University
accessible at
into the Parmenides.
to find a place
contributions
;
exception.
Toward previous workers in the same field, many of them critics and
scholars
of
and give
than
a
British
Museum,
and
ended,
t«>
which
learning
in
all
discussing the
complete
deliverance
by
Diogenes
Laertius
held
to
which'
he
says,
(1)
particularly since
and Zeno ;
the text
were
very
the
Plato's
successor Xenocrates—
oi
314
B.C
the
remark
—
it
do
so,
wanting.
which he makes reference
observed that Galen dates
become
recognized
channels
of
royal
expenditure.
Perhaps
it
rejected
dialogues to have been set aside simply because of their late
admission
"
judgment
of
else
knew
nothing
anything to
:
been reconsidered.
enumerated in support of
find it.
cases in which
404
b,
16.
same,
but
more
is
Again,
Stallbaum,
in
his
copious
and
idescuraGodofr.
i
earneci
introduction
;
subject
in
things
in
ideas
Timaeus
[2S
C
referred
ideas
15.
i*
as has
once
Parmenides
and
some
ideal
theory
had
this
upon ideas
are discussed
pointedly and
Phaedo
Parmenidi
are
vocabulary of the Meta-
of Aristotle
the
latter
or
had
heard
Aristotle
lecturing,
and
the well-known
first
argument
and
resumed
in
by
Ueberweg,
the
last
clause.
it
iftlich
Bedeutsames
;
already
(we
may
bracket
has given
a pithy
declares
they stand at
them.
proved
to
while
it
treats
of
a
argument To
anyone who
explanation of
Plato should allow views so
like
his
own,
fancied it
see
it
may
I
hands
to
Plato
sophistical
Plato
regard
: but that
about systematic details,
under new circumstances lost faith in old' conclusions, which was
as much
a
truism
to
say
universe has
yet met
that which
that
composition.
So
in
the
Republic
-
277)
also
agrees
that this
II.
When
question
would
be
prepared
other writers adduce reasons for choosing
intermediate
you
will.'
The
language of the dialogue, that of
what may be
is
are
wish
The Symposium is at third,
the
to
style
in
a
and
Parmenides
constrained
to
in this list,
the
works
into
(It
rejecting ten
the later
and is
follows
the
inquiry
up
in
other
with
much
ingenuity
individual
books
J
ahrbScher
i2=,
p.
534,
iS8r
of
far
In any
with
this by
Steinhardt,
from
the
final
work. As
to be remote
has much
is
the
original
conversation,
which,
on
the
before
us
are-
to have been governed
greater
belongs
to
it.
dialogue
promised
in
p.
coupled it as
clearly with the
as the
missing work.
been altogether changed.
an
exposition
of
Plato's
there were
ideas for
is drawn that the
appealed
to
in the ideas,
most candid avowals
in all Plato's
distributed
piecemeal
under
the
various
divisions
that
he
has
purposely
describing
his
con-
versation
with
tJj
as
follow
its
method
later stands the Par-
the
dialogue the
direct dramatic
ideal
theory,
not
only
mood
,
being
so,
specific,
contained
in
the
Theaetetus,
works
are
holds that it precedes
Sophistes. Again, he
must
be
plead
age
as
a
reason
for
\JsevSerai.
he
treats
a conclusion
clear that
the Timaeus
earlier
than
of
Teichmuller regards
this as
These
indications
Teichmuller
would
appear
set
almost
aside.
No
one
who
the youth of
represented
as
which
had
led
regulative
a
somewhat
is a just
of necessity be
conception of the idea
you
is there
so much as a hint of difference in this particular between
one
idea
and
another.
Here
that it will need
point
Plato
dialogue
in
which
a
with the problem
is later than
of
Republic, the construction
the
is
there
ideal sphere.
into which
is
would still
some
reason
precision. The
of Aristotle
is in
precipitate' what
the view
the two
bear a
such
a
sun
is
called
the
reasoning.
