pcof: hearing on cost associated with retirement savings instruments in south africa
DESCRIPTION
PCOF: Hearing on cost associated with retirement savings instruments in South Africa. Francois Marais & Gerhard Joubert 10 November 2004. Cost of Savings for Retirement. Some issues. Actuarial paper vs newspaper articles. Mandatory vs voluntary funding. Saving vs investment. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Francois Marais & Gerhard Joubert10 November 2004
PCOF: Hearing on cost associated with retirement savings
instruments in South Africa
Cost of Savings for Retirement
Mandatory vs voluntary funding
Saving vs investment
Costs vs charges
Up-front vs as-and-when commission
Actuarial paper vs newspaper articles
Disclosure of charges
RIY vs “charge ratio”
Some issues
Actuarial Paper
Survey of National Systems
128 pages, 70 references
International context
Measuring charges
Lifetime charges internationally
Analysis of SA charges
Occupational pension funds
Unit Trusts
Individual RA policies
Excellent quantity and quality of research
Newspaper Articles
“Costs ravage your RA benefits”
“..high cost are reducing the benefits from RA’s by
almost 45%”“There is lack of transparancy in the life insurance industry”
“Sales people prefer to promote life assurance products because they receive commission up
front.”
“Time for life industry to come clean about costs”
Serious negative perceptions created
Quotes from actuarial paper
””Individual policies appear to be the most Individual policies appear to be the most expensive,expensive,but even here a blanket statement is but even here a blanket statement is dangerous and misleading.”dangerous and misleading.”
””There are a number of reasons that these There are a number of reasons that these figures should not be regarded as directly figures should not be regarded as directly comparable.”comparable.”
””Life policies … are (hopefully) sold under the Life policies … are (hopefully) sold under the umbrella of sound, holistic advice in the best umbrella of sound, holistic advice in the best interest of the policyholder, the cost of which interest of the policyholder, the cost of which is covered by commission.”is covered by commission.”
Mandatory vs Voluntary Funding
Mandatory vs Voluntary Funding Mandatory retirement systems (16 countries)
Economies of scale
No distribution cost
Occupational pension funds
Voluntary for employer, compulsory for employees
Very little individual advice or choice
Voluntary individual contributions (RA’s)
High level of personal advice and choice
Unit trust RA funds ?!
Main difference : need for and cost of advice
Investment vs Savings
Investment = lump sum business
Older clients, shorter terms (5 years)
Unit trusts, LISPS, single premium policies
Savings = recurring contributions
Younger clients, longer terms
Endowments; RA policies
Are Unit Trusts Cheaper?
On lump sum investments
Life policy often cheaper (short terms)
On recurring contributions
Policies with up-front commission more expensive
Comparison with unit trusts inappropriate
Unit Trust Industry
Total industry assets 30/09/04 303
R’bn
Annual cash flow
Total inflow 252
Total outflow 202
Net inflow 50 Sanlam Collective Investments
Total inflow 14
Regular investments 241m (1,7%)
Investments, not savings
Almost exclusively lump sum investments
Unit Trust RA Funds?
Insignificant volumes
Limited provision for distribution cost
Unrealistic as solution to problem
Serious flaw in actuarial paper
Up-front vs as-and-when Commission
Life industry (Regulated)
Up-front commission on most recurring premiums
Endowments, RA’s, life cover
As-and-when commission on single premiums (max 3%)
Unit trust and LISP’s (Unregulated)
Only as-and-when commission (no maximum)
Mainly lump sum investments
Recurring contributions = series of lump sums
Trail fee as % of assets
Costs vs Charges Costs ( = what institution pays)
Commission Marketing management cost Underwriting cost (on life cover) Administration cost Claims cost
Charges ( = what the client pays) Premium charges Fixed policy fee (e.g. R10) % of premium (e.g. 3%) Buy / sell spread (e.g. 2%) Fund charges
% of assets (e.g. 1,5% p.a.)
Reasons for different charges
Fairness between policies with different terms and size
Example of 1% fund charge
Fund size R1 000 R100 000
Fund charge R10 R1 000
Premium charge : more effective over short term
Fund charge : more effective over long term
Fixed charge : affects small policies
Disclosure of Charges In terms of FAIS and PPR:
Full disclosure of all charges required
All commission must also be disclosed
In terms of new LOA Code on Policy Quotations:
All charges must be discribed and quantified in one section
RIY must be calculated on full actual expense charges
Required Investment Return = Projection rate + RIY
RIR must be printed immediately below projected values
Full clear disclosure
RIY vs Charge Ratio Reduction in yield (RIY)
Same as fund charge as % of assets
Easy to understand
In line with way charges are recouped annually
Charge ratio
Equal to reduction in maturity value
Highly dependant on term
Exaggerates effect of reasonable RIY over long term
Should be used responsibly
Comparison of measures
RIY
Term
10 20 30 40
1% p.a.
2% p.a.
8%
16%
16% 23% 30%
30% 41% 51%
Charge ratio
Stakeholder pensions in UK could not work Stakeholder pensions in UK could not work on 1%on 1%
Charge ratio over 40 year term?
Distribution of RA policy terms
Average unit trust investment term
Term
% policies
<19 20 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39
22% 49% 20% 7%
<40
2%
Money Market 1,3 yearsEquity Funds 2,1 yearsOffshore Funds 3,5 years
Fundamental policy choice
Compulsory contractual saving with limited advice and low cost
Voluntary savings with personal advice at reasonable cost
or
Thank you!