perioperative acute kidney injury
TRANSCRIPT
Perioperative Acute Kidney Injury
Biomarkers, Physicians, and the Surgical Abdomen
Dr. Andrew FergusonDepartment of Anaesthetics & Intensive Care Medicine
Craigavon Area Hospital
Disclosures
• No conflicts of interest to declare
Outline
• Why AKI matters to us
• Diagnostic and staging criteria for AKI
• AKI risk factors in perioperative patients
• Novel biomarkers – what do they offer?
• Clinical challenges – impact of fluid overload
• Take-home points
Perioperative AKI is NEVER benign!
“Predictable and avoidable AKIshould never occur”
“Post-operative AKI is avoidable in the elderly and should not occur”
How do we diagnose & stage AKI?
Cruz DN et al. Critical Care 2009; 13: 211
Ng KP, et al. Q J Med 2011, advance access August 22 2011
The grim reality of real world AKI
In 222 non-ICU AKI patients requiring RRT…
29% of patients died within 30 days
37.6% died within 90 days
51.4% died within one year
34.9% of survivors RRT dependent at 1 year
55% of survivors off RRT by 90d had eGFR < 60
All grades of AKI matter!
Cruz DN, et al. Critical Care 2009; 13: 211Ricci Z, et al. Kidney International 2008; 73: 538-546Clec’h C, et al. Crit Care 2011; 15: R128Mandelbaum T, et al. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: Epub ahead of print
AKIN
Scoring Perioperative AKI Risk• Age > 56 years• Male gender• Active CHF• Ascites• Hypertension• Mild to moderate CKD• Diabetes treated with OHA or insulin• Emergency surgery• Intra-peritoneal surgery
Risk factors Hazard ratio0-2 13 3.14 8.55 15.46 46.2
Kheterpal S, et al. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 505-515
Incidence - emergency surgery
N = 61, mean age 75, unpublished audit data
Incidence – elective surgeryStudy Population AKI definition AKI incidence
Thakar 1 Retrospective504 patients – gastric bypass
> 50% rise in creatinine or need for HD 8.5%
Kheterpal 2Prospective, observational major non-cardiac surgery 15,102 patients creatinine clearance > 80 ml/min
Creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min within 7 days of
surgery0.8%
Abelha 3Retrospective, 1,166 patientsbaseline creatinine < 140 major non-cardiac surgery
AKIN stage 1 7.5%
Kheterpal 4 Retrospective US national dataset 75,952 general surgery patients
creatinine rise of > 167 mol/L from baseline or
need for HD1%
(6+ risk factors: 9%)
Molnar 5Retrospective database cohortMajor elective surgery including cardiac in 213,347 over 65’s
Database coding as AKI 1.9%
1. Thakar CV, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 426-430 2. Kheterpal S, et al. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 892-9023. Abelha FJ, et al. Crit Care 2009; 13: R79 4. Kheterpal S, et al. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 505-5155. Molnar AO, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 939-946
Early diagnosis – the creatinine issue
• Variation with muscle mass & age etc.• Insensitive to rapid changes in renal function• Insensitive to lesser degrees of dysfunction• Frequently absent baseline
Lag time – lost opportunity for therapy Altered by fluid shifts and fluid balance1
–Positive balance can “hide” AKI
1 Liu KD, et al. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: Epub ahead of print (July 2011)
Biomarkers – the renal crystal ball?
Renal biomarker candidates
• Kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1)• Cystatin C• Interleukin 18 (IL-18)• And others…
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)
NGAL - what is it?• 25kDa protein up-regulated in renal injury
• Present in urine and plasma in AKI
• Level rises as early as 2 hours after cell injury
• Falls with successful therapy (animal models)
Predicts AKI
Predicts poor outcomes (RRT/death)Allows monitoring of therapy
Haase M, et al. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16: 526-532
Time (hours)0 3-6 24 48
NGAL
KIM - 1
Cystatin C
Creatinine
McIlroy DR, Wagener G, Lee HT. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 998-1004
Biomarker time-course Therapeutic window
02468
101214161820
NGAL -/Creat -
NGAL +/Creat -
NGAL-/Creat +
NGAL +/Creat +
RRTHosp deathComposite
NGAL and subclinical AKI
• NGAL rise only = similar outcomes to NGAL & creatinine rise• Retrospective pooled design
Haase M, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1752-1761
%
Biomarkers - unresolved issues
• Bedside vs. laboratory testing
• Lack of “real-world” assay validation
• Timing/frequency of testing uncertain
• Lack of evidence for “what’s best to do next?”