These
faults
resolve
themselves
character
which
will
so
attempt re-
youth enjoyed the
;
point is pressed
while the methods of argument practised
by the historic Socrates are sufficient to meet the wants of unsystematic ethical
inquiries,
are
to
be
built
And
the
inference
preliminary training
—
to the
and to
the
methods
and
arguments
of
Socrates,
the
most
expert
dialecticians
fail
to
reason
badly
at
times
and
the point where
8. While Plato in this
dialogue
to view such expressions
as pointing to a
adduced
in
favour
"I
the
view
tint
Parmenidea
takes
.1
the scope
question
what is said. Our
place it, for example,
the Republic. If scholars
are right in speaking
habit of
in
as historic.
can profess
for
in
made
by
some deduction must
be made. It
direct references
case, then we have
might mean
little, but
we have
was
young
only
when
2
and cites
be
aide,
are
much
Socrates fifteen, 1
strike
a
very
reasonable
mean.
This
He
to
only
by
a
for
a
no
be
as
rather
tell
in
favour
of
the
some
older
descended, we might
Nor would
which introduces fresh
in
declaring,
regards the discussed
familiarly
youthful hesitancy,
subject
be
a
delusion,
way
those tenets
is unquestionably
Take the
every
hypothesis.
whatever
assign these
or to
then, are
historic veracity ? It
at
Athens,
same time
interlocutors
are
but
his
the same
connection ? If
Phaedr.
a6i
d.
as historic—though it may well
be
but
another
involved
principally
the
former.
Between
the
accredited
statements
following items of correspondence may be noted. It is a
well-known
assumption
exist,
are
infinitely
divisible.
the
and
at
of
Parmenides; but
case of
as
so
far
which Plato has thought
his
views
embodied
in
practical
legislation,
is
not
to consider all
aspects of the
notice.
points, and
from
a
want
subject,
bis
Parmenides alone is
sufficient to show
is concerned.
Before entering
limited
;
a sufficiency of information from
authoritative sources, and after assimilating
that, to
take the
course which
to be the negative, as the latter is
the positive,
126-129 e.
poem,
after
like many expounders
view. Accordingly
his
poem
he
takes
up
done
wide
while
essential importance?
One might,
Socrates was
admitting the
unanswerable character
world
of
sense
statement
elsewhere.
It
be
in nature.' Plato's
brings
(i.) Are
'and
all
admitted.'
as
we
of Zeno
above,
inadequate.
of their
objects
a
shudder.
To
modern diplomacy, an
question
further
step
to
be
a
necessity.
Enlargement
And
point,
although
is
one
a
narrower
which
he
of the landscape
'
ascribe justly
but
3)
found
developed
idea
may
The
assumption
object represents, so
made, into which
;
to be a
as we have
one
a genealogical tree or
to
one
—not to be the
hope
field for comparison
—the indefinite mass
so
it .m<l
suggestion about thoughts thinking
must
in
to
them.'
It
On
this
new-
development
his attack.
The arguments
the
objections
moment
told in
extent of
all
privilege,
even
the
privilege
of unsullied purity, that it is out of contact with the stream
which
that circumstance too
is emphasized just
like
shoe on, though
self-criticism,
make
any
that
to
certain
as
we
have
just
seen,
is
perfectly
of
implies,
ideas
corresponding
to
every
branch
of
(-
)
ideas
is
be
partaken
of
by
when they
reasoning
which
:
the only
limit is
cannot
be
it
as
the
it solely
because they
They consist ofp
which
this is expressly affirmed
manifestly
untenable
separateness of
the ideal
sphere he
announces that
idea
of
tji
to
individual
should
he
not
translate
in
its
literal
sense
ideas for 'you, and
should
have
in
the
ideal
world,
phaedo
109
sq.
to
Beulah.
with
his
view
capable
of
thinking?
are
and
that if
the ideal
difficulty about
at
all
they
reason assigned by
the
question of ideas here at all is that he may see
the same contradictory
said
out that
many
sees
proof
Phaedo, however,
in
simplicity
'
ap-
The
idea
be admitted at
Heraclitus,
ing
this
theory
as
correct.
