packets of energy and the notion of string theories ... · abstract paper and open memos to leonard...

Abstract Paper and open memos to Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM.

Packets of Energy and the notion of String Theories .

Introduction: pi-Profiling the Word Seeds of Notion for:

Quote: Stanford University youtube physics lectures Published on Mar 30, 2011.

1 through 10: String Theory and M- Theory by: Leonard Susskind End-quote.

when our pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f is [ 16/pi ] denoted f1 . .

Author: Kevin John Trinder, independent researcher .

Please note i am dyslexic and use of the periods is to keep me focused .

Began this paper on June 1st 2017. updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM. .

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 23rd 2017. updated September 4th 2017. 5:57 PM .

pi-Profiling Particle Physics: Argument side of equation versus Sum side of equation ( 4 ) .

regarding the observation of f%T = 21.4601836602552% .

i first observed 0.214601836602552 as a Geometric ratio .

and this ratio of 0.214601836602552 will be observed in many .

approaches to/for understand Particle Physics and Science in general . .

so, Mass ( M ) denotes Packets of Energy ( M ) .

our M^2 formula is as follows: Perhaps

. when our Mass ( a packet of energy ) is progressively increased in one environment to a point of

. maximum energy-efficiency

. perhaps our experiment compensates in two other energy environments

. within or about our experiment

.

. we observe from our pi-Profiling that

.

M^2 = { [ ( M / 2 )^2 ] * pi } + [ { [ ( M / 2 )^2 ] * pi } * 27.3239544735163% ]

.

. because our endeavours to understand Particle Physics are conducted in general

.

with both physical-circular and theoretical-circular Number Theory Concepts .

we are now pleasantly surprised and reassured to find that our diameter 1PD^2 .

and the area of our pi-Profiling Perimeter for our diameter 1PD .

are connected by: .

f%H = 27.3239544735163%

Page ! of !1 37


.

f%T = 21.4601836602552% .

and .

f%H = 27.3239544735163% may be expressed as [ (4/pi) -1 ] * 100 . .

n.b. in closing i suspect that the Mass ( M ) of Higgs boson .

may be considered as a Notional approximate pi extraction value of

4pi/10

Notional Mass ( M ) of Higgs boson =~ 1.25663706143592 GeV/c^2 . .

at this time August 26th 2017. .

i am pi-Profiling my suspected Notional approximate pi extraction value of

Notional Mass ( M ) of Higgs boson =~ 1.25663706143592 GeV/c^2

.

.

my Notional value for The Speed of Light ( Cn ) is .

Cn = 299,655,737.57661187296417378414916.

.

.

this paper

Packets of Energy and the notion of String Theories .

Introduction: pi-Profiling the Word Seeds of Notion for:

Quote: Stanford University youtube physics lectures Published on Mar 30, 2011.

1 through 10: String Theory and M- Theory by: Leonard Susskind End-quote.

when our pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f is [ 16/pi ] denoted f1 .

will continue on as: .

Notional pi-Profiling Formula for: Mass ^2

.

.

pi-Profiling: The Mass ( M ) of the Higgs boson

.

.

electron 0.50995602, 1 eV 1.60207411, the Higgs boson 1.25826606

September 4th 2017. .

Page ! of !2 37

https://pi-profiling.info/mass_squared/2017_august_26_notional_pi-profiling_formula_for_mass_squared.pdf

https://pi-profiling.info/mass_of_higgs_boson/2017_8_28_pi-profiling-the-mass-of-the-higgs-boson.pdf

https://pi-profiling.info/the_electron_electron-volt_and_higgs-boson/2017_9_4th_pi-profiling_of_the_electron_one_electron-volt_and_the_higgs-boson.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 22nd 2017. 4:37 PM.


because i observed the pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator values of .

27.3239544735163% and 21.4601836602552% .

while pi-Profiling the notion of Particle Physics i am going to denote 27.3239544735163% as .

f%H in honour of Peter Ware Higgs .

f%H = 27.3239544735163% .

and i am going to denote 21.4601836602552% as .

f%T after myself .

f%T = 21.4601836602552% .

both f%H and f%T are Geometrical ratios and because the .

numerical environment within and about our pi-Profiling Perimeter has no bias toward units .

we can pi-Profile the notion of Particle Physics outcomes regarding Mass .

to observe Mass ^2 with respect to Geometry and Science in general . .

for ease of recognition, i am also going to denote the notion and term of mass .

with respect to Particle Physics and the notion of .

Quote: Standard model of elementary particles End-quote as .

Mass . .

so the U up, has a Mass of Quote =~ 2.3 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the C charm, has a Mass of Quote =~ 1.275 GeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the t top, has a Mass of Quote =~ 173.7 GeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the the gluon Quote: has no Mass End-quote . .

so the Higgs boson has a Mass of Quote =~ 126 GeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the d down, has a Mass of Quote =~ 4.8 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the s strange, has a Mass of Quote =~ 95 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the b bottom, has a Mass of Quote =~ 4.18 GeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the photon Quote: has no Mass End-quote .

so the e electron, has a Mass of Quote =~ 0.511 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the µ muon, has a Mass of Quote =~ 105.7 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

Page ! of !3 37


so the τ tau, has a Mass of Quote =~ 1.777 GeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the Z boson, has a Mass of Quote =~ 91.2 GeV / C^2 End-quote .

so the νe electron neutrino, has a Mass of Quote =~ < 2.2 eV / c^2 End-quote .

so the νµ muon neutrino, has a Mass of Quote =~ < 0.17 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the νt tau neutrino, has a Mass of Quote =~ < 15.5 MeV / c^2 End-quote .

so the the W boson, has a Mass of Quote =~ 80.4 GeV / c^2 End-quote

.

.

our first value of interest ( VOI ) we are going to pi-Profile .

will be the Mass of the Higgs boson .

being Quote =~ 126 GeV/C^2 End-quote .

n.b. all of the above observed Mass values observed are also in common with .

.

.

Page ! of !4 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 21st 2017. updated August 25th 2017. AM


i today, for some reason, decided to try and relate my pi-Profiling observations to the notion of .

Quote: Higgs boson End-quote .

after the Higgs boson observation ( with hind sight ) it is somewhat easy to express 2^1/3 * 100 being .

Notionally 125.992104989487 GeV/C^2 and this would be quite wrong to do so

my observation for 2^1/3 being 1.25992104989487 is as follows:

3.14159265358979 pi 2 subtraction = 1.14159265358979 . 1.14159265358979 to power 1/3 = 1.04513017878414 .

1.04513017878414 0.82952037262283 [ (pi/2) -1 ] ^1/3 quotient = 1.25992104989487 Notionally found on the Quote: Well-Tempered musical note E ( mi ) End-quote . . additionally we observe 4/pi = 1.27323954473516 .

i prefer to express 1.27323954473516 as: . 3.14159265358979 sqrt = 1.77245385090552 f6 , square root of pi, its importance is paramount . 1.77245385090552 f6 , square root of pi, its importance is paramount 2 quotient = 0.886226925452758 . 0.886226925452758 inverse = 1.12837916709551 f8 . 1.12837916709551 f8 squared = 1.27323954473516 f12

the following observation is well observed throughout the Sciences, well, for a very long time .

