paperno14-habibi-ijma-n-tuples and chaoticity
TRANSCRIPT
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 14, 651 - 657
n-Tuples and Chaoticity
Mezban Habibi
Department of MathematicsDehdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Deahdasht, Iran
P.O. Box 181 40, Lidingo, Stockholm, [email protected]
Abstract
In this paper we characterize the Condition for Chaoticity of Tuplesof operators on a Frechet space.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 47A16, 47B37
Keywords: Hypercyclic vector, Hypercyclicity Criterion, Periodic vector,Chaotic n-tuple, n-Tuple of operators
1 Introduction
Let T1, T2, ..., Tn be commutative bounded linear operators on a Banach spaceX . For n-Tuple T = (T1, T2, ..., Tn), put
Γ = {Tm11 Tm2
2 ...Tmnn : m1, m2, ...,mn ≥ 0}
the semigroup generated by T . For x ∈ X , the orbit of x under T is the setOrb(T , x) = {S(x) : S ∈ Γ}, that is
Orb(T , x) = {Tm11 Tm2
2 ...Tmnn (x) : m1, m2, ...,mn ≥ 0}
The vector x is called Hypercyclic vector for T and n-Tuple T is called Hy-percyclic n-Tuple, if the set Orb(T , x) is dense in X , that is
Orb(T , x) = {Tm11 Tm2
2 ...Tmn2 (x) : m1, m2, ...,mn ≥ 0} = X
The vector x in X is called a Periodic vector for the n-Tuple T = (T1, T2, ..., Tn),if there exist some numbers μ1, μ2, ..., μn ∈ N such that
T μ11 T μ2
2 ...T μnn (x) = x.
652 M. Habibi
Also the n-Tuple T = (T1, T2, ..., Tn), is called chaotic tuple, if we have treebelow conditions together,(1). It is topologically transitive, that is, if for any given open sets U and V,there exist positive integer numbers α1, α2, ..., αn ∈ N such that
T α11 T α2
2 ...Tαnn (U) ∩ V �= φ
(2). It has a dense set of periodic points, in other word, there is a set X suchthat for each x ∈ X , there exist some numbers β1, β2, ..., βn ∈ N such that
T β11 T β2
2 ...T βnn (x) = x
(3). It has a certain property called sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Notice that, all operators in this paper are commutative. For some topics see[1–12].
2 Main Results
Theorem 2.1.[The Hypercyclicity Criterion] Let X be a separable Ba-nach space and T = (T1, T2, ..., Tn) is an n-tuple of continuous linear mappingson X . If there exist two dense subsets Y and Z in X , and n strictly increasingsequences {mj,1}, {mj,2}, ...,{mj,n} such that :1. T
mj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn → 0 on Y as j → ∞,
2. There exist function {Sj : Z → X} such that for every z ∈ Z, Sjz → 0,and T
mj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn Sjz → z,
then T is a Hypercyclic n-tuple.If the tuple T satisfying the hypothesis of previous theorem then we say thatT satisfying the Hypercyclicity criterion.
Theorem 2.2. Suppose X be an F-sequence space whit the unconditionalbasis {eκ}κ∈N . Let T1, T2, ..., Tn are unilateral weighted backward shifts withweight sequence {ai,1 : i ∈ N}, {ai,2 : i ∈ N},..., {ai,n : i ∈ N} and T =(T1, T2, ..., Tn) be an n-tuple of operators T1, T2, ..., Tn. Then the followingassertions are equivalent:(1). T is chaotic,(2). T is Hypercyclic and has a non-trivial periodic point,(3). T has a non-trivial periodic point,(4). the series Σ∞
m=1(∏m
k=1(ak,i)−1em) convergence in X for i = 1, 2, ..., n.
Proof. Proof of the cases (1) → (2) and (2) → (3) are trivial, so we justproof (3) → (4) and (4) → (1). First we proof (3) → (4), for this, Suppose
n-tuples and chaoticity 653
that T has a non-trivial periodic point, and x = {xn} ∈ X be a non-trivialperiodic point for T , that is there are μ1, μ2, ..., μn ∈ N such that,
T μ11 T μ2
2 ...T μnn (x) = x.
