people working with the system
DESCRIPTION
People working with the system. Katarzyna Gromek Broc. The Jury. History The jury system is known in Britain after the Norman Conquest - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PEOPLE WORKING WITH THE SYSTEM
Katarzyna Gromek Broc
The Jury History The jury system is known in Britain after the
Norman Conquest Function: the first jurors acted as witnesses
providing the information on local matters and were used for administrative purposes gathering information, e.g. collecting data
Under Henry the II, the jury started to exercise the judicial role
The jury moved from reporting the events to deliberating on evidence provided by the parties
Jury History Bushell’s case 1670 reiterated in the House of
Lords’ decision R v Wang 2005 Before Bushell’s decision, a well-known practice
where judges exercised pressure on the jury to convict the defendant mainly for the political reasons.
Bushell established that the jury were the sole judges of fact, having the right to give a verdict according to their conscience and should not be penalised for the views on the facts even if opposed to the judge’ views.
Jury The Bushell’s case established the principle that
the juries may acquit the defendant even if the law demands a guilty verdict
In R v Wang, 2005 House of Lords confirmed that the judge cannot pressurise the jury to convict
Today the jury is seen as fundamental part of English Legal System although only a small number of cases is tried by jury
It is in place to ensure that criminal justice system works for the benefit of the public and not for the benefit of the politicians or other leaders.
The function of the jury The jury is weighing up the evidence in order to
decide the true facts of the case The jury’s role is to find out what has actually
happened The judge should inform the jury what is relevant
law, the jury then has to apply the law to the facts they have found in order to reach the verdict
In criminal matters if the jury found the defendant guilty, the judge decides on the sentence
Jury can only consider evidence presented in the court R v Marshall and Crump (2007)
When the jury is used Criminal cases Symbolic role of the jury in criminal cases Jury’s role in the Crown Court only However, the role of the jury has been reduced (criminal offences: summary offences tried in the
magistrate’s courts, indictable offences are tried in Crown Court.)
Criminal Justice Act 2003 increased the power of the magistrates and reduced the power of the jury.
Summary offences (road traffic offences) still for the jury.
Where the jury is used Criminal Justice Act 2003 allows trial by
judge only in two situations When a serious risk of jury tempering
exists (s.44) Where the case involves complex or
lengthy financial and commercial arrangements (s.43)
Where the jury is used Civil cases Very limited cases, less than 1% middle of 19th century: judges were given right to
refuse case be heard before a jury Jury trial is accepted in cases involving malicious
prosecution, false imprisonment and fraud There are also exceptions to this rule In case of prolonged examination of documents or
accounts or any scientific or local investigations or defamation cases
In other cases trial by jury is at the discretion of the court.
Qualifications for jury Before 1972: only those who owned the house
of certain value were eligible 95% of women were excluded Ineligibility 1) the judiciary 2) those who deliver justice: barristers,
solicitors, prison officers, police, staff working in the Crown Prosecution
3) the clergy 4) mentally-ill people 5)People on bail in criminal proceedings
Qualifications for jury Criminal Justice Act 2003 Potential jury members should be Aged 18-70 On electoral register Resident in the UK for at least 5 years Not a mentally disordered person Not disqualified from the jury service
Summoning the jury ½ million people are summoned every year Computerised system is used to send the letters
to people from the electoral lists Jury is compulsory and non attendance can result
in fine The jury for a particular case are chosen by
random ballot in open court The clerk has each panel member’s name on the
card, the cards are shuffled and the first 12 names are called out. 12 people are sworn in
never fewer than 9 jurors in criminal cases, never less than 8 in county courts.
The secrecy of the jury Jurors are not allowed to communicate with
anyone (apart from the judge and the court official) before the verdict is reached.
The arguments in favour of the secrecy It ensures freedom of discussion in the jury
room Protects from outside influence and from
harassment The public should not know how the verdict was
reached, they might respect the decision less. Protects citizens acting as jurors Protects their opinion and unpopular verdicts
Arguments in favour of the Jury System
1. Public participation: ordinary citizen takes part in the administration of justice, respects tradition judgment by peers
Lord Denning : jury service “giving an ordinary folk their finest lesson of citizenship”
2. Certainty : criminal law: verdict guilty or not guilty decision is not open to discussion
3. Judging according to Conscience: protection from political pressure
Arguments against the jury system
Lack of competence The ‘perverse verdicts’ problem Bias Representation of ethnic minorities Jury nobbing
Crown Prosecution ServiceCrown Prosecution Service and models of criminal
justice.
The first thing that you could think about are the purposes for which the Crown Prosecution Service was established for:
What do you think is its main role? Where can we situate it in our system of ‘applying law and doing justice’?
In terms of procedural orthodoxy we can see that the CPS can be placed ‘in the middle’ between the investigation by the police and the adjudication by the courts
CPS The CPS was created in 1985 It was a response to criticisms made by
the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. The expectations were that the CPS would make the criminal process fairer;
and would address some concerns about the quality of police investigations
and introduce some accountability.
CPS The key role of the Crown Prosecution
Service (CPS) is prosecuting.