( 1.27323954473516 minus 1 = 0.27323954473516 ) and 0.27323954473516 * 10 = 2.73239544735163 .

my focus in recent times has been: .

( 1.27323954473516 minus 1 ) * 100 = 27.3239544735163 .

and its companion pi-Profiling formula constant is: .

21.4601836602552 being 27.3239544735163 / 1.27323954473516 .

and this is where we may find the answer to your question on: .

why is our mass squared when we boost it down the Z axis .

at this time i am thinking about two possibilities .

Page ! of !5 37


Firstly: while the Mass appears to be squared outright at optimum boosting .

at this moment of optimum boosting .

the efficiency of the experiment increases by, from one perspective increases by 27.3239544735163% .

and from another perspective 21.4601836602552% .

Secondly: now we have to consider perhaps a new pi-Profiling Formula for Science in general .

and express it as: .

Particle Physics: Argument side of equation versus Sum side of equation .

i am now re-visiting my pi-Profiling formulas: .

n - [{[{√n}/2]2}*pi] = [{[{√n}/2]2}*pi] - { [{[{√n}/2]2}*pi] / 1.3759691969 } .

[ 90 / { [{[(D^2) / ( f12 )] / f180} / 8] / [{D}/2]2}/2] } ] / f181 = 57.2957795130822 = 1 Radian . .

Page ! of !6 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 20th 2017. 12:39 PM.


We will begin with the notion of “J5 = 1.627” .

Quote: 4.4 Neutral Meson Mixing: General description: Page 166

J5 = 1.627. End-quote

2014 Asia–Europe–Pacific School of High-Energy Physics, Puri, India. 4 – 17 November 2014

CERN Yellow Reports: School Proceedings: Volume 2/2017 CERN-2017-005-SP: KEK Proceedings 2017-3

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2276651/files/38-13-PB.pdf .

we will on this occasion only be using two (2) pi-profiling Perimeters in Unison denoted 1P and 2P .

the numerical outcomes to the left are our entry pi-Profiling value from pi-Profiling Perimeter 1P .

pi-Profiling Perimeter 2P will be to the right. 2P input value on this occasion will be 1Pe2, plus (+) one (1) .

We begin with our value of interest ( VOI ) being the value 0.62665706865775 .

n.b. pi declaration is: 3.14159265358979 last decimal places may be rounding .

0.62665706865775 1Pe2 1.62665706865775 2Pe2 rounded is ( 1.627 ) squared = squared = 0.39269908169872 1Pe1 2.64601321901423 2Pe1 . . 0.39269908169872 1Pe1 2.64601321901423 2Pe1 5.09295817894065 f1 5.09295817894065 f1 product = product = 2 and diameter 1PD n.b. 1PDc is 3.19153824321147 13.4760346653636 and diameter 2PD n.b. 1PDc is 8.28449642215213

. we observe the sqrt of 13.4760346653636 diameter 2PD = 3.67097189656413 and is perhaps Notionally:

. Quote Chang-Zheng YUAN https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/0510062.pdf: at BES 11 ( √s = 3.671GeV ) End-quote

.

. and for Quote: at CLEOc ( √s = 3.650GeV ) End-quote

. our Notional 1Pe2 value is 0.617364138951283

. and our Notional 2Pe2 value is 1.61736413895128

.

.

Page ! of !7 37

https://cds.cern.ch/record/2276651/files/38-13-PB.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/0510062.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 19th 2017. 4:24 PM. updated 20th August 2017. .

i have today reasonably aligned/re-orientated the pi-Profiling outcomes of my electronic spread sheet to .

reflect the numerical environment of two pi-Profiling perimeters in unison .

to hopefully show how to connect it to the notion of .

“Particle Physics CP violation” .

and also that hopefully the observed outcomes may be found to .

relate to cross-reference to Particle Physics and Science in general. . .

n.b. i am now thinking that at “your” moment of optimum boosting taking place .

where “we” may be observing not only Mass^2 .

additionally .

we may be observing the sum of two pi-Profiling outcomes that add ( sum ) to Mass^2. . .

i am now searching the internet to cross-reference my observed pi-Profiling values to help .

find the word seeds of notion to describe: .

argument side of equation; .

“moment of optimum boosting” allowing us to observe a new formula for .

sum side of equation; .

Mass^2 observed from boosting = sum of two pi-Profiling outcomes. . .

conjecture this may allow us to rethink the mass of larger particles?? . .

We will begin with the notion of “J5 = 1.627” .

Quote: 4.4 Neutral Meson Mixing: General description: Page 166, J5 = 1.627. End-quote

Page ! of !8 37



0.774, 0.7744, 0.77441, 0.774414, 0.7744136, 0.77441364434485 0.226, 0.2256, 0.22558, 0.22559, 0.225586, 0.2255864, 0.22558635, 0.22558635565515

3.432, 3.433, 3.4328, 3.4329, 3.43289, 3.4328922, 3.43289221591346 0.2913, 0.29129, 0.291299, 0.2912996, 0.29129956, 0.291299562323692

as i pi-Profile the notion of Particle Physics .

and now concentration on the notion of CP violation .

i see the value 0.7744 being used in different mathematical themes .

and n.b. 0.77441364434485 is a pi formula observation attributed to Shane Findley:

Shane Findley's observation ( about 2001 )

[ A/B ] - [ B/A ] =~ pi . and . A + B =~ 1 . . A = 0.77441364434485 . 1 - A = B = 0.22558635565515 .

A / B = 3.43289221591346 .

B / A = 0.291299562323692 subtraction = . 3.14159265358977 =~ pi, a semi-manual pi outcome, last decimal places are a work in progress

.

.

Regarding memo August 14th 2017. 11:15 PM. .

for pi/3 = 1.0471975511966 its shadow is 0.772554322200726 . .

Page ! of !9 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 14th 2017. 11:15 PM. . .

Re: Page 231, Fig. 22: Azimuthal angle of the highest energy φ-segment vs. the azimuthal angle of the jet.

Proceedings of the workshop

HERA and the LHC

workshop series on the implications of HERA for LHC physics

https://inspirehep.net/record/816030/files/arXiv:0903.3861.pdf

Quote: Azimuthal angle of the highest energy φ-segment: 0; 2; 4; 6

vs. ( versus )

the azimuthal angle of the jet: 2.0944; 4.1888; 6.2832 End-quote

.

.

n.b. 2.0944 may be considered to be Notionally 2.0943951023932 .

My Notional pi-Profiling outcomes for 2.0943951023932 and posted to the internet May 13, 2016. are as follow: .

re: Quote: Face-centered Lattice Cell, PE of 74.0480489693061% End-quote .

