philippine national police integrated transformation program performance governance system

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE

Integrated Transformation ProgramPerformance Governance System

PRO 3 ITP PGS SCORECARD

MEASURE PROFILE

UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

MEASURE PROFILES Annexes

A Regional Economic Development Index B PRO 3 Regional Performance Approval RatingC % of Pol Stns compliant with HRD ComponentD % of Pol Stns compliant with Process & System ComponentE % of Pol Stns compliant with Facilities Development ComponentF % of Pol Stns compliant with Citizen’s Empowerment Component G Ratio of Human Rights violations/cases reported against Police personnel H Regional Crime Clearance EfficiencyI Regional Crime Solution EfficiencyJ % reduction of incidence of armed insurgents Activities and No. of Barangay AffectedK Average Rating of Qualified PNP ApplicantsL % of personnel completed mandatory courses M % of personnel completed competency/specialized courses N % of personnel assigned to positions according to their Competency & skillsO Grievance RatioP % of personnel provided with housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance and Health careQ % of policies implementedR % of required audits conductedS PRO-3 Resolution Rate of complaints on CorruptionT Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme(15%:85%, PRO:Field Units)U Maintenance Management SystemV % of LGUs whose support to PPOs/CPOs/Stn Institutionalized( with POCs)W % of LGUs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNPX % of Police Station with LGUs Anti-Criminality Action PlanY Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with the Interest GroupsZ Number of regular interactions with other pillars of the CJS


Objective: A safer place to live, work and do businessRationale: Improvement of Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate of Region 3 is indicative of a progressive socio-economic situation for a more stable, peace and order situation.

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Yearly

What is the unit of measure used? Regional Economic Development index

What data is required in calculating the measure? Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate of Region 3 at constant (1985) prize.

Where/How is it acquired? Through liaisoning with NEDA

Is information about the measure available? Yes

When will this information be available? As obtained from source

How is the measure calculated? As determined by source

Who is responsible for setting targets? NGAsWho is accountable for targets? NGAs

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD

BASELINE

2009

(1.4 %)GRDP Growth

Rate at constant

(1985) prize.

TARGET

2011

2013

2016

Regional Economic Development Index

A UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Objective: Effectively enforce laws

Rationale: By effectively enforcing laws, perception and impression performance will result in the community’s positive public perception.

How often is the measure updated/calculated? As determined by source yearly

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of overall performance approval index

What data is required in calculating the measure? As determined by source

Where/How is it acquired? Data from Pulse Asia or Asia Pacific Center for Research

Is information about the measure available? Yes, as obtained from source

When will this information be available?

As obtained from source

How is the measure calculated? As determined by source

Who is responsible for setting targets? NGAsWho is accountable for targets? NGAsWho is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD

BASELINE2010

67%(PNP Approval

Rating by Pulse Asia )

TARGET

2011

2013

2016

PRO3 Performance Approval Percentage Rating

B UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Percentage of Police Stations Compliant with HRD Component of a Model Police Station

Objective: All PRO3 Police Stations shall be comparable to the Model Police Stations.

Rationale: In line with the Model Police Stations project.

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly

How is the measure calculated?

MR – Moral Recovery , SVF – Spiritual Values Formation, CB - Capacity Building A. Individual Compliance to HRD component = (MR /SVF*45) + (CB * 55) Note: Maximum of 1 MR/SVF for the last 2 years, and 1 CB training appropriate to designation.

Sum of Individual Compliance of all PersonnelB. Police Station Compliant = ---------------------------------------------- to HRD component Total Nr of Personnel

Nr of Police Stations Compliant to HRD component C. Percentage of Police Stations = ----------------------------------------------- Compliant with HRD component Total Nr of PRO Police Stations

What data is required in calculating the measure?A.Police Station Training Profile, Police Station List. B.Table of CB appropriate training for designation.

Where /How is it acquired ? Consolidated Quarterly Reports submitted by PPOs/CPOs.

Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available

*100

Who is the responsible for setting the targets? RPHRDD.Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? PPOs/CPOs and RPHRDD.

