pc ti pe pe1 ae mmmm copyright © pacific crest 2000 pe2 pacific crest 906 lacey ave. suite 211...
TRANSCRIPT
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Pacific CrestPacific Crest906 Lacey Ave. 906 Lacey Ave.
Suite 211Suite 211Lisle, IL 60532Lisle, IL 60532
(630) 737-1067(630) 737-1067fax (630) 737-0881fax (630) [email protected]@pcrest.c
omomwww.pcrest.comwww.pcrest.com
Overview
Faculty Developme
nt
Publishing
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Pacific CrestPacific Crest is an educational consulting and publishing company working to improve the quality of educational outcomes by focusing on five key processes: teachingteaching,, learning learning,, mentoring mentoring,, curriculum designcurriculum design,, and assessmentassessment..
• worked with higher education for the past 17 years
• visited more than 1,800 colleges and universities
• facilitated faculty development events for more than 12,000 faculty
• worked with more than 20,000 students in classroom situations
Faculty Faculty
DevelopmentDevelopment
PublishingPublishing
ConsultingConsulting
Faculty Faculty
DevelopmentDevelopment
PublishingPublishing
ConsultingConsulting
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Faculty Faculty DevelopmentDevelopment Improving faculty Improving faculty performance with key performance with key processes essential to a processes essential to a quality educational system.quality educational system.• Teaching Institutes
• Curriculum Design Institutes
• Program Assessment Institutes
• Interactive Learning System Institutes
• Discipline-specific Institutes
• Workshops
• Learning to Learn Camps
Chronology
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
PublishingPublishingProcess-oriented
curricula
Pacific Crest publishes curricula which support educators who utilize active learning approaches, and seek to challenge their students to develop learning and
self-assessment skills, as well as learn content.
Curriculum Offerings Faculty Resources
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample Sample Curriculum Curriculum OfferingsOfferings
• Foundations of Learning & Activities book
• Learning Assessment Journal
• Foundations of Problem Solving
• Life Vision Portfolio
• Foundations of Prealgebra & Algebra
• Gateway to Business
• Information Literacy: Guidebook and Journal
• Curriculum for psychology, biology, chemistry, human sexuality, and math courses.
Customized special package
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Customized Curriculum Customized Curriculum
PackagePackageIntroduce Process Education into any course
Package includes:
The Learning Assessment Journal
and
your choice of pages from Foundations of Learning and
the Activities book
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Faculty ResourcesFaculty Resources
• Institute Handbooks: Teaching, Curriculum Design,
Program Assessment, and Assessment
• Comprehensive Faculty Guidebook (being developed)
• Cognitive Level and Quality of
Writing Assessment
• Handbook on Cooperative Learning
• Classification of Learning Skills
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Curriculum Curriculum Design Design
InstitutesInstitutesCurriculum and its quality greatly influence the manner in which students learn and the way faculty teach.
By integrating learning theory into the design of active-learning curricula, students’ critical thinking and learning skills can be strengthened.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Interactive Interactive Learning Learning System System
InstitutesInstitutes
Integrating process-oriented curriculum with technology and the Web to improve the quality of the teaching and learning processes.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Program Program Assessment Assessment InstitutesInstitutes
The increasing demands of external accrediting organizations require institutions to take a new look at their programs and outcomes. A new set of questions is being asked and must be addressed.
The institute helps participants determine the quality desired in a program, clarify the program goals, and identify key processes which will help produce those qualities.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Discipline-specific Discipline-specific InstitutesInstitutes
Institutes for faculty within a particular discipline area — providing a forum to address discipline-specific issues.
