physics 116 - university of washington · 5 physical (wave) optics •! so far, we have been using...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 2: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
•! 3 clickers have quiz data logged, but no registration:
•! 622961
•! 649314
•! 614235
If one of these is yours, see me pls
•! Exam 2 next Monday: same procedures as last time
•! Practice exam posted Thursday, in class Friday
•! YOU bring bubble sheet, pencil, calculator
•! Practice questions for Exam #2 are posted (in slides directory), I will go over solutions in class tomorrow
•! Kyle will have special office hour: Monday, 11:30, B442
Announcements
![Page 3: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Today
Lecture Schedule (up to exam 2)
11/3/11
![Page 4: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Quiz: #8
Today, almost all large astronomical telescopes are
reflectors, because with a mirror instead of a lens…
A.!Since refraction is not involved, there is no color aberration
B.!There is only one surface to grind and polish, which is easier
and cheaper
C.!Both of the above
D.!None of the above
11/3/11 4
![Page 5: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Physical (wave) optics
•! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale
–! Analyze optical systems with diagrams and lens/mirror eqns.
–! Works as if light were a stream of particles (rays)
–! Accurate for system lengths from cm up to size of Universe
•! On a microscopic scale (few mm down to wavelength of light), ray optics does not work: must employ the wave nature of light
–! Take into account the physical properties of waves: superposition and interference effects
•! We’ve already discussed this: brief review follows
–! Wave optics applies to behavior of light in and around
•! Narrow apertures (mm or smaller)
•! Arrays of apertures (gratings, meshes, screens)
•! Edges of barriers (if we look closely enough)
•! Reflections in thin (few wavelengths thick) films
![Page 6: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Interference patterns
•! Imagine two kids paddling their hands in a pond in unison
•! Waves (ripples) propagate outward, and overlap
•! There will be lines of reinforcement, and lines of cancellation (constructive and destructive interference)
Halfway between are
lines of destructive
interference
lines of reinforcement, where peaks overlap
(constructive interference)
From mid-October:
11/3/11
![Page 7: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Interference = defining property of waves
•! If you see interference effects, you are looking at waves !
Case study: Isaac Newton thought light was a stream of particles
Newton’s “Opticks” (1687) explained all observations at the time
Thomas Young (120 years later) observed interference effects with light
Only waves could do that…
Wave theory of light replaced Newton’s
•! Interference depends on phase relationship of overlapping waves
•! Phase relationship depends on distance from source
Recall: Phase at distance D from source = 2! (D/")
but sin/cos repeat every cycle, so all that matters is where we are
relative to start of latest cycle: fraction of a cycle
Phase at distance D from source = 2! [ fractional part of (D/") ]
Example: fractional part of 5.678 is 0.678
From mid-October:
Important point to review:
11/3/11
7
![Page 8: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Phase relationships
Example: source of sound has "=1.5m
Point A is 2.5 m away, B is 5.5 m away, C is 7 m away
Phase values are
D / " (distance, in units of wavelengths)
A B C
A, B, C are all 2/3
along a cycle, so sound waves
have the same phase at all these
points
From mid-October:
To make this acoustic
example describe light waves, just change
wavelength units from meters to nanometers!
11/3/11
8
![Page 9: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Example: 2 sound sources with same f
A
B C
Point A: sources 1 and 2 are in phase, so we get
constructive interference
Points B and C: 1 and 2 are “180 deg out of phase”, so
destructive interference
1 2
From mid-October:
Solid line: R = one wavelength,
dashed line: R= ! wavelength
light
These could be closely
spaced pinholes in an opaque screen
11/3/11
9
![Page 10: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
•! Instead of loudspeakers, let’s consider radio antennas
–! spaced 3 km apart, in phase: same electrical signal goes to both
Observer 4km away, parallel to antenna 1, finds constructive interference
(signal is double intensity of a single antenna’s)
What f is being transmitted?
This is just the lowest possible frequency to give constructive interference.
Any integer multiple (harmonic) of this f will also produce constructive interference at the observer’s location: then n > 1
Notice: this is just the stereo loudspeaker example, with meters changed to km and speed of sound in air changed to speed of light
1 2 3km
4km 5km
D1 = 4km D2 = 3km( )2+ 4km( )
2= 5km
D2 ! D1 = n"
for n = 1, " = D2 ! D1 = 1km
f =c
"=300,000 km / s
1km= 300kHz
Another example reworked:
11/3/11 10
![Page 11: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Coherence
•! One big difference between acoustics and optics: ordinary light sources
have billions of independent radiators
–! In acoustics, we only discussed simple cases of one source (or 2 sources “in phase”)
–! Light bulb = 1023 tungsten atoms, each emitting light on its own schedule!