And
accepting
as
applied to a
Yet
of
pattern for all,
the
Ka:u
be an
this
sphere.'
have
repeated
without
to
sense
or
than
The
dualistic
assumption
advance the
earnest-
J'a-m.
need.
It
test the method the ideas
of
'the
beautiful,
confined,
Noi
histoi
t
I
disi
to
th<
single
contention
'if
tin•
many
are,
simply
what
it
affects
to
be—
an
example,
namely,
the
;
l'esprit.'
What
Plato
upon the_
more
and
enigmatical,
in
which
hidden
and
whimsical,
has
occurred
the
Antigone is the
'
of
'in
a
Last
century,
shall show
thought necessary in other
ment
than
any
point seems to
more
something more. Plato had
realize
of nebulous
any
regulative
together, and
with
which
the
dialogue
clo»
This
aeema
not
an
spheres—
which
is
thought
completeness. 'One'
.
satisfactory
? The
point
is
not
that conclusion.
to be the
;
find in
fulfil the
position
identical
with
seems to leave no
that
to
limits
of
on all
ideal
system
with
advantage.
the
exacting
this
as
the
best
important
division
These
these
«66
b.
limits ;
of
the
arising from
to pre-
negative, destructive,—
we
per se
\toward this consummation
plexity : do away
It
shows
what
Dr.
Jackson
says,
'when
row»
rhiioi
xi
tne
the
One
forms
a
centre
for
lies the
wh
it
passes
"tit
of
thought,
it
where qualiti
case is put
same result. As
he has shut
not
be
pressed
out
word,
goes
that
it.
is
the
Many
or
say
again
itself variety
And naturally
so. It
the argument
have
already
law
largely
One
of this
is with the view of clearing this up
that he
inserts unsymmetrically
Demonstration A
maybe; and
and
then
sum
total
of
characteristics,
which
include
m<
not
not':
our
in
uncertain
defective
as
a
repre-
law. That is not
be
overpressed.
Plato
no
doubt
seeks to
partly tends to show
place. What he wants
'
account
for
this
directed against
multiplicity. Plato,
is that his
a
swift
runner
can
overtake
a
from this he
deduces the impossibility
of motion. It may be urged in an ex parte manner that if Achilles cannot overtake
the
tortoise
to do it. As Being
and One are equally divided
,
'
through after
Plato,
of
comparison with
 
:
such is
what,
as
footing with itself— as
It is
the
One
seems
to
be
most
simple
consider that we have
to be man)-.
it cannot
true that One carries number
with
it.
To
plurality.
In
the question
When thought
Thus
just
not
carry
objective
being
with
it.
Plato
first principle
reach.
Thus
to absolutely
featureless Being
and it
is not
een that the One itself under treatment
into Many. Wli.it
discussion,
in
much more clearly
committed.
the
work
with
prince. And so with each tint of Being a separate
shade of Not-being will
ov,
the exact
thus it is
While such a One
but feel
that
it
ingle
out
an)
one
characteristic
given
above
of
natural
elementary character than
distinctness
a quality
that
division
and
Democritus
support
it
in
—that
simultaneously
with
the"
which,
if
we
please,
we
may
call
to be
One, but
of the
of
that
theory
we deal with
weighty
judg-
ment
its
: Can
even
an
ideal
Many
be
It
has
there is assumed
is
Not-being,
the
difficulty
constrained to
do not,
God,' and of which the characteristic is that it shuts
the original and now somewhat
despised
difficulty
•3>;•
his theory was
met the objections,
that
water
would
seemed
to
of subject
and object,
work,
even of
sense is swallowed
up in thought,
and yet suspect
p.
xiviii.
and
existence?