Examples of past discipline-specific institutes
include: chemistry,
nursing,
developmental math, and
engineering.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
WorkshopWorkshopss
Categories of workshops include: • developing quality curricula• developing students' learning
skills• designing a quality course• assessment-related workshops• becoming a quality teacher• facilitating institutional change
Pacific Crest offers a wide variety of workshops which can be customized to meet the needs of your institution. Workshops range from ½ day to 2 days.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Learning to Learn Learning to Learn CampsCampsThe camp integrates two key processes, "learning how to learn" and "mentoring." A learning community
environment helps students to build relationships, gain a sense of "belonging" and improve their ability to perform in the classroom – all factors critical to student retention.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Chronology of Faculty Chronology of Faculty Development EventsDevelopment Events
1985 Commercial workshops for problem solving and statistics
1987 Half-day workshops for higher education focusing on
effective use of technology and curriculum design
1990 Organized first annual Problem Solving Across the
Curriculum Conference
1991 First Teaching Institute at Wells College, Aurora, NY
discipline-specific teacher workshop series in NY State
1992 4 Teaching Institutes during the summer
Faculty development workshop series, series of four
workshops focusing on problem solving and critical
thinking
1993 5 Teaching Institutes (5-day institutes)
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Chronology Chronology continuedcontinued1994 8 Teaching Institutes
Workshops series on Process Education; four half-day workshops delivered to 24 colleges
1995 9 Teaching Institutes (including first 3-day institute)first Curriculum Design Institute & Learning to Learn
Camp
1996 15 Institutesfirst discipline-specific institute (nursing)One-day workshop on Process Education
1997 26 Institutes; first Advanced Teaching Institute
1998 & 1999 24 Institutes, 25 Institutes
2000 25 Institutes including Interactive Learning System, Program Assessment, and Facilitator’s Institute
2001 & 2002 New institutes: Student Success, Assessment, Designing Performance Measures, Faculty Development
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Teaching Teaching InstitutesInstitutes
Pacific Crest’s Objectives (Outcomes) for a Te
aching Institute
Teaching Institute Overview
Sample Agenda
Causes of Faculty Frustration
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Outcomes from a Outcomes from a Teaching InstituteTeaching Institute
Participants are able to...
• incorporate more process approaches in their teaching, learning, service, and research.
• value their role as mentors, and to better assess and measure the development of students’ learning skills.
• integrate new and improved student learning techniques and tools.
• implement new and improved teaching techniques and tools.
• incorporate existing process curricula and learn to design process curricula for use in their own courses.
• value the importance of self-assessment in the growth process and design strategies to make more use of specific assessment tools with students and themselves.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Teaching Teaching Institute Institute OverviewOverview
We want to present a model of Process Education so that participants learn from direct experience.
We want to address issues pertaining to student learning and faculty teaching (including teaching techniques, assessment, self-assessment, evaluation, curriculum design, mentoring).
Key activities include:Learning Process Methodology (LPM)Assessment MethodologySetting TI goals & measurable outcomesDesigning an active learning activity
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample Agenda—Day Sample Agenda—Day OneOne
Introductions of facilitators and
mentors
Overview of Process Education
Team Building activity
Team Goal Setting activity
Teaching the Reading Methodology
Learning Process Methodology
Facilitation Methodology
Creating a Productive Learning
Environment
Managing Learner Frustration
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample Agenda—Day Sample Agenda—Day TwoTwo
Team Reflection activity
Assessment Methodology
Comparing Assessment and Evaluation
Modeling a Process Education Classroom
Dialog with Students about Process Education
Discussion of the Student Session
Midterm Assessment
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample Agenda—Day Sample Agenda—Day ThreeThree
Team Reflection
Designing an Activity
Creating a Quality Learning
Environment
Consulting session
Strategic planning for the host
school
Assessment of the Teaching
Institute
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Causes of Faculty Causes of Faculty Frustration Frustration
• Experiencing an active learning environment from the perspective of a learner.
• Having to perform and work within a cooperative team.
• Dealing with the high level of self-assessment that is required throughout the Institute.
• Having to perform in public (among peers) with explicitly defined performance criteria.
• Coming to the realization that the role of a faculty member in Process Education offers many new challenges and opportunities.
• Lacking proper preparation for an event of this nature.
• Handling the amount of ownership and responsibility that is shifted to Institute participants.
• Juggling three roles simultaneously during the Institute—that of learner, teacher, and researcher.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Cooperative Cooperative Learning Learning
Team RolesTeam Roles
Captain Optimist
Recorder Skeptic
Reflector Technology specialist
Spokesperson
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Introductions and Introductions and Team Building Team Building
ActivityActivityWhyWhy
Introductions serve as a good first step toward helping participants get to know each other and provide an opportunity to become familiar with personal objectives and reasons for participating in the Teaching Institute.
A quality learning environment requires creating and building a sense of familiarity and trust among the participants who share common goals. The skills of interviewing and making introductions are transferable to other social situations and help to create a positive, trusting environment.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Introductions and Introductions and Team Building Team Building
ActivityActivity
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
1. Form initial teams and get to know more about your
fellow participants and why they are at the Institute.
2. Begin the process of team building.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Introductions and Introductions and Team Building Team Building
ActivityActivity
Performance CriterionPerformance Criterion
Your knowledge and ability to relate to team members
Factor 1: knowing every team member’s name and
discipline
Factor 2: knowing one reason why each team member is
participating in this Institute
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Constructing Team Constructing Team GoalsGoals
WhyWhy
Working within a base group or team is an integral part of this
Teaching Institute. The process of constructing team goals serves
to bring additional focus to what can be accomplished and gained
by individual participants. The integration of individual goals into
team goals sets a direction for the team and helps facilitate the
process of team building.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Constructing Team Constructing Team GoalsGoals
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
1. Share personal goals and objectives for the Institute.
2. Create team goals with measurable outcomes to increase
cooperation and begin creating a friendly, trusting learning
environment.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Constructing Team Constructing Team GoalsGoals
Performance CriteriaPerformance Criteria
1. Generate a synthesized list of your team’s three main goals and associated
outcomes.