When the area A of our pi-Profiling Perimeter P is the √1.125 being 1.06066017177982 su. .

our diameter D is 1.16209916712631, the inverse of our diameter D is 0.860511760345587 .

and ( 0.860511760345587^2 ) *100 is 74.0480489693061%

n.b. 0.860511760345587^2 = 0.740480489693061 . .

0.740480489693061 * square root of 8 = 2.0943951023932 . .

or we observe ( 2pi ) / 3 = 2.0943951023932 = ( pi/3 ) * 2 .

pi / 3 being 1.0471975511966 inverse value 0.954929658551372

and we observe [ ( pi / √8 ) ] / ( pi / 3 ) = √1.125

n.b. numerical outcomes for volumes of cubes and spheres may also be considered

Page ! of !10 37

https://inspirehep.net/record/816030/files/arXiv:0903.3861.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 14th 2017. 12:09 AM.

Re: Pages 137, 138, 140, 141 ( ISBN 978-3-95450-172-4 )

Proceedings of HF2014, Beijing, China

Beam-Beam Limit, Number of IP’S And Energy Kazuhito Ohmi, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

The 55th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Luminosity Circular e+e- Colliders – Higgs Factory ( HF2014 )

http://epaper.kek.jp/HF2014/papers/proceed.pdf

Interaction region and machine-detector interface

Quote:

Figure 2 shows ξy per IP and vertical beam size evolution as function of the equilibrium bunch pop-ulation. The vertical beam size evolutions are for (νx , νy )=(0.5775,0.0425)/IP. There are no remarkable sig-nal related to luminosity degradation in x,σ . The x beam-beam tune shift per IP is saturated at 0.12 for (νx , νy )=(0.5775,0.0425)/IP, while is not saturated over 0.18 at (0.51,0.57). The fractional tune operating point (0.5775,0.0425) is given by the tune in Table 1 divided by 4. LEP had been operated at the tune area (0.57,0.04) in every energy. CESR, KEKB, PEPII, BEPC-II had operated at the tune area (νx , νy )=(0.51,0.58). The electron positron colliders were successful by adopting the tune operating point. At (νx , νy )=(0.5775,0.0425)/IP, beam-beam limit is seen ∼ 0.12 at Ne = 3 × 1011. This value is very higher than experimental value 0.044 at Ne = 1.2 × 1011 in Table 1. Figure 3 shows evolutions of ⟨y⟩ and ⟨yz⟩ at Ne = 3 × 1011. Coherent oscillation of π mode is seen in ⟨y⟩ motion (1st and 2nd pictures). ⟨yz⟩ (3rd) of two beams, which is related to head-tail motion, oscillate with an op- posite phase.

End-quote . .

My Notional pi-Profiling constant outcomes for Science in general are:

0.0424927254249574 inverse value 23.5334399005781

0.57768182124058 inverse value 1.7310567222844 . .

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 13th 2017. 12:14 Hrs.

re: 1 Robust Signal Extraction Methods and Monte Carlo Sensitivity Studies for

the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory and SNO+ Experiments

Quote: 5.6.1 Neutron Rate to Flux Conversion:

The SNO heavy water target is taken to be a sphere of radius 600.54 cm with

an average deuteron density (after correcting for the NCD displacement) of 6.6352x1028 m−3. End-quote

https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/sno/papers/Wright_Alexander_J_200909_PhD.pdf . .


6.635207143250630 inverse value is 0.150711195356908

n.b. pi-Profiling outcomes imply no units, we do that

Page ! of !11 37

http://epaper.kek.jp/HF2014/papers/proceed.pdf

https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/sno/papers/Wright_Alexander_J_200909_PhD.pdf



re:

Draine, B.T., and Flatau, P.J. 2012, “User Guide for the Discrete Dipole Approximation Code DDSCAT 7.2”,

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.3424.pdf

21 TARGET GENERATION: PERIODIC TARGETS Page 51

21.4.1 Sample calculation in directory examples_exp/CYLNDRPBC

Quote: Thus πR2 = Nd2, or d = (π/N)1/2R.

The volume of the TUC is V = Nd3. The effective radius of the TUC is aeff = (3V/4π)1/3 = (3N/4π)1/3d =

(3N/4π)1/3(π/N)1/2R = (3/4π)1/3π1/2RN−1/6. With R = xλ/2π we have aeff = (3/4π)1/3π1/2(xλ/2π)N−1/6 =

0.22723 for x = 5 and λ = 1. End-quote

.

.


0.227230037938737 inverse value 4.40082662077278

0.22723, 0.22723004, 0.227230037, 0.2272300379, 4.401, 4.4008, 4.40083, 4.400827, 4.4008266, 4.40082662

4.40082662077278

.

.

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 3rd 2017. 6:39 PM. . .

{ [ 10.033001997781^0.01 ]^2 } * 3 = 3.14159265358979 and profiling

10^ {0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, 0.00001 . . . } we observe a notional value of approx. 0.00000000000001332267629550

inverse value approx. 75059993789508.30

{ [ 10.033001997781^0.01 ]^2 } * 3 = 3.14159265358979

Page ! of !12 37

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.3424.pdf

https://pi-profiling.info/abstract_documents/2017_8_3_ten_to_the_power_of_point_01.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 1st 2017. 9:51 PM. .

re: Impressum .

Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on

Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies 2009

DESY-PROC-2010-04 ISBN 978-3-935702-49-2

ISSN 1435-8077

http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/42/088/42088597.pdf .

Page 235 .

Quote:

However, certain corrections to the Spectral Functions are needed [26]: .

SEW =1.0233±0.0006

End-quote we observe notional 1.0233 value: .

3.1413856441527 this value is not related or extracted form pi, it may be an induced base 10 anomaly 3 quotient = 1.0471285480509 .

1.0471285480509 sqrt = 1.02329299228075 .

1.02329299228075 inverse = 0.977237220955811 .

if these values improve your observation outcomes .

let me know and i will give you their formula, remarks below also refers to 3.1413856441527

Page ! of !13 37

http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/42/088/42088597.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is August 1st, 2017. 4:37 PM. .

re: Revised Phase Diagram of the Gross-Neveu Model .

Michael Thies and Konrad Urlichs .

Institut fu ̈r Theoretische Physik III .

Universit ̈at Erlangen-Nu ̈rnberg .

( Dated: December 17, 2013 ) .

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0302092.pdf .

Page 6; V. Revised Phase Diagram .

Quote: Tt = 0.31833 End-quote .

n.b. i have observed the following values many years ago, .

0.318330862007145 inverse 3.1413856441527 .

3.1413856441527 is not related or extracted form pi, it may be an induced base 10 anomaly .

if these values improve your observation outcomes .

let me know and i will give you their formula .

Page ! of !14 37

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0302092.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 17th, 2017. updated July 21, 2017. AM. . .

from the numerical outcomes regarding:

Cubes and Cuboids as notional “strings”

the numerical outcome of 16.8559670781893 inverse 0.059326171875 is not easily observed. . .

