percutaneous aortic valve implantationking’s college hospital experience 35 patients treated with...

52
Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation Should we all be doing this? Dr Philip MacCarthy BSc PhD FRCP Consultant Cardiologist King’s College Hospital, London, UK. BCIS Autumn Meeting, Crewe Hall, Crewe, September 26th 2008

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Trans-catheter Aortic Valve

Implantation

Should we all be doing this?

Dr Philip MacCarthy BSc PhD FRCP

Consultant Cardiologist

King’s College Hospital, London, UK.

BCIS Autumn Meeting, Crewe Hall, Crewe, September 26th 2008

Page 2: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 3: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 4: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 5: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Otto et al N Engl J Med 1999;341:142–7

Page 6: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Is there an unmet need?

Page 7: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

(SCTS 5th Blue Book 2003)

AVR has become more common in the

elderly

Page 8: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Is there an unmet need?

Page 9: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 10: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

What do we currently have to

offer?

Page 11: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Trans-catheter aortic valve

implantation

CoreValve ‘Revalving’ system – trans-femoral

Edwards Sapien™ prosthesis

Trans-femoral (using the ‘RetroFlex’ catheter)

Trans-apical (using the ‘Ascendra’ catheter)

Page 12: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

CoreValve ‘ ReValving’ System

Page 13: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 14: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 15: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Edwards Sapien™ Trancatheter

Heart Valve prosthesis

Page 16: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 17: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 18: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 19: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 20: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 21: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

What are the challenges of setting

up a TAVI programme in the real

world?

Page 22: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

King’s College Hospital Experience

35 patients treated with the Edwards device

17 Trans-femoral

18 Trans-apical

First 17 of these as part of the PARTNER-

EU study,

Next 18 in the SOURCE registry

Page 23: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

King’s College Hospital Experience

20 women (57%)

Mean age - 83.9yrs

Mean Log Euroscore - 20.3 (porcelain aorta)

Mean peak AV gradient - 85.8mmHg

Mean AVA - 0.61cm2

Median LOS - 8 days

In-hospital mortality - 2 (5.7%)

Page 24: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Patient work-up

Lung/renal function tests

Carotid Dopplers

CT aorta – without contrast

Trans-thoracic echo Morphology of AV – peak/mean grad + AVA

Dimensions of AV annulus

Morphology of septum

Presence/mechanism of MR

LV systolic function

PAP if possible

TOE – if annulus 24mm or greater

Page 25: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Patient work-up

Cardiac Catheterisation

Coronary angiogram

RH cath with PAP

Aortogram (PA or LAO) – 30ml @ 15ml/sec

Iliofemoral angiogram – 30ml @ 6ml/sec

No angioseal!

Page 26: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

The Team

Dedicated Anaesthetist(s)

Echocardiologist

Perfusionist

Surgical scrub nurse

Cath lab scrub nurse

Surgeon(s)

Interventional Cardiologist(s)

The Company (for valve crimping)

Page 27: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Fluoro

Cardio

CT Surg

Cath lab kit

Valve crimping

Surgical

kit

Echo

Machine

Echo

CP bypass

Anaes.

Machine

Anaes

Nurse

Nurse

Rad

Tech

ODA

Rep

Page 28: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

The Learning Curve

Page 29: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 30: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 31: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Trans-femoral pAVR

Page 32: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

TF Valve deployment

Page 33: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Trans-apical pAVR

A higher risk patient group

Page 34: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

TA valve deployment

Page 35: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

The importance of peri-

procedural imaging

Page 36: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Stenosed native aortic valve

Page 37: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Guidewire across native AV

Page 38: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Valve deployment

Page 39: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Edwards Sapien valve in-situ

Page 40: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Potential peri-procedural

complications Vascular access

Passage of introducer sheath

Surgical repair

Iliac dissection/rupture

Balloon valvuloplasty Aortic regurgitation

CHB on background of RBBB

Valve deployment Occlusion of coronary ostia

Displacement of prosthesis

Rapid pacing

Other – Interference with the mitral valve

CVA

Page 41: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Failed femoral access

Page 42: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Iliac balloon occlusion

Page 43: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Occlusive iliac dissection

Page 44: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Iliac artery rupture…

Page 45: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

…repaired with a covered stent

Page 46: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

The importance of case selection

Patients with advanced pulmonary disease may do better with a TF approach

Poor LV systolic function - less room for error

The aetiology of depressed LV function and MR

Beware RBBB

Page 47: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 48: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

So should we all be doing it?

Page 49: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Some words of caution

The precise need is unknown

There is currently no long-term data

Funding issues remain a problem

Page 50: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of
Page 51: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

So should we all be doing it?

At the moment NO - because:

Experience should be concentrated in major centres

New centres should be closely proctored

Centre must have:-

Experienced cardiac anaesthetists

Cardiopulmonary bypass facility

Excellent imaging ability

Dedicated cardiac ITU/recovery area

Long-term data/a solution to funding is needed

Page 52: Percutaneous Aortic Valve ImplantationKing’s College Hospital Experience 35 patients treated with the Edwards device 17 Trans-femoral 18 Trans-apical First 17 of these as part of

Acknowledgements

King’s TAVI Team:-

CT Surgeons - Olaf Wendler &

Ahmed El-Gamel

Cardiologists – Phil MacCarthy &

Martyn Thomas

Echocardiologist – Mark

Monaghan

Anaesthetists – Emma Alcock &

Kailasam Rajagopal

Research Sister/Co-ordinator –

Karen Wilson/Beth Brickham

Other cath lab/theatre staff involved