Or
are
we
not
rather
Parm.
134
f.
bound
filth/
in
their
then approach
we add qualities, and recede from it as we remove
them ?
Not
properly.
no connection with
individual things,
us take a
had vanished
separately dominate
the mind.
so to
?
Becoming ? Is
Becoming
to
piece
published
too
soon
Paris in
standard of
,
Greek has
groups by
as, with
of
it.
completeness
some
77
Mss.
It had
to be
which
indicates that his study
of them on a much
higher level
select
without
hesita-
tion
have
have reversed the
of
the
in
yet
one to
their
and
Jordan
the
mere
date, and the
Prom
the
entire
are several
would
t we
#
the Clarke Ms.
a copy
what
is
called
by
some medical definitions
another of
cor-
responds
to
that
of
of which
to be
of our Platonic
be well
to give on the one hand what seem to be the
data, and
to Rome
works,
Varro . l.l.
a large staff of trained copyists and
assistants,
either
paid
or
bought.
from
to
such
the end
,
and the adjectives
one
t in l.ir
tin•
construction
left
to
good
This
will
be
 
gap,
and
accord-
ingly
Schanz
gap
all
the
existing
Mss.
to 2IAIITub.t.
of
the
Parmenides
investigation
need
go
no
certain Mss.
Mss. -.) This codex,
younger hand, which
,
the text.
intended
to
derivation
of
n
with
1
those
of
which
we
have
been
speaking ;
but
as
it
:
147
mistakes occurring
p.
16
striking
only
(
facts
endings
as,
even
the
most
careful.
Some
of
a
mistake.
So
which
(5),
(6),
(7)
may
in
collation.
Much
comparison of
from
of
hundred
small
diver-
any classification. While
be
determined
be
derived
from
(carelessly
minuscules the two
in
minuscules,
entirely wanting in
these changes were made in 2.
Arguments
carelessness
in
II.
Its
writing
really fine caligraphy, repulsively
two editions
—as in
our u.
caughl
two
also
Martin
Crusius,
to
always
the use of ,
the
other
we
omissions.
We
have
the Mss.
according
is
in
Tub.
no
trace
superiority
o(
81
is
so
undoubted
and
the
errors
in
the
far
and
support
published
*K
'
preserve
more
faithfully
antiquae
in
fere
semper
:
the
superiority
would
supplied from
the inferior
ones, which
certain places
third
century
before
the
Christian
era.
These
papyri
contain
extent from the
ence,
respects
yet a careless
before
deciding
and by
luass,
M^terh
detailed
description
of
the
of the
to
receive
the
title,
sometimes
3,
one
^40.
includes
: SZ are,
word (;
on
p.
317
r.
difficulty at
the point,
as to
whether the
are
K.
there
is
at
the
style
and
details.
The
indeed,
Cobet
says,
151,
small
holes
have
perfect and legible as when
it
outer to
free margins are—inner i*6,
upper
3-5,
give 8
trace
of
this
which
quaternion
has
ruling seems
outer or
four
touched
all,
by the
\0a
tl
at
The
is generally
spaces for these being sometimes
ruled
with
ordinary
contractions.
(3)
.
Errors
and
corT'C'iors.
to
distinguish
them
accurately.
There
appear
to
be
two
which
use
other
of the book
traces of
corrections upon
17
which
makes
a
few
ugly
notes
in
pencil.
after being completed has been
compared
(a)
gaps
represent
columns
Petrie papyri
latter
perpendicular
the inner and
a
rule
where
the
letters
are
of
a
strictly
regulated
size
instead
exaggerates
the
inequalities
which
correct.
Commas
are
rarely
original;
and
significance
of
"I
tl,.
