overview of rooftop solar pv model 11713v2

22
 Antitrust/Competition Commercia l Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Product Liability Regulatory Finance and Accounting Risk Management Securities Tax Utility Regulatory Policy and Ratemaking Valuation Electric Power Financial Institutions  Natural Gas Petroleum Pharmaceuticals , Medical Devices, and Biotechnology Telecommunicat ions and Media Transportation Copyright © 2011 The Brattle Group, Inc. www.brattle.com Overview of Rooftop Solar PV “Green Bank” Financing Model Sponsored by The Connecticut Clean Energy Finance and Investment Authority and The Coalition for Green Capital Developed by Bob Mudge & Ann Murray, The Brattle Group January 17, 2013

Upload: sachinbabu8

Post on 04-Nov-2015

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

RTSPV Model

TRANSCRIPT

  • Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International ArbitrationInternational Trade Product Liability Regulatory Finance and Accounting Risk Management Securities Tax Utility Regulatory Policy and Ratemaking ValuationElectric Power Financial Institutions Natural Gas Petroleum Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and Biotechnology Telecommunications and Media Transportation

    Copyright 2011 The Brattle Group, Inc. www.brattle.com

    Overview of Rooftop Solar PV Green Bank Financing Model

    Sponsored by The Connecticut Clean Energy

    Finance and Investment Authorityand

    The Coalition for Green Capital

    Developed byBob Mudge & Ann Murray, The Brattle Group

    January 17, 2013

  • 2Disclaimer

    Disclaimer:

    Asfurtherdescribedintheexplanatorynotes,thisExcelfinancialmodel(theModel)wasdevelopedbyTheBrattleGroup,Inc. undertheauspicesoftheConnecticutCleanEnergyFinanceandInvestmentAuthority(CEFIA)tohighlightthepotentialimpactofcapitalinputsandpublicincentivesonthecostofbehindthemetersolarphotovoltaicinstallationsataconceptuallevel.TheModelisbeingreleasedtothirdpartyusers(Users)tofacilitatecalculationsbysuchUsersbasedstrictlyontheirownstipulatedassumptions.

    TheModelisprovidedasiswithoutwarrantyofanykind,eitherexpressorimplied,includingbutnotlimitedtotheimpliedwarrantiesofmerchantabilityandfitnessforaparticularpurpose,andshallbeusedbyUsersattheirownrisk.AlthoughtheModelpresentsaframeworkforperformingUserscalculations,itisnotintended,andshouldnotbeusedasthebasisforinvestmentdecisions.NoUsershouldrelyontheModelsresultsasapredictionoffutureoutcomes;actualeventsmaydiffersignificantlyfromthoseproducedbytheModel.

    NeitherCEFIAorTheBrattleGroup,Inc.acceptanydutyofcaretoUsers,includinganyresponsibilityforanyUsersuseoftheModel.AlthoughneitherCEFIAnorTheBrattleGroup,Inc.areunderanyobligationtoprovideupdatestotheModel,CEFIAretainstherighttochange/amendtheModelwithoutnoticetoUsers.

    InnoeventshallCGC,CEFIAand/orTheBrattleGroup,Inc. beliableforanydamageswhatsoever,includingbutnotlimitedtodirect,indirect,incidentalconsequential,lossofbusinessprofits,orspecialdamages,regardlessoftheformofaction,whetherincontract,tort,orotherwise.

  • 3Contents

    1. Background

    2. Illustrative Base Case

    3. Model Mechanics

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt

  • 41. Background

    Focus on incremental benefits of Green Bank funding at project level

    Based on illustrative specifications provided by CT Clean Energy Finance and Investment Authority (CEFIA) and the Coalition for Green Capital (CGC)

    Model derives key metrics for behind-the-meter solar:

    Specifications including:

    Installed costs

    Regional capacity factors [a]

    State policies and incentives [a]

    Capital structure including Green Bank Debt

    Key metrics:

    Retail cost [b]

    Equity returns

    Installed capacity per dollar of Green Bank Debt

    [b] In the form of a 2013 levelized cost of electricity, net of state incentives and RECs.

    [a] Initially shown for Connecticut.

  • 51. Background (Contd.)