?? on, Gauge Theories and the Running Coupling Constants ??

Appendix G - Gauge Theories and the Running Coupling Constants:

http://www.rickbradford.co.uk/CCC_AppG_RunningCouplings.pdf .

Quote: G.4 Electromagnetism and The Weak Nuclear Force.

Page 10, Thus the total correction at this energy is … 0.05933 End-quote . .

16.8559670781893 inverse value 0.059326171875 is an extraction of 1.125 .

4 3.18309886183791 (1/pi)*10 quotient = 1.25663706143592 . 1.25663706143592 sqrt = 1.12099824327959 . 1.12099824327959 0.059326171875 inverse value 16.8559670781893 product = 0.06650453445238 . i find it curious when we search out 1/0.0072 being 138.888888888889 notional 138.9

. n.b. the sqrt of 1.125 being 1.06066017177982, times pi/3 = 1.1107207345396

. and 1.1107207345396 * 8 = 8.8857658763167

. and 8.8857658763167 / sqrt 2 = 2pi

Page ! of !15 37

https://pi-profiling.info/abstract_documents/2017_july_9_cubes_cuboids_as_notional_open_and_closed_strings.pdf

http://www.rickbradford.co.uk/CCC_AppG_RunningCouplings.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 16th, 2017. 4:47 PM



the numerical outcome of 0.308990478515625 inverse 3.23634567901235 is not easily observed.

Existence, character and origin of surface-related bands in the high temperature iron pnictide superconductor BaFe2−xCoxAs2.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c071/45ec45c8f5ae4776a18099622bd346ef20e9.pdf .

Quote: TABLE I: The exact coordinates in the 2× 2 termination. The bulk values (z,x,y) are quoted in brackets. End-quote

.

. Quote: TABLE II: The exact coordinates in the 2 × 1 termination.

The bulk values (z,x,y) are quoted in brackets. End-quote

n.b. 0.308990478515625 and its inverse value 3.23634567901235 are an extraction of 1.125 .

and the sqrt of 1.125 being 1.06066017177982, times pi/3 = 1.1107207345396 .

and 1.1107207345396 * 8 = 8.8857658763167 .

and 8.8857658763167 / sqrt 2 = 2pi .

n.b. 1.125/ 3.6409 = 0.308990478515625 inverse 3.23634567901235 .

see also: .

The Millimeter Wave Spectrum of DCNO: An Example of Current Measurements in the Frequency Range from 60 to 350 GHz

https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zna.1974.29.issue-4/zna-1974-0414/zna-1974-0414.xml

Quote: Bν4 = 10,306.00780 (45) MHz, Dν4 = 3.6409 (22) kHz, End-quote . .

n.b. 1.125 * 0.308990478515625 = 3.64088888888889:

Page ! of !16 37


https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c071/45ec45c8f5ae4776a18099622bd346ef20e9.pdf

https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zna.1974.29.issue-4/zna-1974-0414/zna-1974-0414.xml


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 16th, 2017. 1:48 PM. updated July 20, 2017. 10:30 AM . .



the numerical outcome of 0.192 is not easily observed. . .

?? on, Hadronic Transitions ??

https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.052004 . Quote: gives B ( Υ ( 2 S ) → Υ ( 1 S ) π + π − ) = 0.192 ± 0.002 ± 0.010. End-quote

.

.

0.192 is an extraction of 1.125 . and the sqrt of 1.125 being 1.06066017177982, times pi/3 = 1.1107207345396 . and 1.1107207345396 * 8 = 8.8857658763167 . and 8.8857658763167 / sqrt 2 = 2pi .

n.b. 1.125/ 0.192 = 5.859375 . .

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 12th, 2017. 1:20 PM

further to


at this time i am revisiting some past reconciliations:

Surface Area Ratio Outcomes ( SARO )

Page ! of !17 37


https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.052004


https://pi-profiling.info/abstract_documents/2016-4-25-pi-profiling-surface_area_ratio_outcomes_circle_squares_cubes_and_spheres.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 9th, 2017. updated July 24, 2017. 1:20. PM. .

please forgive me. .

once again i have had to stop pi-Profiling to write a memo to Tullio Eugenio Regge .

Born: 11 July 1931: Italian: Borgo d’Ale .

Died, but not forgotten: 23 October 2014. .

Memo to Doctor Tullio Eugenio Regge ( Theoretical physics ) .

CC to Piere de Fermat .

Dear Dr Tullio .

Subject: Regge theory 2017. .

my dyslexic mind has said that in regard to and with respect to yourself Tullio Eugenio Regge .

and your survivors Rosanna Cester, and children: Daniele, Marta and Anna: .

that your magnificent presentations ( Regge Trajectories ) are just a little off Geometric perspective .

and i think the following WWW link gives a reasonable drawing of you predictions: .

Figure 07 Regge Trajectories, closed string and Figure 08 Regge Trajectories, open string https://universe-review.ca/R15-28-tachyon.htm

.

however, for me your remarkable outcomes are best observed in the .

isometric view of the Cube, cube of one cubic unit .

a side + half the base invokes the square root of 6, [ sqrt ( 0.5 + 1 ) ] * 2 .

and we observe sqrt 0.5 parallel to the square root of 2 and vice versa .

Cubes and Cuboids as notional “strings” . .

a belated thank you to you is extended to Rosanna Cester, and your children: Daniele, Marta and Anna. . .

Kevin John Trinder July 9th 2017. updated July 11, 2017. 11:46 PM. . .

n.b. my Grand Perfect Cubic Equation is: .

x^3 = {[(x-2)*x ]*[ x+2]} + {(x-2)*4} + {[x-(x-2)]*4} .

Kevin John Trinder July 9th 2017. updated July 24, 2017. 1:37 PM.

Page ! of !18 37

https://universe-review.ca/R15-28-tachyon.htm


https://pi-profiling.info/abstract_documents/2014_7_25th_updated_2015_7_24_kevin_john_trinder's_Grand_Perfect_Cubic_Equation.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 8th, 2017. PM. 7:04 PM .

when we pi-Profile our values of interest ( VOI ) the notion of topology, logarithms all sorts of .

mathematical notions are masked from us .

at some time i hope to show that the notion of √x is also masked from us being observed .

as the manipulation of two f values .

one of which is f6 .

f6 is √pi = 1.77245385090552. . .

when we pi-Profiling we are asking the question .

does my VOI cross-reference or co-join with other important extrapolations of pi ? . .

i have now viewed all of your Lectures 1 through 10: String Theory and M- Theory . .

i m now going to revert to one pi-Profiling Perimeter P and its values in common . .

when we enter the numerical environment within and about our Perimeter P .

via our Psi value .

when we do this we observe a work around that gives us our sqrt of diameter D/4 value . .