Comparing the entries at positions j+kN , and j+kN , k ∈ N ∪{0}, of x andTM
1 TN2 (x) we find that
xj+kM1 = (M∏
t=1
(aj+kN+t))xj+(k+1)
xj+kM2 = (N∏
t=1
(bj+kN+t))xj+(k+1)
...
xj+kMn = (N∏
t=1
(bj+kN+t))xj+(k+1)
so that we have,
xj+kM1 = (j+kM1∏
t=j+1
(at))−1xj = c1(
j+kM1∏
t=1
(at))−1, k ∈ N ∪ {0}
xj+kM2 = (j+kM2∏
t=j+1
(at))−1xj = c2(
j+kM2∏
t=1
(at))−1, k ∈ N ∪ {0}
...
xj+kMn = (j+kMn∏
t=j+1
(at))−1xj = cn(
j+kMn∏
t=1
(at))−1, k ∈ N ∪ {0}
with
c1 = (j∏
t=1
(mj,1))xj
c2 = (j∏
t=1
(mj,2))xj
...
cn = (j∏
t=1
(mj,n))xj .
Since {eκ} is an unconditional basis and x ∈ X it follows from [...] that
∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kM1t=1 (mj,1)
)ej+kM1 =1
c1
∞∑
k=0
xj+kM1.ej+kM1
654 M. Habibi
∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kM2t=1 (mj,2)
)ej+kM2 =1
c2
∞∑
k=0
xj+kM2.ej+kM2
...∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kMnt=1 (mj,n)
)ej+kMn =1
cn
∞∑
k=0
xj+kMn.ej+kMn
convergence in X . Without loss of generality we may assume that j ≥ N . Ap-plying the operators T , T 2, T 3,..., TR−1, with R = Min{Mi : i = 1, 2, ..., n},to this series and note that T1(en) = anen−1 and T2(en) = bnen−1 for n ≥ 2,we deduce that ∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kM1−υ1t=1 (mj,1)
)ej+kM1−υ1
∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kM2−υ2t=1 (mj,2)
)ej+kM2−υ2
...∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kMn−υ1t=1 (mj,n)
)ej+kMn−υn
convergence in X for γ = 0, 1, 2, ..., N − 1. By adding these series, we see thatcondition (4) holds.Proof of (4) ⇒ (1). It follows from theorem (2.1), that under condition (4)the operator T is Hypercyclic. Hence it remains to show that T has a denseset of periodic points. Since {eκ} is an unconditional basis, condition (4) withproposition 2.3 implies that for each j ∈ N and M,N ∈ N the series
ψ1(j,M1) =∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kM1t=1 (mk,1)
)ej+kM1 = (j∏
t=1
mk,1).(∞∑
k=0
1∏j+kM1
t=1 mk,1
ej+kM1)
ψ2(j,M2) =∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kM2t=1 (mk,2)
)ej+kM2 = (j∏
t=1
mk,2).(∞∑
k=0
1∏j+kM2
t=1 mk,2
ej+kM2)
...
ψn(j,Mn) =∞∑
k=0
(1
∏j+kMnt=1 (mk,n)
)ej+kMn = (j∏
t=1
mk,n).(∞∑
k=0
1∏j+kMn
t=1 mk,n
ej+kMn)
converges and define n elements in X . Moreover, if M ≥ i then
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn = ψ1(j,M1)
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn = ψ2(j,M2)
...
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn = ψn(j,Mn)
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn = ψ1(j,M1)T
M11 TM2
2 ...TMnn ψ1(j,M1) = ω(j,M1) (1)
n-tuples and chaoticity 655
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn = ψ2(j,M2)T
M11 TM2
2 ...TMnn ψ2(j,M2) = ω(j,M2)
...
