pdf_jtn_974

Upload: zulkarnain-muin

Post on 03-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 pdf_JTN_974

    1/4

    Case

    repot

    Turkish Neurosurgery 2012, Vol: 22, No: 2, 242-245242

    Received: 01.05.2010 /accepted: 15.07.2010

    DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.2902-10.1

    ABSTRACT

    One type o congenital intrasphenoidal meningoencephalocele is remnant o lateral craniopharyngeal (Sternbergs) canal. We present a caseo a 23-year girl with 10-month history o right side CSF rhinorrhea. CT scan, MRI revealed congenital meningoencephalocele and CSF leakrom middle ossa to right side o sphenoid sinus, and there were bony deects at the foor o the anterior aspect o the right middle ossa.Transcranial repair was perormed with right side pterional craniotomy. Careul preoperative evaluation and localization o the sphenoiddeect are essential or selection o the best possible surgical approach and skull base reconstruction or repair o sphenoid sinus CSF leaksand meningoencephaloceles. In this case, an endoscopic technique was not successul so, transcranial repair was perormed with right side

    pterional craniotomy.

    KeywOrds: Meningoencephalocele, Rhinorrhea, Transcranial repair

    Z

    Senoid kanat iine yerlemi meningoensephalosel, lateral kranioarengial kanaln (Stenbergin kanal) artndan meydana gelen bir konjenitalanomalidir. Sa burun deliinden 10 aydan beri BOS gelen 23 yanda kadn olgu olarak sunulmutur. Bilgisayarl tomograi ve manyetikrezonans grntlemede; sa orta ossa tabannn anterior yzndeki kemik deekti ile seneoid sinsn sa tara arasnda iliki bulunmutur.Sa piterional kraniotomi yaplarak; kranial yoldan kemik deekti onarld. Senoid sinsden BOS kaa olan ve meningoenseeloseli olanhastalarda ameliyat ncesi dnemde detayl grntleme almalar ile deekt ortaya konmal ve en iyi cerrahi yaklam yolu bu grntlemealmalarna gre belirlenmelidir. Olgumuzda endoskopik giriimin baarsz olmas nedeni ile sa piterional kraniotomi yaplarak deektonarm yaplmtr.

    AnAhtAr sZCKler: Meningoensealosel, Rinore, Kranial yoldan onarm

    Correpodece ddre:Mohmmd saMaDIan / E-mil: [email protected]

    Mhmm saMadIaN1, Hbibllh MogHaddasI2, Mhen VazIrNEzaMI2, kim HaddadIaN1,omiv rEzaEE1, Mehn arMaNFar1, Ftemeh kHorMaEE3

    1Loqman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran2Loqman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran3Loqman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., Department of Emergency, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Trcri approch for spoteou CsFRhiorrhe due to sterberg C Itrpheoid

    Meigoecephocee: Ce Report d Review ofthe literture

    Stenberg Kanalna Yerleen ve Spontan Rinoreye Neden OlanMeningoensefalosele Transkranial Yaklam: Olgu Sunumu veLiteratr Taramas

    InTRoduCTIon

    A meningoencephalocele is an uncommon malormation

    described by a protrusion o cerebral tissue and meninges

    through a congenital deect in the cranial bones. Serious

    complications rom this condition usually happen In the rst

    ew years (10,11,21) but occasionally symptoms do not occur

    until adulthood (15,24).

    We report here an adult case o Sternbergs canal intrasphe-

    noidal meningoencephalocele with a 10-month history o

    right side CSF rhinorrhea.

    Clinical details

    A 23-year girl with a 10-month history o right side

    CSF rhinorrhea was reerred to the neurosurgery clinic.

    Neuroimaging studies included coronal and axial paranasal

    multislice CT scan with 3D reconstruction o skull base,

    MRI and CT cisternography and showed sphenoid sinuses

    overpneumatization with extension tothe parasellar region.

    There was a well-dened bony deect containing CSF at the

    right parasellar region just lateral to the rotundum oramen

    measuring 3 mm that communicated with the anterior

  • 7/29/2019 pdf_JTN_974

    2/4

    Turkish Neurosurgery 2012, Vol: 22, No: 2, 242-245 243

    Samadian M. et al:Intrasphenoidal Meningoencephalocele

    aspect o right middle cranial ossa and extended tothe

    right sphenoid sinus. The bony deect was a remnant o the

    craniopharyngeal canal (Sternbergs canal) (Figures 1, 2, 3).