•! Incoherent light source: jumble of wavelengths and phases
–! To have constant phase relationships, to observe interference effects, we need to either
•! View a tiny part of an incoherent source (use slits, pinholes)
•! Have a source of coherent light (all atoms emit in synchrony)
–! Simple to do today: use a laser
–! This option did not exist until 1960s !
Broad spectrum
of wavelengths
mixed together Monochromatic
(only 1 wavelength
is produced) 11/3/11
11
![Page 12: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
•! We see interference effects when waves overlap (superposition) after travelling different paths from their source
•! For EM waves that are coherent (phase relationship at their source is fixed, and does not vary with time)
–! Constructive interference if path difference is zero or an integer number of wavelengths
–! Destructive interference if path difference is an odd integer number of half-wavelengths
1 2
observer
l1 l2
Constructive if: !2 ! !1 = m" m = 0,1,2…
and
Destructive if: !2 ! !1 = m !1
2
#$%
&'(" m = 1,2, 3…
alternative statement: !2 ! !1 =n
2
#$%
&'(" n = 1, 3,5…
#$%
&'(
Constructive vs destructive interference
(For phase relationships between these extremes, we get intermediate intensities) 11/3/11
12
(Even number of half-wavelengths = integer number of full
wavelengths)
![Page 13: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Young’s 2-slit experiment
Some call it the most important experiment in physics –! Fundamental impact on quantum theory – as we shall see…
•! Make a mask with 2 pinholes or narrow slits, closely spaced
–! What’s “narrow”? What’s “close”?
•! On the scale of visible light wavelength: fraction of mm
•! Illuminate with plane waves (optical equivalent of equally spaced water waves at a beach, with all wave peaks parallel)
–! How do we get plane waves of visible light? Use a laser
–! How did Thomas Young manage in 1804?
www.physics2000.com/
plane waves
2-slit interference pattern
in laser light
•! Used a pinhole to view a tiny patch of lamp surface
•! “Partially coherent light” – pattern is partially washed out
•! The waves interfere to form bright and dark fringes on a viewing screen some distance away
We can simulate this with water waves in a tank
Slits = barrier with 2 holes
![Page 14: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Contemporary of Newton, advocate of wave theory of light
Proposed a mechanism for wave propagation:
•! Each point on a light wavefront acts like a point source of light
–! Produces expanding spherical wavelets
–! Superposition of wavelets from all points on original wavefront produces the next wavefront
–! Repeat…
Huygens’ principle
Christiaan Huygens (English pronunciation: /"ha#$%nz/), Dutch, 1629 – 1695
spherical wavelets
plane wave
Today, Maxwell’s equations tell us
how EM waves propagate, but Huygens’ Principle provides a
handy model to help us picture interference phenomena.
Picture shows wavelets from 3 points – imagine
every point adding in its contribution:
![Page 15: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
•! Illuminate a pinhole or slit with light from a distant, coherent source
–! Nearby source would give spherical waves, distant source = plane waves
–! Coherent = from a laser*, or by using another pinhole to restrict area of light source used
•! Place a mask with 2 slits in the beam of light
–! Slit spacing d should be “small” (not many wavelengths)
•! Place a screen far away (many wavelengths)
–! Rays* from each slit are nearly parallel when they arrive
•! We get a bright fringe on screen parallel to midpoint
–! Central bright fringe – equal path lengths from the 2 slits
–! Constructive interference
•! Where is the next bright fringe?
–! At what angle do we get next constructive interference?
–! Path difference from the 2 slits must be 1 or more wavelengths
2-slit experiment in detail
* We’ll talk about ‘rays’ only to get path lengths –
then we’ll compare to wavelengths
* Lasers supply plane waves at any distance
!! = 0 !! = "
![Page 16: Physics 116 - University of Washington · 5 Physical (wave) optics •! So far, we have been using simple ray-tracing methods to understand behavior of light on a macroscopic scale](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062505/5e1a6d41988da21e3c49a1f8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
•! Calculate the angle to the next bright fringe:
–! Central fringe for m=1, the next bright fringe on either side for +1, etc
–! Dark fringes = destructive interference:
2-slit experiment in detail
!2 ! !1 = d sin"
Constructive if d sin" = m#,
m = 0, ±1, ± 2, ± 3…
1 2
l1
l2
! (angle to next bright fringe)
!Slit mask
Ray to slit
midpoint
Ray to slit
midpoint Ray to next
bright fringe
Ray to next
bright fringe
90!
d sin!
d
On this scale, the screen is miles away…
!! = 0 !! = "
!! = m "1
2
#$%
&'() m = ±1, ± 2, ± 3…