I
paper, with
interlineary criticisms,
Governor, a
and
half
this vessel,
under
weigh
: a
land
to them
flag [thus
drawing upon
the island, close to
be made impregnable.
extremely
magnificent.
the
have
answered
the
purpose
fully
as
well
who appeared to superintend
in the parent
it were upon a single point, are so generally handsome,
that
There
is
not
a
spot
in
the
the ports
most
much struck
person
habituated
in
with
of
Piata,
written
throughout
upon
vellum,
inhabitants of the
Bursar
Capudan
Pasha referred
Towards sunset,
we
port :
presently,
as
was at
anchor. Upon
to
our
great
Lexicon of
upon deck,
captain
to
as
possible;
as
completely soaked
them
face
is
of
and
e
6€?
is
lessly
binder,
style
and
details.
The
vellum
of
are,
with
paging
leaves in our
, ,
,
the
absence
of
the
lines
used
for
writing
third form
frequent
Iota subscript is
the beginning of a word, and then have as a
rule
the
cases as
graph
in
25,
of
these
is
are
of
in -,
how-
ever,
a closer likeness
to the first
save in
the titles,
the text, is
words,
e.g.,
190
r.
34,
names
of
the
speakers
in
the
lines;
supplies
gaps
(236
7),
and
makes
by
a
late
above
the
IE,
without
pretending
that
?
that
:
and last two lines
accordingly are
either brown
or black.
The injury
From
the
beginning
of
recent
of
p.
418
v.
and
only
thinner
sheets
has
since
been
done,
often
accompanied
by
discoloured words in lines
the
at
abscondit
1, 2,
is
cut
Phaedrus.
A
good
scattered over the
1u
^m}
Itr•
a~tCp^urni
6"DUJTT>
^U.
,
«
further
aggressions
A.D.
807,
at
which
time
Bpant
Emp.,
recognised as a
exarchs
under
gather
from
Ch
- 1
shall
see,
Arethas
tastes
he
the
authority
of
a resident
any
office
he
Plato
written
for
him
in
895
a.d.
When next
of Alexandria
Our note of the words
was
have stood
41
bishops
and
oddly
we
Zoen in uxorem
tint
In
the
ATs.
investigation Maass
with that
compares
the
Mss.
the works of
Arethean
on Euthyphro,
notes on the
that
the
occurrence
Coccius
to
the
'
and
the
debt
which
it
to
his
predecessor
Andreas.
1020,
where
he
returns
to
the
charge.
On
the
picture
churcnes called
an Arethas in
patriarchal
held up
written for Arethas
most
.
',
gorgeous
servantur ornatissimus
p
a
risDX(=
5
ioX
which
seems
to
have
belonged
to
Basil
has long
been sub-
jected to
friction until all but the indentations of the letters is in
some cases rubbed
as
first.
matters,
older
on
the
back
and
in
are
lettered
top
of
the
pages.
«
^cr{^»rrUf
%J
f
A
i
M
yy
v
f
J
J
TtJ
1
as
that
which
that is
portion
alone
that
well preserved,
dimensions tested
is
done
margin,
are
vellum
A.
would give 26
is not quite
how they have been arranged. Originally the 1st and 24th had
been quinions but
quaternion has
its two
last leaves
23
eights
both on
corner, and have a
of
the
brown,
ornaments
and
Khan. Mus.
assigned in
addition
words
the name
Socrates appears
204
other hands,
they represent
for
proper
names.
ri
mi!
existent,
:
:
£
"
Erasur^
> t \
-pas'
:
?
',
cu'et
t
of
at
on
modem
that
tam-ov?
i--?
Whether
is
the
character
reference
to
strange artless appeal
«,
'
/
.
haps the
of the
of
the
his second visit
a
the Republic. Antipho,
hardly
have
been
seems to
Parallel passages
and
are
interest'?
it
such
as
Sympos.
and
Repub,
tive
at
:
years
do)
a
at
suggests an
used
by
Plato
memory
for plupf.
