the request and in principle agrees with the amendment with a few requirements. The first of these is that family swimming pools should be allowed within a side yard on a corner lot with a minimum setback of 20 feet. This is the same standard for main buildings in a street-facing side yard on a corner lot (See Exhibit B). The second set of requirements proposed by Staff and included in the proposed ordinance is that the pool, the decking, and related equipment, should be both behind the required setback, and no farther forward than the forward most point of the main side wall of the home. Both of these modifications are in the proposed ordinance.

The memo discussed the application’s conformance with the General Plan. Housing Goals Goal #1 – Increase Housing Quality and Variety

• Establish and adhere to high quality building and design standards for all housing types so that development enhances the community character.

Strategies

• Proactively evaluate current ordinances and policies to determine whether there are obstacles that can be removed or modified to achieve the community’s housing goals.

• Create design standards to improve the overall quality of North Ogden’s housing. • Work with homeowners, landlords, and renters to maintain and improve existing properties.

2.

https://northogden.municipalcodeonline.com/book?type=code#name=11-10-16:_FAMILY_SWIMMING_POOL


The memo offered the following summary of potential Land Use Authority considerations:

• Should the standards for family swimming pools be amended to allow family swimming pools in the corner side yard of corner lots?

• If so, what should the standards be? • Is the amendment consistent with the General Plan?

The memo concluded staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct the public hearing, receive input, discuss the amendment and any potential changes, and make a recommendation to the City Council if the Commission believes the ordinance is ready to be discussed by the City Council. The Planning Commission can find that the amendment is consistent with the General Plan. Mr. Bell reviewed his staff memo and used the aid of a diagram to illustrate the areas of a corner lot where a pool could be located in a rear yard. He compared this to the allowed areas if the proposed ordinance amendments are approved. In crafting the ordinance amendments and considered appropriate setbacks for swimming pools, staff is trying to ensure protection of property owners with pools as well as their neighbors. This led to brief discussion about setbacks of other structures or improvements located in the rear yard of a residential lot. Commissioner Lunt asked if the ordinance provides guidance for how far the pool must be located from the primary dwelling on a residential lot. Mr. Bell answered no; there may be a standard for that in the Building Code, but he is unsure what that is. City Manager/Attorney Call noted there is not a requirement for a pool to be set back a specified distance from a home, only a requirement for a lot with a pool to be fenced. A door from a home can open directly onto a pool. Mr. Bell presented an updated version of the ordinance that includes edits that were not included in the meeting packet version. He noted that the last sentence of provision A now reads “additionally, no swimming pool, decking, or accessory machinery in a corner yard shall be permitted in the area that is farther forward on the lot than the front corner of the main dwelling that is closest to the pool.” This language is intended to keep the pool and home in tandem so that a pool is not jutting out in front of a home.

a. Public hearing

The public hearing was opened at 7:37 p.m. There were no persons appearing to be heard.

Commissioner Lunt made a motion to close the public hearing. Commissioner Nancarrow seconded the motion.



2.


The motion carried.

The public hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m.

b. Discussion and Recommendation

Chairman Thomas indicated he does not have objection to the amendments. However, he does not believe there is a need to maintain a full 20-foot setback for a pool on a corner lot. He believes 10-feet would be sufficient as the side yard of a corner lot fronts a street rather than another residence. Vice-Chairman Mason agreed. There was brief discussion about the presence of public utility easements located on corner lots, which the Commission acknowledging that a 10-foot setback would serve to protect the public utility easement. Mr. Bell asked if the Commission feels that decking should be allowed in the 10-foot space between the property line and the pool. Chairman Thomas answered yes. He is not concerned about a residential property owner seeking to consume their backyard with decking or concrete. He also supported the text amendment preventing a pool from jutting in front of the front corner of a home. Mr. Bell then offered a final note that staff would recommend that the ordinance amendments apply to single-family residential zones only.