Psi is the number of square root of diameter D/4 increments about Perimeter P .

the square root of diameter D/4 is denoted sqrt Di .

n.b. Di has a companion value denoted De .

our Perimeter P has a companion value denoted Pc .

our diameter D has companion value Dc .

our radius R and R^2 have companion values Rc and Rc^2 .

our area A has a companion area Ac .

the number of sqrt D/4 increments about P is denoted Psi companion value to Psi is cPsi .

our Perimeter P is also notionally the cross-section of a Sphere S .

our Perimeter P has a companion Sphere cS and the denotation .

for volume is SV and cSV .

our Spheres surface area is denoted Ssa and Ssac .

by entering the numerical environment within and about our Perimeter P ..

via our Psi value .

we get the work around sqrt value for our diameter D/4 denoted wDi .

the formula for the wDi is: ( Psi / 4pi )^2 .

so, .

we are going notionally to “ Boost ” or go exponential via Psi . .

now we will introduce pi into Psi as follows: .

{16pi, 20pi, 24pi, 28pi, 32pi … } / 4pi, gives us sqrt wDi values 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 . . .

Page ! of !19 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 8th, 2017. AM. .

thank you for your Physics lectures 1 to 10, September 20, 2010 through November 30, 2010. .

Stanπford physics lectures, Published on Mar 30, 2011. . .

i am now re-orientating our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula and working my way through an extreme .

amount of data output looking for a uniform way to align packets of energy for particles . .

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 4th, 2017. updated July 8, 2017.

change of denotation:

momentum P was denoted as small p and now we will denote P as Q

i have chosen Q for no particular reason but to show we are about to approach our

our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula using possibly three or more

pi-Profiling Perimeters P in unison 1P, 2P, 3P … . .

re: E = M C^2 ( Albert Einstein ) M was denoted as small m .

our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula ( using just one Perimeter P )

now looks like .

[ Qradius bo1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xQm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis yQm bo1Pe5 ] .

[ diameter D ] / (f1) gives us e1 , (e1) * 2 gives us e5 .

bias offset ( bo ) was a denotation to remind me that we were entering the numerical environment within and .

about our pi-Profiling Perimeter P using/entering a radius R value as our 1P e2 entry value .

and this 1Pe2 entry value, radius R value was extracted from .

our notional Perimeter P “Boosting” or going exponential formula: .

1 - { 1 / [ ( 16 / 16 + n ) ] }

Page ! of !20 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is July 2nd, 2017. 11:40 PM. .

today i viewed Lecture 5 and was interested in your remarks: .

1/ at 24:28 Quote: area as fundamental unit End-quote .

2/ at 55: 36 Quote: question is are there indirect tests for string theory? End-quote .

Quote: construct a very very convincing string theory that gives rise to .

the a standard model for exactly in a very computable way End-quote . .

our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula ( Perimeters ( P ) in unison ) .

to numerically connect P^2 with 2m now looks like: .

[ small p radius bo1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ] .

i now have enough pi-Profiling data to move forward, for our trial pi-Loop formula i replaced P with small p .

and at this time we can revert back to P being our momentum .

when you say boost along the z axis, this notion of boosting is what i call .

pre pi-Profiling of our value of interest ( VOI ) to give us a starting point entry value . .

for P greater then sixteen ( 16 ) is entered into the numerical environment within and .

about our pi-Profiling Perimeter by the following pre pi-Profiling Formula . .

1 - { 1 / [ ( 16 / 16 + n ) ] } .

where n may be a decimal an integer or perhaps even a number with both an integer and decimal value .

this pre pi-Profiling formula gives us our entry fraction values of interest ( VOI ) enabling us to observe

[ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ], to be continued. i will now view Lecture 6 after a break . .

Page ! of !21 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 29th 2017. updated July 2, 2017 10:32 PM i viewed Lecture 4 today and once again while the mathematics was confusing

. or just beyond my mathematical education experience

. ( n.b. i did manage to get my amateur radio licence VK3VTR )

.

. from lecture 4, i was still able to make connections with your Word Seed of Notions

. and some of your lecture board drawings/expressions/notations

. to my pi-Profiling observations long ago, back in time

. to when i was observing the pi-Profiling behaviour of number outcomes

. pre January 2012 and then further back in time again to numerical pi observation outcomes

. pre December 1996. at that time, pre December 1996, i was considering

. the notion increments of increments about our pi-Profiling Perimeter P

. increments of increments is about the notion of increments of increments being both

. proportional “too” ?? alternando in proportion: Aristotle??

. and in unison with our diameter D and our perimeter P

. after viewing Lectures 5 through 10

. i will try to build this notion of increments of increments into our trial formula:

.

[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ] . .

my dyslexic mind is saying at this time that perhaps at some point we may have to some how leave .

the notion of Quote: mechanical oscillators End-quote behind .

not forgetting them or replacing our notion of oscillators .

we are perhaps just going strip them back out of the “picture” changing our point of view .

or our numerical point of view or the shifting of our numerical parameter/s .

Page ! of !22 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 27th 2017. 4:00 PM .

increments ( units ) for our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula .


initially i began to build our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula .

with small p as [sqrt 11]^2 .

then i ignored the notion of 11/27 all together after observing .

that when small p was 16 our [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 was Zero ] and [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 was Zero ] .

i have trialled both positive integer { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 … } .

input for small p: {17, 18 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 … } .

and fractions increments of { 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 . . . } .

input for small p: 16.75, 17.5, 18.25 . . . .

input for small p: 16.5, 17, 17.5, 18 . . . .

and so on for 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 . . . .

the fraction increment increase give more interesting data however there is a point of overlap .

i think an important type of increment observations will be when using our mathematical constants e.g. .

input for small p: 16 + { pi, + pi, + pi, + pi, + pi … } .

input for small p: 16 + { 1/pi, + (1/pi), + (1/pi), + (1/pi), + (1/pi), + (1/pi) … } .

am now set to view Lecture 4 .

Page ! of !23 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 27th 2017. 1:30 PM

i have changed the denotation for my pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator observations .

7.71118196790222, 4.9090909090909 and 0.4074074074074 as follows: . .

7.71118196790222 fPO9_3 being [ fPO9_2 ] * [ pi/2 ] . .

4.9090909090909 fPO9_2 being 2 / [ fPO9_1 ] .

and .

0.4074074074074 fPO9_1 being an extraction from positive integer 9 ( PO9 ) .

( pi-Profiling to be given as a separate issue ) . .

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 27th 2017. 11:40 AM .

for our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula outcomes when our small p value is 27 we observe: .

1/ ( pi/2 ) / ( 4/pi ) = 1.23370055013617

inverse value 0.810569469138702 .

pi declaration is: 3.14159265358979 last decimal places may be rounding . .

2/ sqrt ( pi^3) / sqrt ( 4/pi ) = 4.93480220054468 .

inverse value = 0.202642367284676 .


n.b. to arrive at Quote: Page 23, Exact E2 11.1033

re: Numerical Solutions of the Schro ̈dinger Equation Anders W. Sandvik

http://physics.bu.edu/~py502/lectures4/schrod.pdf . .

our small p value is approximately 16.0804588902 inverse value 0.062187280029019, 0.06219 . .