• Impact of testing on outcomes unclear
Challenges in perioperative AKI
Needs surgery NOW!
Can we keep up?
AKI Triggers & Perpetuators
AKI hurts other organ systems
Grams ME, Rabb H. Kidney International 2011; advance online publication, 3 August 2011
General management• Optimise haemodynamics
• Appropriate fluid challenges
• +/- inotrope/pressor (dobutamine/dopamine)
• Stop nephrotoxins & adjust drug doses• Treat underlying sepsis/obstruction• Physiological surveillance/management
• Escalate to HDU/ICU ? CRRT
• Nephrology consult ? IHD
Problem areas - fluid overload• Fluids do not reverse vasodilatory hypotension
• Associated with poor outcomes
• Causes organ/tissue oedema
• Causes venous congestion
• Worsens tissue perfusion
• Intra–abdominal hypertension
Fluid overload & adverse outcomePopulation N Design Results
ARDS + AKI 1 306 Retrospective analysis of RCT Strong association + ve balance and mortality
Septic shock 2 778 Retrospective analysis of RCT + ve balance correlated with increased mortality
AKI 3 297 Prospective cohort More + ve balance associated with mortality
AKI 4 618 Prospective cohort More + ve balance associated with mortality
ICU 5 1,120 Prospective cohort More + ve balance associated with mortality
ARDS 6 1,000 RCT Conservative balance = shorter ventilation time
Pancreatitis 7 247 Prospective cohort More + ve balance associated with increased organ failures
1 Grams ME, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 966-9732 Boyd JH, et al. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 259-2653 Sutherland SM, et al. Am J Kid Dis 2010; 55: 316-325
4 Bouchard J, et al. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 422-4275 Payen D, et al. Crit Care 2008; 12: R746 Wiedemann HP, et al. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2564-25757 de-Madaria E, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2011. Epub 30/08/2011
Fluid overload causes tissue oedema
Cerebral Altered mental status
Myocardial Arrhythmia, diastolic/systolic dysfunction
Pulmonary Impaired gas exchange, increased work
Hepatic Cholestasis
Renal Decreased RBF & GFR, venous congestion
Gut Ileus, anastomotic breakdown
Tissue Poor healing, pressure ulcers, infections
Prowle JR, et al. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6: 107-115
Fluid overload worsens tissue perfusion
• Shedding of endothelial glycocalyx• Triggered by hypervolaemia (ANP) & inflammation 1
• Loss of vascular integrity => leak• Leukocyte/platelet adhesion => microthrombi
1 Bruegger D, et al. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 19th July Online First
Microvascular responses to fluid
• Differs from the macro-haemodynamic response
• Improvement in CO and BP do not guarantee
improvement in microvascular perfusion
• Positive microvascular response to fluid bolus
diminishes significantly over time
Pottecher J, et al. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1874Ospina-Tascon G, et al. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 949-955Harrois A, et al. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17: 303-307
Intra-abdominal hypertension• Normal Intra-Abdominal Pressure < 7 mmHg• Normal Abdominal Perfusion Pressure > 75 mmHg
APP = Mean arterial pressure (MAP) – IAPRenal filtration gradient = MAP – 2*IAP
• Decreased RBF, increased venous pressures• Impaired gut blood flow & gut translocation• IAP > 20 + organ failure = compartment syndrome
So what should we do?• THINK before fluids and MONITOR after
• Early fluid resuscitation is appropriate
• Usually leads to early positive balance
• Make the switch
– Even balance by 48 hours, negative beyond this
– Diuretics or UF
– Earlier move to inotropes/pressors
• Make it part of daily practice
Take-home points
• Any degree of AKI = worse outcome
• Risk recognition and tailored journey
– More haemodynamic optimisation?
– Earlier recourse to HDU/ICU?
• Biomarkers = earlier intervention
• Fluid timing and balance are critical
• Renal rescue bundles?
“Poison is in everything, and no thing is without poison.
The dosage makes it either a poison or a remedy”
Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim “Paracelsus” (1493-1541)