outline motivation: fission isomers spectroscopy of 237f pu: measurement results outlook
DESCRIPTION
prompt fission. 2:1. g- Spectroscopy of superdeformed 237 Pu. OUTLINE Motivation: fission isomers Spectroscopy of 237f Pu: measurement results Outlook. experimental goal: - first experimental identification of - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
OUTLINEOUTLINE• Motivation: fission Motivation: fission isomersisomers• Spectroscopy of Spectroscopy of 237f237fPu:Pu:
• measurementmeasurement• resultsresults
• Outlook Outlook
Isolde Workshop 14Isolde Workshop 14thth of February of February 20072007
experimental goal:experimental goal: - - first experimental identification of first experimental identification of single-particle states in largely deformed single-particle states in largely deformed actinidesactinides -> determination of fission barrier from level -> determination of fission barrier from level densitydensity
T. Morgan LMU MunichT. Morgan LMU Munich
g-g-Spectroscopy of Spectroscopy of superdeformed superdeformed
237237PuPu
prompt fission
2:12:1
direct access to r-process path out of reachdirect access to r-process path out of reach extrapolations of nuclear models require experimental dataextrapolations of nuclear models require experimental data knowledge of fission barriers is crucialknowledge of fission barriers is crucial fission barriers:fission barriers: - determine end of chart of nuclides - determine end of chart of nuclides - change of shell correction energy by 1 MeV:- change of shell correction energy by 1 MeV: fission lifetime changed by 10fission lifetime changed by 1055
T. MorganT. Morgan
no experimental datano experimental data
-> contradicting theoretical -> contradicting theoretical predictionspredictions::
r-Process Path in Heavy r-Process Path in Heavy Element RegionElement Region
240f240fPu Pu (even-(even-eveneven))
(3.8 ns)(3.8 ns)
237f237fPu Pu (odd-even)(odd-even)
(110 ns)(110 ns)
238238U(U(aa, 2n) 24 , 2n) 24 MeVMeV
235235U(U(aa, 2n) 24 , 2n) 24 MeVMeV
ssdelay delay = 10 = 10 mmbb ssdelay delay ~1 - 2 ~1 - 2 mmbb
T. MorganT. Morgan
(Future)
• • Present Present KnowledgeKnowledge
• D. Pansegrau et al. Phys. Lett. B 484 (2000) 1
• D. Gaßmann et al. Phys. Lett B. 497 (2001) 181
in spite of low cross section in spite of low cross section
comparable yields expectedcomparable yields expected
Spectroscopy of the first Spectroscopy of the first Odd-N fission isomer Odd-N fission isomer
237f237fPu: rigid rotorPu: rigid rotor
=> regular rotational band structure=> regular rotational band structure
prompt
delay
1.21.2×10×10-4-4
prompt
delay
1.21.2×10×10-5-5
• • ReactionReaction: : 235235U(U(aa,2n),2n)237f237fPu; Pu;
• • BeamBeam: E: Eaa = 24 MeV: = 24 MeV: pulsed, pulsed, DDt = 400ns, width ~ 4 ns, t = 400ns, width ~ 4 ns,
Cologne TandemCologne Tandem• • TargetTarget: thick (rolled) : thick (rolled) 235235U; U; 3.7 mg/cm 3.7 mg/cm22 →→ gg-emission at rest-emission at rest
metallic: low reaction background from e.g. oxygen and carbonmetallic: low reaction background from e.g. oxygen and carbon but: highly oxidising, all handling under vacuum or Ar atmospherebut: highly oxidising, all handling under vacuum or Ar atmosphere
T. Morgan
Detectors:Detectors:
• fission fragments:fission fragments: compact PPAC array - 8 trapezoidal modulescompact PPAC array - 8 trapezoidal modules
- 13 fold segmented anode- 13 fold segmented anode
- position sensitive for time of flight- position sensitive for time of flight
- large solid angle (73 %)- large solid angle (73 %)
• gg-rays:-rays: MINIBALLMINIBALL
- 8 triple cryostats, distance to target ~10 cm- 8 triple cryostats, distance to target ~10 cm
- high resolution 2.3 keV (1.3 MeV)- high resolution 2.3 keV (1.3 MeV)
- high efficiency - high efficiency eephph ~ 9% (1.3 MeV) ~ 9% (1.3 MeV)
- trigger: fission fragment & - trigger: fission fragment & gg-ray-ray
- 3 weeks beamtime- 3 weeks beamtime
~ 2~ 2×10×104 4 delayed fission events (Ndelayed fission events (Ngg = 1 ~ 90 %; N = 1 ~ 90 %; Ngg = 2 ~10 = 2 ~10 %)%)
Experimental Experimental ProcedureProcedure
T. Morgan
• • theoretical theoretical expectation:expectation:
• • experimental experimental finding:finding:
• • relative isomeric relative isomeric populationpopulation
=> => consistent with consistent with literatureliterature
Isomeric LifetimeIsomeric Lifetime
5102.1 prompt
isomer
5102.1 prompt
isomer
~ 2mb
1
2~
long
short
Time [ns]Time [ns]
Cou
nts
/[n
s]C
ou
nts
/[n
s]
nsisomer 165nsshort 115ns
long1120