Page ! of !24 37

http://physics.bu.edu/~py502/lectures4/schrod.pdf


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 26th 2017. updated June 27, 2017. AM .

taking our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for a spin: .


and we observe that [ small p radius 1P ] / [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] = 4/pi

and .

{[ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ]} / [ small p radius 1P ] = [ pi/2 ] . .

n.b. pi-Profiling the Word Seed of Notion: Exact* .

({[Axis xm bo1Pe5] + [Axis ym bo1Pe5]}) / ( [ small p radius 1P ] / [Axis xm bo1Pe5] ) = 1.23370055013617 from WWW internet searches we find:

. Numerical Solutions of the Schro ̈dinger Equation

Quote: The most basic problem in quantum mechanics is to solve the stationary Schr ̈odinger equation End-quote

.

. Anders W. Sandvik, Department of Physics, Boston University

http://physics.bu.edu/~py502/lectures4/schrod.pdf .

Quote:

Page 23 ; M Exact: Eo 1.233701 ; E1 4.934802

Table 1: The three lowest energy eigenvalues for different basis sizes M in Lanczos calculations for a one-dimensional hard-wall box of length 2, using discretization ∆ = 0.01.

End-quote

. pi-Profiling the Word Seed of Notion: Exact*

. ( pi/2 ) / ( 4/pi ) = 1.23370055013617

inverse value 0.810569469138702 .


sqrt ( pi^3) / sqrt ( 4/pi ) = 4.93480220054468

inverse value = 0.202642367284676 .


so i am confident that for the behaviour of numbers in regard to your remark: .

Quote: .

each time you increase the energy of a spring or string the internal energy .

by one unit it increases the mass squared by one unit .

End-quote .

are of a very special significants . .

Page ! of !25 37



Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 24th 2017. updated 4:09 PM updated June 27, 2017. .

i have made some perhaps curious remarks and i will endeavour to address them for you: .

1/ i have used 16, what is 16 with reference to pi-Profiling? . .

2/ algebra in general is also masked when we are pi-Profiling .

we do work with important numerical ratios of right angle triangles . .

3/ i have said n.b. 0.4074074074074 denoted fPO9_1 is an extraction from positive integer 9 . .

4/ may be connected to the theorem on indices given by Pierre de Fermat in .

Quote: 1637 End-quote and

. Quote: his "Last Theorem" ( Observatio Domini Petri de Fermat ). End-quote

i am still thinking about items 3 and 4 above .

and do remarks items 3 and 4 relate to your boosting Axis z ??

.

. re: 1/ above

giving a pi-Profiling formula positive integer 16 re item 1/above: .

note there are many ways of presenting pi-Profiling outcomes that arrive at 16 .

i will give the pi-Profiling formulas for what i think gives us an overall awareness:

31.0062766802998 pi^3 . 5.56832799683171 sqrt (pi^3) . 2.78416399841585 [ sqrt (pi^3) ] / 2 . . 6.28318530717959 pi*2 2.78416399841585 [ sqrt (pi^3) ] / 2 quotient = 2.25675833419103 . 2.25675833419103 ^2 = 5.09295817894065 [2pi /{[sqrt (pi^3) ]/2}]^2, being pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f1 . . 3.14159265358979 pi 5.09295817894065 [2pi /{[sqrt (pi^3) ]/2}]^2, being pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f1 product = 16

re: 2/ above and and 4 times the sqrt pi ( n.b. some pi-Profiling outcomes are pre January 2012 )

. my remarks from: pi-Profiling Concepts ( updated May 2, 2016 )

. Authors notes: February 18th 2016. ( updated May 26, 2016 ) page 21

. Symmetry Warning: Friend or Foe

. My preface to the warning, Symmetry Warning: Friend or Foe is that, my interest is in how

.

numbers behave and with this in mind i make the following remarks: .

Page ! of !26 37


when we use the number six, or we have six of anything . >< . .

or when we use √2, √3 and √6 we must be aware that 4 * ( √ pi ) being 7.0898154036221 .

may be written as: {(√pi/3) * (√8)} * [√6] = 4*√pi

. 1.02332670794649 being √ ( pi / 3 ) 2.82842712474619 √8 product = 2.89440501823307 being [ √ ( pi / 3 ] * [ √8 ] . 2.89440501823307 being [ √ ( pi / 3 ] * [ √8 ] 2.44948974278318 being √6 also being ( √2 ) * ( √3 ) product = 7.08981540362206 being 4 * ( √ pi )

.

my concern is in reference to the notion of Hadrons, Mesons (1 quark plus 1 anti-quark) and the . >< . quotients arrived at by division using √2 ,√3 and √6.

. Question: what if Mesons were found to have a physical connection to 4(√pi)?

. Question: could Symmetry at 8(√pi) being 14.1796308072441 and denoted f2 be of a danger to

.

the technicians and or the Nuclear Accelerator?

. >< .

6, √6, (1/pi) and the notion of Quote: C-parameter and coupling constant End-quote .

see symmetry warning Page 17.

Authors notes: February 20th 2016. when we use number six, or we have six of anything containing

. or dividing by number 6

. . >< .

6, √6, ( 1/pi ) and the notion of Quote: C-parameter and coupling constant End-quote. . .

Authors notes: February 20th 2016. Quote: Particle momentum in the Centre of Mass .

Quoting paper: Properties of C-parameters and coupling constant .

Contributions to C-parameter n=2; A; 2.4317 End-quote. .

Ok, i am know going back to October 29th 2002 when i observed the following pi-Profiling .

outcome of : 2.43170840741611 and i posted the pi-Profiling Formula for .

this outcome 2.43170840741611 to my web site at that time.

pi-Profiling Formula for 2.43170840741611: . 2.44948974278318 √6 0.318309886183791 1/pi denoted f5 product = 0.779696801233676 ( √6 ) * ( 1/pi ) .

0.779696801233676 ( √6 ) * ( 1/pi ) squared = 0.607927101854027 [ ( √6 ) * ( 1/pi ) ]^2 .

Page ! of !27 37


0.607927101854027 [ ( √6 ) * ( 1/pi ) ]^2 4 product = 2.43170840741611 pi-Profiling Formula outcome for 2.43170840741611

Authors notes: February 20th 2016. ( updated March 31, 2016 ) .

Solar constant and the notion of one second.

.

.

My pi-Profiling outcome value for Solar constant and posted to my web site May 6th 2003 was .

1367.0340735 and note, we can rewrite the pi-Profiling Formula for this value 1367.0340735 to .

give a numerical outcome of 9,192,434,085.993 which is a good approximation for the oscillations .

of caesium - 133, used for defining one second or The Second.

Page ! of !28 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 24th 2017. 11:51 AM updated June 27, 2017. PM .

we can now write our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for ( “binding them” ): .

