paying for water in california: prop 218 caitrin chappelle, associate center director april 28, 2015...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Paying for Water in California: Prop 218
Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director
April 28, 2015Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation
![Page 2: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The current drought highlights the crucial role of our water system
2
California’s economic, social, and environmental health all rely on a well-managed water system
A key ingredient for success is adequate funding
![Page 3: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Local agencies raise most of the $30+ billion spent annually
3SOURCE: Author estimates (various sources)
![Page 4: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Three constitutional reforms have made it harder to pay for local water services
1978 1996 2010Prop 13 Prop 218 Prop 26
• Property taxes reduced
• Local special taxes require 2/3 voter approval
• State taxes require 2/3 legislative approval*
* Ballot measures can still pass with simple majority (50%) of state voters
• General taxes no longer available to special districts
• Local property-related fees/assessments:
1. Property-owner protest hearings
2. Strict cost-of-service requirements
3. Floods and stormwater: new charges require 50% vote by property owners or 2/3 popular vote
• Stricter requirements on local non-property related fees and state regulatory fees (more likely to be taxes)
• Stricter cost-of-service requirements for wholesale agency fees
![Page 5: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Urban water and wastewater utilities are in relatively good fiscal health
Usually can raise rates to meet needs
Investments have improved urban drought-resilience
But looming concerns:– Rising costs (treatment standards, aging infrastructure, Delta)
– Legal obstacles to conservation pricing, portfolio-based management, lifeline rates 5
Source: Capital needs estimates from EPA Clean Drinking Water Survey (2013) and Clean Watershed survey (2008)
![Page 6: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
San Juan Capistrano Case
Good news: The judge rejected the notion that recycled water costs couldn’t be spread among all users.
Bad news: The ruling will significantly complicate tiered pricing. Tiered rates can be consistent with Prop 218, if agencies face increasing marginal costs for higher levels of supplies. But this isn’t a precise science.
Next steps: many rate structures are vulnerable, agencies need to make better cases, reform?
6
![Page 7: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
We face debilitating funding gaps in other areas
7
Overall gradeAnnual gap($ millions)
Water supply Passing (mostly) —
Wastewater Passing (mostly) —
Safe drinking water (small rural systems)
Failing $30–$160
Flood protection Failing $800–$1,000
Stormwater management Failing $500–$800
Aquatic ecosystem management
Failing $400–$700
Integrated management On the brink $200–$300
Total Annual Gap: $2–$3 Billion
![Page 8: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Stormwater management has been most hindered by constitutional reforms
New and growing regulatory mandate to manage pollution, not just drainage
Any new charge requires a vote – often at 2/3 supermajority – and beneficiaries are usually downstream
Costs are rising as regulations get stricter
8
The Los Angeles River watershed is expected to
reach “zero-trash”
![Page 9: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Stormwater capture is an example of integrated water management
Addresses pollution Augments water supply
Success requires– Breaking down management silos
– Raising funds Water bills can pick up part of the tab (for water supply benefits)
9
Green Streets in Burlingame
![Page 10: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
California needs to look beyond state bonds to close funding gaps
Gap areaAnnual gap
($ millions)
One-time infusion from
Prop 1 ($ millions)
Other long-term funding options
Safe drinking water in small rural systems
$30–$160 $260*
Statewide surcharges on water, chemical use
Flood protection
$800–$1,000 $395
Developer fees Property assessments Special state, local
taxes
Stormwater management
$500–$800 $200
Developer fees Property assessments Special state, local
taxes Surcharges on water,
chemical, or road use
Aquatic ecosystem management $400–$700 $2,845**
Special state, local taxes
Surcharges on water use, hydropower production
Integrated management $200–$300 $510
Special state, local taxes
Surcharges on water use
10
![Page 11: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Transparency and integration are key
Local agencies can make a better case– Communicate costs and needs to ratepayers
– Integrate to boost performance and funding options
State and federal agencies can help reduce costs– Get integrated– Improve regulatory efficiency– Crunch the numbers (models, data, analysis)
11
![Page 12: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Constitutional reforms may be needed
Allow portfolio-based water pricing Treat stormwater as regulatory fee Treat floods like water and sewer Allow lifeline rates Lower voting thresholds for special taxes
12
![Page 13: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The drought opens windows of opportunity for local and statewide action
13
Source: PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and their Government
![Page 15: Paying for Water in California: Prop 218 Caitrin Chappelle, Associate Center Director April 28, 2015 Supported by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062717/56649e4d5503460f94b425fe/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Notes on the use of these slides
15
These slides were created to accompany a presentation. They do not include full documentation of sources, data samples, methods, and interpretations. To avoid misinterpretations, please contact:
Caitrin Chappelle: 415-291-4435, [email protected]
Thank you for your interest in this work.