  • 62. Illustrative Base Case

    Key Assumptions:

    Aggregate portfolio of 20MW

    Installed cost of $4.5/ Watt

    25-year underlying project life

    Regional capacity factors applied per NREL data

    Operating costs modeled @ $27/ kW-Year

    Annual degradation modeled at 0.5%

    State incentives modeled at $0.225/ kWh for 6 years

    Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) modeled at $0.030/ kWh under financeable 15-year contract

  • 72. Illustrative Base Case (Contd.)

    3rdpartyownership(targetreturn=15%)

    RelianceonTaxEquity(targetreturn=12%)

    PrecedentofCTSolarLeaseProgram

    Expectationofdebtsecuritization(interestmodeledat6%)

    CAPITALIZATION

    BehindtheMeterHost(s)

    ProjectOwner(Fund)

    ProjectSponsor

    FederalGovt.

    StateGovt.

    ITC

    Utility

    RECMarket

    Taxincentives,grants*

    TaxEquityInvestors

    CommercialLenders

    (emerging)

    Equity

    PotentialBackleverage

    *Subjecttofunding,legislation

    * Assumed Structure Before Green Bank Loans

  • 82. Illustrative Base Case (Contd.)

    12%

    44%48%

    13%

    40% 42%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    UpfrontCapitalization

    LifetimeCost(25Years)

    %

    o

    f

    C

    a

    p

    i

    t

    a

    l

    C

    o

    s

    t

    s

    PercentageCostComponents

    CommercialDebt

    GreenBankLoans

    TaxEquity

    DeveloperEquity

  • 92. Illustrative Base Case (Contd.)

    OPERATIONSBehindtheMeterHost(s)

    ProjectOwner(Fund)

    1.O&M

    2.DebtService

    3. Capex/Rsvs.

    4. TaxEquityAllocation

    5. CashEquityAllocation

    CommercialLenders

    (emerging)

    ProjectSponsor

    TaxEquityInvestors

    FederalGovt.

    StateGovt.

    ITCandaccelerateddepreciation

    Utility

    RECMarket

    PPA/Lease

    Debtservice

    PerformanceBasedIncentives

    PotentialBackleverage

  • 10

    2. Illustrative Base Case (Contd.)

    Under above assumptions, reliance on:

    Tax Equity

    State Incentives

    RECs

    would hold retail costs at $0.210/ kWh (without Green Bank Debt)

    RECs

    StateIncent.

    0.050

    0.100

    0.150

    0.200

    0.250

    0.300

    0.350

    $

    p

    e

    r

    k

    W

    h

    (

    2

    0

    1

    3

    $

    )

    DerivationofRetailCost(over25YearLife)

    Operations

    CommercialDebt

    GreenBankLoans

    TaxEquity

    DeveloperEquity

    NetRetailCost

    AvgResidentialPrice(CT)

    AvgCommercialPrice(CT)

  • 11

    3. Model Mechanics

    Users can stipulate financing cost assumptions Base Case before adding Green Bank Debt is shown below:

    % Maturity TargetReturns(AT) 9.0%

    Min Avg 2013$State Subsidies 0%

    Debt

    Commercial (not < 0) 40% 6 6.0% 0.121

    Green Bank:

    Subordinated 0% 15 0.0% -

    Tax Equity 48% 12.0% 0.037 Developer Equity 12% 15.0% 0.127

    Total 100% 0.286

    ProjectCapitalStructure

    KEY FINANCING INPUTSLevelizedCosts

    ($/kWh)

    KEY OUTPUTSTotalDSCR

    1.35 1.37

  • 12

    3. Model Mechanics (Contd.)

    Users can stipulate revenue source assumptions:

    Basic model calculation sets net PPA/ Lease rate sufficient to satisfy capital cost requirements.

    % 2013$/MWh Escalation

    2013$Capital 0.286 Operations 0.025

    Gross 0.311 Less State Incentives 225.0 N 0.082

    Less RECs 30.0 N 0.020

    Net PPA/ Lease 210.1 Y 0.210

    ProjectRevenueSources($/MWh)

    LevelizedCosts

    ($/kWh)

  • 13

    3. Model Mechanics (Contd.)

    Base Case Cash Flow Summary ($M; Nominal Basis)

