paola di ciaccio vanja nikolac - arthiqs - wp5 - arthiqs.pdfvanja nikolac. directive 2004/23/ec of...

25
Paola Di Ciaccio Vanja Nikolac

Upload: others

Post on 18-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Paola Di Ciaccio

    Vanja Nikolac

  • Directive 2004/23/ECof the European Parliament and of the Council of

    31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and

    safety for the donation, procurement, testing,

    processing, preservation, storage and distribution of

    human tissues and cells

    LAW DECREE November 6 2007, n.191

    Transposition of Directive2004/23/EC on setting

    standards of quality and safety for the donation,

    procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage

    and distribution of human tissues and cells

    Directive 2006/17/ECimplementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European

    Parliament and of the Council as regards certain

    technical requirements for the donation, procurement

    and testing of human tissues and cells

    LAW DECREE January 25 2010, n.16

    Transposition of Directives 2006/17/EC and 2006/86/EC

    of the European Parliament and of the Council as

    regards certain technical requirements for the donation,

    procurement and testing of human tissues and cells, as

    well as regards traceability requirements, notification of

    serious adverse reactions and events and certain

    technical requirements for the coding, processing,

    preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues

    and cells

    Directive 2006/86/ECof 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC

    of the European Parliament and of the Council as

    regards traceability requirements, notification of

    serious adverse reactions and events and certain

    technical requirements for the coding, processing,

    preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues

    and cells

    ITALY in the HSC field: HOW IS THIS RULED?

  • STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR TISSUE ESTABLISHMENTS(RESPONSIBILITY OF CENTRES)

    RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES

    IN SINGLE MEMBER STATES

    FOR CHECK ON APPLICATION OF TE STANDARDS

    IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

  • BLOOD CELLS

    ORGANS TISSUES

    DONATORE

    Competent Authorities in Italy: Health Minister and

    Regions act through technical bodies, CNT and CNS

  • They are technical and organizational structures thatcoordinate the national transplant network (for organs,

    tissues and cells) and the national blood donationnetwork, respectively

    They are both located in Romeat the ITALIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH

    A ROLE INBETWEEN HEALTH MINISTRY AND REGIONAL AUTHORITIES

    Law n. 91, Aprile 1, 1999Art.7

    ITALIAN NATIONAL TRANSPLANT CENTRE

    ITALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD CENTRE

    Law n.219. October 21, 2005

  • Article 4 – implementation of requirements foreseen by Directives

    Article 6 – authorization and accreditation of tissue establishments

    Article 7 – adoption by CAs of adequate control measures and inspection

    system (every two years) to ensure adherence to Directive requirements

    Article 8 – guarantee traceability

    Article 9 – vigilance on import/export

    Article 10 – data and activity registry and compulsory annual public report

    Article 11 – notification and investigations of serious adverse events and

    reactions

    DIRECTIVE 23/2004/EC

  • ACTIVITIES IN HSC FIELD

    � Data collection and processing

    � National coordinating and

    supporting body

    � Training of professionals and

    inspectors

    � Issuing of protocols and guidelines

    � Inspections

    � Vigilance and surveillance (SAERs)

  • HSC Donor identification issues and registries

    Pat Don

    • need for high degree ofcompatibility;

    • about one third of patientsrequiring HSCT finds acompatible donor withinhis/her family;

    • patients without a familycompatible donor rely thenon unrelated donors frominternational registry .

  • International bone marrow registry (I)

    Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW) is the continuing effort to collect the HLA phenotypes and other relevant data of volunteer stem cell donors and cord blood units, and is responsible for the co-ordination of their worldwide distribution. Participants are 73 stem cell donor registries from 52 countries, and 47 cord blood banks from 32 countries.

    23,853,648(23,246,742 donors

    and 606,906 CBU's)

    BMDW started as an initiative of the Immunobiology Working Party of the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) in 1988. In February 1989 the first edition was distributed, which contained the donor files of eight registries with a total of 155,000 volunteer stem cell donors.

  • International bone marrow registry (II)

    Adults Unrelated Donors

    - Bone Marrow

    - Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

    Unrelated

    Cord Blood Units

    Registries

    HLA typing Laboratories

    (Biological identity profile)

    Cord Blood

    Banks

    Patients

    Transplant Centre

  • 0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    14000

    16000

    18000

    20000

    1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Cord bloodPeripheral bloodBone marrow

    10.493

    12.227

    13.305

    15.399

    16.876

    18.302

    19.265Top five countries in 2012:

    Germany 6,247 41%

    USA 3,374 22%

    Japan 1,332 9%

    China 639 4%

    UK-ANT 405 3%

    4.126

    10.989

    4.150

    MATCHED UNRELATED DONORS in the world

  • WHY THIS ISSUE IN ARTHIQS (I)

    • Increased transplant activity;• increase the clinical indications;• improvement of supportive care;• increasing age of the patients;• increasing age of donors.

  • • Risks related to HSC donation are generally considered as non-existent.

    • However, over the years various reports from individualtransplantation centers and donor registries have shown thatthe collection procedure can be related to theonset of anumber of symptoms, with changes in vital signs and/orexaminations, in the majority of cases of moderate andtransient entity.

    • Some serious adverse events/reactions(including death) havebeen reported.

    • HSC donor follow-up is widely recognized to beinsufficient,especially regardingrelated donors.

