Office of Management and Budget

1

PERFORMANCE 2008

Office of Management and Budget

2

WHERE ARE WE TODAY?

“CHARTING THE COURSE FOR EXCELLENCE IN GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE – ALASKA”

“Alaska’s performance reporting is one of the bestin the country…”

The Pew CenterGrading the States 2008

“

Office of Management and Budget

3

WHERE DO WE NEED TO BE?

“In Alaska, information works about the same way – as money—agencies have a lot, but they often lackthe capacity to use it.”

“…the next step–linking the performance numbers to the budget–hasn’t been taken yet.”

“If the state can improve that link the way it has improved the measures themselves, the results could be impressive.”

The Pew CenterGrading the States 2008

Office of Management and Budget

4

CHANGING HOW WE DO IT

INTEGRATE PERFORMANCE LOGIC Legislative presentations Increment Requests Management discussions

INTEGRATE BUDGET NUMBERS Performance web pages

Office of Management and Budget

5

TELL THE STORYCommercial Fisheries

Our purpose is to manage subsistence, commercial, and personal use fisheries under sustained yield principles for the best interest of Alaska (mission)

We do this through harvest management, stock assessment, and customer service (core services)

Our goal is to achieve stable or increasing economic and social benefits derived from the harvest and use of fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants (end result)

AND

Office of Management and Budget

6

ARE YOU MAKING A DIFFERENCE?

Office of Management and Budget

7

USE YOUR METRICS (targets)

To Demonstrate Progress

Through management, we are making progress towards achieving the goals of economic and social benefit from fisheries (end result):

$1.4 billion value of commercial harvests and mariculture, continuing a five year upward trend

77% of fisheries were within the amounts necessary for subsistence, above the 70% target

Established reproductive goals or baseline biological reference points for 99% of salmon stocks - critical for science based decisions

Current permits for aquatic farms increased from 45% to 97% current, short of our 100% target but providing increased protection for wild populations

Office of Management and Budget

8

USE YOUR METRICS (targets)

When More Resources Are Needed

In some areas, we are not yet making sufficient progress. Increased support is needed to move fisheries management closer to achieving the desired benefits for Alaskans (end result):

Defensible decisions that maintain population viability and sustainable harvests require data. Insufficient baseline biologic reference points exist for: herring 17%, shellfish 58%, groundfish 76%.

Less than 50% of fisheries are achieving the user group allocation objectives designated by the board, we are consistently below the 80% target.

Office of Management and Budget

9

USE PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORKIncrement Requests

To increase progress towards the divisions goals, we need more funding to perform the following functions:

Core Service: Harvest Management $440.0

Core Service: Stock Assessment $1,567.5

Core Service: Customer Service $ 492.5

Office of Management and Budget

10

BECOME A LEARNING ORGANIZATIONQuestion the Data

STATE STATDept StatDiv StatSec Stat

Office of Management and Budget

11

ALIGNMENT

• Mission:– Why do we exist?

• Core Services– How we get there

• End Results– Value to the public

• Performance– How are we doing?– Making a difference?– Need to change

course?– More money?

Office of Management and Budget

12

NEW TOOLSJust for You!

Vital Indicators (Key Targets)

Results at a Glance at Agency level

Status Statements

Graphing

Office of Management and Budget

13

VITAL INDICATORSShow the Trends

Office of Management and Budget

14

RESULTS SUMMARY PAGEFacilitate Discussion

FY2008 Budget: $60,129,500

Office of Management and Budget

15

Status For Every Target

A more correct Methodology is : $/lb of species x lbs of harvest. Harvest by species is derived from fish tickets and NOAA reports. Exvessel prices by species are calculated from the F&G annual COAR (Commercial Operators Annual Report

Office of Management and Budget

16

GRAPHING TOOL

Standardize Presentation

Visual present-ability Additional or contextual data is a good

thing Provide a link to more information, or

discuss more within the analysis section.  

Storage Capacity

Office of Management and Budget

17

Office of Management and Budget

18

Single Bar Graph

Office of Management and Budget

19

Multiple Bar Graph

Office of Management and Budget

20

Multiple Line Graph with a Gap/Target

Office of Management and Budget

21

Multiple Line Graph Quarterly Data

Office of Management and Budget

22

Stacked Bar Graph

Office of Management and Budget

23

Mix Graph Types

Office of Management and Budget

24

GRAPHING NOTES

Graph Average, Target, Total Change, Forecast, Quarters Option to display a subset of the table data

Ignore a year Vertical axis defaults to logical range, can override

Table Displays in descending year order Option to be invisible, display graph only Option to hide specific columns

Office of Management and Budget

25

OTHER CHANGES

Comment field changed to Methodology Vital indicators (Key targets) on Admin siteRemoved Resources PageOMB can restrict publishing

In ProcessABS Performance information flow

Mission and Core Services Budget Numbers

Office of Management and Budget

26

THE PLAN

Department Status Statements ASAP

RDU/Comp Status Statements next in line

Graphs by September 30 Picture uploads phased out

STAT sessions – at any time!

Office of Management and Budget

27

WHY BOTHER?

Mitigate politics in decision making Appropriate resource allocation

Are we doing the right things–in the right way? Unintended consequences? Effective service delivery? Operational weakness?

Communication Unites diverse groups towards common goal of

better government, initiative accomplishment Citizen centered accountability

Office of Management and Budget

28

SHOOT FOR THE MOON