Factor 1: goals are action oriented
Factor 2: team goals represent input from all team members
Factor 3: outcomes are measurable
2. Ability to follow and meet requirements for performance within your team
role;
Factor 1: Captain directs the team to complete the Plan within the
given time constraints
Factor 2: Recorder uses the appropriate form and accurately records
team goals and outcomes
Factor 3: Reflector is able to provide an Oral Reflector’s Report if
called upon the by the facilitator
Factor 4: Spokesperson is able to clearly articulate the teams goals
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Teaching the Teaching the Reading Reading
MethodologyMethodology
WhyWhy
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Teaching the Teaching the Reading Reading
MethodologyMethodology
Learning Learning ObjectivesObjectives
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Teaching the Teaching the Reading Reading
MethodologyMethodology
Performance Performance CriteriaCriteria
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Reading QuizReading QuizLearning Process Learning Process MethodologyMethodology
1. How many steps are there in the Learning Process Methodology (LPM)? Level 1– information
2. Which step(s) in the LPM help the learner improve future learning performance? Level 2 – comprehension
3. How could you effectively use the LPM in your class?
Level 3 – application
4. How can methodologies be used to improve students’ use of processes? Level 4 – problem solution
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Learning Process Learning Process Methodology Methodology
ActivityActivity
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Managing Learner Managing Learner FrustrationFrustration
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Team ReflectionTeam Reflection
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Assessment Assessment MethodologyMethodology
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Midterm Midterm AssessmentAssessment
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Modeling the Design Modeling the Design
of an Activityof an Activity
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Overview of Overview of Process EducationProcess Education
The need The need for changefor change
in higher education in higher education has lead to has lead to research, study, and research, study, and thethe
articulation articulation of a philosophyof a philosophy
which is which is based based uponupon
certain certain principlesprinciples
which require the which require the utilization of utilization of certaincertain
processesprocessesand toolsand tools
which which producproducee
learning and learning and assessment skillsassessment skills
in students in students which leads to which leads to development development ofof
self-self-growersgrowers
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Process EducationEducation
• Process Map for Process Education• Knowledge Tables• Key Concepts associated with PE• Key Processes associated with PE• Tools associated with PE• Way of Being for a Process Educator• Bloom’s Taxonomy and PE• The Learning College• Levels of Knowledge• Creating a Productive Learning Envir
onment
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process EducationProcess Education (cont.)(cont.)
• Levels of Learner Performance• Profile of a Quality Learner• Excerpt from American Imperative• Classification of Learning Skills• Accelerator Model• Components of a Life Vision Portfolio
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Process Education...Education...
• is an educational philosophy focusing on the improving
students’ learning skills and creating “self-growers.”
• is a philosophy which utilizes an approach of continuous
quality improvement with respect to the key educational
processes of learning, teaching, mentoring,curriculum design,
assessment,
and administration.
• involves the use of innovative concepts, processes, and tools
to create environments which are instructive, enlightening,
and assist students in improving their learning and self-
assessment skills.
PEPEPEPE
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Paradigm ShiftParadigm Shift
““A paradigm shift is taking hold in American A paradigm shift is taking hold in American
higher education. In its briefest form, the higher education. In its briefest form, the
paradigm that has governed our colleges is this: A paradigm that has governed our colleges is this: A
college is an institution that exists to provide college is an institution that exists to provide
instructioninstruction. .
Subtly but profoundly we are shifting to a new Subtly but profoundly we are shifting to a new
paradigm: A college is an institution that exits to paradigm: A college is an institution that exits to
produce produce learninglearning. This shift changes everything. It . This shift changes everything. It
is both needed and wanted.”is both needed and wanted.”
“ From Teaching to Learning–A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education” by Robert B. Barr and John Tagg. Change, November/December
1995
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Excerpt from Excerpt from “An American “An American Imperative”Imperative”
Traditionally, the acquisition of skills essential
to life and work has been considered a by-
product of study, not something requiring
explicit attention on campus. We know of only
a handful of the nation's colleges and
universities that have developed curricular
approaches similar to, for example, the list of
critical skills by the Secretary of Labor's
Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills
(SCANS).