    She was a candidate or endoscopic repair o the meninoen-

    cephalocele. Endoscopic transethmoidal - pterygoidal - sphe-

    noidal repair was perormed. We tried to repair the deectwith the endoscopic approach. Because o very lateral exten-

    sion o the deect we did not have good view o the deect,

    and with standard endoscopic instrument the acute angleo

    the working area was not accessible. Then transcranial repair

    was perormed with right side pterional craniotomy. With

    right side standard craniotomy with an intradural approach,

    dissection was perormed in the subtemporal region in the

    middle ossa. The bony deect was seen including part o the

    brain and meninges that protruded into the sphenoid sinus.

    The sot tissue mass was amputated and the bony deect

    repaired with a small cranial bone grat and duraplasty

    was perormed with ascia o temporalis muscle. Duraand craniotomy closure was perormed with the standard

    method. The postoperative state was uneventul and she

    was discharged rom the hospital ater 3 days without any

    neurological decit or CSF rhinorrhea. Post op MRI showed

    that the deect was well repaired (Figure 4). In ollow-up or

    one year she is in good condition without CSF leak.

    Figr 1: Coronal T2W MRI shows communication o the middleossa with the sphenoid sinus via a bony deect. Brain, meninges

    and CSF protruded rom the middle ossa to the RT sphenoid

    sinus.

    Figr 2: Coronal CT cisternography o patient; Overpneumatiza-tion o sphenoid sinus and CSF leak rom middle ossa to RT

    sphenoid sinus through small bony deect (arrow) were seen.

    Figr 3: 3D reconstructed multislice CT scan o skull base showsintracranial view o skull base and bony deect anterolateral to

    oramen rotundum (arrow).

    Figr 4: Coronal T2W MRI shows good repair o the deect.

  • 7/29/2019 pdf_JTN_974

    3/4

    Turkish Neurosurgery 2012, Vol: 22, No: 2, 242-245244

    Samadian M. et al:Intrasphenoidal Meningoencephalocele

    dISCuSSIon

    The incidence o cephaloceles (meningoceles, encephaloceles)

    is assumed to range between 1 and 3 in 10,000 children (7,19).

    Occipital, sincipital (nasorontal, nasoethmoidal, nasoorbital),

    and basal (sphenoorbital, sphenomaxillary, transethmoidal,

    sphenoethmoidal, sphenonasopharyngeal, basioccipital)cephaloceles can be distinguished in relation to the site o

    origin (16). A rare nding is a basal cephalocele that is limited

    to the sphenoid sinus and has been proposed to present a

    urther subtype o basal cephaloceles (3).

    It may be dicult to determine the accurate etiology o

    cephaloceles especially i no trauma is evident in the patients

    history. Generally, non-traumatic cephaloceles include

    congenital and acquired orms (4).

    Clinically, transsphenoidal encephaloceles are the only con-

    genital type ound in the sphenoid sinus. Abiko et al. (1).

    urther distinguished two types o transsphenoidal menin-

    goencephaloceles: the true transsphenoidal and the intra-sphenoidal. The rst one describes meningoencephaloceles

    extending into the sphenoid sinus but restricted by its foor.

    The latter describes encephaloceles traversing the foor o the

    sphenoid sinus and protruding into the nasal cavity or naso-

    pharynx. Abnormalities o the ace will most commonly coex-

    ist with the true transsphenoidal-type encephaloceles, which

    are transmitted through the sphenoid bone, optic system,

    and brain, corresponding to the median clet ace syndrome

    (14). In the early inantile period, high surgical risks may be

    encountered with transsphenoidal encephaloceles as the

    pituitary-hypothalamic structures are usually incorporated in

    the herniated encephaloceles o this age group (12,18). Most

    patients present during childhood, Cases diagnosed in later

    adult lie are rare (15,24).

    Generally, non-traumatic cephaloceles include congenital

    and acquired orms. One type o congenital intrasphenoidal

    meningoencephalocele is a remnant o the craniopharyngeal

    (Sternbergs) canal. The complex ontogeny o the sphenoid

    bone and the embryological conditions can cause the

    development o congenital sphenoidal cephaloceles (17,

    20). During embryological development, the anterior

    sphenoid bone (presphenoid), the lesser wings, the posterior

    sphenoid bone (basisphenoid), the greater wings and the

    lateral pterygoid processes are built up rst as independent

    cartilaginous precursors. At the third month o etal lie

    ossication o the cartilaginous precursors starts rom 18 to

    19 ossication centers (22).