It sits between the police and the courts
CPS: Would it fulfil its promise To what extent do you think that the CPS has
delivered on these aims? Will look at some issues raised by the Royal
Commission on Criminal Procedure prepared in 1981. Some criticisms raised included the lack of objectivity of the investigation process relative to prosecution (police used to be responsible both for investigating and prosecuting); and that there was a lack of accountability in the process and in some extreme cases a misuse of power.
Other criticisms referred to lack of uniformity in application of the law and the poor filtering of weak cases.
Response to the problems with the system
The CPS provided an independent
prosecution body that has been in operation for the last twenty five years.
Do you think that the process has been fairer since? Could you reflect upon the role of the CPS and what criminal justice system is for?
In doing so, you could reflect on the different purposes of criminal justice. Can you think about some? What models of criminal justice could be identified? Are they contradictory?
CPS For example could you identify the advantages of the
Due Process model, the Crime Control Model and the Bureaucratic model? You will need to think what the CPS actually does?
In the light of the current debate could you consider the issue of efficiency of criminal justice system? Furthermore, could you reflect upon the increasing attention and centrality of the victims of crime? More importantly could you look at the extent to which the CPS protects victims? Could you balance the interest of victims with the public interest?
Procedural orthodoxy ... Police
CPS
Courts
Investigate
Prosecute
Adjudicate
Concerns about the role of the police in prosecuting ...
Lack of objectivity ... Variations in application from place to
place ... Not filtering out weak cases ...
CPS created to provide an independent prosecution body ...
Role of the CPS makes us think about what criminal justice is for
CPS Models of criminal justice are devices for
thinking about what is important in criminal justice ...
The best known models were devised by Herbert Packer in The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (1968) ...
CPS The Due Process
model
Acknowledges the importance of suspects’ rights ...
Processes have an intrinsic value, independent of the guilt of the suspect ...
Models The Crime Control
model
Emphasises the need to secure convictions
Focuses on needs of victims and public
CPS An administrative /
bureaucratic model ...
Focuses on efficiency and cost ...
CPS The models can help us to understand
what the CPS does ...
Two fairly recent developments ...
Consider the extent to which ‘efficiency’ is now driving the criminal justice debate
Consider the increased priority given to the interests of victims of crime in policy discussions around criminal justice
Efficiency ... Who could argue against it ... ? Has always been there as an issue ...
The tests in the Code for Crown Prosecutors reflect a variety of concerns, including efficiency Evidential sufficiency (‘realistic prospect of
conviction’) Public Interest
Efficiency ... Who could argue against it ... ? A sensible move –
CPS aligns geographically with police areas in 1999 following the Glidewell review
Efficiency ... Who could argue against it ... ? A more problematic moves –
CPS start to work closely with police on charging decisions following White Paper Justice for All (2002) and Criminal Justice Act 2003
CPS now responsible for most charging decisions other than in minor cases
Victims and witnesses ... Clearly, the interests of victims and
witnesses are important, but ... ... to what extent, and in what ways, is it
the job of the CPS to protect them?
CPS Recognising the interests of victims and
witnesses will often be consistent with good outcomes for prosecutors, but, for example, victims’ interests are not necessarily the same as the public interest
2. People working with the system: Magistrates
Magistrates: 1361 Peace Act: gave judicial power to appoint lay people
Till the 19th century administration of local government was entrusted to them
Today, there are over 28.000 lay magistrates (justice of peace) hearing over 1000 criminal cases a year. (they do not receive salary but travel, subsistence and financial loss of allowance)
magistrates’ court Usual criminal, but some civil cases eg
Family Proceedings Court Licensing
Who does the judging: Three lay magistrates (unpaid, not
professional), + Court Clerk,or District Judge
Appeals High Court
magistrates’ courts Summary offences – minor
offences eg road traffic, common assault, minor criminal damage
Either way offences tried summarily eg theft. Accused can insist on a trial ON
INDICTMENT at Crown Court (with jury) or the magistrates may refer the case to Crown Court.
2 or 3 Lay Magistrates (Justices of the Peace) or a legally qualified District Judge (previously Stipendiary Magistrate).
Legal representation by solicitor or barrister.
Committal proceedings: Either way offences
to be tried on indictment
Major offences known as indictable offences
Is there a prima facie case against the defendant? not guilt or
innocence Is there evidence
upon which a reasonable jury could convict?
Should be ‘on remand’ in custody or given bail?
Crown Court
Trial court More serious
offences Trial before a judge
(to decide the law and direct the jury) and jury (to decide the facts and apply the law as directed by the judge).
Sentencing Court Some ‘either way’
cases, tried by magistrates are sent to Crown Court for sentencing as Crown Court has greater powers of sentencing.
Appeal Court Appeals from
magistrates court Magistrates + judge.
Youth Court For children (10 – 13) and young persons (14 –
17) Special part of magistrates court.
Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court
2, often 3 judges, usually including a Lord Justice of Appeal, often Lord Chief Justice.
2 main functions: Appeals from magistrates courts on a point of
law ‘by way of case stated’ Appeals from the Crown Court by way of case
stated when the Crown Court has heard an appeal from the Magistrates Court.
