perspectives on the nitrogen cycle

19
Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle Peter Vitousek Stanford University

Upload: sen

Post on 25-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle. Peter Vitousek Stanford University. We are entering the Anthropocene “the geologic epoch in which the human species has emerged as a globally significant force reshaping the face of Earth” P.J. Crutzen 2002. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Peter VitousekStanford University

Page 2: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

We are entering the

Anthropocene

“the geologic epoch in which the human species has emerged as a globally

significant force reshaping the face of Earth”

P.J. Crutzen 2002

Page 3: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Global Terrestrial N Budget(Galloway and others 2007)

“Natural” Biological N Fixation 70 - 100Lightning 5

Total Fixed Naturally 75 – 105

Inorganic N Fertilizer 100Crop N Fixation 30Fossil Fuel Fixation 25Industrial Uses of fixed N 20

Total Fixed by Humanity ~175

Page 4: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

EPA Nitrogen Report 2011

United States Nitrogen Budget

Page 5: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Vitousek 1994

Page 6: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

IPCC Third Assessment Report, 2001

1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000Year

Page 7: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle
Page 8: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Robertson and Vitousek 2009

Page 9: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Anthropogenic reactive N is distributed unevenly across Earth

In some areas we use far too little N, in others we release far too much – and both extremes damage the environment and threaten human well-being.

Page 10: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Kenya North China Midwest US Maize Yield 2000

N P All in kg ha-1 y-1

Fertilizer 7 8

Removal in harvested 59 7 products

Agronomic inputs minus -52 +1 harvest removals

Comparison of Nutrient Balances

Sanchez andPalm pers. communication.

Page 11: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

double crop, w wheat Kenya North China Midwest US Maize Yield 2000 8500

N P N P All in kg ha-1 y-1

Fertilizer 7 8 588 92

Removal in harvested products 59 7 361 39

Agronomic inputs minus harvest removals -52 +1 +227 +53

Comparison of Nutrient Balances

Ju et al. 2009

Page 12: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Maize-Wheat double-cropping, North China Plain

Ju et al. 2009

Page 13: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Rotation w/soybean Kenya North China Midwest US

Maize Yield 2000 8500 8000 N P N P N P

All in kg ha-1 y-1

Fertilizer (plus N fixation) 7 8 588 92 155 14

Removal in harvested products 59 7 361 39 145 23

Agronomic inputs minus harvest removals -52 +1 +227 +53 +10 -9

Comparison of Nutrient Balances

David and Drinkwater perscommunication.

(Vitousek et al. 2009)

Page 14: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

EPA Nitrogen Report 2011

Page 15: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Prof. Fusuo Zhang, Dean, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University

Page 16: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Maize-Wheat double-cropping, North China Plain

Ju et al. 2009

Page 17: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

Yield and Fertilizer UseISSM versus Farmer Practice

Farmer Practice ISSM

Maize Yield (t/ha) 6.8 (1.6) 13.0 (1.6)

N input (kg/ha) 257 (121) 237 (70)

Yield per unit N added (g/g) 26 (20) 57 (13)

N inputs minus harvest removals (kg/ha) +127 (42) -12 (56)

Chen et al. 2011

Page 18: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

From P. Johnes (personal communication)

Page 19: Perspectives on the Nitrogen Cycle

We are entering the

Anthropocene

“the geologic epoch in which the human species has emerged as a globally

significant force reshaping the face of Earth”

P.J. Crutzen 2002