parameter sensitivity in hydrologic modeling tanya hoogerwerf march 7 th, 2002
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic
Modeling
Tanya HoogerwerfMarch 7th, 2002
![Page 2: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline Flood discharge calculation
overview Problem statement and
research objectives Case studies Sensitivity analysis of
hydrologic parameters Conclusions
![Page 3: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Flood Discharge Calculation
![Page 4: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Soil Type and Land Use
Hydrologic Modeling Parameters
SLOPE
Longest Flow Path (LFP)
AREA
Slope
Longest Flow Path
Area
Soil Type and Land Use (CN)
![Page 5: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
How Are Parameters Calculated?
Level 1:
From Paper Maps (Traditional Method)
Map Wheel Planimeter
Level 2:
From Scanned Maps
![Page 6: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
How Are Parameters Calculated?
Level 3:
From Grid-Based Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
Level 4:
From Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs)
![Page 7: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Lag Calculation
Soil Type and Land Use
SLOPE
Longest Flow Path (LFP)
Lw is Longest Flow Path
CN is Curve Number (derived from Soil and Land Use Data)
s is slope
s
CNL
tw
lag67.31
91000
(min)
7.08.0
SCS Lag Formula (1972)
![Page 8: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Flood Discharge Calculation
s
CNL
tw
lag67.31
91000
(min)
7.08.0
SCS Lag Formula (1972)
Q
t
Qpeak
![Page 9: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Problem Statement
Differences encountered in lag results between traditional methods and automated methods
Traditional MethodsAutomated Methods
![Page 10: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Research Objectives
For traditional and automated processes, determine Sources of error Range of errors Significance of errors
![Page 11: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Outline Flood discharge calculation
overview Problem statement and
research objectives Case studies Sensitivity analysis of
hydrologic parameters Conclusions
![Page 12: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What Was Used to Test? Set up the four levels of case studies 3 differently sized areas
0.5mi2
8.8mi2
1.6 mi2
![Page 13: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Determination of Parameter Sensitivity
% change in slope…% change in lag…% change in Q
![Page 14: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Case 1: Measurement From Paper Maps
![Page 15: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Case II: On Screen From Raster Maps
![Page 16: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Case IIIA: 10m and 30m Digital Elevation Models, Using GIS/CRWR-
PrePro
![Page 17: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Case IIIB: 10m and 30m Digital Elevation Models Using WMS
![Page 18: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Case IV: Automated Methods Using WMS and a Triangulated Irregular Network Model (TIN)
![Page 19: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Longest Flow Path
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
1 2 3
Area
Mile
s
PrePre30
PrePre10
Hand
Digitized
WMS-30
WMS-10
Coefficient of Variation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Area Curve Num ber LFP Slope
%C
v
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
%Cv = /
Case Study Results
![Page 20: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Outline Flood discharge calculation
overview Problem statement and
research objectives Case studies Sensitivity analysis of
hydrologic parameters Conclusions
![Page 21: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Elasticity As a Measure of Sensitivity
Elasticity is dimensionless
Provides measure of sensitivity <1 is “inelastic” >1 is “elastic”
y
xX*
Y*
input
output
change
change
XdxY
dy
elasticity%
%
*
*
![Page 22: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Area 2
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
115.0
120.0
2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40
LFP- miles
LAG
Longest Flow Path
Analytical Calculation of Gradients
Q t
As the longest flow path varies by 13.2%, the lag varies by 10.6%
The elasticity is 10.6/13.2 = +0.80…inelastic
13.2%
10.6%
![Page 23: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
% Change in LAG
Dis
char
ge (
Q)
Numerical Calculation of Gradient
Q t
10.6%
-3.04%
Elasticity =-0.29
![Page 24: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Sensitivity Results
% change in parameter…..% change in lag…..% change in Q
-35.0%
-30.0%
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
% V
ari
ati
on
fro
m M
ea
n
Param eter Input
Lag Ouput
Q Output- 2 Yr
![Page 25: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Elasticity
SLOPE
14.0%
%
Slope
Q
Change
Change
LONGEST FLOW PATH (LFP)
29.0%
%
LFP
Q
Change
Change
CN
01.1%
%
CN
Q
Change
Change
![Page 26: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Elasticity
AREA
14.1%80.1
%05.2
%
%
Area
Q
Change
Change
CN
01.1%99.8
%09.9
%
%*
%
%
%
%
lag
Q
CN
lag
CN
Q
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
![Page 27: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Conclusions
Automated methods using grid-based DEMs are less time consuming than traditional methods…USE AUTOMATED METHODS
Slope and longest flow path measurements do not greatly influence discharge
Measurements of area do not vary greatly, spend time/resources obtaining accurate soil and land use data for CN
![Page 28: Parameter Sensitivity in Hydrologic Modeling Tanya Hoogerwerf March 7 th, 2002](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062407/56649e625503460f94b5eff3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
~Thanks ~
Dr. Maidment
David Stolpa
Dr. Charbeneau
Dr. Barrett
Dr. Nelson
CRWR Group
EWRE Friends
Environmental Modeling Systems, Inc.