"
,
79
a
2,
Proclus
>7? «/ ...
(b.c.
versation.
(Euthyphro
it
may
be
4
A,
with
Sophist.
217
c,
we
have
Some
light
would
be
thrown
one cannot
the infin.,
but
rather
argument
word
may
ei
opinions,'
or
'from
front
to
has a
a
place
in
your
•flection,
friendship
towards
scratch
between
and
in
word,
Phaedr.
241
a,
without
noticing
*
(
=
€),
8
oh
would
be
9,
is
better
than
in
of
one
hut
so
head,
while
at
the
speculation,
what
is
left
as
'
'
''•,
as
hopeless
two
verbs
and
that
and the more specific,
a comprehensive
be
a
distinction,
terms,
are
the
of
conditional
sentences
whose
shades
many,'
etc.
vvv
8f|
for
and felt
to
Of ptv
25
1
B,
the world
of ideas
251
v,
252-53
A
79
b
1,
and
is
found
all
to
all
ideas
Plato
«rriv
oirwra
;
.
991
a
23,
Bekker
which
of
to
that the
,
of sensible
'
common,
especially
and
Hut
the
text
<>f
Proclui
ti
o
ropifrn
diverse
process
participation
has
than
tion of
and the possible varieties of the
fact
-is, -
lx.), for,
he says
least.
... : preceded
by
be
note the
ohject to,
hile that
active sense
cu
part of the
a
portion
the ambiguities arising from
•
is
lessens the
part cannot
oWo/mis,
rd
sed potius
the idea
phrase
with
PI.
ev
xliv.)
ing
would
be
better
from
a
fresh
generalization
based
sense.
tinguished.
Is
accord
with
the
and
the
xliii.).
extended idea
to
Simplicius
25,
81
the
cm -.l.-m
/' ol
the
iDtTi'
cogi-
tat?'
'of
adds
have
Plotifi
1
V.
not be rendered
Phys.
p.
31,
who
the 6th
of
he
assumes
by
apparently unconnected like objects were by some
divine
infins. like
a
sense
is
clear,
than that of resembl.
to be a
esse nisi similitudo
be
gram-
the
his
can
is whether
ascending
yet
,
necessity of
what
he
advances
Engelm.
for the next
and
SO
gain,
tis €£>
quidem haec
derstanding of
this would
eu$os
manifesto
is
complete
abstractness
judgment
put
it is.' Again
23 ,
.
>]
ledge
know-
up
to do
and , while
He
meant
after
impossible,
as
precedes
by the
ideas
as
will
match
We may note several
Plato
Is not it an
former which
may lurk
But we
have the
world of
sense consisting
explain it or no ?
look too
be
an is subscript
.
? See
L.
and
significatu
of
defining
to what
defi-
nition,
«
out the
details of
this dictum.
pretty
detailed,
does
not
fulfil
riot existing.'
writes
?
y
reads with
Proc,
V.
311,
33.
the
us, feeling
that the
ready.
;
nxu£ovra 5
as
relative.
been historically
135
D,
el
long
finds the
neuter better.
that,
so
says Aristotle
in speculation
of
the
one
overtaking
up.'
(PL
Par;
OfGr.'s
many
references
to
Sv
To
(UV
different
; and he
refers to
reverie
—if it
really is
within itself
be due
This is the
mere
to
Schleiermacher's
ping
the
I
: faultless
when
what
to
seem
that
-
'-?
'
be
139
the different. He
the one has
gone off upon
motion \vhich leans
that posi-
'
that
what
:
or
sufficient
are
now
pointless
a
the
'other than
altero
nequit.
Quocirca
post
deinde
rursus
infertur
ab
?
the 1
same
'
,
does
as
is to
do,
reason
at
work.
is resemblance,'
pp.
139
d,
140
a
be
the
argt.
what Proc.
incommens.,
while
the
adjs.
qualify
measure
the
objs.
the
same
orig.
admiss.
both
Mss.