    IRR Invest. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028

    1 Inflation Index 1.025 1.051 1.077 1.104 1.131 1.160 1.189 1.218 1.249 1.280 1.312 1.345 1.379 1.413 1.448

    2 PPA/ Lease $/kWh 0.215 0.221 0.226 0.232 0.238 0.244 0.250 0.256 0.262 0.269 0.276 0.283 0.290 0.297 0.304

    3 Elec. Sales GWh 22.4 22.3 22.2 22.1 22.0 21.9 21.8 21.6 21.5 21.4 21.3 21.2 21.1 21.0 20.9

    4 PPA/ Lease Revs. $M 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.4

    5 State Incentives $M 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 - - - - - - - - -

    6 RECs $M 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

    7 Total Revenues $M 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.9 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.9 7.0

    8 Operations $M 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8

    9 EBITDA $M 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.2 10.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.2

    10 Debt Service $M 6% (36.4) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 - - - - - - - - -

    11 Tax Equity

    12 Pre-Tax $M (43.7) 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

    13 Tax Impact $M 27.1 3.0 6.6 2.5 (0.0) (0.2) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)

    14 After tax $M 12% (16.7) 5.1 8.7 4.7 2.2 2.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

    15 Developer Equity

    16 Pre-Tax $M (10.9) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.7 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9

    17 Tax Impact $M - - - - - - (1.7) (2.1) (2.1) (2.1) (2.2) (2.2) (2.2) (2.3) (2.3) (2.4)

    18 After tax $M 15% (10.9) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5

    To Year 25

  • 14

    3. Model Mechanics (Contd.)

    Under forgoing assumptions, Green Bank Debt could complement commercial debt

    % Maturity TargetReturns(AT) 9.0%

    Min Avg 2013$State Subsidies 0%

    Debt

    Commercial (not < 0) 20% 6 6.0% 0.060

    Green Bank:

    Subordinated 20% 15 2.0% 0.042

    Tax Equity 48% 12.0% 0.035 Developer Equity 12% 15.0% 0.102

    Total 100% 0.239

    ProjectCapitalStructure

    KEY FINANCING INPUTSLevelizedCosts

    ($/kWh)

    KEY OUTPUTSTotalDSCR

    1.75 2.44

  • 15

    3. Model Mechanics (Contd.)

    with significant reduction in retail cost:

    % 2013$/MWh Escalation

    2013$Capital 0.239 Operations 0.025

    Gross 0.265 Less State Incentives 225.0 N 0.082

    Less RECs 30.0 N 0.020

    Net PPA/ Lease 163.5 Y 0.163

    ProjectRevenueSources($/MWh)

    LevelizedCosts

    ($/kWh)

  • 16

    3. Model Mechanics (Contd.)

    To Year 2520% Green Bank Debt Case Cash Flow Summary ($M; Nominal Basis)

    IRR Invest. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028

    1 Inflation Index 1.025 1.051 1.077 1.104 1.131 1.160 1.189 1.218 1.249 1.280 1.312 1.345 1.379 1.413 1.448

    2 PPA/ Lease $/kWh 0.168 0.172 0.176 0.180 0.185 0.190 0.194 0.199 0.204 0.209 0.214 0.220 0.225 0.231 0.237

    3 Elec. Sales GWh 22.4 22.3 22.2 22.1 22.0 21.9 21.8 21.6 21.5 21.4 21.3 21.2 21.1 21.0 20.9

    4 PPA/ Lease Revs. $M 3.8 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.9

    5 State Incentives $M 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 - - - - - - - - -

    6 RECs $M 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

    7 Total Revenues $M 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.7 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

    8 Operations $M 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8

    9 EBITDA $M 8.9 8.9 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8

    10 Debt Service $M 3% (18.1) 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

    11 Tax Equity

    12 Pre-Tax $M (43.6) 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

    13 Tax Impact $M 26.9 3.0 6.6 2.6 0.2 0.1 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)

    14 After tax $M 12% (16.6) 5.1 8.7 4.8 2.4 2.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

    15 Developer Equity

    16 Pre-Tax $M (10.9) 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 3.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2

    17 Tax Impact $M - - - - - - (1.3) (1.6) (1.6) (1.7) (1.7) (1.7) (1.7) (1.8) (1.8) (1.8)

    18 After tax $M 15% (10.9) 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4

  • 17

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt

    For Illustration, Green Bank Scenarios defined per capital structure scenarios shown below:

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

    P

    e

    r

    c

    e

    n

    t

    o

    f

    C

    a

    p

    i

    t

    a

    l

    GreenBankDebtasaPercentageofCapital

    CapitalStructure

    CommercialDebtGreenBankDebtTaxEquity

    DeveloperEquity

  • 18

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt (Contd.)