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
But skills such as these— written and oral communication, critical analysis, interpersonal competence, the ability to obtain and use data, the capacity to make informed judgments, and the skills required in community life— are essential attributes of a liberal education when they are accompanied by discipline-based knowledge. These skills can be learned. If they are to be learned, however, they must be taught and practiced, not merely absorbed as a result of unplanned academic experience.
“An American Imperative–Higher Expectations for Higher Education,” Wingspread Group on Higher Education, Copyright ©1993, The Johnson Foundation, Inc.
excerpt continuedexcerpt continued
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Map for Process Process Map for Process EducationEducation
MENTORSMENTORSMENTORSMENTORS
growthgrowthgrowthgrowth
facilitate the
of
studentsstudentsstudentsstudents peerspeerspeerspeers
with respect to
&
Learning Processes & SkillsLearning Processes & SkillsLearning Processes & SkillsLearning Processes & Skills
KnowledgeKnowledgeKnowledgeKnowledge
to accelerate the construction of
recognizing &
respecting respecting the Individualthe Individual
respecting respecting the Individualthe Individual
use all types and forms of AssessmentAssessmentAssessmentAssessment
guided by
Quality Quality MeasuresMeasures
Quality Quality MeasuresMeasures
to
learn, create, design, applylearn, create, design, applylearn, create, design, applylearn, create, design, apply
CurriculumCurriculumCurriculumCurriculum
Teaching Teaching Techniques & Tools Techniques & Tools
Teaching Teaching Techniques & Tools Techniques & Tools
LearningLearningEnvironmentEnvironment
LearningLearningEnvironmentEnvironment
Learning Learning Techniques & Tools Techniques & Tools
Learning Learning Techniques & Tools Techniques & Tools
what to do
how to do it
the following:
harmonizing with
FacilitationFacilitation Techniques & Tools Techniques & Tools
FacilitationFacilitation Techniques & Tools Techniques & Tools
ConstructiveConstructiveInterventionsInterventions
ConstructiveConstructiveInterventionsInterventions
EmpowermentEmpowermentEmpowermentEmpowerment
leading to
directed towards
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Map for Process Process Map for Process EducationEducation
Respecting the Respecting the IndividualIndividual
• Learning stylesLearning styles
• Personality Personality
differencesdifferences
(Myers-Briggs)(Myers-Briggs)
• Personal historyPersonal history
• Cultural backgroundCultural background
• Value systemsValue systems
• Life visionsLife visions
• Cognitive stylesCognitive styles
• Affect issuesAffect issues
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Map for Process Process Map for Process EducationEducation
EmpowermentEmpowerment
Self-Learner
• lifelong learning
• personal education plan
• strong learning skills
• good problem solver
• confident
Self-grower
• self-assesses
• self-mentors
• no limits
• servant leader
• mentors others
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Map for Process EducationProcess Map for Process Education
Facilitation Techniques Facilitation Techniques and Toolsand Tools
• learner-centered approach• quick start-up time• time regulation (time-pressured learning) to control
challenge level• real-time curriculum design• continuous assessment• expectation of high-level performance• challenging environment• judging versus standards• summarizing and debriefing
Facilitation Methodology
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Map for Process Process Map for Process EducationEducation
Constructive Constructive InterventionsInterventionsSupport Techniques• empathy• listening• “being there”• provide more “rungs”
Critical Questions• directed• convergent• divergent• indirect
Declaratives• answers• “just-in-time” lectures• doing something• directive
Control Techniques• inventorying• redirection• rephrasing• planning
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Process Map for Process Process Map for Process EducationEducation
Quality MeasuresQuality Measures
Processes
• robust
• coordinated
• precise
• economical
• timely
• adaptive
Outcomes• unified• clear• logical• aesthetic• meaningful• authoritativ
e• sensitive
In general
• effective
• efficient
• accurate
• flexible
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Principles of Process Principles of Process EducationEducation
1.Each person’s learning processes can always be improved.
2.There is no measurable limit to one’s potential for learning; one’s potential is not constrained by perceived ability.
3.At times, everyone requires help with learning, but one’s goal is to become a capable, self-sufficient learner.
4.Methodologies serve to model processes and are extremely helpful for learning to use processes more effectively.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Principles of PE Principles of PE (continued)(continued)
5.Educators must assess their students regularly; not only for purposes of feedback, but also to model the assessment process and help students learn to self-assess better.
6.An empowered learner is able to effectively use learning processes and self-assess to improve future learning and performance.