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

6% 20% 60% 100%

(

C

)

Table of CB Appropriate Training for Designation

Designation Class Minimum Training Required

Admin Human Resources Mgmt Crs

Intel Intel Orientation, Intel Analysis, PIC

Operation Specialized Planning Crs

Invest Basic Criminalistics, CIDC, SOCO, CRIDEC

PCR PCR Specialists Course, Psy Ops Crs

Logistic Basic Logistic, Logistic Mgmt , Supply & Property Mgmt Crs, Logistics Mgmt Seminar

Finance Comptrollership, Finance Crs

Patrol Police Responders Crs, SCOUT

Note: Or other related Seminars conducted at least at the PPO Level.


D

Objective

To establish QSL in all police stations.

Rationale

To better serve the community

How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of formula.

No. of police stations established QSL

Is information about the measure available?

Available with minor changes


Monthly.

Percentage of Police Stations compliant with process and system component

How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly

What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stations complied

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired?

Summation of number of police stations compliant with the establishment of QSL.

Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD

Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD


TARGET

Base line2010

2011 2013 2016

6% 25% 50% 75%


Total No. Of Police StationX 100

E

Objective

To establish Model Police Station within the entire region.

Rationale

For the PNP personnel to have a decent Police Station to better serve the community.

How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of formula.

No. of police stations owned and constructed within the region


Currently available

Percentage of Police Stations compliant with Facilities Development

How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly

What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stations owned and constructed


No. Police Stations owned constructed / total number of Police Station x 100

Who is responsible for setting targets? PNP NHQWho is accountable for targets? ORLDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ORLRDD

TARGET

Base line2010

2011 2013 2016

33.59% 36.7% 44.53% 57.81%


F

Percentage of Police Station Compliant w/ Citizen’s Empowerment Component

Objective

Adopt the best practices in the community and rights based policing supported by appropriate information and communication technology.

Rationale:

It is an established component of model police station.


Numbers of Police Stations that displayed the service standard and flowcharts of PNP Citizen’s Charter / Total No. Of Police Stations X 100


Available with minor changes


Monthly

How often is the measure updated / calculated?

Monthly

What is the unit of measure used?

Number of Police Stn complied


Summation of the numbers of police stations that are compliant with the displaying of service standard and flowchart of PNP Citizen’s Charter.

Who is responsible for setting targets?

RPCRD

Who is accountable for targets?

RPCRD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?

RPCRD

TARGET

Base line2010

2011 2013 2016

100% maintaine

d

100% maintained

100% maintained

100%maintained


Objective: Adopt the best practices in community and rights-based policing supported by appropriate information and communication technology.

Rationale: Reduction of human rights violation/cases are best indicator for human rights compliance.

How often is the measure updated / calculated? The measure will be updated/calculated on a quarterly and annual basis.

What is the unit of measure used? No. of cases of HRV per period.

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? The data is acquired through liaisoning with CHR from PPOs/CPOs.

Is information about the measure available? Currently available based on CHR Data

When will this information be available? As soon the data is available at CHR

How is the measure calculated? No. of human rights violations compared with previous data covering the same period.

Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRDWho is accountable for targets? RPCRDWho is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD

BASELINE2010

0: 9,679(Total No. of PRO3

PNP personnel )

TARGET

2011 0

2013 0

2016

0

Ratio of human rights violations/cases filed in court against PNP personnel over population

G UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly

What is the unit of measure used? % of total crime cleared and total crime volume

What data is required in calculating the measure? UCPER

Where/How is it acquired? Through the reports from the different police stations.


Crime Clearance Efficiency = Crime Cleared x 100% Crime volume

Crime Volume – number of crime incidents committed in a given area over a period of time which includes index and non-index crimes.

Is information about the measure available? Currently available

When will this information be available? Monthly

Who is responsible for setting targets? RIDMD

Who is accountable for targets? RIDMD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RIDMD

Objective: To improve the partial solution rate of criminal incidence. To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis the number of crime incidence reported to PRO3. Rationale: To reflect the true crime rate and come up with generation of a timely and accurate crime statistics.

BASELINE TARGET

2010

15.77%

2011

16.27%

2013

17.27%

2016

18.77%

Regional Crime Clearance Efficiency

H

* CCE targeted at .5% increase per annum based on DIDM


Objective: To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis number of crime incident reported

Rationale: To reflect the law enforcement agencies investigative capability or efficiency in the process of solving crime.


