palaeomagnetism, polar wander and global tectonics: some controversies · 2013-10-10 · new...
TRANSCRIPT
New Concepts in Global Tectonics Journal (www.ncgt.org), v. 1, no. 3, September 2013, pp. 103-117
Discussion
PALAEOMAGNETISM, POLAR WANDER AND GLOBAL
TECTONICS: SOME CONTROVERSIES
David PRATT
This is a response to Karsten Storetvedt’s article ‘Global theories and standards of judgment’ (this
issue, p. 55-101), in so far as it comments on my review paper ‘Palaeomagnetism, plate motion and
polar wander’ (NCGT Journal, v. 1, no. 1, 2013, p. 66-152).
Crustal movements
According to Karsten Storetvedt (p. 57), ‘In his article, David Pratt sets out to question everything that
smacks of lithospheric mobility – basically returning to the late 19th century North American idea of continental-oceanic fixity.’ Given that my article speaks of ‘periodic changes in the distribution of
land and sea’ and refers to abundant evidence showing that large areas of the present oceans were
once dry land, this is a remarkable misunderstanding. In my article I also wrote: The Earth’s crust is in constant motion. The Earth’s relief currently ranges from 8.8 km above sea level to 10.8
km below it. There is ample evidence that mantle heat flow and material transport can cause significant changes
in crustal thickness, composition, and density, resulting in substantial uplifts and subsidences – without the need
for ‘plate collisions’ and ‘subduction’. The scale of vertical movements is indicated by the fact that the thickness
of marine sedimentary layers in mountain belts is commonly over 10 km and can reach 23 km. As far as
horizontal movements are concerned, field evidence indicates that crustal strata can be thrust tens if not
hundreds of kilometres, that crustal extension or shortening of up to hundreds of kilometres has occurred, and that motion of over a hundred kilometres has taken place along some wrench faults. But given the widely
varying thickness of the lithosphere, the existence of deep continental roots, the lack of a continuous
asthenosphere, the absence of some ‘plate’ boundaries, and the correlation between near-surface features and
deep mantle features, the movement of lithospheric slabs as relatively rigid bodies over hundreds or thousands
of kilometres seems utterly impossible. (p. 84)
Storetvedt quotes the first four sentences of this passage (p. 71). At the end of the first sentence about the crust being in constant motion, he adds: ‘[vertically, I suppose]’. He chooses not to quote the
statement about horizontal movements – which contradicts his suggestion that I only recognize
vertical movements.
Space-geodetic data, too, leave no room for doubt about the ongoing horizontal and vertical motions
of the earth’s crust. There is, however, plenty of room for debate about the areal extent and thickness
of the elements of the earth’s crust and lithosphere that are actually moving, how far they have moved, and the forces responsible.
Planetary degassing
According to Karsten Storetvedt, I am a ‘prostrate supporter’ of surge tectonics and look upon Arthur Meyerhoff as a ‘high priest’. In reality, I have never regarded surge tectonics as a definitive global
tectonic model. I do believe that there is strong evidence that vertical and horizontal flows of magma
in the lithosphere have played a significant role in the earth’s geologic history; such concepts originated long before the development of surge tectonics, as Meyerhoff et al. (1996a, p. 20-29) make
clear. The fact that the earth is still degassing is also very pertinent (Williams & Hemley, 2001; Porcelli & Turekian, 2003), and the hypothesis that ascending hydrous fluids can cause crustal
2
alteration and motion – which Storetvedt has strongly advocated – is worthy of further investigation.
There has been a lot of discussion in the NCGT group about oceanization/basification (e.g. NCGT Newsletter, no. 12, p. 18-24; and no. 14, p. 18-23), but the last word has not yet been said.
Storetvedt speculates that upstanding sections of the core-mantle boundary (CMB) indicate the main
locations of degassing. He often presents a figure from Morelli & Dziewonski (1987) to support this, claiming that upstanding sections shows ‘close agreement’ with the surface arrangement of oceanic
depressions (his figure 2; included in figure 1 below). However, the agreement is not particularly
impressive, and the figure in question also shows upstanding CMB sections beneath the Scandinavian Shield and most of the Canadian Shield. Storetvedt says that the image he uses is an ‘early version’ of
CMB topography. Examples of more recent versions are given in the figures below, which show that
different tomographic models can lead to very different results.
Fig. 1. (http://yoshida-geophys.jp)
Fig. 2. CMB topography (Soldati et al., 2012, fig. 9).
Wrench tectonics and polar wander
Karsten Storetvedt thinks that my article ‘sets out to put surge tectonics on the map’, but also
complains that the principal tenets of surge tectonics are not discussed. The main purpose of my
3
article, as the title suggests, is to critically review theories connected with palaeomagnetism and polar
wander.
The fundamental assumption that averaged palaeomagnetic poles for specific periods approximately
coincided with past geographic poles is unproved. In addition, fossil magnetism in rocks can be
altered by many factors, remagnetization is common, tectonic movements further complicate the picture, and as a result the palaeomagnetic database is full of inconsistencies. There is great scope for
subjectivity in the selection, processing and interpretation of palaeomagnetic data. According to Lisa
Tauxe (2013): ‘Picking out the meaningful poles from the published data is part of the art of paleomagnetism.’ Richard Kerr (1987) writes: ‘Deciding which are the most reliable paleomagnetic
data has always been a controversial subject, prompting the playful label of “paleomagician” for
practitioners in the field.’