7.A quality learning environment involves facilitators who focus on improving students’ learning skills in specific defined areas through timely, appropriate, and constructive interventions.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Principles of PE (continued)Principles of PE (continued)
8.An educational system can be continually improved by:
a. improving the quality of instruction
b. improving the management of the educational system with better performance criteria and measures
c. improving the quality of curricula
d. empowering learners to continually improve their performance in the context of the defined system
9.Implementation of Process Education involves utilizing a set of ideas, processes, and tools, which improve through ongoing research and application with continuous quality assessment.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Levels of Learner Levels of Learner PerformancePerformance
• Trained individuals• Learned individuals• Lifelong learners• Enhanced learners• Self-growers
Profile of a Quality Learner
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Self-growersSelf-growers
• Seek to improve their own learning
performance with every experience.
• Create their own challenges.
• Serve as a leader and mentor to others.
• Take control of their own destiny —there are no bounds.
• Self-assess and self-mentor to facilitate their own
growth.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Profile of a Quality Profile of a Quality LearnerLearner
• is an active participant in the learning process
• focuses on improving his/her learning skills
• takes individual responsibility for learning
• has developed a life vision
• seeks to continually develop his/her self-assessment
skills
• makes use of and applies appropriate tools on a
regular basis
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Processes and Tools Processes and Tools used in Process used in Process
EducationEducation
Faculty Processes
Faculty Tools
Student Processes
Student Tools
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Student Student ProcessesProcesses
• language development• writing• reading• information processing• literary analysis• mathematical
reasoning• communication• self-management• teamwork
• critical thinking• problem solving• personal
development• educational planning• creating a life vision• self-assessment• journal writing• tool usage• research
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Faculty Faculty ProcessesProcesses
• mentoring• assessment• evaluation• communication• facilitation• planning• peer coaching• curriculum
design
• designing a syllabus• building knowledge maps• constructing methodologies• designing performance
criteria• developing performance
measures• producing a quality
learning environment
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Student Tools used Student Tools used in PEin PE
• learning journals• methodologies• study groups• peer assessments• peer tutoring• portfolios• Internet• software tools
• mentors• learning assessment
journals• interactive learning
systems• self-assessment papers• life vision plan• undergraduate research• learning communities
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Faculty Tools used Faculty Tools used in PEin PE
• active learning• guided-discovery learning• applied critical thinking• structured self-reflective
thought• open-ended labs• constructive interventions
• cooperative learning• journal writing• technology• project work• facilitation• problem-based
learning
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Classification of Learning Classification of Learning SkillsSkills
CognitiveDomain
SocialDomain
AffectiveDomain
PsychomotorDomain
Language Development & Assessment and Evaluation
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Cognitive DomainCognitive DomainProcesses and General Skill Processes and General Skill AreasAreas
InformationInformation ProcessingProcessing
Collecting Data
Generating Data
Organizing Data
Retrieving Data
Critical Critical ThinkingThinking
Applying Knowledge
Modeling
Reasoning
Analyzing
Synthesizing
Creativity
Problem SolvingProblem Solving
Setting up the Problem
Structuring the Problem
Solving the Problem
Assessing Problem Solution(s)
ResearchResearchIdentifying Knowledge
NeedsDiscoveringPeer Review
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Social DomainSocial DomainProcesses and General Skill Processes and General Skill AreasAreas
CommunicatiCommunicationon
Creating the Message
Presenting the Message
Receiving the Message
Effective Use of Form
ManagementManagement
Managing Organizations
Managing Systems
Leadership
Managing Resources
TeamworkTeamwork
Team Building
Team Maintenance
Performing in a Team
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Affective DomainAffective DomainProcesses and General Skill Processes and General Skill
AreasAreas
Value Value DevelopmentDevelopment
Valuing Self
Valuing Others
Personal Personal DevelopmentDevelopment
Self Management
Emotional Management
Social ManagementEsthetic Esthetic DevelopmentDevelopment
Self expression
Cultural Appreciation
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Psychomotor DomainPsychomotor DomainProcesses and General Skill Processes and General Skill AreasAreas
WellnessWellness
Maintenance
Renewal
Motor Motor DevelopmentDevelopment
Physical Development
Motor IntegrationTool UsageTool Usage
Using Information Processing Tools
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Assessment Assessment and Evaluationand Evaluation
Designing an AssessmentDesigning an Assessment
Conducting an AssessmentConducting an Assessment
EvaluatingEvaluating
Reporting an AssessmentReporting an Assessment
Building VocabularyBuilding Vocabulary
Decoding Decoding CommunicationCommunication
Understanding syntaxUnderstanding syntax
Identifying SemanticsIdentifying Semantics
Identifying ContextIdentifying Context
Language Language DevelopmenDevelopmen
tt
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Bloom’s Taxonomy and Bloom’s Taxonomy and PEPE
Level Bloom’s Taxonomy Alternate Term Process Skill Area
1. Knowledge/facts Information baseInformationProcessing
2. Comprehension Knowledge Critical thinking
3. Application Knowledge skillHigher-order critical
thinking
4. Analysis Problem solution Problem Solving
5. Synthesis New knowledge Research
6. EvaluationPeer-reviewed
knowledgeAssessment
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
The Learning The Learning CollegeCollege
• Creates substantive change in individual learners.
