overview of the icao universal safety oversight audit programme
DESCRIPTION
International Civil Aviation Organization. Overview of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme. North Asia Regional Aviation Safety Team. Beijing, 25 September 2003. Outline. Background Audit programme State Safety Oversight System Status of implementation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Overview of the ICAOOverview of the ICAO
Universal Safety OversightUniversal Safety Oversight
Audit ProgrammeAudit Programme
Overview of the ICAOOverview of the ICAO
Universal Safety OversightUniversal Safety Oversight
Audit ProgrammeAudit Programme
North Asia Regional Aviation Safety TeamNorth Asia Regional Aviation Safety TeamNorth Asia Regional Aviation Safety TeamNorth Asia Regional Aviation Safety Team
International Civil Aviation OrganizationInternational Civil Aviation OrganizationInternational Civil Aviation OrganizationInternational Civil Aviation Organization
Beijing, 25 September 2003Beijing, 25 September 2003
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 2
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
BackgroundBackground
Audit programmeAudit programme
State Safety Oversight SystemState Safety Oversight System
Status of implementationStatus of implementation
Analysis of the findings – AFDDAnalysis of the findings – AFDD
Implications of the findingsImplications of the findings
Future of the ProgrammeFuture of the Programme
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 3
Safety oversight is a function by which States ensure the effective implementation of the safety-related Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs), and associated procedures and practices contained in the Annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and associated documents
What is safety oversight?What is safety oversight?What is safety oversight?What is safety oversight?
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 4
Most importantly,Most importantly,Most importantly,Most importantly,
Safety oversight is about COMMITMENT
to the Convention on International Civil
Aviation; a commitment by Governments
to satisfactorily fulfill their obligations
under the Convention, having agreed on
certain principles and arrangements in
order that international civil aviation may
be developed in a safe and orderly
manner. (Preamble to the Convention))
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 5
Universal safety oversight audit programmeUniversal safety oversight audit programmeUniversal safety oversight audit programmeUniversal safety oversight audit programme
The ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme was established to:
Assist States to effectively implement the critical elements of a safety oversight system;
Assist them to better undertake their responsibilities for safety oversight under the Convention; and
Uphold the principles and the spirit of Uphold the principles and the spirit of the Convention on International Civil the Convention on International Civil Aviation.Aviation.
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 6
Various reports in the early 1990s Various reports in the early 1990s on the lack of implementation by on the lack of implementation by States of ICAO SARPsStates of ICAO SARPs
Increased concern over the level Increased concern over the level of aviation safety world-wideof aviation safety world-wide
Need to reduce accident rates to Need to reduce accident rates to off-set the rapid increase in trafficoff-set the rapid increase in traffic
Why an ICAO ProgrammeWhy an ICAO Programme??
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 7
Assembly Resolution A29-13 (1992)Assembly Resolution A29-13 (1992) Approval of the ICAO safety oversight voluntary assessment Approval of the ICAO safety oversight voluntary assessment
programme by the Council (June 1995)programme by the Council (June 1995) Voluntary assessments commence (March 1996) Voluntary assessments commence (March 1996) DGCA Conference (November 1997)DGCA Conference (November 1997) Approval of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Approval of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit
Programme by the Council (May 1998)Programme by the Council (May 1998) Assembly Resolution A32-11 (1998)Assembly Resolution A32-11 (1998) Mandatory audit programme established on 1 January 1999.Mandatory audit programme established on 1 January 1999. Assembly Resolutions A33-8 and A33-9 (2001)Assembly Resolutions A33-8 and A33-9 (2001)
The making of a programmeThe making of a programme
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 8
Evolution of the Programme Evolution of the Programme Evolution of the Programme Evolution of the Programme
VOLUNTARY
CONFIDENTIAL
MANDATORY
TRANSPARENT
FUNDED BY ICAOFUNDED BY STATE CONTRIBUTIONS
ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME
(Mar 96 - Dec 98)
ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME
(Mar 96 - Dec 98)
AUDIT PROGRAMME
(Jan 99 )
AUDIT PROGRAMME
(Jan 99 )
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 9
Scope of the auditsScope of the auditsScope of the auditsScope of the auditsCompliance with:Compliance with: Chicago ConventionChicago Convention State RegulationsState Regulations Conformance with:Conformance with: ICAO StandardsICAO Standards
Adherence to:Adherence to: Recommended practicesRecommended practices Related proceduresRelated procedures Guidance materialGuidance material Relevant industry practicesRelevant industry practices
The overall implementation of the Critical Elements of a Safety Oversight System
The overall implementation of the Critical Elements of a Safety Oversight System
ANNEXES:1 – PEL6 – OPS8 – AIR
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 10
State safety oversight systemsState safety oversight systemsState safety oversight systemsState safety oversight systems The establishment of a safety oversight
system is essentialessential to fulfill State obligations under the Chicago Convention.
State safety oversight systems are comprised of a number of organizational organizational processes and proceduresprocesses and procedures,, which enable civil aviation administrations to implement international SARPs and safe industry practices.
Failure to implement proper safety oversight systems could harbour conditions which may have an impact on the safety of civil aviation.
