pile eurocode

20
Eurocode 7 and New Design Challenges A Wee Scottish Bridge Stuart Pennington 19 March 2013 UCL

Upload: eswara-prasad

Post on 16-Jan-2016

248 views

Category:

Documents


13 download

DESCRIPTION

Pile design

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pile Eurocode

Eurocode 7 and New Design Challenges A Wee Scottish Bridge

Stuart Pennington

19 March 2013

UCL

Page 2: Pile Eurocode

2

• Ed ≤ Rd

• Challenges with pile design

Page 3: Pile Eurocode

3

Introduction

• New cable stayed bridge

• Specimen design

• Typically piers on pile groups, central tower on spread foundation

• Piles ≈ 3.0m diameter

Page 4: Pile Eurocode

4

Introduction

Made ground

Beach

Alluvium

Raised beach

Till

Fluvio-glacial

SST/XST/MST

Dolerite

Tuff

Limestone

Page 5: Pile Eurocode

5

Effects of Actions

Challenges

• Combinations and factors (y, g): numerous

• Set C (GEO Design Approach 1 Combination 2): forgotten

• Structural and geotechnical engineers: interaction

Page 6: Pile Eurocode

6

Effects of Actions - factors

ULS

SLS

Page 7: Pile Eurocode

7

Effects of Actions - factors

Page 8: Pile Eurocode

8

Effects of Actions

Challenges

• Combinations and factors (y, g): numerous

• Set C (GEO Design Approach 1 Combination 2): forgotten

• Structural and geotechnical engineers: interaction

Page 9: Pile Eurocode

9

Effects of Actions - interaction

Defines:

- characteristic actions

- combinations of actions

- partial factors (g)

- factors (y)

- construction tolerances

- serviceability criteria

Calculates:

- design actions

Defines:

- construction tolerances

- serviceability criteria

Designs:

- structure

Calculates:

- design resistances

- effects of actions

- global stability

- movement

Designs:

- geotechnical elements

STRUCTURES GEOTECHNICS

Earth

Loading

Page 10: Pile Eurocode

10

Resistance

Challenges

• Partial factors for accidental loading: not given

• Large diameter piles: calculation model

• Model factor: 1.2 or 1.4?

Page 11: Pile Eurocode

11

Resistance - factors for accidental loading

• Rc;d = Rb;k / gb + Rs;k / gs

• Rt;d = Rt;k / gs;t

Page 12: Pile Eurocode

12

Resistance - factors for accidental loading

• Maintain level of reliability

• Raccidental ≈ gACC-EN1992 / gPERM/TRAN-EN1992 . R4

• Others

Resistance Symbol Set

R4 with

ver. SLS

Raccidental

Base gb 1.7 1.5

Shaft gs 1.4 1.2

Shaft (tension) gs;t 1.7 1.5

Page 13: Pile Eurocode

13

Resistance

Challenges

• Partial factors for accidental loading: not given

• Large diameter piles: calculation model

• Model factor: 1.2 or 1.4?

Page 14: Pile Eurocode

14

Resistance - large diameter piles

• Typical rock socket design:

- generally empirical

- socket friction (fs) = func{UCS}

- limited to diameter ≤ 1500mm

• For piles > 1500mm fs reduces with increasing diameter

• Rocket analyses:

- fs = func{c'i, f'i, fb, n, a, shi, Em}

Page 15: Pile Eurocode

15

Resistance - large diameter piles

• Reasonable agreement at 1.0m

Page 16: Pile Eurocode

16

Resistance - large diameter piles

• Sensitivity analyses:

- socket friction influenced by several variables

- not possible to confirm influence of diameter from published data

- GI can’t directly determine socket roughness

• Hence:

Page 17: Pile Eurocode

17

Resistance

Challenges

• Partial factors for accidental loading: not given

• Large diameter piles: confidence in design

• Model factor: 1.2 or 1.4?

Page 18: Pile Eurocode

18

Resistance - model factors

Page 19: Pile Eurocode

19

Resistance - model factors

pile

Page 20: Pile Eurocode

20

Outcomes

• Manage geotechnical/structural interaction early on

• Complete simple checks - it’s easy to get lost in partial factors and combinations

• New partial factors ok but remember reliability

• Check your calculation model

• Be clear on what your pile test is testing

Outcomes