T. Morgan
110 ns
Disentanglement Disentanglement of isomeric of isomeric gg-rays-rays
115 ± 15 ns
1210 ± 25 ns
Eg = 363.1 keV
Eg = 363.1 keV
Eg = 213.1 keV
Eg = 213.1 keV
1120 ns
170 170 gg lines in lines in spectrumspectrum
115 115 ××115 ns 115 ns gg transitionstransitions55 55 ××1120 ns 1120 ns gg transitionstransitions
T. Morgan
→ → No obvious correlationsNo obvious correlations
→ → automatic search via peak automatic search via peak correlationcorrelation
Identification Identification of rotational of rotational bandsbands
237f237fPu: rigid rotorPu: rigid rotor
=> regular rotational band structure=> regular rotational band structure 2
)1(2
JJE
gg--gg correlation (2000 N correlation (2000 Ngg = 2 events): = 2 events):
(SD axis ratio 2:1(SD axis ratio 2:1 ~ 3.3 keV)~ 3.3 keV)
Variation of rotational parameter 2
2
=> result:
keVkeV]20[28.32
2
• • 9 rotational bands9 rotational bands
••
test case for peak correlation algorithm:test case for peak correlation algorithm:
T. Morgan
Isomeric rotational Isomeric rotational bandsbands
115 ns115 ns
1120 ns1120 ns
3/2 and 5/23/2 and 5/2
9/2 and 9/2 and 11/211/2
T. Morgan
Construction of Construction of isomeric level isomeric level scheme(s)scheme(s)
→ → Ritz combinatorial search program usedRitz combinatorial search program used (courtesy of T. v. Egidy, E18 TU München):
ground state bands + 170 ground state bands + 170 gg transitions transitions
keVkeV]20[28.32
2
2)1(2
2
1
JEE JJ
89
53
23
0- 15
115 ns :
7/2
5/2
9/2
3/2
11/2
2)1(
2 JJEJ
15/2
0 9/2
11/2
13/2
36
77
125ground state rotational bands:ground state rotational bands:
1120 ns:
T. Morgan
Rotational level scheme Rotational level scheme for short lived isomer for short lived isomer ((115 ns115 ns) )
237f237fPu:Pu:
connecting inter-band transitions identifiedconnecting inter-band transitions identified-> consistent picture -> consistent picture
T. Morgan
Rotational level scheme Rotational level scheme for long lived isomer for long lived isomer ((1120 ns1120 ns) )
237f237fPuPu
work in progress:
Summary:Summary:
•• first high resolution first high resolution gg-spectroscopy in Odd-N fission isomers -spectroscopy in Odd-N fission isomers •• regular rigid rotor pattern allows to interpret low-statistics spectraregular rigid rotor pattern allows to interpret low-statistics spectra
•• 9 rotational bands identified with SD moment of inertia9 rotational bands identified with SD moment of inertia • • gg-spectra disentangled into contributions from 2 fission isomers-spectra disentangled into contributions from 2 fission isomers
•• level schemes constructed with Ritz combination (gs-band and interband level schemes constructed with Ritz combination (gs-band and interband transitions)transitions)
Outlook:Outlook:
•• finalise analysisfinalise analysis •• ccomplementary conversion electron spectroscopyomplementary conversion electron spectroscopy (Mini Oranges) (Mini Oranges)
=> => bb-vibration, E0 transitions-vibration, E0 transitions ● ● gg-spectroscopy of -spectroscopy of 239f239fPuPu– conversion electron data already availableconversion electron data already available– identification of Nilsson orbitalsidentification of Nilsson orbitals– localisation of r-process path via fission barriers (theory)localisation of r-process path via fission barriers (theory)
T. Morgan
Summary and Summary and OutlookOutlook
T. MorganT. Morgan11, A. Blazhev, A. Blazhev22, S. Becker, S. Becker11, B. Bruyneel, B. Bruyneel22, L. , L. CsigeCsige33, ,
F. FinkeF. Finke22, D. Habs, D. Habs11, H. Hess, H. Hess22, A. Holler, A. Holler22, H. H, H. Hüübelbel44, A. , A. ImigImig22, ,
M. KalkühlerM. Kalkühler22, R. Lutter, R. Lutter11, H. J. Maier, H. J. Maier11, P. Reiter, P. Reiter22, , O. SchaileO. Schaile11, C. Sch, C. Schüürmannrmann11, W. Schwerdtfeger, W. Schwerdtfeger11, M. , M.
SeidlitzSeidlitz22, , T. KotthausT. Kotthaus22, P. G. Thirolf, P. G. Thirolf11, N. Warr, N. Warr22, A. Wiens, A. Wiens22, K. , K.
WimmerWimmer11 and the MINIBALL Collaboration and the MINIBALL Collaboration 1. Ludwig Maximilians Universit1. Ludwig Maximilians Universitäät Mt Müünchennchen
and MLL Garchingand MLL Garching
2. Universit2. Universitäät zu Kt zu Köölnln3. Inst. of Nucl. Research of the Hungarian 3. Inst. of Nucl. Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Atomki) DebrecenAcademy of Sciences (Atomki) Debrecen
4. Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität Bonn4. Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität Bonn
T. Morgan
CollaborationCollaboration