Summary offences or either way offences tried summarily.
If an appeal is lodged against an indictable offence (or an either way offence which has been tried on indictment) then appeal to Court of Appeal Criminal Division
Court of Appeal Criminal Division
Appeals against conviction and sentence from Crown Court
Consists of LCJ, Lord Justices of Appeal and QB Judges
Usually 3 judges sit (eg LCJ, LJ of Appeal and QBD), exceptionally 2 judges may hear appeals against sentence.
3. People working with the system: Judges
Judges The judges are in the centre of the English Legal
System, deciding the cases and creating precedenceThe Constitutional Reform Act created as a head of
judiciary: the President of the Court of England and Wales replacing the Lord Chancellor
The president (Lord Chief Justice) is a president o the Court of Appeal, the High Court, the Crown court the county courts and magistrates’ courts and can hear cases in any of them. He would likely sit in the Court of Appeal
Function: to represent the views of judiciary to Parliament and the government ministers
Judges Appointment of judges: Constitutional
Reform Act 2005 changed the procedure:
Old system: Lords of Appeal and Lord Justices of Appeal
appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister who was advised by the Lord Chancellor
High Court Judges, Circuit Judges were appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Lord Chancellor
Judges: Appointment: New System Constitutional Reform Act 2005 established a
Judicial Appointments Commission responsible for new appointments:
Purpose? To reinforce judicial independence Commission : 14 members, 5 lay members, 5
judges, two legal professionals, a tribunal member and a lay magistrate.
Appointments of the Lord Justice will continue to be made by the Queen on the recommendation of Prime Minister after the Commission had made recommendation
Judges Appointments: The new Appointment Commission is not
involved in appointment of judges in Supreme Court
Instead a minister would appoint a temporary Commission ( in case of vacancy)
Termination: Judges of High Court and above are covered by
the Act of Settlement 1700, which provides that they can only be removed from office by the Queen on the petition of both Houses of Parliament. This happened only once.
Judges Dismissal: Under the Courts Act 1971, Circuit
Judges and district judges can be dismissed for inability and misbehaviour by the Lord Chancellor after the Lord Chief Justice had agreed. (It happened only once)
4. People working with the system: The Legal Profession
Two separate branches solicitors and barristers
They do similar job, drafting, giving written advice advocacy, representing a client
Barristers spend more time in court Solicitors are more concentrated on the paper
work Barristers are hired by solicitors if there is
such a need (recent relaxation of this rule) These two branches are quite free to regulate
their own matters
Legal Profession Solicitors, 98.000 solicitors since 1970 tripled in
size Work: paper work, conveyancing, wills and
contracts, giving written and oral advice Advocacy work in the lower courts, county courts
and magistrates’ courts, In the past Solicitors were eligible for the judiciary
but only to become Circuit Judges, Legal Service Act 1990, opened it up to become a judge of a higher court
Qualifications: Law degree is not necessary, instead CPE, then LPC and two years training.
Barristers Self-employed,14 000, their number is
diminishing Work: advocacy, but also some paper work,
sometimes employed by the government departments or by law centres
they cannot form partnership Qualification: Bar Vocational Training 1 Year
(expensive) Called to the Bar, he/she needs to find a
place in Chamber for a one year apprentenship –pupillage after tenancy
Queen’s Council 10 years of practice as a barrister Work higher profile cases, better pay
£270 000 a year Appointment: in the past similar to the
senior judges, now government is not longer involved
It is a task of Bar Council and Law Society
Legal Education Law Students
Part of the system? - No compulsory link between a
university legal education and the legal profession or the legal system.
- for solicitors: no need for an university education
- barristers: university education but need not be law
Contemporary Situation: - law schools central to legal
training for solicitors - 192 non-graduate - 220 formerly barrister - 3907 law degree - 1185 other degree
Law Students England & Wales (2004)
61% female 29% ethnic minorities 18% working class 26% father has degree 18% has close relative in legal
profession
Law Students Perception of legal studies:
vocational with strong academic content
72% pragmatic choice (enter legal profession)
24% interest in the subject
Different Schools of Law - blackletter (doctrinal) - socio-legal - Jurisprudential:
critical (CLS) realist other
Black-letter Law School traditional approach ‘although law may appear to be
irrational, chaotic and particularistic, if one digs deep enough and knows what one is looking for, then it will become evident that law is an internally coherent and unified body of rules’ (Sugarman)
Black-letter Law School ‘[i]t is for law professors to set forth
the law as a coherent whole – to analyse and define legal conceptions – to reduce the mass of legal rules to an orderly series of principles’ (A.V.Dicey)
Jurisprudential Law School - emphasis on legal philosophy - can take a variety of perspectives
including realist, critical legal studies, positivist,..
Jurisprudential Law School: Critical Legal Studies
- interprets law from the point of view of power relationships.
- Marxist inspired E.g. Birkbeck College School of Law
(University of London)
Socio-Legal Law School - Promotes interdisciplinary legal studies - aims to be relevant for the society in
which it operates E.g. Kent Law School (University of
Canterbury)