    Union o the various ossied components results in ormation

    o the complex sphenoid bone (16). Bony usion o the greater

    wings with the presphenoid/basisphenoid starts in its anterior

    portion. Posteriorly usion can be incomplete, creating a

    lateral craniopharyngeal canal (Sternbergs canal). Sternbergs

    observations showed incomplete usion o the greater wings

    and presphenoid in lower mammals (e.g. Paradigitatae).The

    development o the sphenoid sinus starts with usion o the

    sphenoid turbinates (ossicula Bertini) and sphenoid bone. At

    the age o 3 to 4 years this connection is expected (23).

    The shape o the later sphenoid sinus depends on the

    various extent o pneumatization due to bone absorption. A

    congenital bony deect resulting rom incomplete usion o

    the dierent sphenoid bone components can communicate

    with the sphenoid sinus ater the necessary pneumatization

    has taken place. However, as extensive pneumatization othe sphenoid sinus usually results in only a thin bony border

    to the intracranial space, the prevalence o the sphenoid

    sinus border disorders in the development o acquired bony

    dehiscences has to be considered (13).It is important to take

    into account that usion planes oer special resistance to

    pneumatization to dierentiate between a congenital and an

    acquired non-traumatic bony deect in the sphenoid sinus.

    Consequently, sphenoidal cranial base deects at usion planes

    are more likely to be o congenital origin than the acquired

    type. The lateral craniopharyngeal canal (Sternbergs canal)

    may act as the site o origin o congenital meningoceles or

    cerebrospinal fuid stulas when there is sucient sphenoid

    sinus pneumatization (26).

    Traumatic or spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea make up 4% o

    the cases. These are subdivided into normal pressure and

    high pressure leaks. High-pressure leaks include tumors and

    hydrocephalus. They are due to long-standing increases in

    intracranial pressure and account or 45% o spontaneous

    leaks. Increased pressure in the subarachnoid space orces CSF

    through a weak or potential pathway. Normal pressure leaks

    account or 55% o cases. They are thought to be due to slow

    erosion o the skull base secondary to normal fuctuations

    in intracranial pressure leading to point erosion and CSF

    rhinorrhea. 90% originate rom a congenital or potential

    pathway such as a persistent craniopharyngeal canal. Direct

    erosion o the skull base by tumor or inections make up theremaining 10%. In either case, the initial leak is requently

    precipitated by coughing, sneezing or straining (22).

    CT cisternography, 3D reconstructed multislice CT scan and

    MRI provide excellent three-dimensional denition o the

    lesion useul or both diagnosis and surgical planning (2,5),

    and to classiy other related intracranial anomalies.

    The treatment o intranasal basal meningoencephaloceles

    is solely surgical. Although the rst successul operation

    or intranasal meningoencephalocele was perormed via a

    transmaxillary route (6), an intracranial approach have been

    widely adopted more recently (10,11,15,21,22,24) as well.

    I the deect in the skull base is small, an endoscopic transnasalapproach can be considered to reduce surgical complications

    (25). The endoscopic approach also provides the most

    fexibility or visualization and exact localization o the deect

    site. However, in some cases like our case, the endoscopic

    approach may be unsuccessul. Failure with the endoscopic

    approach may be related to inaccurate localization o the

    deect, insucient grat size and its displacement, incomplete

    apposition o the grat to the skull base deect, and non-

    compliance o the patient with post-operative instructions

    (9). Beore deciding on the operative approach, the site

    and size o the meningoencephalocele and the associated

  • 7/29/2019 pdf_JTN_974

    4/4

    Turkish Neurosurgery 2012, Vol: 22, No: 2, 242-245 245

    Samadian M. et al:Intrasphenoidal Meningoencephalocele

    12. Jabre A, Tabbaddor R, Samaraweera R: Transsphenoidal

    meningoencephalocele in adults. Surg Neurol 54: 183188,

    2000

    13. Kauman B, Nulsen FE, Weiss MH, Brodkey JS, White RJ, Sykora

    GF: Acquired spontaneous, nontraumatic normalpressure

    cerebrospinal fuid stulas originating rom the middle ossa.

