pfas: the michigan experience - acwa€¦ · 2 water resources division protect and monitor 4 great...

25
1 1 PFAS: The Michigan Experience Phil Argiroff Water Resources Division Assistant Director [email protected] 517-290-3039

Upload: others

Post on 02-Nov-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

11

PFAS: The Michigan Experience

Phil ArgiroffWater Resources Division Assistant Director

[email protected]

Page 2: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

22

Water Resources Division

Protect and Monitor4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair11,000 inland lakes76,000 river and stream miles6.5 million acres of wetlands74,000 acres of coastal dunesGroundwater

For swimming, fishing, drinking water, and aquatic ecosystems.

Page 3: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

33

WRD PFAS Work• Surface Water

• Ambient water sampling• Fish collection

• Wastewater

• Industrial Pretreatment Program

• Direct discharges• Permit Strategy• Biosolids

Page 4: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

44

DEQ Water Quality Criteria for PFAS

• Michigan developed Rule 57 Human Noncancer Values (HNV) for both PFOS and PFOA in surface waters

• PFOS builds up in fish tissue to a higher degree than PFOA

HNV (nondrinking)

HNV (drinking) FCV FAV AMV

PFOS (ng/L) 12 11 140,000 1,600,000 780,000

PFOA (ng/L) 12,000 420 880,000 15,000,000 7,700,000

Human Noncancer Values (HNVs); Aquatic Life Final Chronic Value (FCV), Final Acute Value (FAV), and Aquatic Maximum Value (AMV)

Page 5: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

55

Page 6: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

66

IPP PFAS Initiative• February 2018 – 95 POTWs required to screen Industrial

Users – Survey Industrial Users with potential sources of PFAS – Follow-up sampling of probable sources– Sample POTW effluent if sources above screening

criteria (12 ppt PFOS)– Interim Reports due June 29, 2018 unless extension

requested

• 35 extension requests– Summary Reports due October 26, 2018 unless

extensionAdditional information on IPP PFAS Initiative:https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/0,9038,7-365-86510---,00.html

Page 7: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

77

Page 8: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

88

IPP PFAS Initiative

Recommended Screening &

PFAS Evaluation Procedures

Wastewater PFAS

Sampling Guidance

FAQs Regional Informational

Meetings

Multiple meetings,

presentations to stakeholders

8

WRD Compliance Assistance and Outreach Activities

Page 9: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

99

IPP PFAS Initiative• At the start (June 2018):

– 70 WWTPs (72%) were meeting WQS and/or had no significant PFOS sources

• Currently (July 2019): – 79 WWTP (83%) are meeting WQA and/or are have no

significant PFOS • Low concentrations of PFOS (Range ~3-5 ppt)

were detected even when no significant industrial sources were present. – Suggests anthropogenic “background” levels of PFAS

may be found in most communities.

9

Page 10: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1010

95 POTWs with IPPs:• 95 IRs* Submitted• 0 IR Overdue

*IR = Interim Report

Bin 2: 26Sources found but

POTW Effluent ≤WQS1

Bin 1: 42No sources

PFOS/PFOA found

Bin 3: 25Sources found and

POTW Effluent >WQS1

IPP PFAS Requirements Complete

• Source reduction recommended• Semi-annual PFAS monitoring required• Local limits and PMP recommended

3a: 16Effluent concentrations of moderate priority2

• Source reduction required• Quarterly POTW effluent monitoring

required• Local limits recommended• Pollutant Min Plan SUO provisions

recommended

3b: 9Effluent concentrations at highest priority3

• Source reduction required• Monthly POTW effluent monitoring

required• Biosolids monitoring required• Local limits recommended• Pollutant Min Plan SUO provisions

recommended

IPP PFAS Initiative Status Update 7-31-2019

Bin TBD: 2Interim Report submitted but a bin determination cannot be made as staff have not yet reviewed the report, the report was determined to be incomplete, or sample results (from IUs and/or POTW effluent) are still pending

Page 11: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1111

NPDES Permitting Strategy for PFOS and PFOA

• Industrial direct dischargers will use an Administrative Consent Order (ACO)

• Program components for Municipal Permits include:Additional monitoring requirementsEffluent monitoringAnalytical methods and quantification levelsUpdated Michigan and Federal Industrial Pretreatment

Program language for approved programsMonitoring frequency reduction language for PFOA and