While plate tectonics explains palaeomagnetic data mainly in terms of the motion of entire
lithospheric ‘plates’ together with a relatively small degree of true polar wander, wrench tectonics
explains them mainly in terms of large-scale true polar wander along with ‘modest’ continental/plate rotations and displacements. Storetvedt argues that unevenly distributed degassing from the earth’s
interior would lead to internal mass reorganization and trigger significant polar wander. However, this
would only be the case if the earth possesses a low enough strength and mantle viscosity; my article reviews this controversial issue at length and shows that it is still unresolved. Wrench tectonics claims
that the poles wandered some 35° within 2-3 Myr at the Eocene-Oligocene (E-O) boundary. Tsai &
Stevenson (2007), however, calculated that polar wander was limited to 8° in 10 Myr; they assumed a mantle viscosity of 3 x 1022 Pa S (which may be several orders of magnitude too low) together with
the existence of mantle convection and slab subduction.
Wrench tectonics states that over the past 450 Myr the north pole has moved from about 20°S to its present position, mainly along the 180° meridian, but that there have also been several reversals of
direction. In the Jurassic and lower Cretaceous the poles are said to have been not far from their
present positions, with the equator running across the Central Sahara. At about 100 Ma the equator allegedly shifted to the northern rim of the African continent, but then moved back to the Central
Sahara at 80-60 Ma, before returning to the southern rim of the Mediterranean in the lower Tertiary.
After the alleged rapid burst of polar wander at the E-O boundary (about 35 Ma), when the equator
shifted to around its present position across Central Africa, the equator moved north again in mid-Miocene time, cutting across Central Arabia, before returning to its present location around 5 Ma.
As I said in my article (p. 112), such a scenario, with the poles moving back and forth like a yoyo in more or less the same plane, seriously strains credulity, since internal mass anomalies would have to
arise and decay in a highly contrived and nonrandom fashion. I also pointed to various problems with
interpreting the climate shift at the E-O boundary in terms of polar wander, and highlighted the need to take account of more recent data on post-Eocene climate fluctuations.
Examples of the continental/plate rotations and translations proposed by wrench tectonics are the
following: most of South America rotated ~10º clockwise, while the northern portion rotated anticlockwise, and South America as a whole shifted southward by ~20°. Greater India rotated ~135°
clockwise near the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Antarctica rotated 140° clockwise and Australia 70º
anticlockwise, and the Antarctica-Australia-New Zealand-Melanesia block moved 15° northeastward. As shown in my article, these claims cannot be reconciled with various structural lineaments that run
across oceans and continents. If the proposed continental/plate motions are implausible, something is
seriously wrong with the underlying assumptions of wrench tectonics, whatever its pretensions to be a ‘next-generation global tectonic platform’.
Storetvedt has developed his own method of selecting, handling and interpreting palaeomagnetic data.
The evidence he presents in support of the alleged 35° of polar wander around the E-O boundary provides an insight into his methods. He plots selected palaeomagnetic data for Europe North
America and Africa, ignores actual rock ages on the grounds that remagnetization has probably
4
occurred, and simply ‘infers’ that the dates of the palaeopoles progress in a manner consistent with his
theory of a 35° shift of the poles (see figures 6.2 and 6.3 of my article). In his response, Storetvedt says I have not understood that he is talking about remagnetization ages. Perhaps he failed to notice
that I quoted his own remark that ‘magnetization and physical rock ages may easily have been
disconnected by remagnetization’ (p. 113). He does not address my suggestion that it would be better
to present the actual rock ages along with the ‘inferred’ ages and the rationale behind them. After all, if the only constraint on the inferred dates is that they must fit his pet theory, the approach could
hardly be termed ‘scientific’.
Storetvedt repeats his stock argument that ‘lithospheric wrenching is latitude-dependent – increasing
in intensity towards the palaeo-equator’ (p. 92). Of the inertial forces he likes to invoke, the
centrifugal force is indeed strongest at the equator, but as I mentioned in my article (p. 56-57), the Coriolis force (which he seems to think can rotate entire continents and the surrounding oceanic
lithosphere) is weakest at the equator, as far as horizontally moving material is concerned.
The Meyerhoff letter Arthur Meyerhoff and Karsten Storetvedt spent a day discussing their respective geotectonic
hypotheses in November 1993. We only have Storetvedt’s account of what was said (including his
interpretation of Meyerhoff’s body language), and some of it reads rather comically. Meyerhoff wrote
a letter on 10 March 1994 (in reply to one from Storetvedt), commenting on their hypotheses. Extracts from this letter were first published in 1999 (NCGT Newsletter, no. 12. p. 25-27), and again in 2010
(no. 55, p. 29). Storetvedt interprets the letter to mean that Meyerhoff had largely embraced wrench
tectonics.
Nowhere in the letter does Arthur Meyerhoff explicitly state that he has abandoned his earlier views
and now fully accepts large-scale polar wander and continental rotations as the only correct explanation of palaeomagnetic, palaeoclimatic and palaeontological data. If he had changed his views
so radically, it seems likely he would have made this known more widely. He remained in contact
with his coauthors until his death on 18 September 1994 but, according to Dong Choi (email, 2013),
he did not give any sign of having significantly revised his views. Nor did he do so in other published correspondence (see, for example, the extracts from a letter he wrote on 20 June 1994 in NCGT
Newsletter no. 6, p. 3-4).
Neither of his two posthumously published works (Meyerhoff et al., 1996a and 1996b) contains the
slightest hint of any ‘conversion’. The biogeography book (accepted for publication in July 1995)
presents palaeoclimatic and palaeontological evidence which is interpreted in the same way as in his
papers in the 1970s. The surge tectonics book (based on material prepared by Meyerhoff, and completed by his coauthors) states that palaeomagnetism is ‘plagued with uncertainties’ (p. 64) and
that polar wander ‘cannot be regarded as anything but speculation’ (p. 8). According to Irfan Taner,
another of his coworkers, Meyerhoff believed that crustal blocks could rotate, but not entire continents (NCGT Newsletter, no. 12, p. 24). This is in line with the evidence for deep continental
roots and the lack of a global asthenosphere, which are highlighted in the surge tectonics book.