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn = ψ1(j,M1)T
M11 TM2
2 ...TMnn ψn(j,Mn) = ω(j,Mn)
and, if N ≥ ji then
Tmj,1
1 Tmj,2
2 ...Tmj,nn ω((j, i), N) = ω((j, i), N) (2)
for mj,i ≥ N and i = 1, 2, ..., n. So that each ψ(j,N) for j ≤ N is a periodicpoint for T . We shall show that T has a dense set of periodic points. Since{eκ} is a basis, it suffices to show that for every element x ∈ span{eκ : κ ∈ N}there is a periodic point y arbitrarily close to it. For this, let x =
∑mj=1 xjej
and ε > 0. We can assume without lost of generality that
| xi
i∏
t=1
at,1 |≤ 1 , i = 1, 2, 3, ...,m1
| xj
i∏
t=1
at,2 |≤ 1 , i = 1, 2, 3, ...,m2
...
| xi
i∏
t=1
at,n |≤ 1 , i = 1, 2, 3, ...,mn
Since {en} is an unconditional basis, then condition (4) implies that there arean M,N ≥ m such that
‖∞∑
n=M1+1
εκ,11
∏κt=1 at,1
eκ‖ <ε
m1
‖∞∑
n=M2+1
εκ,21
∏κt=1 at,2
eκ‖ <ε
m2
...
‖∞∑
n=Mn+1
εκ,n1
∏κt=1 at,n
eκ‖ <ε
mn
for every sequences {εκ,i}, i = 1, 2, ..., n taking values 0 or 1. By (1) and (2)the elements
y1 =m1∑
i=1
xiψ(i,M1)
y2 =m2∑
i=1
xiψ(i,M2)
...
656 M. Habibi
yn =mn∑
i=1
xiψ(i,Mn)
of X is a periodic point for T , and we have‖yλ − x‖ = ‖∑mλ
i=1 xi(ψ(i,Mλ) − ei)‖= ‖∑mλ
i=1(xi∏i
t=1 dt,Mλ)(
∑∞k=1
1∏i+kMλt=1
at,Mλ
ei+kMλ)‖
≤ ∑mλi=1 ‖(xi
∏it=1 dt,Mλ
)(∑∞
k=11∏i+kMλ
t=1at,Mλ
ei+kMλ)‖
≤ ∑mλi=1 ‖(
∑∞k=1
1∏i+kMλt=1
at,Mλ
ei+kMλ)‖
≤ εas λ = 1, 2, ..., n and by this, the proof is complete.
References
[1] J. Bes, Three problem on Hypercyclic Operators, Ph.D Thesis , KentState University 1998.
[2] P. S. Bourdon and J. H. Shapiro, Cyclic Phenomena for CompositionOperators, Mem. of Amer. Math. Soc. , 125 (1997), 345-353.
[3] G. Costakis and M. Sambarino, Toplogically Mixing Hypercyclic Opera-tors, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 132, No. 2 (2003), 385-389.
[4] F. Ershad, B. Yousefi and M. Habibi, Conditions For Reflexivity on someSequences Space, Int. Jour. of Math. Anal. , 4, No. 30 (2010), 1465-1468.
[5] R. M. Gethner and J. H. Shapiro, Universal vectors for Operators onSpaces of Holomorphic Functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 100 (1987),281-288.
[6] M. Habibi and F. Safari, n-Tuples and Epsilon Hypercyclicity, Far EastJour. of Math. Sci. , 47, No. 2 (2010), 219-223.
[7] M. Habibi and F. Safari, Chaoticity of a Pair of Operators, Int. Jour. ofApp. Math. , 24 , No. 2 (2011), 155-160.
[8] M. Habibi and B. Yousefi, Conditions for a Tuple of Operators to beTopologically Mixing, Int. Jour. App. Math. , 23, No. 6 (2010), 973-976.
[9] C. Kitai, Invariant Closed Sets for Linear Operators, Thesis, Universityof Toronto 1982.
[10] G. R. MacLane, Sequences of derivatives and normal families, Jour. Anal.Math. , 2 (1952), 72-87.
n-tuples and chaoticity 657
[11] J. H. Shapiro, Composition Operators and classical Function Theory,Springer-Verlag 1993.
[12] B. Yousefi and M. Habibi, Hypercyclicity Criterion for a Pair of WeightedComposition Operators, Int. Jour. of App. Math. , 24 , No. 2 (2011),215-219.
[13] B. Yousefi and M. Habibi, Hereditarily Hypercyclic Pairs, Int. Jour. ofApp. Math. , 24 , No. 2 (2011), 245-249.
[14] B. Yousefi and M. Habibi, Syndetically Hypercyclic Pairs, Int. Math. Fo-rum , 5, No. 66 (2010), 3267-3272.
Received: September, 2011