[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to 4 / [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P ] .

conversely .

[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P / 8 ] .

noting that [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P / 8 ] is our .

pi-Profiling Environment Formula Facilitator bo1Pe5 .

our pi-Profiling Formula e5 is ( e1 ) * 2 gives us e5 .

we can now write our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula notionally as: .

[ small p radius 1P ] is mutual to and in unison to notionally [ Axis xm bo1Pe5 ] + [ Axis ym bo1Pe5 ]

i will now revisit Lecture 1 and 2: String Theory and M- Theory

given thought to, what could “boosting down the Z axis: be? re: .

1:11:52 Quote: each time you increase the energy of a spring or string the internal energy .

by one unit it increases the mass squared by one unit End-quote . .

Page ! of !29 37


Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 21st 2017. updated July 4, 2017. PM .

having viewed Lecture 3 many times and while the application mathematical notions used are .

somewhat confusing to me many of your Word Seeds of Notions have had some resonance for me .

firstly .

at 6:27 re: Quote: sum of squares a^2 + b^2 End-quote .

algebra in general is also masked when we are pi-Profiling .

we do work with important numerical ratios of right angle triangles . .

secondly .

at 44:53 re: string at rest M naught squared ( M0 )^2 .

at 46:37 re: Quote: EGS ” to “ M naught squared End-quote .

Quote: a dagger one gives us, one extra unit of energy End-quote .

Quote: Energy = what ever naught squared is + one End-quote .

at 56:04 re: Quote: you must realise quote we have come to a disaster End-quote Quote: M naught squared plus one = zero End-quote

. Quote: ( re the notion of tachyons ) negative mass squared is a bad thing End-quote

.

. for me a ( negative mass squared ) may be considered

. as a pi-Profiling Environment Facilitator ( e ) value

. ( negative mass squared ) may be considered as our e2 value

. ( negative mass squared )^2 may be considered as our e1 value

. [ ( negative mass squared )^2 being our e1 value ] * f1 gives us our diameter D

.

where pi-Profiling Formula Facilitator f1 is 16/pi . .

before i move on, for the above remarks our value 1Pe2 in unison with 2Pe2 .

and the notion of tachyons would be interesting to follow up within an about our perimeter P . .

from my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula i have observed .

a behaviour of numerators when a denominator of 16 .

gives us a starting null value of >16 which may be useful .

if at some time we need to give our notional small p value a decimal part . .

so my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula using two pi-Profiling Perimeters 1P and bo1P .

now looks like: ( sqrt { [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6 . . . ) ] ) / ( [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6 . . . ) ] -16 ) }

.

is our pi-Profiling Perimeter (1P) radius 1R .

and .

( sqrt { [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, . . . ) ] ) / [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4, p = 5, p = 6, p = 7 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, 7 . . . ) ] -16 } is mutual to and in unison with

.

Page ! of !30 37


4 / [ our biased offset Perimeter bo1P ] .

by the pi-Profiling Formula: .

4.9090909090909 .

divided by .

[ ( sqrt { [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, . . . ) ] ) / [ ( p = 2, p = 3, p = 4 . . . )^{ 4, 5, 6, 7 . . . ) ] -16 } ] * fPO9_3 .

where .

4.9090909090909 denoted fPO9_2 is fPO9_3 / ( pi/2 )

and fPO9_3 is [2 / 0.4074074074074] * pi/2 .

0.4074074074074 fPO9_1 being an extraction from positive integer 9 ( PO9 ) .

( pi-Profiling for fPO9 to be given as a separate issue ) . .

Dear Professor Leonard Susskind Today is June 20th 2017. updated June 27, 2017. .

i have changed my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula using two pi-Profiling Perimeters 1P and bo1P .

re: your remark Lecture 2, 1:13:40 Quote: two co-ordinates x and y End-quote . .

now our formula looks like: .

1P: #p ( 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 … )^{ 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 . . . ) mutual to or in unison with bo1P: # ( xm even + ym even ) .

now i will think about parameters of scale.

the notion of boundaries is interesting .

our fundamental boundary for the area A of a Perimeter P is P itself .

( xm even + ym even ) may very well be our companion diameter Dc and .

xm even and ym even may be our companion radius Rc .

at 90 degrees to each other .

for me .

we cannot imply that a numerical outcome is touching or resting on .

our pi-Profiling Perimeter P and add .

that our pi-Profiling Perimeter P is notionally the cross-section of its companion Sphere S

Page ! of !31 37



i have used the symbol # to let you and other readers know .

at this time we are we are working with integers .

and our trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for .

our expression ( #p^2 )^n>1 .

where small p is the [sqrt 11]^2 .

n.b. we will assign integers for small p later .

and for our expression #m/2 .

m is 27/2 . .

i have denoted the pi-Profiling Constant Formula Facilitator 7.71118196790222 as fPO9_3 .

to alert you and other readers that i am trying to pi-Profile your Word Seeds of Notion given .

during Lecture 1 and 2: String Theory and M- Theory given by yourself. . .

i also have observed a pi-Profiling Constant Formula Facilitator value denoted fMeson .

and .

a pi-Profiling Constant Formula Facilitator value denoted fQuark . .

my trial pi-Profiling Loop Formula for our expression ( #p^2 )^n>1 .

where small p is the [sqrt 11]^2 .

n.b. we will assign integers for p later .

and for our expression #m/2 .

when m is 27/2 .

we observe some interesting results .

which has once again made it necessary for me to hold of .

a presentation of the pi-Profiling outcomes for the moment . .

from my data i am observing the behaviour of .

Quote: strings End-quote .

may be connected to the theorem on indices given by Pierre de Fermat in .

Quote: 1637 End-quote .

and .

Quote: his "Last Theorem" ( Observatio Domini Petri de Fermat ). End-quote . .

Page ! of !32 37



for the trial pi-Profiling outcomes given at June 1st 2017 this paper and updated June 8, 2017. PM .

denotation for the trial pi-Profiling input values of interest ( VOI ) 11/27 are: .

for our expression ( #p^2 )^n>1 .

small p is [sqrt 11]^2 .

n.b. we will assign integers for small p later .

for our expression #m/2 .

m is 27/2 .

for our pi-Profiling environment 1P, our VOI is small p being the (sqrt 11)^2 .

and 1P is mutual to or in unison with pi-Profiling environment bo1P .

for our pi-Profiling environment bo1P, our VOI is m being 27/2 .

when we are using pi-Profiling concepts .

the notions trigonometry and unit-circle are masked from us and .

pi-Profiling outcomes do not imply status or units we do that. i am now up to Lecture 3. . .


over the last few days i have begun to build a .

pi-Profiling Loop Formula using Perimeters P in unison .

to numerically connect P^2 with 2m, at this time i have given the P^2 the expression #small p^2

.

and 2m the expression #m/2 .

we want to be able increase P^2 exponentially ( “Boost it ) .

hence ( #small p^2 )^n>1 .

i suspect that our Speed of Light value Cn maybe masked in the value 2 .

hence #m/2 .

i am now looking for pi-Profiling Perimeters P in unison .

that can be firstly pi-looped and then re-orientate to satisfy ( “Bind them” ) .

