parametric model of an air-core measuring … modeling - comsol multippyhysics 3.5a application...
TRANSCRIPT
PARAMETRIC MODEL OF AN PARAMETRIC MODEL OF AN AIR-CORE MEASURING TRANSFORMERTRANSFORMER
DEJANA HERCEGFACULTY OF TECHNICAL SCIENCES
N S O NO SA S AUNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD, SERBIA
COMSOL Conference 2010 Paris
Presented at the COMSOL Conference 2010 Paris
Introduction
determining power qualityin power distributionsystems
harmonic distortion in thevoltage and currentwaveforms
measurements of suchvoltage with harmonics
new developed instrument the input unit: the input unit:
small air-core transformer base probe
2/22
Air-core transformer base probe p
Non-sinusoidal measured voltage on primary coil: Non sinusoidal measured voltage on primary coil:
n - number of harmonics; f - frequency (50-2.5kHz) Induced voltage on secondary coil:
Transformer ratio should be constant for all freq.
3/22
External EM fields and shieldingg
The goal of this work is to design a feromagnetic The goal of this work is to design a feromagneticshield around the probe in order to protect it from the impact of external magnetic field. p g Optimize the shield shape to cancel the impact of
external magnetic field as much as possible (shielding effectiveness was investigated)
Minimize the influence of the shield shape on the f b dtransformer probe reading
(transformer linearity coefficient was investigated)
4/22
Shield shapes
The probe was centered inside different types of
p
The probe was centered inside different types of ferromagnetic shields
Shape, size, thickness, material properties (, )5/22
Modeling - COMSOL Multiphysics 3.5a g p y
Application Mode:pp Axial symmetry 2D AC/DC Module Quasi-Statics, Magnetic Azimuthal Induction Currents, Mag. Vector Potential Time-harmonic analysis
20
1r Aj A J
Subdomain Integration Variable (secondary coil)
0 r
N2 22
2
4 NEMF U j f r AA
6/22
Parametric model approachpp
Several ways to create a parametric model can be Several ways to create a parametric model can be employed geometric parametric sweeps option in COMSOL
Multiphysics v3.5a, in connections with a specialized CAD software, such as SolidWorks and AutoDesk Inventor,
moving mesh (ALE model) moving mesh (ALE model) programming in MATLAB.
The last approach was chosen as it allows varying The last approach was chosen as it allows varying geometric dimensions without changing the model topology in numerical simulations.
7/22
Connection with MATLAB
Creating Creating parametric model
8/22
Geometry modelingy g
Using COMSOL GUI or MATLABg Basic geometry objects: rect2, circ2, curve2… geometry
functions: geomcomp, geomcsg, …
Analyze and update the geometry data by using geomanalyze (e g moving objects)geomanalyze (e.g. moving objects)
If the indexing of subdomains stays constant while the If the indexing of subdomains stays constant while the values of geometry parameters are changing, then geomanalyze is not needed.
9/22
Creating the meshg
The number of mesh elements will be changed inside The number of mesh elements will be changed inside the loop, depending on the skin depth and the thickness of shield.
Element size of the shield subdomain is related to the skin depth of the ferromagnetic material of shield p g
The skin depth is about 7 times smaller for the 50th
harmonic than for the fundamental frequency at 50Hz.
10/22
External magnetic field in simulationsg
Standard CEI EN 61000-4-8: circular or square coil testing area can be up to 60% the of the coil diameter up to 3dB inhomogenity of magnetic field
In simulations: magnetic field strength magnetic field strength
100A/m (5. level) Diameter 1m Inside the testing area (less than 10% of the diameter), the
amplitude of time harmonic magnetic field is changed not more than 5%.
11/22
When the external magnetic field (50Hz) is present, the magnetic field inside the shielded probe is approx. 20A/m (5 times less than without the shield)(5 times less than without the shield)
without shield with shield
12/22
without shield with shield (R=28.5mm, H=2R, d=0.5mm)
Reduced potentialp
Magnetic vector potential Magnetic vector potential
Reduced potential Circular coil
13/22
Reduced potential Circular coil
The shielding effectiveness and th t f li it ffi i t the transformer linearity coefficient
The shielding effectiveness is defined as a ratio of The shielding effectiveness is defined as a ratio of the two magnetic flux densities, without and with the shield present.p
The transformer linearity coefficient was defined as
(unshielded case 0.1553 mV/Hz) The normalized transformer linearity coefficient is
14/22
Shielding efficiency as a function of H/R ratio for different shield shapes (thickness of shield 0 5mm)
5.5
6.0 R [mm]
28.5
shapes (thickness of shield 0.5mm)
4.5
5.0
28.5
38
57
3.5
4.0S e
57
85.5
sphere 38mm
2 5
3.0
3.5 sphere 38mm
sphere 57mm
ellipsoid v
2.0
2.5
0 1 2 3 4
ellipsoid v
ellipsoid h
H/R
15/22
Normalized coefficient kN in function of H/R ratio for different shield shapes (same thickness 0 5mm and r 550 for all shields)
1.25 R [mm]
28.5
shapes (same thickness 0.5mm and r 550 for all shields)
1 15
1.2028.5
38
57
1.10
1.15
k N
57
85.5
sphere 38mm
1.05
sphere 38mm
sphere 57mm
ellipsoid v
1.000 1 2 3 4
ellipsoid v
ellipsoid h
H/R
16/22
Distribution of magnetic flux density along the shield due to external time harmonic magnetic field at 50Hz (thickness of the shields 0 5mm and 5mm)(thickness of the shields 0.5mm and 5mm)
17/22
Impact of external magnetic field is expressed by the transformer linearity coefficient as a function of magnetic field frequency
-2
00 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
6
-4
2
V/H
z]
unshielded
-8
-6
freq
) [m
V
shielded d=0.5mmshielded d=5mm
-12
-10
log(
emf/
-16
-14
6freq[Hz]
18/22
Shield shape influence on transformer linearity coefficient as function of frequency of input signal on primary winding
0.1620
0.1630unshieldedshielded d=0.5mm
0 1590
0.1600
0.1610
mV
/Hz] shielded d=5mm
0 1570
0.1580
0.1590
f/fre
q [m
0 1550
0.1560
0.1570
emf
0.1540
0.1550
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500freq [Hz]
19/22
Conclusion
COMSOL Multiphysics is a very useful FEM COMSOL Multiphysics is a very useful FEM based tool for a wide range of applications.
The parameterized probe model was created p pand used for a large number of simulations in order to find appropriate solution of this particular task.
Parametrizing the models can be complicated. From the discussed range of the shields, the
spherical shields performed best, as expected f th from theory.
20/22
Conclusion
However without COMSOL it would be However, without COMSOL it would be impossible to conclude what shield shapes and sizes are most appropriate. sizes are most appropriate.
A cylinder of particular dimensions can be a sufficiently good solution sufficiently good solution.
Future work will employ an optimization technique together with an appropriate fitness technique together with an appropriate fitness function introduced into COMSOL and used for the optimum searchthe optimum search.
21/22
Acknowledgementg
This paper is a part of the two projects no. 11024 This paper is a part of the two projects no. 11024 and 18043, supported by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia. g p , pThe author is also grateful to DAAD and TU Ilmenayfor the continuing support.
22/22