210-12),
tis
«rar&uas
Thomas Magister
587
e:
a
list
which
sets
aside
und deren
Proc.
goes
the demands of
ante
time just noted. This
time
such
as
we
know
thus
far
considered
(vi.
249
etc.),
-l
argt.
is
p•
quite clear,
des
ovv
confessi
sumus,
.
all
be.'
we
like
their
character
here lies
astonished
forget it.
before
Ii ,
.is
Stallb.
suggests.
av
ctij
is
TO II*
and
wrote
Xcyerai
scripsisse
conjiciat
in
has
a
part,
whatever
more.
what
is
prima
,
equally
decided
in
oVtos],
but
to
reach
apa
tv
lurks in the
carry the
carried
on
ad
the
Thorns,
cps.
2,
185
b
5,
does
sion. 'One'
difficulty about
 
/.
Otn
tssump.
was
Prot
in
connec.
with
the
idea
of
e.g.
only if the constr.
be
suggested
by
the
later
binary,
altern.,
as
he
says
yrivioiv
old
without
being
seen,
as
bus : velut [l>]
Phps. the best grouping is
ovv ev
dividi dicitur, verbis
non animadvertissent grammatici et veteres et recen-
tiores, tentare hujusmodi locos scriptorum veterum
temere
cannot
be
determined.
give
thought
removed
the
ence can revolutionize
.
..
262,
'
. ?
(.)
'
,'
€
'
and
above
a
whole
by
A.
.
first of
it
to
appear,
of
it
no duty laid
To an action, occurring
Such
objects
would
dwelt
33
etc.
«rTi
in his
unum,
distat
thesis in doing so.
divisible. The fact that
idea of its
and
pred.
of
the
parts.
to
find
part
as
1
one,'
tv
€
•
if
of
the
as it
is ex-
d
proof
of
est de
together?
proxime
nomini
accommodare.
Menon.
Te
... ev
«rep»
and
as
it
would
be
if
'always
in
itself.'
Tots *
regard
to
hepov
and
but to the ideal
regard to the sensible
ques.
of
merely,
its parts under
the
'whole'
pepos
for
the
forward
the
con-
trad,
«
a
in
the
connec.
with
the
Stallb. following
that self
thing
Stallb. We may
sense,
and said
the
different,
in
tin-
his
it by
if they
may
put
to
explain
the
corrup.
of
.
the
one
much argt.
compari-
son
First
with
the
from
differing.'
Next
simply
a
number
of
ones
it.
But
the
absence
ways. 1. The
the
1
1
iMi-,
bo
at
others like-
wise than
inter-
changed
D
(or
Tt).
with
Ast
218c,
of
the
gives
the
otherwise.
.9
cases, the first of
seem
to
have
had ,
which
the
are
({/,
scribes
i
4
s
onward.
at
Oxford)
reading
in
the
sense
of
these
infinity of
be
chosen
as
as if he
above; but
et
.
and we
we have
proved
of their
difference they
need not
unlike,
must be
held as
the one which
it is at
:
rough,
t
agrees,
having
and
y
been inserted in the
of
a
row
means those
that? And if he
corroborat-
ing
the
text?
tols ...*.
the
probability
than
be
aban-
doned.
had
the
Without
copied
both
In
amount'
the equal
gorean
yxoVas
and
•; Seas,
and
finally
cps.
147
a.
'
•
one
this to
far
the
oihers,
therefore
it
totu
lies
in
in addition
at
to subvert it.
two
reasons.
1.
the
others
being
such
a
collection
of
ones,
touch
hard
to
explain
its
and
e'o
ment
are
not
equal
or
unequal
confus. with the
word is quoted
"
place
to
speak
The
article
however
-re ye
Arist.
Met.
vi.
5,
1030
b
34.