Elsewhere in this issue (p. 116-120), Arthur Meyerhoff’s children provide further valuable
information setting the historical record straight.
Palaeoclimate Karsten Storetvedt calls Meyerhoff’s palaeoclimate maps ‘dubious’, and believes that he ‘implicitly
put his palaeo-climatic maps aside’ in his letter. But the maps simply plot the location of
palaeoclimatic indicators on the present globe, based on dozens of sources. It is in the interpretation of
5
the data that the controversy lies – and proponents of all tectonic models are seemingly able to cite at
least some such data in support of their theories. The maps in Meyerhoff et al. 1996b are similar to those he published in the 1970s, because the underlying data are largely the same. (For comparison,
see the palaeoclimate maps compiled by Chris Scotese (www.scotese.com), though these have the
disadvantage of being plotted on plate-tectonic continental reconstructions.)
On Storetvedt’s map of Devonian evaporites, red beds and coral limestones (his figure 10), based on
Schwarzbach (1961; see figure 3 below), the evaporite areas show a reasonable match with those on
Meyerhoff et al.’s map (1996b, figure 7), based partly on Boucot & Gray (1983), though Schwarzbach omits some deposits. Storetvedt’s figure 12 (figure 4 below) shows his hypothetical tropical belt for
the mid-Palaeozoic, based on a south palaeopole at 0°E, 20°S; parts of the belt pass through many of
the areas marked in his figure 10.
Fig. 3. Climatic map of the Devonian (Schwarzbach, 1961, fig. 3). 1 – reef limestones; 2 – Old Red Sandstone
facies; 3 – evaporites; 4 – Iapo Formation and Table Mountain tillite; 5 – upper Devonian tillite; 6 –
palaeomagnetic north and south poles (after Runcorn); 7 – equator and polar circles; B – bauxite.
Fig. 4. Mid-Palaeozoic tropical zone, according to wrench tectonics.
It should be borne in mind, however, that evaporites, red beds and coral limestones are not necessarily tropical indicators. Corals are indicators of overall humid conditions, warm to cold (Boucot, 2009);
6
Teichert (1964) cautioned that Palaeozoic corals and stromatoporoids should not be seen as indicators
of any specific water temperature. According to Joachimski et al. (2009), the Devonian palaeotemperature record suggests that microbial reefs dominated during warm to very warm intervals
whereas coral-stromatoporoid reefs flourished during cooler intervals.
Evaporites and red beds are indicators of arid climates. Arid zones can certainly be found in the tropics, but modern evaporites accumulate in desert areas located in two belts situated between about
15° and 45° north and south of the equator (Lugli, 2009). Interestingly, in the late Precambrian/early
Palaeozoic wrench tectonics places the north pole in Pakistan/Iran, in a region with widespread contemporaneous salt deposits (Storetvedt & Bouzari, 2012, fig. 1; Storetvedt & Longhinos, 2012).
The main locations of ancient evaporites are shown in figure 5. From the data plotted on his more detailed maps, Meyerhoff (1970) discovered that 95% of all evaporites from the late Proterozoic to
the present, by volume and by area, lie in regions which today receive less than 100 cm of annual
rainfall, i.e. in today’s dry-wind belts. Neither shifting the continents nor shifting the poles helps to
explain this distribution. Green (1961), too, concluded that ‘the distribution of evaporites through geological time can be explained on the basis of climatic change alone, without necessitating any
changes in relative positions of continental masses, or in positions of the rotational poles of the earth’
(p. 85). Van Houten (1961) showed that although shifting the poles to different palaeoclimatically or palaeomagnetically determined positions would move some Permo-Triassic red-bed deposits closer to
the equator, it would move other deposits very close to the poles.
Fig. 5. Location, approximate size, and age of the world’s major ancient evaporite deposits, together with
modern arid and semiarid areas. (Lugli, 2009, fig. E16)
In his letter to Storetvedt, Meyerhoff says that on some of the palaeoclimate maps the climate zones
do not run parallel to the equator. This is a point he had also emphasized in his earlier papers. Modern climate zones do not run parallel to the equator either, due to the distribution of land and sea,
continental topography and oceanic bathymetry, and related atmospheric and ocean circulation.
Meyerhoff explained the existence of high northern-latitude evaporites in certain geologic periods
partly in terms of the warmer global climate at such times and partly by tracing the history of sill
development across the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans; the successive appearance of sills finally
diverted the saline waters, in Permian and Triassic times, into central and western Europe and the present Mediterranean. Meyerhoff & Meyerhoff (1976, p. 366) argued that it was no coincidence that
7
the only regions with high-latitude evaporites – Proterozoic to Triassic – are the lands which today
border the North Atlantic Ocean and the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean, this being ‘the one region which is invaded by the only major warm, saline oceanic current to reach latitudes higher than
50°-55°’. Storetvedt dismisses this reasoned argument as ‘ad hoc’. Palaeoclimatologists, however,
regard the opening and closing of ocean gateways as a key factor in understanding past climates.
Palaeozoic glaciations
Storetvedt says that placing the mid-Palaeozoic pole near South Africa is ‘in correspondence with widespread glaciation in Central-South Africa at that time’. To assess this properly, we need to
consider the global distribution of glacial events. The locations of the main glacial deposits during the
three major Palaeozoic glaciations are outlined below.