• Engages learners in the learning process as full partners, assuming primary responsibility for their choices.
• Creates and offers as many options for learning as possible.
• Assists learners to form and participate in collaborative learning activities.
• Defines the roles of learning facilitators by the needs of the learners.
• Its learning facilitators succeed only when improved and expanded learning can be documented for its learners.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Knowledge Knowledge TableTable
Concept — an idea that represents a set of relationships
Process — a sequence of steps, events, or activities that results in a change or produces something over a period of time
Tool — any device, implement, instrument, or utensil that serves as a resource to accomplish a task
ContextContext — the whole situation, background, or conditions relevant to
the process
Way of being — the set of behaviors, actions, and use of language
associated with a particular discipline or knowledge area;
a culture
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Knowledge Table Knowledge Table (continued)(continued)
Knowledge Form Key Question Example
Concept What is it? Newton’s Laws
Process How do we do it? Problem solving
Tool What will we use? Spreadsheet
Context Where will we do it? Laboratory
Way of Being Why should we do it? Precision isimportant
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Way of Being for a Way of Being for a Process EducatorProcess Educator
• wants to see growth in others• trusts and respects students• is a risk-taker• is willing to shift control to students• can handle and adapt to change• has the desire to be a self-grower• enjoys assessment and is open to feedback• is a highly productive person• works well with others
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Key Concepts Key Concepts associated with associated with
Process EducationProcess Education• learner ownership
• empowerment
• self-grower
• mentor
• lifelong learner
• learning skills
• active learning
• life vision
• personal growth
• rate of learning
• mutually shared respect
• performance based learning
• levels of knowledge
• performance criteria
• adding value to process
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Key Processes Key Processes associated with associated with
Process EducationProcess Education• assessment
• mentoring
• learning
• facilitation
• teamwork
• problem solving
• constructive intervention
• grading/evaluation
• faculty development
• personal development
• activity management
• curriculum design
• program assessment
• creating methodologies
• peer coaching
• designing quality measures
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Tools associated Tools associated with Process with Process
EducationEducation• cooperative learning
• journals
• portfolios
• technologies
• activities
• foundations course
• learning communities
• methodologies
• concept models
• interactive learning systems
• Classification of Learning Skills
• learning assessment journal
• problem-based learning
• peer assessment
• self-growth paper
• reflection time
• laboratories
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Levels of KnowledgeLevels of Knowledge
Level 1 knowledge — informationLevel 1 knowledge — information
Level 2 knowledge— comprehensionLevel 2 knowledge— comprehension
Level 3 knowledge— applicationLevel 3 knowledge— application
low level 3– application within a single context
high level 3 – generalize across multiple
contexts
Level 4 knowledge— analysisLevel 4 knowledge— analysis
(a working expertise with the knowledge)
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Creating a Productive Learning Creating a Productive Learning EnvironmentEnvironment1. Establish initial respect.2. Start with no prejudging.3. Obtain shared commitment.4. Foster and support risk-taking.5. Permit the learner to fail.6. Set high expectations.7. Establish clear performance criteria.8. Implement a quality assessment system.9. Document performance.10. Continually challenge performance.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Accelerator ModelAccelerator Modelfocus on cognitive growthfocus on cognitive growth
ChallengChallengee
Cognitive Cognitive SkillsSkills eq
ual m
atch
line
(45o )
maximum
cognitive
growth line““Happy Zone”
Happy Zone”
ComplacencyBoredomDisengagement
Anxiety
Frustration
AngerDisengagement
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Accelerator ModelAccelerator Model3 axes3 axes
Challenge
Cognitive Skill Set
Affective Skill Set
Equal Match Line
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Components of a Components of a Life Vision PortfolioLife Vision Portfolio
• pre-assessment
• self analysis
• values analysis
• processing life’s difficulties
• role model exploration
• educational plan
• career search
• reflect on personal life issues
• time analysis
• resume/vita
• meaning of life
• passion exploration
• legacy
• synthesis
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Assessment Assessment and Evaluationand Evaluation