PFOSPollutant monitoring and source evaluation and reduction

program for PFOA and PFOS; and reporting requirement

Page 12: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1212

Categorization of Municipal Facilities

Bins Sources Present

PFOS Effluent Data > WQS

PFOS Effluent Data (ng/L)

3b Yes Yes >50

3a Yes Yes 13-50

2 Yes No <12 ng/L

1 No No* <12 ng/L*

Page 13: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1313

For IPP WWTPs: • PFOS/PFOA monitoring

– Bin 1: 4x/5 yrs (w/additional monitoring requirements)

– Bin 2: 2x/yr– Bin 3a: 4x/yr– Bin 3b: 12x/yr

• PMPs for PFOS/PFOA – Bin 3: all– Bin 2: upon trigger– Reporting may overlap

w/IPP requirements

National Pollutant

Discharge Elimination

System (NPDES) Permits & PFAS

Page 14: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1414

Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) PFAS InitiativeWixom Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)

• Federal/State Regulatory Program

• Prevent pollutant pass thru and accumulation in solids

• Strategy – reduce at source (Tribar, Plant 4)

• Treatment installed October 2018

• Discharge to Wixom from Tribar: <12 ppt PFOS since treatment

• PFOS concentrations in WWTP effluent discharged to Norton Creek continues to decrease

14

Additional information on IPP PFAS Initiative:https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/0,9038,7-365-86510_88079-476131--,00.html

290

4800

2100

940530

240269

150 130 53 30 19 270

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

PPT

WIXOM WWTP EFFLUENT RESULTS

PFOS

Treatment Installed

6 other WWTPs with IPPs in the watershed. PFAS present but at much lower concentrations

• Brighton WWTP: 16 ppt PFOS• Lyon Twp., Dexter, Ann Arbor, YCUA (emerg.

outfall only): 5 ppt or less.

Page 15: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1515

Norton Creek/Sherwood Lake

Wixom/Milford Area

PFOS concentrations downstream of WWTP significantly reduced July 2018 – 5,500 ppt Aug 2018 – 1,500 ppt Oct 2018 – 88 ppt April 2019 – 13 ppt

Lake Sherwood, Mill Pond – PFOS Non-Detect

Wixom WWTP

Page 16: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1616

Statewide Biosolids Study

• Sample Effluent, Influent, & Biosolids from 41 WWTPs (Oct – Nov 2018)• 20 Largest • Various Medium and Small WWTPs • (3.0 – 9.0 MGD ( 8 WWTPs), 0.5 – 3.0 MGD ( 8 WWTPs), 0.2 – 0.4 MGD ( 5 WWTPs)• Various treatment processes• Some w/ no industrial users (and no IPPs)

• Screen select fields from WWTPs with high conc. of PFOS in biosolids (Spring 2019)

Follow-up based on results• Sample fields from WWTPs with “typical/low” PFOS concentrations in

biosolids• Identify data gaps• In lieu of criteria, develop guidance to assist with biosolids management

decisions

Page 17: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1717

0 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 11 11 13 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 20 21 22 25 42 43 43 55 78 91 160161387

9831,0601,200

1,680

2,150

150.2412.80

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Batt

le C

reek

WW

TPSa

gina

w W

WTP

Delh

i Tw

p W

WTP

Osc

oda

Twp

WW

TP…

Holla

nd W

WTP

East

Lan

sing

WRR

FLa

nsin

g W

WTP

Holla

nd W

WTP

Dext

er W

WTP

Lyon

Tw

p W

WTP

Kala

maz

oo W

WTP

GLW

A W

RRF

Lans

ing

WW

TPCl

into

n Ri

ver W

RRF

-…YC

UA

Regi

onal

WW

TPS

Huro

n Va

lley

UA

WW

TPBa

y Ci

ty W

WTP

War

ren

WW

TPGL

WA

WRR

FM

onro

e W

WTP

Mus

kego

n Co

WW

MS…

Mid

land

WW

TPCo

mm

erce

Tw

p W

WTP

Sand

usky

WW

TPFl

int W

WTP

Trav

erse

City

WW

TPW

yom

ing

WW

TPAn

n Ar

bor W

WTP

Gene

see

Co-R

agno

ne W

WTP

Jack

son

WW

TPHo

wel

l WW

TPGr

and

Rapi

ds W

RRF

Mt C

lem

ens W

WTP

Alpe

na W

WTP

Dow

nriv

er W

TFM

arqu

ette

WW

TPGa

ylor

d W

WTP

Port

Hur

on W

WTP

Jack

son

WW

TPN

orth

Ken

t S A

WW

TPLA

PEER

WW

TPKI

Saw

yer W

WTP

Ioni

a W

WTP

Bron

son

WW

TPW

ixom

WW

TPLA

PEER

WW

TPW

ixom

WW

TP

WWTP Biosolids/Sludge PFAS ResultsPFOS (ng/g)