Fig. 6. (Meyerhoff et al., 1996b, fig. 5; partly based on Boucot & Gray, 1983)
During the late Ordovician and early Silurian, short but severe glaciations affected parts of North
Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, South Africa, and South America (Ghienne, 2011; Finnegan et al., 2011; Díaz-Martínez et al., 2011; Díaz-Martínez & Grahn, 2007; Le Heron & Howard, 2010; Paris et
al., 1995; Biju-Duval et al., 1981). Glaciomarine deposits with dropstones of Ordovician/Silurian age
have also been found in Canada (Newfoundland/Nova Scotia – located in the wrench-tectonic
equatorial zone) (Schenk & Lane, 1981; Harland, 1981; Kennedy, 1981), and in various parts of Europe – Brittany, Thuringia and the Iberian Peninsula (Doré, 1981; Robardet & Doré, 1988; Steiner
& Falk, 1981; Paris et al., 1995). (See figure 6.) Le Heron & Dowdeswell (2009) rejected the concept
of a gigantic, continuous ice sheet covering a huge area of Gondwana in favour of the idea that small, separate ice sheets developed in different areas.
Most of the Devonian is believed to have been a time of widespread equable climates (Becker et al.,
8
2012). Oxygen-isotope data from Australia, Europe and the mid-continent USA indicate that
temperatures were around 30°C in the earliest Devonian, falling to around 23 to 25°C in the mid-Devonian, rising again to around 30°C in the late Devonian, before falling again (Joachimski et al.,
2009). However, the cool-water Malvinokaffric fauna indicates a cooler climate in southern South
America, the southern tip of Africa, and Antarctica in early and middle Devonian times (Boucot &
Gray, 1983). In the Ordovician, Malvinokaffric fauna had extended into North Africa, Arabia, Western Europe, parts of northern South America, and a limited portion of easternmost North
America (see figure 6).
In the late Devonian and earliest Carboniferous, glaciation is believed to have affected northern-
central and southern Africa, and parts of South America, from Peru and Bolivia to the Amazonas and
Parnaíba basins (Caputo & Crowell, 1985; Caputo et al., 2008; Isaacson et al., 2008; Wicander et al., 2011; Streel et al., 2000), though some of the evidence has been called into question (Dickins, 1993).
Contemporaneous tillites and dropstones have also been found in the Appalachian basin of eastern
North America (Brezinski et al., 2008; Cecil et al., 2004), i.e. in the wrench-tectonic equatorial zone.
From the late Carboniferous to the early to middle Permian, a series of glaciations affected parts of
South America, Africa, Arabia, India, Tibet, Australia, and Antarctica (Caputo & Crowell, 1985;
Dickins, 1996; López-Gamundí & Buatois, 2010; Jones & Fielding, 2004). Dropstones, glaciomarine deposits, and diamictites of Pennsylvanian/Permian age have also been reported from Siberia
(Epshteyn, 1981a,b; Chumakov, 1994; Ustritsky, 1973; Raymond & Metz, 2004). (See figures 7 and
9.)
The conventional view is that the late Palaeozoic ice age was a single event lasting tens of millions of
years, but more recent research indicates that it comprised a series of shorter, discrete glacial events
(<1 to ~8 Myr in duration) separated by periods of warmer climate (Fielding et al., 2008a,b; Montañez & Poulsen, 2013). It began with short-lived, localized glacial events in South America around the
Devonian/Carboniferous boundary. In the latest Mississippian and the Pennsylvanian, ice expanded
across South America, southern Africa, Australia, and then Oman and Arabia. In the latter half of the Pennsylvanian, some evidence points toward climatic amelioration, though ice centres continued to
occur. A massive expansion of ice occurred at the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary, focused on
Antarctica, Australia, southern Africa and South America, and glacial deposits in Siberia indicate that
glaciation was by this time bipolar. Ice sheets reached their maximum extent during the Asselian and early Sakmarian, after which they decayed rapidly. Glaciation may have continued intermittently in
Australia and Siberia throughout the late Early and Middle Permian. While major events appear to
have been synchronized globally, the timing of individual glaciations may have been asynchronous.
The wandering palaeopoles proposed by wrench tectonics shift some Palaeozoic glacial centres into
higher latitudes, but move other glacial deposits into lower latitudes, as far as the equator (see
Storetvedt’s figure 13 for his palaeoequators1). The same latitudinal spread of Palaeozoic glacial
deposits occurs if the poles are kept in their present positions. Even today ‘there are small glaciers
near or at the equator on all transequatorial continents, and, during the peak of Pleistocene glaciation,
some glaciers were widespread and at fairly low elevations’ (Meyerhoff & Teichert, 1971, p. 303-
304). In plate-tectonic reconstructions, Palaeozoic glaciations extended at their peak from the south pole to 20-30°S (Montañez & Poulsen, 2013); palaeomagnetic uncertainties allow the positions of
continents to be adjusted to keep glacial centres away from the equator.
1 Wrench tectonics places the north pole at 180°E, 20°N in the upper Ordovician (~450 Ma) and also in the Devonian (Storetvedt, 1997, figures 1.3, 3.4, 3.6). According to the ‘global’ polar wander path (1997, fig. 9.5), based on selected data from Africa and Europe, the pole was still in virtually the same place (about 21°N) in the lower Carboniferous (~350 Ma). By the upper Carboniferous-Permian (~300 Ma) it had moved to about 41°N. All wrench-tectonic palaeoequators for the past 450 Myr pass through two points on the present equator, at 90°E and 90°W.
9
Fig. 7. (Meyerhoff et al., 1996b, fig. 8)
Needless to say, glaciations are not just polar phenomena, but can also occur at lower latitudes if the
elevation or other local factors produce suitable climatic conditions. The onset of glaciation is related to temperature, the presence of highlands, and the availability of moisture (Meyerhoff & Teichert,
1971). Mountain and valley glaciation played a major role in many of the Palaeozoic glacial events
(Dickins, 1985a; Meyerhoff & Teichert, 1971; Meyerhoff & Meyerhoff, 1974; Jones & Fielding,
2004; Fielding et al., 2008a; Montañez & Poulsen, 2013). Plate tectonicists initially assumed the existence in the late Palaeozoic of a massive icecap centred on the migrating palaeo-south pole in
Gondwana, but most now recognize the existence of small to moderate-size ice sheets emanating from
multiple ice centres during successive, short-lived glacial events, separated by warmer, sometimes ice-free conditions (Montañez & Poulsen, 2013). The size of Palaeozoic continental ice sheets (mainly
Asselian) is still a matter of contention; Dickins (1985a, 1992, 1993, 1996) presents a very critical
assessment of the evidence.