    Base Case $0.210/ kWh retail cost shown at upper left in table below

    Alone, or with help from reductions in installed costs, Green Bank Debt could achieve parity with retail rates:

    Cells with retail cost < average 2011 CT retail price escalated to 2013 ($0.190/ kWh) are shaded

    Retail Cost ($/kWh) as a Function of Green Bank Debt and Installed Cost

    Other Assumptions:

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Developer equity return: 15%

    4.5 0.210 0.187 0.163 0.140 0.117 Tax equity return: 12%

    4.0 0.174 0.154 0.133 0.112 NA Total leverage: 40%

    3.5 0.139 0.121 0.103 0.085 NA Commercial debt int.: 6%

    3.0 0.103 0.088 0.072 0.057 NA 15-Year RECs: $0.030/ kWh

    6-Year State incentives: $0.225/ kWh

    Installed Cost ($/W)

    % Green Bank Debt in Capital Structure

  • 19

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt (Contd.)

    Green Bank Debt could help take pressure off State incentives

    Cells with retail cost < average 2011 CT retail price escalated to 2013 ($0.190/ kWh) are shaded

    Retail Cost ($/kWh) as a Function of Green Bank Debt and State Incentives

    Other Assumptions:

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Installed cost: $4.5/W

    0.300 0.172 0.149 0.126 0.103 NA Developer equity return: 15%

    0.225 0.210 0.187 0.163 0.140 0.117 Tax equity return: 12%

    0.150 NA 0.224 0.201 0.177 0.155 Total leverage: 40%

    0.075 NA NA 0.238 0.215 0.192 Commercial debt int.: 6%

    15-Year RECs: $0.030/ kWh

    State Incentives per kWh

    % Green Bank Debt in Capital Structure

  • 20

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt (Contd.)

    as well as REC prices:

    Cells with retail cost < average 2011 CT retail price escalated to 2013 ($0.190/ kWh) are shaded

    Retail Cost ($/kWh) as a Function of Green Bank Debt and REC Prices

    Other Assumptions:

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Installed cost: $4.5/W

    0.045 0.199 0.175 0.152 0.129 0.106 Developer equity return: 15%

    0.030 0.210 0.187 0.163 0.140 0.117 Tax equity return: 12%

    0.015 0.221 0.198 0.175 0.152 0.129 Total leverage: 40%

    - 0.233 0.209 0.186 0.163 0.140 Commercial debt int.: 6%

    6-Year State incentives: $0.225/ kWh

    REC Prices per kWh

    % Green Bank Debt in Capital Structure

  • 21

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt (Contd.)

    At given levels of retail cost, Green Bank Debt can help developers achieve target returns:

    Cells with developer return > assumed target (15%) are shaded

    Developer Return (%) as a Function of Green Bank Debt and Retail Cost

    Other Assumptions:

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Installed cost: $4.5/W

    0.230 17.0% 20.2% 24.7% 30.8% 38.6% Tax equity return: 12%

    0.180 12.0% 14.2% 17.4% 22.4% 29.5% Total leverage: 40%

    0.130 NA 8.1% 9.9% 12.9% 18.5% Commercial debt int.: 6%

    0.080 NA NA NA NA NA 15-Year RECs: $0.030/ kWh

    6-Year State incentives: $0.225/ kWh

    Retail Cost per kWh

    % Green Bank Debt in Capital Structure

  • 22

    4. Potential Impact of Green Bank Debt (Contd.)

    Depending on dollars deployed and role in capital structure, Green Bank Debt could support significant MWs of solar pv installation:

    Cells with retail cost < average 2011 CT retail price escalated to 2013 ($0.190/ kWh) are shaded

    MWs Installed as a Function of Green Bank Debt Deployed

    Other Assumptions:

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Installed cost: $4.5/W

    Retail Cost 0.210 0.187 0.163 0.140 0.117 Developer equity return: 15%

    100 - 220 110 74 55 Tax equity return: 12%

    75 - 165 83 55 41 Total leverage: 40%

    50 - 110 55 37 28 Commercial debt int.: 6%

    25 - 55 28 18 14 15-Year RECs: $0.030/ kWh

    6-Year State incentives: $0.225/ kWh

    Green Bank Debt Deployed ($M)

    % Green Bank Debt in Capital Structure