• Types of Assessment
• Comparison of Assessment and Evaluation
• Key Assessment Issues
• Example of an Assessment Design
• Grading Strategy for a Process Course
• Sample Evaluation/Grading System
• Course Assessment System
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Types of AssessmentTypes of Assessment
Assessments can be:• Formative – made on a continuous basis• Summative – occur at the end of a set time
frame or set number of performances • Real-time – made as a performance is
happening
Assessments can be performed by:• oneself, self-assessment• peers or colleagues, peer assessment• for others, either individually or in teams
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Comparison of Assessment and Comparison of Assessment and EvaluationEvaluation
EvaluationEvaluation determines if a standard was met; success or failure
Assessment Assessment provides feedback on performance; Strengths, Areas for Improvement, and Insights (SII)
Assessor provides feedback on how the performance can be improved
Assessor provides feedback on what were strengths of the performance and why
MeasurementMeasurement
Assessor provides clarification and meaning with insights about the performance
Measured performance
Low
High
using Standard 2 measured
performance was a success
using Standard 1measured
performance was a failure
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Key Assessment Key Assessment IssuesIssues
• meeting external accreditation requirements
• clarifying the difference between assessment & evaluation
• improving the quality of peer coaching
• assessing process as well as content
• creating quality performance measures
• improving the quality of real-time and formative assessment
• improving students’ self-assessment skills
• shifting from discreet evaluation of knowledge to continuous assessment of performance
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Example of an Assessment Example of an Assessment DesignDesign
Scenario:Scenario: a college faculty picnic
Purpose of the performance:Purpose of the performance: a time for community, enjoyment, and sharing among families
Purpose of the assessment:Purpose of the assessment: to measure the degree of fun and good times of the participants
Criterion:Criterion: quality of the weatherfactor 1:factor 1: air temperaturescale:scale: degrees Fahrenheit
factor 2:factor 2: amount of sunshinescale:scale: percentage of clouds/cloudiness
Criterion:Criterion: amount of activity by childrenfactor:factor:official games and contestsscale:scale: number of games and contests entered
per child
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Grading Strategy for a Grading Strategy for a Process CourseProcess Course
% of Total GradeDuring Class
(50–70%)Out of Class
(30–50%)
Group Work(20–35%)
Individual Work(65–80%)
detailed breakdown
detailed breakdown
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample In-class Sample In-class Grading StrategyGrading Strategy
• Portfolios (10–20%)• Quizzes• Learning activities• Simple problem solving• Recorder’s reports• Reflector’s reports• Peer assessments• Presentations (5%)
• Exams (20–30%)• Portfolio (10%)• Quizzes (10%)• Essays (5%)
Group WorkGroup Work
Individual WorkIndividual Work
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample Out-of-class Sample Out-of-class Grading StrategyGrading Strategy
• Projects (5–10%)
• Take home exam
• Homework
• Problem solving exercises
• Learning Journal (10%)
• Assessment Journal (10%)
• Papers (10–20%)
• Problem solving activities (10%)
• Self-growth paper (10%)
Group WorkGroup Work Individual WorkIndividual Work
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Sample Evaluation/Grading Sample Evaluation/Grading SystemSystem
Group portfolio 15%
group project 10%
Midterm exams(2) 20%
Final exam 20%
Learning Journal 10%
Assessment Journal 10%
Paper 10%
Problem solving 5%
Midterm exams (3) 30%
final exam 20%
Learning journal 10%
Assessment Journal 10%
Project presentation 5%
Written report/project 10%
Problem solving 10%
Self-growth paper 5%
With Cooperative Learning
Without Cooperative Learning
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Course Assessment Course Assessment SystemSystem
Learning Outcomes:Learning Outcomes:
• differentiate between assessment and evaluation
• decide to create an assessment system
• allocate time for assessment
• describe the most important characteristics
• address the most important assessment issues
• determine what you and your students are going to assess
• utilize various methods of assessment
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
MethodologiesMethodologiesKey tools to help learn processes• Reading Methodology• Learning Process Methodology• Problem Solving Methodology• Assessment Methodology• Facilitation Methodology• Methodology for Designing a Course• Methodology for Designing a Guided-Discovery
Activity• Methodology for Creating Performance Measur
es• Methodology for Creating Methodologies
1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Reading Reading MethodologyMethodology