What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Solved cases out of the total crime volume.

What data is required in calculating the measure? Total Cases Solved and Crime Volume

Where/How is it acquired? Through the reports from the different police stations.

How is the measure calculated? Crime Solution Efficiency = Solved Cases x 100 Crime Volume

Crime Volume – No. of crime incidents committed in a given area over a period of time which includes Index and Non- Index crimes reported to the PNP.

Who is responsible for setting targets? RIDMD – RAD

Who is accountable for targets? RIDMD – RAD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RIDMD - RAD


When will this information be available? Anytime

BASE-LINE TARGET

2010

8.76%

2011

9.26%

2013

10.26%

2016

11.76%

Regional Crime Solution Efficiency

I UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Objective: Achieve excellence in performing the integrated QUAD operation to overcome the insurgency problem

Rationale: Insurgent activities constitute a major threat to peace and order and hinder the socio economic-political stability of an area

How is the measure calculated? No. of incidents in Current Yr – No. of incidents in Previous Yr No. of incidents of Previous Yr

No. of brgys affected in Current Yr – No. of brgys affected in Previous Yr No. of brgys affected of Previous Yr


Currently available


Monthly

Who is responsible for setting targets? Regional QUAD staff

Who is accountable for targets? Regional QUAD staff

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? Regional QUAD staff

How often is the measure updates / calculated? Daily/monthly

What is the unit of measures used? Percentage reduction

What data is required in calculating the measure? No. of armed incidents and of no. barangays affected

Where/How is it acquired? Daily Intelligence Brief (DIB)

Percentage reduction of incidence of armed insurgent activities and Barangays affected

J

Baseline 2010

2011 2013 2016

No. of Insurgent Armed Activities

21

15% less 4

incidents

18%Less 3

incidents

21%Less 4

incidents

No. of affected barangays

39

20%Less 8

affected barangays

25%Less 8 affected

barangays

30%Less 7

affected barangays


Average Rating of Qualified PNP Applicants

Objective: To entice at least 250% number of PNP recruitment quota to have a better basis in determining the most qualified applicants.

Rationale: Applicant is given corresponding points for the following in reference with NHQ PNP Circular No. 2005-008 dated June 29, 2005 (Rationalization of the Qualified Standards for the Initial appointments to the rank of Police Officer I):

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Every Recruitment Program/Quota

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Number of Recruits and Average Rating obtained by the recruits.

How is the measure calculated? Nr . of Applicants Nr. of Quota

Final Grade of an applicant is computed as follows: Education (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Eligibility (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Agility Test (Minimum 11.25 pts, Maximum 15 pts), Interview (Minimum 16.75 pts, Maximum 25 pts) , Board Passers of their courses are given higher points in Education. Plus bonus points for honor graduates and those with LLB units. Rating on board exam/PNP Entrance or CSC Prof is the basis for Eligibility points. Plus 1 pt for any additional eligibility. The top ranking applicants will be selected for appointment.

X 100

Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD.

Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDDWho is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

173%

1,612 applicants vis-à-vis

930 quota

250% 250% 250%

K

What data is required in calculating the measure? Number of Recruit and Sum of Final Grade of all Recruit and Allotted Quota for PRO3

Where /How is it acquired ? Worksheets and Table evaluations of documents submitted by the applicants.


Percentage of Personnel Completed Mandatory Courses

Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people

Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people. All PRO3 should have undergone the mandatory course required to their rank to enable them to discharge the responsibilities tasked to them.


What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 with mandatory training/ schooling required for the current rank.


Total Nr of Personnel with mandatory training/schooling required for the current rank Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3

What data is required in calculating the measure? Updated Training Profile and Updated Strength Profile of PRO3

Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)

Consolidated Training Profile and Strength profile from RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB

X 100

Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available.

Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD.

Who is accountable for targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD

Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB

BASE-LINE

TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

85% 90% 95% 100%

L

( )


Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people

Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people.


What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 completed competency/ specialized course.


Total Nr of Personnel completed in-service training Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3

What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr of Personnel completed in-service training

Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Training profile of Personnel who completed in –service training from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB


Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD.

