paris interop

Interoperability Interoperability frameworks for exchange frameworks for exchange of information between of information between

diverse management diverse management systemssystems

Luis Anido-Rifon – University of Vigo (ES) Niall Sclater – University of Strathclyde (Sco)

CEN/ISSS Workshop Learning Technologies, March, 24-25. Paris

2

AgendaAgenda

Interoperability frameworks for exchange of information between diverse management systems

CEN/ISSS Workshop on Learning Technologies, 10-11 December 2002, Copenhagen, Denmark

Introduction Decisions from Copenhagen Current State Next Steps

3

IntroductionIntroduction



– To provide interoperability specifications for a range of information exchange, initially aimed at school systems but also applicable in a wider lifelong learning context. This work item will support the outputs of the OASIS (Open Architecture and Schools in Society) project that enable different applications and systems to share information.

– The work item will focus on collaborating with the OASIS partners in ensuring that the specifications they produce do not duplicate international standards activity, are appropriate for a broader audience and are suitable for e-Europe standardization.

4

Decisions from Copenhagen (i)Decisions from Copenhagen (i)

The main task of the PT should be to act as a gateway between OASIS and the WS. An overall objective should be to publish one or more CWAs containing results from OASIS.


5

Decisions from Copenhagen (ii)Decisions from Copenhagen (ii)

The first contacts should be established with SIF and then with OASIS.


6

Decisions from Copenhagen (iii)Decisions from Copenhagen (iii)

For the short term the PT should concentrate on analyzing SIF.


7

SIF SIF

SIF presentation:

The PT contacted Tim Magner, director of SIF, who kindly volunteer to do a presentation on SIF.


8

Current State Current State

The PT delivered on March 20th a report on SIF.

Available at the PT web site.


9


The PT delivered on March 20th a report on eEurope standardization, where main standardization initiatives within the EU scope are outlined.

Available at the PT web site.Interoperability frameworks for exchange of information between diverse management systems

10

eEurope Standardization eEurope Standardization


Report structure:1. Foreword2. Introduction3. eEurope 2002 and eEurope 20054. eEurope Standardization5. The Contribution of European Standardization to

the eEurope initiative6. eLearning Standardization7. Reference8. Appendixes

11



Report sources:Contents of the report were taken from the

following sources:http://www.eeurope-standards.org/http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/http://www.cenorm.be/http://www.cenelec.org/http://www.etsi.org/http://www.ict.etsi.fr/Activities/eEurope.htmhttp://www.eubusiness.com/

12



Section 3: eEurope 2002 and eEurope 2005

This section introduces the main objectives and targets of these initiatives.

The actions are clustered around three main objectives:

1.- A Cheaper, faster and secure Internet1.- A Cheaper, faster and secure Internet a) Cheaper and faster Internet access b) Faster Internet for researchers and students c) Secure networks and smart cards

13




This section introduces the main objectives and targest of these initiatives.


2.- Investing in people and skills2.- Investing in people and skills a) European youth into the digital age b) Working in the knowledge-based economy c) Participation for all in the knowledge-based

economy

14






3.- Stimulate the use of Internet3.- Stimulate the use of Internet a) Accelerating e-commerce b) Government online: electronic access to public services c) Health online d) European digital contents for global networks e) Intelligent transport systems

15






3.- Stimulate the use of Internet3.- Stimulate the use of Internet a) Accelerating e-commerce b) Government online: electronic access to public services c) Health online d) European digital contents for global networks e) Intelligent transport systems

16





The target is that by 2005, Europe should have: Modern on-line public services: e-government, e-Modern on-line public services: e-government, e-

learning servicies, e-health services...learning servicies, e-health services... A dynamic business environment; and as an enabler for A dynamic business environment; and as an enabler for

these: widespread availability of broadband access and these: widespread availability of broadband access and competitive prices with a secure information competitive prices with a secure information infrastructureinfrastructure

17



Section 4: eEurope Standardization

This section introduces the three European Standardization Organizations (ESOs):

CEN CENELEC: European Committee for Electrotechnical

Standardization ETSI: European Telecommunications Standards Institute

and outlines other standardization institutions thatcollaborate with ESOs (e.g. ECBS, ECMA, TM Forum,

OpenGroup, DVB, EBU, W3C, etc.)

18



Section 5: The contribution of European Standardization to the eEurope initiative

We identify which standardization activities are related to each objective/sub-objective within eEurope 2002 and eEurope 2005.

