pharmaceuticals conference

33
National State Attorney General Program at Columbia Law School Pharmaceuticals Conference May 11, 2007

Upload: natala

Post on 11-Feb-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Pharmaceuticals Conference. National State Attorney General Program at Columbia Law School. May 11, 2007. John Rother, JD. Director Policy & Strategy. Rx Drugs in Context. Costs for National Health Expenditures. Projections. Billions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pharmaceuticals Conference

National State Attorney General Program atColumbia Law School

Pharmaceuticals Conference

May 11, 2007

Page 2: Pharmaceuticals Conference

DirectorPolicy & Strategy

John Rother, JD

Page 3: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Rx Drugs in Context

Page 4: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Costs for National Health Expenditures

Bill

ions

Overall Medicare Costs compared to Overall Health Costs

Projections

Source: CMS, National Health Accounts

$0

$600

$1,200

$1,800

$2,400

$3,000

$3,600

1993 1998 2002 2004 2006 2014

Page 5: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Rx Drug Increases in 10 years (1995 thru 2004) Big Portion of Rising HC Bill

4.3%

14.9%

0.9%

4.8%

3.5%

9.1%

2.9%

2.4% 4.3%

0.8%2.8%1.5%

26.8%

20.9%

Hospital Care

Physician and Clinical Services

Dental Services

Other Prof. Services

Home Health Care

Other Non-Durable Medical Products

Rx Drugs

Durable Medical Equipment

Nursing Home Care

Other Personal Health Care

Admin. & Net Cost of Priv. HealthInsurancePublic Health Activity

Research

Structures & Equipment Sou

rce:

Cal

cula

tions

by

PP

I AA

RP

usi

ng C

ente

rs fo

r Med

icar

e &

Med

icai

d S

ervi

ces,

Offi

ce o

f the

Act

uary

, CY

196

0-20

04 N

atio

nal H

ealth

Exp

endi

ture

Dat

a

Hospital CareHospital Care

Rx DrugsRx Drugs

Physician &Physician &Clinical Clinical ServicesServices

27%

21%15%

Page 6: Pharmaceuticals Conference
Page 7: Pharmaceuticals Conference

U.S. Total Drug Expenditures as Percent ofNational Healthcare Expenses: 1988 to 2010

23.8%

10.7%

19.2%

16.6%

8.1%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

% of NHE

Source: Compiled by the PRIME Institute, University of Minnesota from data found in Pharmaceutical Benefits Under Medical Assistance Programs, National Pharmaceutical Council, 1975 to 2002 and in HCFA Form 64.

Doubled share in 10 years

Projected

Will havetripled share

22.1%

Today

Page 8: Pharmaceuticals Conference

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Cumulative Rise 2000 thru 2006

Average Rx Manufacturers’ Price Increases Far Outpacing Inflation

Yea

rs re

fer t

o ch

ange

from

pre

viou

s ye

ar. S

ourc

e: A

AR

P P

ublic

Pol

icy

Inst

itute

Apr

il, 2

007

Ave

rage

% C

hang

e

Inflation 20.3%

53.6%

Page 9: Pharmaceuticals Conference

$13

$31

$30

$20

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

Out of Every $100

Distribution of Gross Revenues for U.S. Drug Companies by Expense Type

Net ProfitTaxes & Other Costs

Cost of Production

Research & Development

Marketing, Advertising, & Administrative Costs

Source: Compiled by the PRIME Institute, University of Minnesota from data found in DHHS, CMS, Jan 2003, andfrom Bloomberg, analysts models, & corporate annual reports. Presented by AARP Rx Watchdog Forum February 2005

$6

Page 10: Pharmaceuticals Conference
Page 11: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Generic Substitution Rates in USA, 1984-2006

•More than half of Rx drugs dispensed in USA are GENERIC•Yet they account for only 13% of total Rx costs

Per

cent

of R

x Fi

lled

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Page 12: Pharmaceuticals Conference

USA in a Global Context

Page 13: Pharmaceuticals Conference

-$500

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500B

illio

ns o

f dol

lars

Above ESAWESAW

Excesses, Gaps in US HC Spending

ESAW = Estimated Spending According to WealthSource: OECD; MGI analysis McKinsey & Company

28%

40%36%

27%-57%

-70%82%

15%

Below ESAWOverall

Rx

Page 14: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Lessons from Europe

• Price transparency - a precondition for good policy and fair competition

• U.S. prescription drug pricing now takes place in a black box

Page 15: Pharmaceuticals Conference

The “Black Box” of U.S. Pharmaceutical Pricing

Page 16: Pharmaceuticals Conference

U.S. Pharmaceutical Supply & Payment

DrugManufacturer Consumer

Pharmacy

Page 17: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Pharmacy Benefit Manager(PBM)

Employer/Plan Sponsor

or Health Insurer

WholesaleDistributor

U.S. Pharmaceutical Supply & Payment

Source: AARP---Based on work of The Health Strategies Consultancy (now Avalere Health) for the Kaiser Family Foundation

DrugManufacturer Consumer

Pharmacy

Page 18: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Pharmacy Benefit Manager(PBM)

Employer/Plan Sponsor

or Health Insurer

WholesaleDistributor

U.S. Pharmaceutical Supply & Payment

DrugManufacturer

Pharmacy

M.D.