Who is accountable for targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD

Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD/RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB

BASELINETARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

60% 65% 85% 100%

M

)( X 100

Percentage of personnel completed in –service training


Percentage of all personnel assigned to positions according to their competency and skills

Objective: Uphold and promote the principles of meritocracy and fitness in the PNP career ladder

Rationale: Required Placement for Police Superintendent Based on the Updated Provisional List of Position for PSUPT as of June 29, 2010 and Police Chief Inspector Based on the Updated Provisional List of Position for PCINSP as of January 2009


What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions


Total No. of PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions Allocated PSUPTs and PCINSP Positions


Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD.


BASE-LINE

TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

54% 70% 100% 100%

N

X 100( )

What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of PNP Personnel without competency /specialized course

Where /How is it acquired?

Monthly Report of Placement of PSUPT and PCINSP from the PPOs/CPOs/ RPSB3


Grievance Ratio

Objective: To address immediately any valid complaint by member(s) of the PNP

Rationale: Promote the Grievance System of the PNP where they can voice out their grievances and not in other venues. Speedy disposition of these Grievances will result to the PNP personnel’s trust in the System.

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Annual Basis

What is the unit of measure used? Ratio of grievances resolved to the total number of grievances filed.

How is the measure calculated? Nr of Grievances Resolved : Nr of Grievances filed What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of grievances filed and resolved

Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)

Report from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB


Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD

Who is accountable for targets? Immediate Superior or Chief of office Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD and Immediate Superior or Chief of Office

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

0:0 1:1 1:1 1:1

O UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Percentage of Personnel provided with Housing, Quartering, Educational assistance and Healthcare

Objective: Institutionalize adequate package of benefits and remunerationRationale: To determine the nr of Personnel who availed of housing, Quartering, educational assistance and healthcare .

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Semi Annually

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Personnel with Housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance, Healthcare


HOUSING= Total Nr of Personnel provided with housing by the PNP X 100 Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE = Total Nr of Scholars X 100 Total Nr of entitled dependents Quartering = Total Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters X 100 Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot

Health Care = No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE X 100 Total Nr of PRO Personnel

Is the information about measure available? Housing - Yes, currently available Educational Assistance - Yes, currently available Quartering - Yes, currently available RHE - Yes, currently available

Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD


BASELINETARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

Housing 3% 6% 9% 12%Quartering 5% 10% 15% 20%Educational Assistance

62.5% 100% 100% 100%

Healthcare1.5%

1.75%

2.78%

4.33%

P

What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of PNP Personnel provided with house and Lot., Nr of personnel without house and lot, Nr. of PNP Personnel who were KIA. Nr of entitled dependents of all KIA personnel, Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters, No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE, and No of PRO3 Personnel Reported Confined and Discharged from Confinement

Where /How is it acquired? Reports from RPHRDD, RESPO, RLRDD, RHS3


Percentage of policies implemented

Objective: Ensure an enabling environment for Organizational Development

Rationale: Determine whether all of the policies are implemented.

How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Annual Basis

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of policies implemented

How is the measure calculated? Total Nr of Policies in the organization Actual number of policies implemented

What data is required in calculating the measure? List of Existing Policies and Action taken / reports from units on their implementation of policies.

Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Reports from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB


Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB

Who is accountable for targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB

Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

100% 100% 100% 100%

X 100( )

UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011Q

Percentage of required audits conducted

R

Note: Computation of PS312,120,355.45 x 100 = 100%312,120,355.45

Computation of CO3,729,000 – 559,350 = 85% 3,729,000

Objective: Ensure transparency and accountability in all financial and logistical transactions

Rationale: To optimize the proper utilization of funds and management of logistical resources


Who is responsible for setting targets? D-Staff

Who is accountable for targets? D-Staff

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD

How are the units of measures used? MOOE = Report of utilization Personal Services = Report of Disbursement Capital Outlay = Inventory reports of plants, properties and equipment

What data are required in calculating the measures? Where/how are they acquired? MOOE = RAOMO (Registry of Allotment & Obligation on MOOE) Personal Services = RAOPS (Registry Allotment & Obligation on Personal Services) Capital Outlay = RAOCO (Registry Allotment & Obligation on Capital Outlay)

How are the measures calculated?MOOE: 15 % 85% schemePersonal Services: NCA received x 100 Fund released Capital Outlay: Fund Released - NCA Received Fund Utilization

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

MOOE = 100%

Personal Services=100%

Capital Outlay=100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%


PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on CORRUPTION

S

Objective: Ensure transparency and accountability in all financial and logistical transactions

Rationale: This will determine PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on corruption .