Safetydefences
Workplaceconditions
Latentconditions
Activefailures
USOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and Procedures
Safetydefences
Workplaceconditions
Latentconditions
Activefailures
Organizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 12
The audits, as a tool to enhance aviation safety, enable ICAO to:
EvaluateEvaluate the effectiveness of organizational procedures and processes in Civil Aviation Administrations
ReinforceReinforce safety defences DetectDetect latent conditions which may be embedded
in the system IdentifyIdentify workplace conditions which could
adversily impact safety AvertAvert active failures and, thus, prevent accidents
and incidents
Audits = a tool for aviation safetyAudits = a tool for aviation safety
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 13
Safetydefences
Workplaceconditions
USOAP AuditsUSOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
Auditing philosophy and approachAuditing philosophy and approach
Safetydefences
PrimaryPrimarylegislation
legislation Operating
Operating
regulationsregulations
Stru
ctur
e/or
gani
zatio
n
Qualified
Technical
PersonnelTechnical guidance
Licensing/
certification
Resolution
of safety
concerns
Cont
inui
ngsu
rvei
llanc
e
USOAP AuditsUSOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
CriticalElements
of aSafety
OversightSystem
Workplaceconditions
USOAP AuditsUSOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
- Job stability- Staff turn-over
- Competitive remuneration- Support equipment,
facilities and guidance- Qualifications and experience
- Employee morale- Credibility and trust
- Job stability- Staff turn-over
- Competitive remuneration- Support equipment,
facilities and guidance- Qualifications and experience
- Employee morale- Credibility and trust
Safetydefences
Latentconditions
No effective laws, policy, No effective laws, policy, procedures and guidance procedures and guidance
No clearly established safety No clearly established safety requirementsrequirements
Non implementation ofNon implementation of SARPS SARPS No programmes to certify, inspect No programmes to certify, inspect
and surveille the industryand surveille the industry No training policy and programmes No training policy and programmes Self-regulating organizationsSelf-regulating organizations No identification of safety No identification of safety
concernsconcerns No resolution of safety issuesNo resolution of safety issues
USOAP AuditsUSOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
Breaches in safety defences harbour latent conditionsBreaches in safety defences harbour latent conditions
Inappropriate issuance, validation Inappropriate issuance, validation or renewal of licenses/certificatesor renewal of licenses/certificates
Improper approval of procedures Improper approval of procedures and documentsand documents
““Cutting corners”Cutting corners” Errors and violationsErrors and violations Inability to identify safety concerns Inability to identify safety concerns
and take remedial actions and take remedial actions Lack of enforcementLack of enforcement Inability to provide guidance to Inability to provide guidance to
industry counterpartsindustry counterparts
Workplaceconditions
Activefailures
Adverse workplace conditions result in active failuresAdverse workplace conditions result in active failures
USOAP AuditsUSOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
Safetydefences
Workplaceconditions
Latentconditions
Activefailures
USOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and Procedures
Safetydefences
Workplaceconditions
Latentconditions
Activefailures
USOAP AuditsUSOAP AuditsOrganizational Processes and ProceduresOrganizational Processes and Procedures
REINFORCE ENHANCE
IDENTIFIFY AVERT
AUDIT
Status of implementationStatus of implementationStatus of implementationStatus of implementation
Auditscompleted
181 *181 *
Interimreports
181181
Actionplans
173173
Summaryreports
180180
Auditfollow-ups
102102
*In addition, five territories have been audited under the auspices of Contracting StatesTotal – 187 Contracting States
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 20
Based on factual and recent data Enables identification of deficiencies
impacting on safety Coincides with regional accident/
incident rates Safety tool, both for ICAO and its
Contracting States 178 audit interim reports analyzed Updated as audit follow-up validation
missions are completed
Analysis of the findingsAnalysis of the findingsAnalysis of the findingsAnalysis of the findings
Audit Findings and Differences Database (AFDD)Audit Findings and Differences Database (AFDD)
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 21
Customization of remedial action:Customization of remedial action: At a State or group of States level At a regional or sub-regional level Can be targeted to resolve specific problems
on the basis of established prioritiesIt will support and allow:It will support and allow: ICAO Regional Offices prioritize their
activities, seminars and workshops ANB Sections identify needs for guidance
material, seminars, workshops and SARPs amendment
Identification of regional or subregional needs and development of specific projects to resolve identified and quantified problems
Benefits of the AFDDBenefits of the AFDDBenefits of the AFDDBenefits of the AFDD
SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM CRITICAL ELEMENTS (Doc 9734)Lack of Effective Implementation (%)
SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM CRITICAL ELEMENTS (Doc 9734)Lack of Effective Implementation (%)
ESAF/21 – 40.03%ESAF/21 – 40.03%APAC/33 – 25.3%APAC/33 – 25.3%
MID/17 – 30.65%MID/17 – 30.65% WACAF/21 – 50.17%WACAF/21 – 50.17%
