page 1 cristina chifor (a) ken phillips (b), brian dennis (c) a) damtp, university of cambridge, uk...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
Cristina Chifor (a) Ken Phillips (b) , Brian Dennis (c)
a) DAMTP, University of Cambridge, UKb) Mullard Space Science Lab, UK
c) NASA/GSFC, Maryland, USA
RHESSI Spectroscopy of Thermal RHESSI Spectroscopy of Thermal Solar Flare X-ray Emission Solar Flare X-ray Emission
‘X-ray Spectroscopy and Plasma Diagnostics From the RHESSI,RESIK and SPIRIT Instruments’ 6-8 December 2005
Wroclaw, Poland
Page 2
Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager: Data Access and Analysis
Fe Line Complexes : Observations with RHESSI
RHESSI / RESIK Cross - Calibration
How to get more help with RHESSI data & analysis
Presentation Outline
Page 3
RHESSIReuven Ramaty High Energy Solar
Spectroscopic Imager
NASA Small Explorer
Imaging and spectroscopic observations of solar flares
since February 5th, 2002
Principal Investigator: Robert Lin, UCB
Lead Co-investigator: Brian Dennis,
NASA/GSFC
Page 4
9 cylindrical cooled Ge detectors (< 75 K)
Energy range: 5 keV to 17 MeV
(~ 8 mÅ to 2.5 Å)
FWHM ~1 keV (12.4 Å) in the “soft” X-ray range
(“soft” ~ up to 20 keV)
Movable shutters, high-rate electronics with “pile-up” suppression
RHESSIReuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager
Page 5
Object Oriented Software & GUI Distributed through the Solar Software
package
SSWIDL (hessi) http://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssw/hessi/doc/hessi_data_access.htm
RHESSI DATA:1.Flare catalogue2. “Quicklook” plots3.Level 0 Telemetry Data
How to Access RHESSI Data ?
Page 6
Up to date text and binary FITS file Currently, containing more than 18,000 flares
INCLUDING…:
FLARE CATALOGUE NO.START, PEAK & END TIMESDURATION PEAK COUNT FLUX (C/S)ENERGY RANGE X, Y COORDINATES (ARCSEC)FLAGS (i.e attenuator state, night-time, SAA )
RHESSI Data I: Flare Catalogue
Page 7
Daily FITS files in the metadata/catalogue directory of the RHESSI data archive
RHESSI Data II: « Quicklook »
Page 8
Packets in FITS files (up to ~ 110 Mb) One FITS file/single orbit between local midnights Multiple FITS files for large flares
http://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/hessidata/ GSFC (Maryland)
ftp://hercules.ethz.ch/pub/hessi/data ETH (Switzerland)
RHESSI Data III: Level 0 Telemetry Data
Page 9
STEP 1. Generate count rate spectra.
hessi -> RHESSI GUI
OUTPUT: Count spectrum file
+ Response Matrix (srm) file
Spectral Analysis Overview I
Page 10
Spectral Analysis Overview II
STEP 2. OSPEX. Obtain photon spectra + models.obj = ospex()
INPUT: Count spectrum file + Response Matrix (srm) file
Until recently, used MEWE spectral model.Now changed to CHIANTI.
Page 11
"RHESSI Observations of the Iron - Line Feature at 6.7 keV”,
Phillips, K. J. H., Chifor, C. , Dennis, B. - submitted to the Astrophys. J
Motivation RHESSI observes both continuum and Fe line complexes (at 6.7 keV and 8 keV)
How does the empirical Fe/H abundance ratio in flares vary with Te ?
How do empirical correlation curves compare with theoretical curves calculated with coronal Fe abundances ?
Page 12
Isothermal approximation OK in the late decay stages So, choose long duration, slowly decaying flares Used GOES to select flares according to this criteria
Flare Sampling Criteria
Example: GOES fluxes, high-energy band (~ 25 keV) lightcurves for July 2002
Page 13
30 flares between 2002 - 2005
GOES X-ray classification: C3 – X8
More than 2000 spectra of 20 – 60 s in the decaying stages of these flares
Sampled Flares
Page 14
I. RHESSI GUI: spectral file + SRM file Energy bins: 1/3 keV in the 3 - 20 keV range
1 keV in the 20 – 100 keV range Time bins: 20 – 60 s Optional pulse pile-up corrections ( rate > 1000 counts/s)
II. Input the 2 files in the Object Spectral Executive (OSPEX)
Background subtraction One isothermal component to fit continuum + 2
Gaussian lines (1 keV FWHM) centered at ~ 6.7 and 8 keV to model the Fe and Fe/Ni complexes
Reduced chi-squared for best fit
Spectral Modeling
Page 15
High count rates in RHESSI detectors decrease energy resolution in the soft X-ray range and increase calculated T.
“pulse pile-up” problems at high count rates
Therefore, for now, avoid A0 attenuator states (i.e. when no shutters are in front of detectors)
Some Instrumental Issues
Page 19
Fe Line Complexes: Summary & Conclusions
Survey of > 30 RHESSI flares (GOES class C3 - X5)
Fe line features observed by RHESSI at 6.7 keV indicate a coronal abundance of Fe for the emitting flare plasma.
Some differences between the observed and theoretical EW’s of the lines may be due to:
Non-isothermal nature of the flare plasma (in particular at and shortly after the flare peak)
Instrumental effects such as the resolving of the line features at high count rates
Possible errors in atomic rates used in theoretical He-like Fe ion fractions.
Page 20
A number of coincident flares: cross-calibration possible.
RHESSI low energy end ~5 keVRESIK in 1st -order mode observes from 2.0 to 3.7 keV
RESIK in 3rd–order mode sees Fe line feature at 6.7 keV
RHESSI vs. RESIK