PFOS ng/g PFOS Mean ng/g PFOS Median ng/g

Page 18: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1818

*MDEQ concentrations from 2018 statewide study and excludes industrially impacted solids that are no longer being land applied.

* *

Range of PFOS Concentrations

Page 19: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

1919

Land Application Site Screening• Field selection procedure to

prioritize fields for screening• April 2019 – Field Screening

• Land App sites used by WWTPs with high PFOS concentrations

• Revisit City owned field in Lapeer (complete)

• Land app sites used by WWTPs with low/typical PFOS concentrations ranges

• Soils, drain tiles, swales, surface waters

• Follow-up if necessary

Page 20: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

2020

Wixom WWTP (pre Tribar Plant 4)03N06E04-JW01 and 03N06E04-JW05

Effluent (ppt): PFOS 269; Total 4681Biosolids (ppb): PFOS 2150 ; Total 2322

JW01: 243 dT 1995-2000 (4 applications)

JW05: 188 dT 1995-2001 (4 applications)

Page 21: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

2121

Wixom WWTP02N05E01-BC01 and 02N05E01-BC02

Effluent (ppt): PFOS 269; Total 4681Biosolids (ppb): PFOS 2150 ; Total 2322

BC01: 521 dT 2010-2015 (5 applications)

BC02: 184 dT 2010-2015 (5 applications)

Page 22: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

2222

Next Steps

• Monitoring Well Installation• Additional Field Data• Statewide Soil Study• Biosolids Guidance Strategy

Page 23: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

2323

PFAS Resources• Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART) • https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse

• Michigan PFAS Sampling Guidance• https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/0,9038,7-365-86510_87154-469832--,00.html• • Suggested PFAS Laboratory Analytes • • General PFAS Sampling Guidance • • Wastewater PFAS Sampling Guidance • • Surface Water PFAS Sampling Guidance • • Fish Tissue PFAS Sampling Guidance

• WRD Industrial Pretreatment Program PFAS Initiative• https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/0,9038,7-365-86510_88079-476131--,00.html• • Recommended PFAS Screening & Evaluation Procedure for IPPs • • PFAS Frequently Asked Questions for IPPs • • EGLE IPP PFAS Staff Map • • PFAS Source Evaluation Follow-Up Letter to IPP WWTPs • • PFAS Source Evaluation and Reduction Requirements Letter to IPP WWTPs • • IPP PFAS Initiative Regional Information Meetings • • EGLE IPP PFAS Initiative webinar (4/11/18, 61 min)

• Michigan Rule 57 Water Quality Values• https://www.michigan.gov/egle/0,9429,7-135-3313_3681_3686_3728-11383--,00.html• • WRD, Rule 57 Values for Perfluorinated Compounds (attached)

• Biosolids• • PFAS and Biosolids Frequently Asked Questions • • NEBRA information update: PFAS in Biosolids

• PFAS Related Watershed Activities• https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/0,9038,7-365-86510_88060_88065---,00.html• • Clinton River/Lake St. Clair• • Flint River Watershed• • Huron River Watershed• • River Raisin Watershed Report

Page 24: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

2424

Staff Contact

Jon Russell (overall program)Field Operations Manager, Lakes Erie and Huron

517-243-9951 – [email protected]

Christine Alexander (all treatment/permit questions)Permits Section Manager

517-243-4670 – [email protected]

Stephanie Kammer (overall program/biosolids)Supervisor, Lansing District Office

517-284-5522 – [email protected]

Mike Person (biosolids)Biosolids Program Specialist

989-297-0779 – [email protected]

Page 25: PFAS: The Michigan Experience - ACWA€¦ · 2 Water Resources Division Protect and Monitor 4 Great Lakes and Lake St. Clair 11,000 inland lakes 76,000 river and stream miles 6.5

2525

Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy

800-662-9278www.Michigan.gov/EGLE

Sign up for email updates

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel

Follow us on Twitter @MichiganEGLE