GLOBAL/180 – 28.63%GLOBAL/180 – 28.63% EUR/NAT/53 – 20.42%EUR/NAT/53 – 20.42%
NACC/21 – 23.16%NACC/21 – 23.16% SAM/13 – 23.47%SAM/13 – 23.47%
1010
2020
3030
4040
5050
6060
7070
PrimaryAviation
Legislation
SpecificOperating
Regulations
CAA Structure &Safety Oversight
Functions
TechnicalGuidanceMaterial
QualifiedTechnicalPersonnel
Licensing &CertificationObligations
ContinuedSurveillanceObligations
Resolutionof Safety
Issues
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 23
SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM CRITICAL ELEMENTS (Doc 9734)Lack of Effective Implementation (%)
SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM CRITICAL ELEMENTS (Doc 9734)Lack of Effective Implementation (%)
CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF A SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEMLACK OF EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION (%) Audit
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Primary AviationLegislation
Specif ic OperatingRegulations
CAA Structure andSafety Oversight
Functions
Technical GuidanceMaterial
Qualif ied TechnicalPersonnel
Licensing andCertif icationObligations
Continued SurveillanceObligations
Resolution of SafetyIssues
GLOBAL: 181 (30.23%) COSCAP NA Audit (19.84%)
Parallel between findings and regional accident ratesParallel between findings and regional accident rates
0
10
20
30
60
40
50
70
80
Asia and PacificRegion
Southern AmericanRegion
Eastern and Southern African
Region
European and N. Atlantic
Region
Middle EastRegion
N. / C. American and Caribbean
Region
Western and Central African
Region
Accident rates per 1 000 000 departures - scheduled (International and Domestic, 1996)
Audit Findings – Lack of Effective Implementation of SARPs, (178 audit reports)
Accident rates per 1 000 000 departures - scheduled (International and Domestic, 2000)
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 25
What does this all mean?What does this all mean?What does this all mean?What does this all mean?
1. What is the impact of the
results of the audits on
safety?
2. What can and should be
done?
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 26
Increased commitmentcommitment on the part of Governments to fulfill their responsibilities
Greater supportsupport to Civil Aviation Administrations: Legislation and regulations Delegation and empowerment Proper staffing, resourcing and financing
Working togetherWorking together – joining efforts ICAO, Contracting States, international organizations
and industry Regional, sub-regional or group of States
What can and should be doneWhat can and should be done??What can and should be doneWhat can and should be done??
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 27
CONTRACTINGSTATES
AVIATIONINDUSTRY
PARTNERS INPARTNERS INTHE PROMOTIONTHE PROMOTION
OF AVIATION OF AVIATION SAFETYSAFETY
PARTNERS INPARTNERS INTHE PROMOTIONTHE PROMOTION
OF AVIATION OF AVIATION SAFETYSAFETY
ICAOREGIONAL ANDINTERNATIONALORGANIZATIONS
Working togetherWorking together
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 28
Taking corrective actionTaking corrective actionTaking corrective actionTaking corrective action
CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF A SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEMLACK OF EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION (%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Primary AviationLegislation
Specific OperatingRegulations
CAA Structure andSafety Oversight
Functions
Technical GuidanceMaterial
Qualified TechnicalPersonnel
Licensing andCertificationObligations
ContinuedSurveillanceObligations
Resolution ofSafety Issues
GLOBAL: 181 (29.58%) Initial Audit: 85 (26.30%)GLOBAL Follow-Up: 181 (22.56%) Audit Follow-Up: 85 (9.51%)
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 29
Taking corrective actionTaking corrective actionTaking corrective actionTaking corrective actionCRITICAL ELEMENTS OF A SAFETY OVERSIGHT SYSTEM
LACK OF EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION (%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Primary AviationLegislation
Specif ic OperatingRegulations
CAA Structure andSafety Oversight
Functions
Technical GuidanceMaterial
Qualif ied TechnicalPersonnel
Licensing andCertif ication Obligations
Continued SurveillanceObligations
Resolution of SafetyIssues
GLOBAL Follow-Up: (22.16%) COSCAP NA Follow-Up: (7.42%)
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 30
Continued validation of the implementation of State corrective action plans
Generic air navigation support to States
Expansion of the Programme to other safety-related areas (Annexes 11, 13 and 14 as of 2004)
Promotion of the development of State Safety Quality Management Systems
Future of the ProgrammeFuture of the ProgrammeFuture of the ProgrammeFuture of the Programme
COSCAP-NACOSCAP-NA ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme 31
ReviewReviewReviewReview
BackgroundBackground
Audit programmeAudit programme
State Safety Oversight SystemState Safety Oversight System
Status of implementationStatus of implementation
Analysis of the findings – AFDDAnalysis of the findings – AFDD
Implications of the findingsImplications of the findings
Future of the ProgrammeFuture of the Programme
Overview of the ICAOOverview of the ICAO
Universal Safety OversightUniversal Safety Oversight
Audit ProgrammeAudit Programme
Overview of the ICAOOverview of the ICAO
Universal Safety OversightUniversal Safety Oversight
Audit ProgrammeAudit Programme
THANK YOU!THANK YOU!THANK YOU!THANK YOU!
International Civil Aviation OrganizationInternational Civil Aviation OrganizationInternational Civil Aviation OrganizationInternational Civil Aviation Organization
[email protected]@icao.int