Is information about the measure available? Still to be formulated

Who is responsible for setting targets? RCD

Who is accountable for targets? RCD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

Zero complaint

100% 100% 100%How is the measures calculated?

No. of complaints – No. Of unresolved X 100 No. of complaints

How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of resolved cases on corruption

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Monthly Report s submitted by PPOs and CPOs


Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme 15% - 85% (PROs/Field Units)

T

Objective: Optimize utilization of financial and logistical resources to support administrative, operational and other priority programs of the PNP

Rationale: This will put the operations of the PNP within the context of a well defined, integrated and synchronized planning and budgeting


Who is responsible for setting targets? Program Directors (D-Staff)

Who is accountable for targets? Program Directors (D-Staff)

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? All D-Staff, PROs, DILG/NAPOLCOM, COA, DBM & NEDA

BASELINE TARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

100% 100% 100% 100%

How is the measures calculated? Per capita = Programmable amount No. of personnel

How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly

What is the unit of measure used? Sub-allotments issued to Program Directors (D-Staff)

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Registry allotment of MOOE


Objective: To optimize utilization of financial and logistical resources to support administrative, operational and other priority programs of PRO3

Rationale: An antiquated and dilapidated building for police stations and PNP equipments put the lives of our personnel in danger and continually undermines the capability of the PNP to combat crime efficiently and effectively. How often is the measure updated / calculated?

Quarterly

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of serviceable police equipments

How is the measure calculated? Police stations owned and constructed:

X + Y X 100 = % of PS in good conditions ZX – Total Nr. of PS presently in good condition (Repaired/renovated and newly constructed)Y – Nr. of PS for the year (Repaired/renovated and newly constructed)Z – Total Nr. of PS region wide

Mobility: No. of serviceable vehicles X 100 Total no. of issued vehicles

Firearms: No. of serviceable firearms X 100 Total no. of issued firearms

Inves Eqmt: No. of serviceable Inves Eqmt X 100 Total no. of issued Inves Eqmt

Commo Eqmt: No. of serviceable Commo Eqmt X 100 Total no. of issued Commo Eqmt

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired?

Data on status of police station buildings renovated and the status of PNP equipment regionwide which can be obtained from the quarterly inventory reports submitted by the PPOs/CPOs.

Who is responsible for setting targets? ORLRDD Who is accountable for targets? ORLRDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ORLRDD

Maintenance Management System

U

Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes


Baseline Data of Maintenance Management System

BASELINE TARGET 2010 2011 2013 2016Police Station 31% 38% 50% 66%Firearms : 92% 93% 95% 98%Mobility 87% 88% 90% 93%Investigative Equipment 90% 91% 93% 96%Communications 87% 89% 93% 98%

Note:Police Station :As of 2009 PRO3 has 43 total no. of Police Station owned and constructed vis-a-vis the 128 total no. of Police Station in the region.Targets indicated above are based on the submitted 15 years program for the construction of Police Station Buildings of the Regional Engineering office3 to TDL dated June 21, 2009.Completion of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the release of funds from the National Headquarters.

Firearms:To attain the 1 is to 1 ratio issuance of short firearms to PNP personnel.Filled-up of long firearms by 50% of all Police Stations and 100% on RPSB/PPSC/CPSC.Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of firearms from the National Headquarters.

Mobility:Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of mobility from the National Headquarters.All Police Station will have at least 2 patrol cars/jeeps and 2 motorcycles

Investigative Equipment:Every Police station shall have investigative equipments which contains finger print kit, tape recorder, security line, finger print card and camera.

UI UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Communications equipment

The table represents the parameters needed for a unit(PRO,PPO,CPO.MPS) to be considered filled-up according to its classification whether type A,B or C . At present the region has total 1590 hand held radio, 228 base radio and 209 mobile radios with general average of 39.27 % filled-up.