Chairman Thomas made a motion to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding application ZTA 2020-08, legislative amendment to allow swimming pools in residential zones to be allowed in the corner side yard of corner lots, based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed in the staff report, and the following adjustments:

• Adjusting the setback for pools on corner lots to 10-feet; and • Specifying that the ordinance amendments apply only to single-family residential

zones. Vice Chairman Mason seconded the motion.


Chairman Thomas aye Vice Chairman Mason aye Commissioner Arner aye Commissioner Barker aye Commissioner Lunt aye Commissioner Nancarrow aye Commissioner Waite aye

The motion carried.

9. REMARKS FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:

Vice-Chairman Mason suggested that so long as the Commission continues to meet in a virtual format, that the Pledge of Allegiance not be recited by all participants, but that it be recited by one person to avoid the issues associated with lag time for different connections.

2.


Chairman Thomas then asked the Commission if they felt the open meeting statement could simply be printed on the agenda or if it is necessary to read it into each meeting. He asked the same question for the statements included in staff reports for administrative and legislative items; is it necessary to read that language during the meeting. Commissioners indicated their only concerns relate to the fact that some people attending the meeting may not read the statements and they will not have a clear understanding of meeting protocol or the Commission’s authority in regard to administrative and legislative applications. Mr. Call stated that staff can work to try to abbreviate the statement to provide the same direction to meeting participants while not consuming such a large portion of the meeting.

10. REPORT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR:

There were no additional comments from the Planning Director.

11. REMARKS FROM CITY MANAGER/ATTORNEY:

There were no additional remarks from the City Manager/Attorney.

12. ADJOURNMENT

Commissioner Nancarrow made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Arner seconded the motion.


Chairman Thomas aye Vice Chairman Mason aye Commissioner Arner aye Commissioner Barker aye Commissioner Lunt aye Commissioner Nancarrow aye Commissioner Waite aye

The motion carried.

The meeting adjourned at 7:58 p.m.

_______________________________________ Planning Commission Chair

2.


_______________________________________ Administrative Assistant ______________________________________ Date approved

2.

September 10, 2020

PROPOSED RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR ITEMS OR HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA

Before each agenda item begins City staff will give a report. After the staff report, the item will be opened for other speakers. The applicant will speak first and be allowed up to 10 minutes. Following the applicant, any other interested person will be allowed to speak for up to 3 minutes. The applicant has final rebuttal time of up to 5 minutes.

Any materials that are displayed or referenced, e.g., pictures or written materials are part of the record and must be left with the Commission.

Speakers are required to have signed in at the door and will state their name and address before beginning their remarks. If you agree with a previous speaker then state your agreement to avoid repetitious remarks.

Speakers shall address the Commission from the podium or microphone and shall address all comments to the Planning Commission.

PROPOSED RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR ITEMS OR HEARINGS ON THE AGENDA (ZOOM VERSION)

Before each agenda item begins City staff will give a report. After the staff report, the item will be opened for other speakers. The applicant will speak first and be allowed up to 10 minutes. Following the applicant, any other interested person will be allowed to speak for up to 3 minutes. The applicant has final rebuttal time of up to 5 minutes.

Any materials that are displayed or referenced, e.g., pictures or written materials are part of the record and must be forwarded to the Commission.

Speakers are required to have registered their full name on Zoom and will state their name and address before beginning their remarks. If you agree with a previous speaker then state your agreement to avoid repetitious remarks.

Speakers shall address all comments to the Planning Commission.

3.

September 10, 2020

*Please see notes regarding Public Comments rules and procedure

a. Time is made available for anyone in the audience to address the Committee. b. When a member of the audience addresses the Committee they should have signed

in at the door and they will state their name and address. If they agree with the previous speaker then state the agreement to avoid repetitious remarks.

c. Any materials that are displayed or referenced, e.g., pictures or written materials are part of the record and must be left with the Commission.

d. Citizens will be asked to limit their remarks/questions to three (3) minutes each. e. The Chairman shall have discretion as to who will respond to a comment/question. f. In all cases the criteria for response will be that comments/questions must be

pertinent to this Committee, that there are no argumentative questions and no personal attacks.

g. The Chairman will inform a citizen when he or she has used the allotted time.