Aiu
in another it may
stronger;
(Ktivo,
i.e.
thing
Of
course
a
6,
10
16
b
10,
yap
If he speaks literally
«8
St
etc.
The
one
has
been
proved
somehow
in which
the
one
and
the
others
contrads.,
and
towards
the
argt.
PI.
and as these
cannot enter, size
1
1
rn
seems to
make two
^ the
iiru-
which
to be predicated by
the
argt.
several occasions:
but it
'
of a compound concep. may
be
is
also
around
(</),
in
describing
the
situation.
Now
still
more
way
be
:
(4)
must
be
cancels the idea of
is
ambig.
and
confus.
Before
(
...
,
incidentally
pos-
a
is
an
isolated
one, as
Ol
the
has .1
struck some
with
such, we
right: Notes
of Bekker's
157
B,
0€ «.
€
he
says
Mss.)
order ; i.e.
come
with
the words were
ev
7T)
ev
?v ^-
being,
each
sixth it
must follow
ev.
.
the
pre-
vious
statement
and in
irpos
For
constr. makes
that
(if
that
out
of
that
tend to
142
B-155
e.
the
syllog.)
to
prove
one
the
contrary
character.
of
appreciably before One is
no being
to
iv.
All
as he
can make
On
(144
a;
)y
would
Arist.
adds
to
iiore applying
results.
As
possibility of exist-
actually
say
that
the
...
'
'
to
what
has
just
preceded.
Yet
though
is
is concerned.'
even certain
'how
(
you
PI. is
(
instan
taneous
and
one
yiyveo-itai
type of
's edition rests?
or
previous conclus., calls in
three)
dimen-
of it
part of
time, but
play a
clearly his
corresponds
with
. In
the
present
than
redundant. Stallb.
while commenting
sense
and individual
be part of
the
all.
This
It
cannot
be
be
the
one
one
whole
ol
whii
I»
the
oi
on
Fie)
wishes
ivbs
of the and
. Proc-
Dam.
(300)
puts
it
differently—
«r«
TtXtiov
!\• of
157
the
'
read
the
connec.
a separate treatment
successive,
thoughts
that
are
to
would
;
archet.
one
of
these
might
142
and
155
e.
It
a lost
not
is
govd.
by
~ov.
you have
Dem.
€«\=
is spoken
the views
already
nunc
esse
aientibus
gaudere
attributis.
defined
by
negative
qualities?
On
is not'
hand a definite
lies
in
the
The subject to
of
its
neg.
charac.
The
fallacy
lies
statement of a
fact, because our
veracity hangs upon
No
doubt
PL
and
still
two senses
the
that
of
correc. in
possibility.
Proc.-Dam.
(below)
-.
neg.
necessities,
and
is
explained
by
be the case
Chiasm
...? referring
to
existent,
ol
non
PL
wishes
to
say
.
errors
clause,
or
of
the
former,
and
is
as
presents
p.
3
6.
are
retained
as
intelligible
gives it,
to
138
r,
otl
is here reversed
terminology:
the
linking the
one is.' It is synthet. or construct,
being
based
upon
such
a
less
ways
are
not
111.
lubstnv
tum
when
Unum
is
taken
away:
be right in
the
change.
the repeated
compound
two cases
should
II.,
under
the
and
attain
their
object,
tends
usual
we deal with not-being
Categ.
of
It
does
not
hold
(Grote
above)
is
that
off»)
etVai
applied
same as in
take
ivplv
, still
how
deal
with
t
gives
Heind. seems
we assume that each
as
being
t.
which
the
group
required here
anywhere.
else it
l"
oue
In•
ami
the
Real,
which
both
by
whole
puzzling
of
his
problem
truth
Plato
may
him-
self
have
to
and unwarranted
Errata.—
The
to give the
been
'
78,
81,
105,
ill,
117;
its
object,
Campb.
Libraries,
 
in,
115,
Perceive,
-ception,
xlvii.
,