UNIT TYPE Authorized Requirement

Hand Held

BASE MOBILE

PRO3 A 20 5 3

3RD RPSB C 20 2 3

A 20 2 3

B 16 1 2

C 9 1 1

CPOs

A 21 2 3

B 16 1 2

C 9 1 1

MPs

A 16 2 3

B 9 1 1

C 5 1 0

PPSC

A 10 2 3

B

U2 UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Percentage of LGU whose support to PPOs/CPOs is institutionalized with POCs

V

Objective: Attain financial and logistical adequacy consistent with law

Rationale: To institutionalize the support of the LGU in anti-criminal campaign of the PPOs/CPOs


Who is responsible for setting targets? RCD/ROPD

Who is accountable for targets? RCD/ROPD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD/ROPD

BASELINETARGET

2010 2011 2013 2016

82% 85% 90% 95%

How is the measure calculated? Program Review and Analysis

Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) with support of POC / Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) X 100

How often is the measure updated / calculated? Semi-Annually

What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of LGU’s support to PPOs and CPOs

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Reports submitted by PPOs and CPOs


W

Percentage of LGUs & LCEs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNP (Percentage of Barangays with BPATs Organized and Mobilized)

Objective: Achieving excellence in performing the Integrated “QUAD +” Operations.

Rationale: This would indicate the extent of the nationwide implementation of LOI Bayanihan.

How is the measure calculated? Number of Barangays with BPATs established divided by the total number of barangays, especially in CT-cleared areas multiplied by 100

Is the information about the measure available? Available with minor changes

When will this information be available? As soon as regular updates are done





What is the unit of measure used? By the number of barangays where BPATs are established.

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/ How is it required? Number of BPATs mobilized and the names of supervisors. Data are acquired through reports submitted through mail, e-mail or fax

BASELINE TARGET

2010

95% or

2,934(BPATs

Organized)

2011

98%

2013

100%

2016

100%


Objective:

Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the stakeholders.

Rationale:

Holistic approach in addressing crimes involving the participation of LGUs.

How often is the measure updated? Yearly updated

How is the measure calculated? Percentage Total Score Gathered from Points Allocated

% of PS with ACAP = # of Pol Stn with ACAP X 100 total # of Pol Station

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? ACAP of MPS/CPS


When will this information be available? As submitted by CPS/MPS

Who is responsible for setting targets? ROPD

Who is accountable for targets? ROPD

Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ROPD

BASELINE 2010

42%

TARGET2011

100% 2013100%

2016100%

Percentage of Police Stations w/ LGU’s Anti-Criminality Action Plan

X UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Objective:

Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the stakeholders through public information campaign.

Rationale:

To gain the support of stakeholders as partners for a genuine transformation in the PNP.

How often is the measure updated?

Monthly basis.


Total number of ITP lectures conducted

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? Number of sustained ITP lectures/Information campaign

Is information about the measure available? Yes

When will this information be available? As submitted by PPOs and CPOs




BASELINE

151 (InfoCam-Paign)

TARGET

20111 info

Campaign/month/station

20131 info

campaign/month

/station

20161 info

campaign/month/station

Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with interest group.

Y UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

Z

Objective: Sustain public information and dialogue with the stakeholders and other pillars of CJS

Rationale: The number of interactions would indicate a sustained public information and dialogue. This would also indicate the effects of Information Operations efforts of the PNP.

How is the measure calculated? Summation of the interactions with other pillars of CJS conducted /initiated by various PNP offices/units.

Is the information about the measure available? Current Available

When will this information be available? Available after monthly consolidation of reports.

Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRDWho is accountable for targets? RPCRDWho is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD

Number of regular interactions with other pillars of CJS

How often is the measure updated/calculated? MonthlyWhat is the unit of measure used? Number of interactions conducted.

What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it required? Summation of the number of ugnayans, dialogues conducted and information operations media lines crafted. Available through reports submitted via e-mail or fax.

BASELINE TARGET

2010

1/month/ station/office

(100%)6,720- activities

2011


2013


2016



philippine national police integrated transformation program performance governance system

Documents