A fundamental feature of the earth’s evolving climate over geologic time is the succession of globally
warm and cool periods, resulting in significant changes in the width of climate zones. It is an
inescapable fact that regions can undergo dramatic changes of climate without any change in latitude. For instance, a lowermost Permian cold-water sequence (including tillites) is found in Arabia,
Pakistan, Peninsular and Himalayan India, and Tibet, containing Gondwanan fauna of low taxic
diversity. Above it lies a carbonate-bearing unit deposited in shallow, warm-water, tropical-subtropical seas, with rich, diversified, Tethyan fauna. In fact, early Permian cold-water Gondwanan
faunas are succeeded abruptly by Tethyan warm-water faunas from the Indian subcontinent to New
Guinea and Western Australia, and from the subcontinent to the Andes (Meyerhoff et al., 1996b;
Dickins, 1985b).
After reviewing climatic data for different continents during the Permian, Dickins (1985b) concluded:
If climate is to be taken as an indication of latitude during the Permian and other possible factors are put aside, it
10
would be expected on the basis of this information that India would be closest to the equator, cratonic South
America and southern Africa further away, Australia further away again and Antarctica farthest. [T]his
information does not readily fit the currently proposed continental reconstructions for this time. (p. 87)
Moving the poles may help to explain selected evidence for particular periods but, as shown in my
literature review, when a broad range of climatic, faunal and floral data are considered, the evidence is
found to be readily compatible with the present location of the poles. The bipolar distribution of many
biotas since at least Devonian time strongly supports this (Meyerhoff et al., 1996b). A major unknown is the precise location and size of now sunken landmasses in different geologic periods, and how they
affected ocean and atmospheric circulation and faunal and floral migration.
On the basis of the inferred direction of ice movement, plate tectonicists believe that during the early
Permian, glaciers advanced into the Paraná basin of central-eastern South America from Africa, into
South Africa, eastern India and southern Australia from Antarctica, and into the sea basins of the Himalayas and Tibet from Australia (Chumakov & Zharkov, 2002). If the inferred ice movements are
correct, the glaciers could have originated on now sunken landmasses (Dickins et al., 1992; Vasiliev
& Yano, 2007). In the late Ordovician/early Silurian, the sedimentary record of glaciation in the Peru-
Bolivia basin indicates that glacial centres and sediment sources were located on a landmass to the west, including the Arequipa massif (Caputo et al. 2008; Díaz-Martínez et al., 2011). This, too, is an
area where various lines of evidence point to a former Palaeozoic landmass (Dickins, 1994).
Palaeomagnetic fantasies and discrepancies Figure 8 shows the plate-tectonic reconstruction for the mid-Devonian. A striking feature is the extent
to which Asia in particular has been chopped up into numerous separate units. Boucot & Gray (1983),
although staunch supporters of plate tectonics, severely criticized the modern palaeomagnetically-
inspired tendency to ‘slice and dice’ continents and shuffle the pieces around. They argued, for example, that a fragmented Asia was contradicted by the presence of lithofacies belts extending across
vast areas of the region, and that lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic data also ruled out major
displacement between Europe, Africa and the Middle East. They presented an alternative reconstruction for the Devonian which they claimed was in accordance with geologic and climatic
evidence – but given that it is based on seafloor spreading, it violates a mass of data on the
‘anomalous’ age and composition of the seafloor.
Fig. 8. Plate-tectonic palaeogeographic reconstruction for the mid-Devonian (Becker et al., 2012).
KO = Kolyma-Omolon (northeast Russia); J = Japan; N.CH = North China; S.CH = South China;
KAZ. = Kazachstania (part of central Asia); TM = Tarim (western China); TB = Tibet; B.MA = Burma-Malaya;
IC = Indochina; NZ = New Zealand.
11
The very different palaeogeographies to which different interpretations of (sometimes different) palaeomagnetic data can give rise can be seen by comparing figure 8 with the wrench-tectonic
reconstruction in figure 4. Numerous palaeolatitude discrepancies can be found, and they sometimes
become worse if corrections are made for the post-Palaeozoic continental movements postulated by
wrench tectonics. Karsten Storetvedt has not yet given his solution to the palaeomagnetically-based fragmentation of Eurasia, so it is not yet known how much the various blocks/terranes will have to be
rotated or displaced, and how much data selectivity or other ‘palaeomagic’ will be required to fit them
into the overall wrench-tectonic scheme.
According to Powell & Li (1994), the south pole was located off the coast of southern Chile at 400
Ma, reached eastern Brazil at 360 Ma, was in Central Africa at 340 Ma, moved across Antarctica from about 330 to 260 Ma, and then entered Australia, and was off the coast of West Antarctica at 175 Ma
(see figure 9).2 According to wrench tectonics, on the other hand, the south pole was never in any of
these precise locations in the middle to late Palaeozoic (the discrepancy ranges from ~10° to ~90°),
and Antarctica only became polar after about 35 Ma.