*Please see notes regarding Public Comments rules and procedure (Zoom Version)

a. Time is made available for anyone in the audience to address the Committee. b. When a member of the audience addresses the Committee they should have signed

in with their full name to the Zoom meeting and they will state their name and address. If they agree with the previous speaker then state the agreement to avoid repetitious remarks.

c. Any materials that are displayed or referenced, e.g., pictures or written materials are part of the record and must be forwarded to the Commission.

d. Citizens will be asked to limit their remarks/questions to three (3) minutes each. e. The Chairman shall have discretion as to who will respond to a comment/question. f. In all cases the criteria for response will be that comments/questions must be

pertinent to this Committee, that there are no argumentative questions and no personal attacks.

g. The Chairman will inform a citizen when he or she has used the allotted time.

3.

SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION

Application Request: Consideration and action on an administrative application for an extension of final approval for the Northview Estates Subdivision, Phase 7, located at approximately 3700 North and 400 East

Agenda Date: September 16, 2020 Applicant: Cecil Satterthwaite File Number: SUB 2019-03

PUBLIC NOTICE Mailed Notice: N/A City Website: September 11, 2020

PROPERTY INFORMATION Address: 3700 North 400 East Project Area: 14.32 acres (50 Lots) Zoning: Hillside Protection Zone HP-1 Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed Land Use: Residential Parcel ID: 160370102, 160370080, 160370008

ADJACENT LAND USE

North: Vacant South: Residential East: Residential West: Residential

STAFF INFORMATION

Lynne Bexell, Administrative Assistant [email protected] (801) 737-2215

APPLICABLE ORDINANCES North Ogden Zoning Ordinance Title 12 Subdivision Regulations North Ogden Zoning Ordinance 11-9 Hillside Protection Zones

BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting the extension of final approval of the Northview Estates subdivision, a 50-lot subdivision located at approximately 3700 North and 400 East. The final approval was to expire on

6.

mailto:[email protected]

Northview Estates Subdivision, Phase 7 Page 2 of 2

September 18, 2020. There are no changes to the application/subdivision design. All conditions of approval remain in effect.

SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATIONS • Does the proposed use meet the requirements of the applicable City Ordinances?

STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve an extension until September 18, 2021 for the Northview Estates, Phase 7, Subdivision.

EXHIBITS

A. Application B. Notice of Decision, dated September 19, 2019

AREA MAP

6.

NOTICE OF DECISION

September 19, 2019

Cecil Satterthwaite

690 W 1100 S.

Ogden, UT 84404

RE: Northview Estates, Phase 7 Subdivision Final Approval

The North Ogden Planning Commission met on September 18, 2019 and made a motion to grant final

approval for the Northview Estates Phase 7 subdivision subject to conditions listed in the Staff Report,

and that easements be granted for the temporary turnarounds for the subdivision, while also clarifying

in their motion that a will-serve letter needs to be provided for secondary water, (without requiring that

will-serve letter to be from a specific company).

The Staff Report was included in the same email that this Notice of Decision is attached to for your

reference regarding the additional conditions of approval listed in the Staff Report.

This final approval will expire if the plat, final plans, and/or necessary permits and/or licenses have not

been obtained within twelve months of the date of the decision, or an extension of time granted in

accordance with city ordinances.

If you have any questions please contact the Planning Department at (801) 782-7211.

Regards,

Brandon Bell, CNU-A

Associate Planner NORTH OGDEN CITY 505 E. 2600 N. | North Ogden, Utah, 84414 Phone: (801) 737-2216 [email protected]

6.

mailto:[email protected]

planning commission meeting september 16, 2020 at …€¦ · final action may be taken on any item...

Documents