AdvertisingRxRxRx

Consumer

Payment for Marketing and Advertising

Source: AARP---Based on work of The Health Strategies Consultancy (now Avalere Health) for the Kaiser Family Foundation

Page 19: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Lessons from Europe (con’t)

• Comparative Effectiveness information held by the industry and by other governments; using effectiveness as a basis for pricing has been successful in Europe.

• Truly innovative medicines should receive high reimbursement; “me-too” drugs required to show cost savings

Page 20: Pharmaceuticals Conference

State & Federal Strategies to Lower Rx Drug Costs

Page 21: Pharmaceuticals Conference

State Strategies

• Large purchasing pools • Comparative Effectiveness

[Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center]

• Transparency [e.g. NY program requiring that pharmacies post prices online]

• NH court case on physician profiling

Page 22: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Federal Strategies

• Secretarial negotiation for Medicare– Very narrow rejection in Senate –

needed 60 votes– With no formulary – CBO estimates no

savings– Veto threat

Page 23: Pharmaceuticals Conference

S. 1082, the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments sponsored by Senator Kennedy– Reauthorize Prescription Drug User Fees that help fund FDA– Also includes some Rx drug safety provisions and other

amendments– Currently on the Senate floor (and will likely pass by today)

S. 316 – the Kohl-Leahy bill – Would prohibit generic manufacturers from accepting

anything of value as part of a patent settlement with a brand name company

– Offered as an amendment to PDUF– Unclear whether will pass as part of that measure 

Federal Strategies

Page 24: Pharmaceuticals Conference

S. 1088 – the Stabenow-Lott bill– “Lower Prices Reduced with Increased

Competition and Efficient Development of Drugs” Act

– Many of its provisions on PDUFA, offered as part of a “managers’ amendment”

– Expected to pass

S. 623 – the Clinton-Schumer biologics bill.– As part of PDUFA, there was a “sense of the

Senate” amendment that essentially said that the Senate HELP Committee should report out a generic biologics bill by June 13

– Key players are working on proposals

Federal Strategies

Page 25: Pharmaceuticals Conference

HR 1038 –– Waxman-Emerson biologics proposal -

identical to the Clinton-Schumer proposal - issue moving more slowly in the House, though two hearings already held

HR 380 –– Emanuel-Emerson importation proposal– This is the House companion to Dorgan-

Snowe

Federal Strategies

Page 26: Pharmaceuticals Conference

PDUFA Reauthorization in the House– The House moving more slowly than Senate;

hasn’t drafted language yet, just starting process

– Expected to move in the House, get conferenced with the Senate bill over the summer

– Unknown at this time whether the House will try to include Rx safety and other measures on the PDFUA reauthorization or whether it will simply move a “cleaner” piece of legislation.

Federal Strategies

Page 27: Pharmaceuticals Conference

HR 1902 – the Rush-Waxman legislation– similar to the Kohl-Leahy bill– Energy & Commerce Committee held a hearing on this

issue last week– Unknown at this time whether sponsors will try to attach

this to PDUFA

HR 2184 – Comparative effectiveness research – Monday, Rep. Allen (D-ME) introduced legislation to

expand comparative effectiveness research (including a significant increase in funding)

– Senator Clinton working on similar legislation

Federal Strategies

Page 28: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Federal Strategies

S. 242 – the Dorgan-Snowe importation legislation– Co-sponsored by 33 Members of Senate– Allows for safe importation of Rx drugs from abroad– Offered as amendment, the

measure passed by voice vote Monday– However, “poison pill” amendment sponsored by

Senator Cochran also passed by a vote of 49-40• Requires that before any importation system can be

implemented the Secretary of HHS must certify safety of imported drugs

• Similar provision already part of current law

• Stronger political support possible if Canada does industry negotiating for us

• Unlikely to produce much in short-term savings• Plays off of public anger in being played for fools

Page 29: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Longer-Term Agenda

• Generic biologics • Continuing Comparative Effectiveness

studies • Focus on marketing costs

– DTC advertising– Physician detailing– Payments to physicians

• “Date certain” patent expiration policy

Page 30: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Consumer StrategyConsumer campaign for “Wise Use”

– Counters detailing, DTC and other questionable marketing

– Promotes use of generics

– Fosters full compliance• Continue taking full prescription until finished• Continue on with maintenance drugs

– Encourages shopping around for price

– Has patient proactively inform physician about every health and Rx substance taken

– Focuses patients on knowing side effects to watch for

Page 31: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Pharmaceuticals Only Part of Reform

• Rx pricing, patent, advertising, and detailing practices only one component of broader health reforms needed

Page 32: Pharmaceuticals Conference

Future Agenda

• The AG’s nationwide have great opportunities to influence pharmaceutical pricing by creating:

– Better market rules– More effective consumer protections

Page 33: Pharmaceuticals Conference

National State Attorney General Program atColumbia Law School

Pharmaceuticals Conference