Fig. 9. The legendary Gondwana supercontinent, showing late Palaeozoic basins with glacial evidence in their stratigraphic record. Glacial episode I = late Devonian-earliest Carboniferous; Glacial episode II = early Late
Carboniferous; Glacial episode III = late Carboniferous-early Permian. (Circled numbers refer to chapters of the
GSA publication in question.) (López-Gamundí & Buatois, 2010, fig. 1)
To illustrate the variation in plate-tectonic reconstructions, five more apparent polar wander paths are shown in figure 10. Palaeomagnetists are free to fight out their differences among themselves.
2 In plate-tectonic literature, it is normal to give the 95% confidence circle radius for palaeomagnetic poles – often around 10° for the Palaeozoic (Robardet & Doré, 1988; Torsvik et al., 2012). This does not seem to be standard practice in wrench-tectonic literature.
12
Fig. 10. Left: Four apparent polar wander paths (Torsvik & Van der Voo, 2002, fig. 4). The one by Scotese &
Barrett is said to give palaeoclimatic indicators precedence over palaeomagnetic data. Right: APW path by
Torsvik & Van der Voo (2002, fig. 5). Numbers are in millions of years.
Conclusion To repeat my previous article’s conclusion: ‘Geological, geophysical, palaeontological and
palaeoclimatic data do not require large-scale plate motion or polar wander; they point to nondrifting
continents and stable poles, with vertical tectonic movements causing periodic changes in the distribution of land and sea.’
References
Becker, R.T., Gradstein, F.M., & Hammer, O., 2012. The Devonian Period. In: Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G.,
Schmitz, M.D., & Ogg, G.M., eds., The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier, ch. 22, p. 559-601.
Biju-Duval, B., Deynoux, M., & Rognon, P., 1981. Late Ordovician tillites of the Central Sahara. In: Hambrey,
M.J., & Harland, W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, p. 99-107.
Boucot, A.J., 2009. Early Paleozoic climates (Cambrian-Devonian). In: Gornitz, V., ed., Encyclopedia of
Paleoclimatology and Ancient Environments. Springer, p. 291-293.
Boucot, A.J., & Gray, J., 1983. A Paleozoic Pangaea. Science, v. 222, no. 4624, p. 571-581. Brezinski, D.K., Cecil, C.B., Skema, V.W., & Stamm, R., 2008. Late Devonian glacial deposits from the eastern
United States signal an end of the mid-Paleozoic warm period. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, v. 268, nos. 3-4, p. 143-151.
Caputo, M.V., & Crowell, J.C., 1985. Migration of glacial centers across Gondwana during Paleozoic era.
Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, no. 8, p. 1020-1036.
Caputo, M.V., Melo, J.H.G., Streel, M., & Isbell, J.L., 2008. Late Devonian and early Carboniferous glacial
records of South America. Geological Society of America Special Paper 441, p. 161-173.
Cecil, C.B., Brezinski, D.K., & Dulong, F., 2004. The Paleozoic record of changes in global climate and sea
level: Central Appalachian Basin. In: Southworth, S., & Burton, W., eds., Geology of the National Capital
Region – Field trip Guidebook. US Geological Survey Circular 1264, p. 77-135.
13
Chumakov, N.M., 1994. Evidence of late Permian glaciation in the Kolyma River basin: a repercussion of the
Gondwana glaciation in Northeast Asia? Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, v. 2, no. 5, p. 426-444.
Chumakov, N.M., & Zharkov, M.A., 2002. Climate during Permian-Triassic biosphere reorganizations. Article
1: Climate of the early Permian. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, v. 10, no. 6, p. 586-602.
Díaz-Martínez, E., & Grahn, Y., 2007. Early Silurian glaciation along the western margin of Gondwana (Peru,
Bolivia and northern Argentina): paleogeographic and geodynamic setting. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, v. 245, p. 62-81.
Díaz-Martínez, E., Vavrdová, M., Isaacson, P.E., & Grahn, C.Y., 2011. Early Silurian vs. late Ordovician
glaciation in South America. In: Gutiérrez-Marco, J.C., Rábano, I., & García-Bellido, D., eds., Ordovician of
the World. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, p. 127-134.
Dickins, J.M., 1985a. Late Palaeozoic glaciation. BMR Journal of Geology and Geophysics, v. 9, p. 163-169.
Dickins, J.M., 1985b. Palaeobiofacies and palaeobiogeography of Gondwanaland from Permian to Triassic. In:
Nakazawa, K., & Dickins, J.M., eds., The Tethys. Tokyo: Tokai University Press, p. 83-92.
Dickins, J.M., 1992. Permian geology of Gondwana countries: an overview. International Geology Review, v.
34, no. 10, p. 986-1000.
Dickins, J.M., 1993. Climate of late Devonian to Triassic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, v. 100, p. 89-94.
Dickins, J.M., 1994. What is Pangaea? In: Embry, A.F., Beauchamp, B., & Glass, D.G., Pangea: Global environments and resources. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 17, p. 67-80.
Dickins, J.M., 1996. Problems of late Palaeozoic glaciation in Australia and subsequent climate in the Permian.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 125, p. 185-197.
Dickins, J.M., Choi, D.R., & Yeates, A.N., 1992. Past distribution of oceans and continents. In: Chatterjee, S., &
Hotton, N., eds., New Concepts in Global Tectonics. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press, p. 193-199.
Doornbos, D.J., & Hilton, T., 1989. Models of the core-mantle boundary and the travel times of internally
reflected core phases. Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 94, no. B11, p. 15,741-15,751.
Doré, F., 1981. The late Ordovician tillite in Normandy (Amorican Massif). In: Hambrey, M.J., & Harland,
W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 582-584.
Epshteyn, O.G., 1981a. Middle Carboniferous ice-marine deposits of northeastern USSR. In: Hambrey, M.J., &
Harland, W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 268-269.
Epshteyn, O.G., 1981b. Late Permian ice-marine deposits of the Atkan Formation in the Kolyma river
headwaters region, USSR. In: Hambrey, M.J., & Harland, W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial
Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 270-273.
Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D., & Isbell, J.L., 2008a. The late Paleozoic ice age – a review of current understanding
and synthesis of global climate patterns. Geological Society of America Special Paper 441, p. 343-354.
Fielding, C.R., Frank, T.D., Birgenheier, L.P., Rygel, M.C., Jones, A.T., & Roberts, J., 2008b. Stratigraphic
imprint of the late Paleozoic ice age in eastern Australia: a record of alternating glacial and nonglacial
climate regime. Journal of the Geological Society, v. 165, no.1, p. 129-140.
Finnegan, S., Bergmann, K. Eiler, J.M., Jones, D.S., Fike, D.A., Eisenman, I., Hughes, N.C., Tripati, A.K., &
Fischer, W.W., 2011. The magnitude and duration of late Ordovician-early Silurian glaciation. Science, v.
331, no. 6019, p. 903-906.
Ghienne, J.-F., 2011. The late Ordovician glacial record: state of the art. In: Gutiérrez-Marco, J.C., Rábano, I.,
& García-Bellido, D., eds., Ordovician of the World. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, p. 13-
19.
Green, R., 1961. Palaeoclimatic significance of evaporites. In: Nairn, A.E.M., ed., Descriptive
Palaeoclimatology. New York: Interscience, p. 61-88.
Grunow, A.M., 1999. Gondwana events and palaeogeography: a palaeomagnetic review. Journal of African
Earth Sciences, v. 28, no. 1, 53–69.
Harland, W.B., 1981. Gander Bay tillites of the Davidsville Group (Ordovician), northeastern Newfoundland.
In: Hambrey, M.J., & Harland, W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, p. 711-712. Isaacson, P.E., Diaz-Martinez, E., Grader, G.W., Kalvoda, J., Babek, O., & Devuyst, F.X., 2008. Late
Devonian-earliest Mississippian glaciation in Gondwanaland and its biogeographic consequences.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 268, nos. 3-4, p. 126-142.
Joachimski, M.M., Breisig, S., Buggisch, W., Talent, J.A., Mawson, R., Gereke, M., Morrow, J.R., Day, J., &
Weddige, K., 2009. Devonian climate and reef evolution: insights from oxygen isotopes in apatite. Earth
and Planetary Science Letters, v. 284, nos. 3-4, p. 599-609.
Jones, A.T., & Fielding, C.R., 2004. Sedimentological record of the late Paleozoic glaciation in Queensland,
Australia. Geology, v. 32, no. 2, p. 153-156.
14
Kennedy, M.J., 1981. The early Palaeozoic Stoneville Formation, northern Newfoundland. In: Hambrey, M.J.,
& Harland, W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.
713-716.
Kerr, R.A., 1987. Tracking the wandering poles of ancient earth. Science, v. 236, p. 147-148.
Le Heron, D.P., & Dowdeswell, J.A., 2009. Calculating ice volumes and ice flux to constrain the dimensions of
a 440 Ma North African ice sheet. Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 166, p. 277-281.
Le Heron, D.P., & Howard, J., 2010. Evidence for late Ordovician glaciation of Al Kufrah Basin, Libya. Journal
of African Earth Sciences, v. 58, no. 2, p. 354-364.
López-Gamundí, O.R., & Buatois, L.A., 2010. Introduction: late Paleozoic glacial events and postglacial
transgressions in Gondwana. Geological Society of America Special Paper 468, p. v-viii.
Lugli, S., 2009. Evaporites. In: Gornitz, V., ed., Encyclopedia of Paleoclimatology and Ancient Environments.
Springer, p. 321-325.
McElhinny, M.W., Powell, C.McA., & Pisarevsky, S.A., 2002 [2003]. Paleozoic terranes of eastern Australia
and the drift history of Gondwana. Tectonophysics, v. 362, nos. 1-4, p. 41-65.
Meyerhoff, A.A., 1970. Continental drift: implications of paleomagnetic studies, meteorology, physical
oceanography, and climatology. Journal of Geology, v. 78, p. 1-51.
Meyerhoff, A.A., & Meyerhoff, H.A., 1974. Tests of plate tectonics. In: Kahle, C.F., ed., Plate Tectonics – Assessments and Reassessments. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 23, p.
43-145.
Meyerhoff, A.A., & Meyerhoff, H.A., 1976. Climatically controlled sediments, the geomagnetic field, and trade
wind belts in Phanerozoic time: a discussion; plus reply by G.E. Drewry, A.T.S. Ramsay & A.G. Smith.
Journal of Geology, v. 84, no. 3, p. 365-375.
Meyerhoff, A.A., & Teichert, C., 1971. Continental drift. III: Late Paleozoic glacial centers and Devonian-
Eocene coal distribution. Journal of Geology, v. 79, p. 285-321.
Meyerhoff, A.A., Taner, I., Morris, A.E.L., Agocs, W.B., Kaymen-Kaye, M., Bhat, M.I., Smoot, N.C., & Choi,
D.R., 1996a. Surge Tectonics: A new hypothesis of global geodynamics (D. Meyerhoff Hull, ed.). Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Meyerhoff, A.A., Boucot, A.J., Meyerhoff Hull, D., & Dickins J.M., 1996b. Phanerozoic Faunal & Floral Realms of the Earth: The intercalary relations of the Malvinokaffric and Gondwana faunal realms with the
Tethyan faunal realm. Geological Society of America Memoir 189.
Montañez, I.P., & Poulsen, C.J., 2013. The late Paleozoic ice age: an evolving paradigm. Annual Review of
Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 41, p. 629-656.
Morelli, A., & Dziewonski, A.M., 1987. Topography of the core-mantle boundary and lateral homogeneity of
the liquid core. Nature, v. 325, no. 6106, p. 678-683.