1. Establish purpose.
2. Set objectives and criteria.
3. Estimate time.
4. Skim and outline.
5. Understand vocabulary.
6. Read and question.
7. Assess and reread.
8. Synthesize information.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Learning Process Learning Process MethodologyMethodology LPMLPMLPMLPM
1. Why1. Why 8. Plan 8. Plan
2. Orientation2. Orientation 9. Model(s)9. Model(s)
3. Prerequisites3. Prerequisites 10. Critical Thinking10. Critical Thinking
4. Learning Objectives4. Learning Objectives 11. Transfer/Application11. Transfer/Application
5. Performance Criteria5. Performance Criteria 12. Problem Solving12. Problem Solving
6. Vocabulary6. Vocabulary 13. Self-assessment13. Self-assessment
7. Information7. Information 14. Research14. Research
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Problem Solving Problem Solving MethodologyMethodology
1. Define the Problem
2. Identify the Key
Issues
3. Collect and Assess
Information
4. Identify Assumptions
5. Break Problem Apart
6. Model Sub-Problems
7. Integrate Solutions
8. Test and Validate
9. Generalize the Solution
10. Communicate the
Solution
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Assessment Assessment MethodologyMethodology
1. Develop guidelines for the assessor to follow
when assessing a performance.
2. Design the methods used for the assessment.
3. Collect information during the performance.
4. Report the findings to the assessee.
S: S: I: I:
I: I:
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Facilitation Facilitation MethodologyMethodology
1. Define the outcomes of an activity.
2. Design, review, and prepare for an activity.
3. Decide which teaching/learning processes and tools are appropriate for each activity including the roles for the learners.
4. Pre-assess before an activity. Assess the level of students’ preparation.
5. Set up the activity. Make sure students have the why, learning objectives, performance criteria, resources, and general tasks for an activity. Performance criteria should be set in terms of both process and content.
6. Release the teams to pursue the activity.continuecontinuedd
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Facilitation Facilitation MethodologyMethodology
7. Assess team and individual performances.
8. Provide constructive interventions based on process not
content.
9. Bring all the teams back together at conclusion of the
activity.
10. Provide closure with inter-group sharing of performance.
Share quality performances that others can benefit from
and areas where performance needs improvement .
11. Use various forms of assessment to provide feedback to
students. Make regular use of oral reflector’s reports.
12. Follow up after class.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Methodology for Designing a Methodology for Designing a CourseCourse
1. Identify long-term behaviors.2. Identify key learning objectives.3. Identify key measurable learning outcomes
(competencies).4. Construct a knowledge map.5. Choose themes for the course.6. Create appropriate methodologies.7. Produce key performance criteria.8. Identify a set of activities.9. Identify 15 selected learning skills. 10. Locate or build key performance measures.11. Identify activity preference types. continuedcontinued
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Methodology for Designing a Methodology for Designing a CourseCourse12. Match activity types with chosen activities.
13. Allocate time across theme areas.
14. Choose 30 in-class and 30 out-of-class activities.
15. Sequence the activities across the themes.
16. Create individual activities from a priority list.
17. Enhance activities using technology.
18. Have the activities you create peer reviewed.
19. Design a course assessment system.
20. Design a course evaluation system.
21. Create a course syllabus.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Methodology for Methodology for Designing a Guided-Designing a Guided-Discovery ActivityDiscovery Activity
1. Identify the focus of the activity and choose the appropriate “key instrument” for the activity (methodology, model, simulation, etc.)
2. Identify the focus of the Select or develop the appropriate key instrument; provide a “Model.”
3. Choose an appropriate “Title.”
4. Create the “Why” for the activity.
5. Identify the “Learning Objectives.”
6. Define the “Criteria” for performance.
7. Create “Critical Thinking Questions.”
continuedcontinued
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Methodology for Methodology for Designing a Designing a Guided-Discovery Guided-Discovery Activity Activity (continued)(continued)
8. Identify pertinent and necessary “Resources” and “Information.”
9. Create a “Glossary” of relevant terms.
10. Write a “Plan” for the activity.
11. Develop “Skill Exercises.”
12. Determine an “Assessment activity.”
13. Design a “Problem solving project.”
14. Provide a “Research project.”
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
Methodology for Methodology for Creating Performance Creating Performance MeasuresMeasures1. Build a team.2. Identify a facilitator.3. Divide into work teams.4. Write a descriptive definition of the skill.5. Synthesize into a descriptive paragraph.6. Identify a skill expert.7. Brainstorm factors.8. Produce a top 10 list.9. Identify five qualitative labels.10. Develop five statements that clarify behaviors.11. Write parallel statements.12. Test the classification levels.
PC TITI PEPE PE1PE1 AEAE MMCopyright © Pacific Crest 2000 PE2
How to Create a How to Create a MethodologyMethodology1. Define the direction.
2. Identify the key issues.
3. Put into context.
4. Set criteria.
5. Inventory information and resources.
6. Logically order steps or activities.
7. Execute the methodology.
8. Assess each step.
9. Facilitate the process.
10. Assess performance.
Step 1Step 1