    Radiology 122:379387, 1977

    14. Kitakara Y, Tagaki H, Ichikava F, Yamada M, Ootsuka E: Basal

    encephalocele: A report o two cases and consideration o

    its pathogenetic classication. No shinkei Geka 16:983-988,

    1988

    15. Kumar KK, Ganapathy K, Sumathi V, Rangachari V, Sundara-

    rajan I, Govindaraj R: Adult intranasal meningoencephalocele

    presenting as a nasal polyp. J Clin Neurosci 12:594-596, 2005

    16. Nager G T: Cephaloceles. Laryngoscope 97:7784, 1987

    17. Peltonen E, Sedlmaier B, Brock M, Kombos T: Persistent cere-

    brospinal fuid rhinorrhea by intrasphenoidal encephalocele

    Zentralbl Neurochir 69:187-190, 2008

    18. Peter J C, Fieggen G: Congenital malormations o the brain:A neurosurgical perspective at the close o the twentieth

    century. Childs Nerv Syst 15: 635645, 1999

    19. Rowland CA, Correa A, Cragan JD, Alverson CJ: Are

    encephaloceles neural tube deects? Pediatrics 118:916-923,

    2006

    20. Schick B, Brors D, Prescher A: Sternbergs canal--cause o con-

    genital sphenoidal meningocele. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

    257:430-432, 2000

    21. Sekerci Z, Iyign O, Bari S, Cokluk C, Bozkurt G, Rakunt C,

    Celik F: Intranasal (transethmoidal) encephalomeningocele.

    Case report. Neurosurg Rev 18:123126, 1995

    22. Starck D: Embryologie. Stuttgart: Thieme-Verlag, 1975: 582

    603

    23. Van Alyea OE: Sphenoid sinus. Anatomic study, with

    consideration o the clinical signicance o the structured

    characteristics o the sphenoid sinus. Arch Otolaryngol

    34:225253, 1941

    24. Vergoni G, Antonelli V, Veronesi V, Servadei F: Spontaneous

    cerebrospinal fuid rhinorrhoea in anteromedial temporal

    occult encephalocele. Br J Neurosurg 15:156-158, 2001

    25. Wormald P J, McDonogh M: Bath-plug technique or the

    endoscopic management o cerebrospinal fuid leaks. J

    Laryngol Otol 111:10421046, 1997

    26. Yucel A, Degirmenci B, Yilmaz MD, Altuntas A: [Spontaneous

    trans-sphenoidal encephalocele presenting with nontrau-

    matic cerebrospinal fuid rhinorrhea (case report). Tani Giri-

    sim Radyol 10:196-199, 2004

    malormations should be properly determined by detailed

    neuroradiological examination

    ConCluSIon

    Careul preoperative assessment and localization o the

    sphenoid deect and a thorough understanding o underlying

    etiologies are necessary in the selection o the best possible

    surgical approach and skull base rebuilding or repair o

    sphenoid sinus CSF leaks and meningoencephaloceles. In

    this case, endoscopic technique was not successul and

    transcranial repair was thereore perormed with right side

    pterional craniotomy.

    ACknowledGeMenT

    The authors would like to thank Farzan Institute or Research

    and Technology or technical assistance.

    ReFeRenCeS

    1. Abiko S, Aoki H, Fudaba H: Intrasphenoidal encephalocele.

    Neurosurgery 22: 933936, 1988

    2. Blaivie C, Lequeux T, Kampouridis S, Louryan S, Saussez S:

    Congenital transsphenoidal meningocele: Case report and

    review o the literature. Am J Otolaryngol 27:422-424, 2006

    3. Daniilidis J, Vlachtsis K, Ferekidis E, Dimitriadis A: Intrasphe-

    noidal encephalocele and spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea. Rhi-

    nology 37: 186189, 1999

    4. David D J: Cephaloceles classication pathology and

    management: A review. J Cranioac Surg 4:192202, 1993

    5. Diebler C, Dulac O: Cephaloceles clinical and neuroradiologi-

    cal appearance associated cerebral malormations. Neurora-

    diology 25: 199216, 1983

    6. Fenger C: Basal hernias o the brain. Am J Med Sci 62: 117,1895

    7. Giunta G, Pappagallo G, Piazza I, Girardi A: A rare case o

    recurrent meningitis: Intranasal encephalocele. Minerva Med

    81:577-581, 1990

    8. Gra von SF: Keilbein Ossphenoidale. In von Bardeleben K,

    Disse J (eds) Skelettlehre. Handbuch der Anatomie. Jena:

    Fischer Verlag 1896: 125148

    9. Greenberg J: Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea. Available rom:

    http://www.bcm.edu/oto/grand/120398.html. Access 1 May

    2010

    10. Hayashi T, Hashimoto T, Anegawa S, Utsunomiya H:

    Transethmoidal encephalomeningocele in neonate: Report

    o two cases and review o literatures. No To Shinkei 42:175-182, 1990

    11. Izquierdo M, Gil-Carcedo LM: Recurrent meningitis and

    transethmoidal intranasal meningoencephalocele. Dev Med

    Child Neurol 30: 248251, 1988