Paris, F., Elaouad-Debbaj, Z., Jaglin, J.C., Massa, D., & Oulebsir, L., 1995. Chitinozoans and late Ordovician
glacial events on Gondwana. Seventh International Symposium on the Ordovician System, Society for
Sedimentary Geology, Pacific Section, p. 171-176.
Porcelli, D., & Turekian, K.K., 2003. The history of planetary degassing as recorded by noble gases. In:
Keeling, R.F., ed., Treatise on Geochemistry. Elsevier, v. 4, p. 281-318.
Powell, C.McA., & Li, Z.X., 1994. Reconstruction of the Panthalassan margin of Gondwanaland. In: Veevers, J.J., & Powell, C.McA., eds., Permian-Triassic Pangean basins and foldbelts along the Panthalassan
margin of Gondwanaland. Geological Society of America Memoir 184, p. 5-9.
Raymond, A., & Metz, C., 2004. Ice and its consequences: glaciation in the late Ordovician, late Devonian,
Pennsylvanian-Permian, and Cenozoic compared. Journal of Geology, v. 112, p. 655-670.
Robardet, M., & Doré, F., 1988. The late Ordovician diamictic formations from southwestern Europe: North-
Gondwana glaciomarine deposits. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 66,
p. 19-31.
Schwarzbach, M., 1961. The climatic history of Europe and North America. In: Nairn, A.E.M., ed., Descriptive
Palaeoclimatology. New York: Interscience, p. 255-291.
Schenk, P.E., & Lane, T.E., 1981. Early Palaeozoic tillite of Nova Scotia, Canada. In: Hambrey, M.J., &
Harland, W.B., eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 707-710.
Scotese, R.C., & Barrett, S.F., 1990. Gondwana’s movement over the south pole during the Palaeozoic:
evidence from lithological indicators of climate. Geological Society, London, Memoirs v. 12, p. 75-85.
Smith, A.G., 1999. Gondwana: its shape, size and position from Cambrian to Triassic times. Journal of African
Earth Sciences, v. 28, no. 1, p. 71-97.
Soldati, G., Boschi, L., & Forte, A.M., 2012. Tomography of core-mantle boundary and lowermost mantle
coupled by geodynamics. Geophysical Journal International, v. 189, no. 2, p. 730-746.
Steiner, J., & Falk, F., 1981. The Ordovician Lederschiefer of Thuringia. In: Hambrey, M.J., & Harland, W.B.,
15
eds., Earth’s Pre-Pleistocene Glacial Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 579-581.
Storetvedt, K.M., 1997. Our Evolving Planet: Earth history in new perspective. Bergen, Norway: Alma Mater.
Storetvedt, K.M., & Longhinos, B., 2012. The Atlantic and its bordering continents – a wrench tectonic
analysis: lithospheric deformation, basin histories and major hydrocarbon provinces. New Concepts in
Global Tectonics Newsletter, no. 64, p. 30-68.
Storetvedt, K.M., & Bouzari, S., 2012. The Tethys configuration and principal tectonic features of the Middle East: a wrench tectonic survey. New Concepts in Global Tectonics Newsletter, no. 65, p. 103-142.
Streel, M., Caputo, M.V., Loboziak, S., Melo, J.H.G., & Thorez, J., 2000. Palynology and sedimentology of
laminites and tillites from the latest Famennian or the Parnaíba Basin, Brazil. Geologica Belgica, v. 3, nos.
1-2, p. 87-96.
Sze, E.K.M., & van der Hilst, R.D., 2003. Core mantle boundary topography from short period PcP, PKP, and
PKKP data. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, v. 135, p. 27-46.
Tanaka, S., 2010. Constraints on the core-mantle boundary topography from P4KP-PcP differential travel times.
Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 115, no. B04310.
Tauxe, L., 2013. Essentials of Paleomagnetism. University of California Press, 2010; 2nd web edition, 2013,
http://magician.ucsd.edu/Essentials_2.
Teichert, C., 1964. Some biological and paleogeographical factors in the evaluation of ancient climates. In:
Nairn, A.E.M., ed., Problems in Palaeoclimatology. London: Wiley-Interscience, p. 597-600. Torsvik, T.H., & Van der Voo, R.V., 2002. Refining Gondwana and Pangea palaeogeography: estimates of
Phanerozoic non-dipole (octupole) fields. Geophysical Journal International, v. 151, p. 771-794.
Torsvik, T.H., Van der Voo, R., Preeden, U., Niocaill, C.M., et al., 2012. Phanerozoic polar wander,
palaeogeography and dynamics. Earth-Science Reviews, v. 114, nos. 3-4, p. 325-368.
Tsai, V.C., & Stevenson, D.J., 2007. Theoretical constraints on true polar wander. Journal of Geophysical
Research, v. 112, B05415, doi:10.1029/2005JB003923.
Ustritsky, V.I., 1973. Permian climate. In: Logan, A., & Hills, L.V., eds., The Permian and Triassic Systems and
their Mutual Boundary. Calgary, Alberta, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 2, p. 733-744.
Van Houten, F.B., 1961. Climatic significance of red beds. In: Nairn, A.E.M., ed., Descriptive
Palaeoclimatology. New York: Interscience, p. 89-139.
Vasiliev, B.I., & Yano, T., 2007. Ancient and continental rocks discovered in the ocean floors. New Concepts in Global Tectonics Newsletter, no. 43, p. 3-17.
Wicander, R., Clayton, G., Marshall, J.E.A., Troth, I., & Racey, A., 2011. Was the latest Devonian glaciation a
multiple event? New palynological evidence from Bolivia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, v. 305, p. 84-92.
Williams, Q., & Hemley, R.J., 2001. Hydrogen in the deep earth. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary
Sciences, v. 29, p. 365-418.