19



Section 6: eLearning Standardization

This section contains an introduction to the main learning technology standardization activities within Europe.

It includes past and present initiatives within our WS and identifies which standardization activities presented in the previous section may affect eLearning.

20



Appendixes enumerate the different working groups and technical committees the ESOs are composed of.

This report will be used as the base document to ensure that OASIS outputs are suitable for eEurope Standardization.

21


Two meetings were held with OASIS partners:

1.- Brussels, January 17th 2003

2.- Madrid, March 21st 2003


22

OASIS OASIS

1.- Brussels, January 17th 2003

Attending people from: EUN, UPM, SUN, Apple, Academie de Grenoble, Spanish Ministry of Education, CEN/ISSS WS-LT


23

OASIS OASIS

1.- Brussels, January 17th 2003OASIS is trying to get the data from 4

ministries and compare with SIF.Questionnaire was also sent out but not

much response.Correlating SIF, IMS and ministries’ (Spain,

France, Ireland & Sweden) data models to ensure that there is a common set of data.


24

OASIS OASIS

1.- Brussels, January 17th 2003OASIS Workpackage 2 is producing a

set of docs which could form the basis for our CWAs.

OASIS is using XML to define their data model – CEN/ISSS might prefer to produce a conceptual model – working back from the binding.


25

OASIS OASIS

2.- Madrid, March 21st 2003Madrid, March 21st 2003Attending:Agustín Quintana (Project Manager)Agustín Muñoz (Spanish MoE)Mariano Sanz (EUN, WP2 leader)Marta Permanes (Spanish MoE)Niall Sclater (CEN/ISSS WS-LT)Luis Anido-Rifón (CEN/ISSS WS-LT)


26

OASIS OASIS

2.- Madrid, March 21st 2003Main conclusions:Main conclusions:

Focus on WP2 as this is producing the OASIS data model and adaptation of the SIF architecture.

OASIS WP2 is interested in publishing its outcomes as CWAs.


27

OASIS OASIS


We agreed that a joint document (eventually producing a CWA on “Internationalization of SIF and harmonisation with other standards/specs”) will be of interest for both OASIS and SIF. This document will focus on identifying issues rather than proposing solutions.


28

OASIS OASIS


OASIS will focus on Europeanisation of SIF while the PT will assure that SIF does not overlap other standards/specs

The PT will assist with “Quality control” for the OASIS WP2 intermediate deliverables.


29

OASIS OASIS 2.- Madrid, March 21st 2003

Proposed CWAs:1. Review/Adaptation of SIF Infrastructure,

Architecture, Message Processing and Transport Layer. (draft-Q2 , final Q3)

2. Internationalisation of SIF and Harmonisation with other standards/specs (draft Q2, final Q3)

3. Adaptation of SIF data model for a European context (draft Q3, final Q4)


30

OASIS OASIS

Do you agree with these objectives and target CWAs?


31

Next Steps Next Steps

1.- By the end of March the PT will contact CAPITA (UK company in charge of broading (internationalising?) SIF

2.- By mid April we expect from OASIS WP2 team their documents on SIF infrastructure, architecture, message processing and transport layer


32


3.- These will be reviewed and used as a base for a CWA-1 on "Review of SIF infrastructure, architecture, message processing and transport layer" which will be returned back to OASIS for comments by the end of April

4.- The PT will produce by the end of April and send to OASIS a report on SIF data model crossovers with other specs/standards


33


5.- This report, together with the first “european” OASIS data model, expected by mid May from OASIS WP2, will be used to produce the first draft of a CWA2 on "Internationalisation of SIF and harmonisation with other specs/standards“, which will be delivered back to OASIS by the end of May


34


6.- Comments by OASIS WP2 team on the first draft of CWA1 are expected by mid May. A second draft of CWA1 will be delivered by the PT to both OASIS and SIF by the end of May.

7.- Final comments by OASIS on both CWA drafts and SIF on CWA1 expected by mid June.


35


8.- CWA1 and CWA2 delivered for WS-LT consideration by Q2 meeting (Greece)

Further steps:Endorsement of CWA1 and CWA2 (Q3 meeting)Draft of CWA3 by Q3 meeting (Adaptation of

SIF datamodel) and final CWA endorsement in Q4 meeting.

More details on workplan document to be published


36


Comments on the PT workplan?


ThanksThanks

http://www.gist.uvigo.es/~lanido/interop/

Luis [email protected]

Niall [email protected]



mailto:[email protected]







paris interop

Documents