( #small p^2 )^n>1 mutual to #m/2 .

the notion of P^2 and 2m being considered as numerator and denominator has been .

striped away hopefully allowing us to further define the notion “open and closed strings”. . .

.

.

Page ! of !33 37


Abstract began this paper June 1st, 2017. updated June 27, 2017.

.

for me, Leonard Susskind has striped back the formulas for many notions of Physics .

and mathematics i will now endeavour to strip back our pi-Profiling formula concepts .

hopefully to help with the understanding of: .

firstly (1) .

Quote: Quantum Mechanical oscillator: Integer Multiple of Something. End-quote .

secondly (2) .

Quote: [ P^2 / 2m ] and the notion of an additive constant B independent to P .

( being a state of motion ) End-quote .

thirdly (3) .

to co-join numerical outcomes observed from pi-Profiling .

to possibilities of Particle Physics and Science in general. .

This paper is a work in progress .

as i try and relate pi-Profiling Concepts to the Word Seeds of Notion for .

Particle Physics, necessitating the update of this paper. . .

Page ! of !34 37


Today is June 1st 2017. updated June 8, 2017. PM .

Once again i have had to stop what i am pi-Profiling and i have begun to pi-Profile the notion of " String Theory "

. ? are we basing the notion of string theory on the notion of quotient ?

. i am observing two pi-Profiling Perimeters in unison with

a bias offset ( bo ) .

we are working on our perimeter P .

and in particular with what i have called a bias offset pi-Profiling Perimeters ( boP ) in unison

.

. when we divide 11 / 27

and positive integer fractions of a similar theme .

both the numerator and denominator may be considered as surface areas .

i am now preparing pi-Profiling formulas hopefully to assist you and myself to understand your notion of "string theories"

. so in good faith, let's begin with:

. 0.592593, 0.5925925, 0.5925926, 0.59259259259, 0.592592592592593

. { [ ( 27 * 125 ) = 3375 ] * ( 0.0005 ) } = 1.6875

. 1 / 1.6875 = 0.592592592592593

. 1 - 0.592592592592593 = 0.4074074074074 being fPO9_1

. 27 * 0.4074074074074 = 11

. and of course 11/27 = 0.4074074074074 being fPO9_1

. i am showing, that some times the behaviour of numbers

are not what they seem .

at first sight to me "string theory" is a system to demonstrate an observation "string theory" is a good system and i think we can pi-Profile our way

. to co-join "string Theory" quotient outcomes

.

. 270 / 275 = 0.9818181818182

. and i don't expect you to accept that

.

0.9818181818182 is our bias offset pi-Profiling Perimeter ( bo1P ) .

0.9818181818182 / 4 = 2.4545454545455 .

1boP / 4 and

. 1 / 2.4545454545455 = 0.4074074074074 being fPO9_1

.

. this afternoon i surfed the WWW internet

to learn about " String Theory " . .

the good news i found my way to: .

Stanford University youtube lecture Lecture 1 : String Theory and M- Theory by: Leonard Susskind

Physicist

Page ! of !35 37


Today is June 11th, 2017. .

i have been working on a pi-Profiling formula to explain the notion .

of whole number fractions within and about the numerical environment of .

our pi-Profiling Perimeter ( bo1P ) .

i am working with an enormous amount of data .

and it will take me some time .

to cross reference various numerical outcomes

so, i will make available to you any pi-Profiling Formula Facilitators ( f ) .

as i observe them .

the first f value observed and denoted fPO9_3 is: .

fPO9_3 = 7.7112, 7.71118, 7.711182, 7.71118196790222 .

inverse value 0.129681805482285 and i am pleased to have found an WWW internet reference to:

.

.

The free energy distribution http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c5/cp/c5cp06416c/c5cp06416c1.pdf

. APPENDIX S1

Quote: Figure4: ( the parameters of the fitting )

Count: k1; value: 4; Standard Error: 7.71118 End-quote.

.

.

from our fPO9_3 value of 7.71118196790222 we observe: 1.56669890360128 .

1.57, 1.566, 1.567, 1.5667, 1.56669, 1.56669, 1.56669, 1.5666989 inverse value: 0.6383, 0.6382, 0.63828, 0.638285, 0.6382847, 0.638284738504225

and ( 1.56669890360128 )^2 = 2.45454545454545 = 27 / 11

.

. and from WWW internet search we find:

.

. Scaling of the B and D meson spectrum in lattice QCD

. Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

This journal is © the Owner Societies 2016 http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c5/cp/c5cp06416c/c5cp06416c1.pdf

. Quote:

Page 4: Light quark propagators: On the configuration set with β = 5.7 the clover coefficient Csw is .

set to its tadpole-improved tree level value Csw = 1.5667, as determined from .

the 4th root of the plaquette [15]. .

End-quote. . .

Page ! of !36 37

http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c5/cp/c5cp06416c/c5cp06416c1.pdf


Cross Referencing my observation to WWW internet:

. Lecture 1, String Theory and M-Theory

Leonard Susskind ( Physicist ) http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+%2b+String+Theory+and+M-

Theory&view=detail&mid=EE60959BBEA63FD238E6EE60959BBEA63FD238E6&FORM=VIRE . .

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. This journal is © the Owner Societies 2016

APPENDIX S1 . .

The free energy distribution http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c5/cp/c5cp06416c/c5cp06416c1.pdf

.

.

Scaling of the B and D meson spectrum in lattice QCD CLNS 00-1665 GUTPA/98-12-1 OHSTPY-HEP-T-99-021 UTCCP-P-78 hep-ph/0003130

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0003130.pdf . .

Numerical Solutions of the Schro ̈dinger Equation .

Anders W. Sandvik, Department of Physics, Boston University http://physics.bu.edu/~py502/lectures4/schrod.pdf

Authors closing remarks: .

n.b. You may use, copy or store my numerical outcomes, pi-Profiling .

observations and formulas for educational purposes with attribution to me where possible. .

n.b. pi declaration is: 3.14159265358979, note for numerical outcomes the last decimal places may be rounding.. .

Due to illness i have not had the opportunity to update: .

pi-Profiling Concepts Post December 2011 using [ 16/pi ] denoted f1 .

pi-Profiling Concepts Post December 2011 using [ 16/pi ] . .

pi-Profiling Information . .

Kevin John Trinder, September 4th 2017. PM.

Page ! of !37 37

http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c5/cp/c5cp06416c/c5cp06416c1.pdf


https://pi-profiling.info/pi-profiling_concepts/2013_october_30_pi-profiling_concepts_kevin_John_trinder.pdf

http://pi-profiling.info

packets of energy and the notion of string theories ... · abstract paper and open memos to leonard...

Documents