    WHY THIS ISSUE IN ARTHIQS (II)

  • HOW WE ARE GOING TO TACKLE THIS …

    ⇒Revision of existing standards and their

    harmonization with EU directives, in close

    collaboration with international registry and

    professionals scientific societies;

    ⇒Definition of European guidelines to assure high

    level donors safety in all MS.

  • CROATIA - Competent Authority

    Population

    2011 census 4,284,889

    Area

    56,594 km2

    Capital

    Zagreb

    Competent Authority

    Ministry of Health

  • Croatian Ministry of Health- organisational chart

  • Competent authority forblood

    tissues and cells

    organs

    assisted reproductive technologies

    Institute for transplantation and biomedicine

    Data collection

    Authorisation

    Regulatory issues

    Organisational and financial issues

    Service for Inspection of Blood, Tissues and Cells

    Inspection

    Supervision of the implementation of acts and other regulations

    Vigilance (adverse reaction and event reporting system)

    Croatian Ministry of Health

  • CROATIAN

    LEGISLATION IN THE FIELD OF HSC

    Directive 2004/23/EC

    of the European Parliament and of the

    Council of 31 March 2004 on setting

    standards of quality and safety for the

    donation, procurement, testing,

    processing, preservation, storage and

    distribution of human tissues and cells

    ACT ON THE APPLICATION OF HUMAN

    TISSUES AND CELLS

    December 14 2012

    2nd, improved set of legislation transposing EUTCDs

  • CROATIAN

    LEGISLATION IN THE FIELD OF HSC

    Directive 2006/17/ECimplementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European

    Parliament and of the Council as regards certain

    technical requirements for the donation, procurement

    and testing of human tissues and cells

    Ordinance

    On the conditions in terms of premises, personnel,

    medical and technical equipment and quality system

    for the performance of the activities of collection,

    procurement, testing, processing, preservation,

    storage and distribution of human tissues and cells

    June 17 2013

    Directive 2006/86/ECof 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC

    of the European Parliament and of the Council as

    regards traceability requirements, notification of

    serious adverse reactions and events and certain

    technical requirements for the coding, processing,

    preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues

    and cells

    Ordinance

    On the method of monitoring serious adverse events

    and serious adverse reactions in the field of

    application of human tissues and cells, the method of

    keeping records, the notification time limits and the

    content and format of the annual report

    April 17 2013

    Commission Decision 2010/453/EU

    of 3 August 2010 establishing guidelines concerning the

    conditions of inspections and control measures, and on

    the training and qualification of officials, in the field of

    human tissues and cells provided for in Directive

    2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the

    Council

    Ordinance

    On the requirements concerning professional

    qualifications and professional training and on the

    method of conducting supervision in the field of

    application of human tissues and cells

    April 30 2013

  • CBB : deserves special attention

    Umbilical Cord Blood• First transplantation in 1988., in Paris, in a patient with Fanconi anemia

    • First unrelated cord blood transplant in adult in 1996.

    • In 1997. International NetCord Foundation, a non-profit association of umbilical cord blood banks was established - today aprox. 35 banks and

    registries are members

    • In the global network of CBB there are aprox. 600 000 UCB units (Eliane Gluckman, Annalisa Ruggeri, Fernanda Volt, Renato Cunha, Karim Boudjedir and Vanderson Rocha: Milestones in umbilical cord blood transplantation, 2011 Blackwell

    Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 154, 441–447)

    • More than 20 000 units have been distributed (Ibid.)

  • CBB deserves special attention

    Umbilical Cord Blood

    mobility source

  • CBB deserves special attention

    Umbilical Cord Blood

    • Long term leukaemia-free survival in children (Wagner et al, 1996; Locatelli et al, 1999) and adults(Cairo & Wagner, 1997; Rubinstein et al, 1998; Laughlin et al, 2001; Sanz et al, 2001) is similar for cord blood transplant

    recipients and matched unrelated bone marrow transplant recipients

    • Improved results, mostly in adults, with the use of double cord blood transplants (Barker et al, 2005; Brunstein et al, 2007; Rocha et al, 2010)

    • Notch-mediated expansion resulting in rapid engraftment (Colleen Delaney, Shelly Heimfeld, Carolyn Brashem-Stein, Howard Voorhies, Ronald L. Manger, and Irwin D. Bernstein1; Notch-mediated expansion of Human Cord Blood Progenitor Cells

    Capable of Rapid Myeloid Reconstitution , Nat Med. 2010 February ; 16(2): 232. doi:10.1038/nm.2080)

    Shows that storing of high quality units

    is not only worth but essential

  • CBB deserves special attention

    Umbilical Cord Blood- advantages• Simple collection procedure

    • Has to be risk for donor - a mother or a newborn• No donor attrition• Low risk of viral transmitting• Immediate availability in emergency• Easy delivery • Grater proportion of rare haplotypes present in UCB banks then in BMT

    registries

    (Anfisa Stanevsky a, Gal Goldstein b, Arnon Nagler: Umbilical cord blood transplantation: Pros, cons and beyond)

  • Targets

    • Developing guidelines for CB banking establishing commongood practice for the field in MS

    • Setting guide for CBB inspection leading to harmonisation ininspection practice (including inspectors’ education and

    skills, inspection documentation, performance) and mutual

    recognition of EU inspection bodies